Table Of Content

YEAR-END INDEX Author Index Key To Index Vol 87 A —Article No. 1, Fall 1996 pp 1-366 BR—Book Review No. 2, Winter 1997 pp.367-632 C —Comment No. 3, Spring 1997 pp 633-1074 N —Note No. 4, Summer 1997 pp 1075-1520 \ G Larry Alexander & Kimberly D Ke ssler, Joseph L. Gastwirth & Tapan K. Nayak, Sta- Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes (A), p tistical Aspects of Cases Concerning Racial 1138 Discrimination in Drug Sentencing: Ste- Ronald J. Allen, Foreword: Montana v. Egel phens v. State and United States v hoff —Reflections on the Limits of Legisla Armstrong (A), p. 583 tive Imagination and Judicial Authority Alan M. Gilbert, Defining “Use” of a Firearm (A), p. 633 (N), p. 842 Craig M. Glantz, “Could” This Be the End of B Fourth Amendment Protections for Motor ists? (N), p. 864 John A. Barrett, Jr., Crimes Involving Art (BR), p. 335 H Leigh B. Bienen, The Proportion ality Review of Capital Cases by State High Courts After David A. Harris, “Driving While Black” and Gregg Only “The Appearance of Justice "? All Other Traffic Offenses: The Supreme (A), p. 130. Court and Pretextual Traffic Stops (A), p Richard J]. Bonnie et al., Decision-Making in 544 Criminal Defense: An Empirical Study of David Hemenway, Survey Research and Self Insanity Pleas and the Impact of Doubted Defense Gun Use: An Explanation of Ex Client Competence (A), p. 48 treme Overestimates (A), p. 1430 Jami Brodey, The Supreme Court Rejects Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Protection J Against the Forfeiture of an Innocent Owner's Property (N), p. 692 Nicole E. Jaeger, Maybe Soldiers Have Rights Kristen Brown, A Case for Harmless Error Re After All! (N), p. 895 view of Ake Errors (N), p. 786 Melissa L Jampol Goodbye to the Defense of Selective Prosecution (N), p. 932 David P. Bryden & Sonia Lengnick, Rape in the Criminal Justice System (A), p. 1194 K ( Sanford H. Kadish, Reckless Complicity (A), p Matthew Costigan, Go Directly to jail, Do Not 369 Pass Go, Do Not Keep House (N), p 719 Amy J. Kappeler, Changing the Tide of Double Jeopardy in the Context of Continuing Angela Crawford, Pleas, Plain Language and Criminal Enterprise (N), p. 967 Precedent: Applicability of Rules 11(f) and 31l(e) to Criminal Forfeiture Provisions Mitchell Keiter, Just Say No Excuse: The Rise (N),p . 812 and Fall of the Intoxication Defense (A), p 482. Gary Kleck & Marc Gertz, The Illegitimacy of F One-Sided Speculation: Getting the Defen- Leslie Feiner, The Whole Truth: Restoring Re- sive Gun Use Estimate Down (A), p. 1446 ality to Children’s Narrative in Long-Term In John L. Kowlakowski, Protecting First Federal cest Cases (A), p. 1385 Habeas Corpus Petitions: Closing the Open 1517 ing Left by Gomez (N), p. 990 Kevin R. Reitz, Zimring, Hawkins, and the Macro Problems of Imprisonment (BR), p 604. Barry Latzer, Toward the Decentralization of Criminal Procedure: State Constitutional Ss Law and Slective Disincorporation (A), p 63 Lanier Saperstein, Copyrights, Criminal Sanc- tions and Economic Rents: Applying the M Rent Seeking Model to the Criminal Law Formulation Process (C), p. 1470. Alaya B. Meyers, Rejecting the Clear and Con- Kenneth W. Simons, When is Strict Criminal vincing Evidence Standard for Proof of In Liability Just? (A), p. 1075. competence (N), p. 1016 Christopher Slobogin, /s Justice Just Us?: Us- ing Social Science to Inform Substantive O Criminal Law (BR), p. 316. Gregory W. O'Reilly, Comment on Ingraham’s Tom W. Smith, A Call for a Truce in the DGU “Moral Duty” to Talk and the Right to Si- War (A), p 1462 lence (A), p. 521 Shari Seidman et al., Juror Reactions to Attor- neys at Trial (A), p. 17. P Martha B. Stolley, Sword or Shield: Due Process and the Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine Dawn M. Phillips, When Rules Are More Im (N), p. 751 portant than Justice (N), p. 1040 R Michael Radelet, Deterrence and the Death Michael Vitiello, Three Strikes: Can We Return Penalty The Views of Experts (A), p. 1 to Rationality? (A), p 395. SUBJECT INDEX (N), p 812 Martha B. Stolley, Sword or Shield: Due Pro Art cess and the Fugitive Disentitlement Doc john A. Barrett, Jr Crimes Involving Art trine (N), p. 751 (BR), p. 335 H Complicity Habeas Corpus Sanford H. Kadish, Reckless ¢ ympiicity 4) John L. Kowlakowski, Protecting First Fed p 369 eral Habeas Corpus Petitions: Closing the Opening Left by Gomez (N) p. 990 D Death Penalty Leigh B. Bienen, The Proportionality Revieu Imprisonment of Capital Cases by State High Courts After Kevin R. Reitz, Zimring, Hawkins, and the Gregg: Only “The Appearance of Justice”? Macro Problems of Imprison ment (BR). p (A) p x0 604 Kristen Brown, A Case for Harmless Error Incest Review of Ake Errors (N), p 7R6 Leslie Feiner, The Whole Truth Re storing Michael Radelet, Deterrence anda the Death Reality to Children’s Narrative in Long ’enalty: The Views of Experts (A), p. 1 Term Incest Cases (A) p 1385 Double Jeopardy Incompetence Amy J. Kappeler, Changing the Tide of Alayva B. Meyers, Rejecting the Clear and Double Jeopardy in the Context of Continu Convincing Evidence Standard for Proof of ing Criminal Enterprise (N) p 067 Incompetence (N), p. 1016 Insanity Richard | Jonnie et al., Decision-Making n Criminal Defense An Empincal Study of Eighth Amendment Insanity Pleas and the Impact of Doubted Nicole E. Jaeger, Maybe Soldiers Have Client ( ompetence | A) p 18 Rights After All! (N p RO5 Intellectual Property Lanier Saperstein, ( opynghts Criminal Sanctions and Economi Rents Applying the Rent Seeking Model lo the Criminal Firearms Law Formulation Process (C), p 1470 Alan M. Gilbert, Definiy Intoxication Defense arm (N), p. 842 Mitchell Keiter, Just Say No Excuse: The David Hemenway, Survey Research ind Self Rise and Fall yf the Intoxication Defense Defense Gun Use in Explanation of kx A), p. 482 treme Overestimates 4), p. 1430 Gary Kleck & Marc Gertz The Ile giulimacy of One-Sided Spee ulation Getting the De fensive Gun Use Estimate Down (A), p Judicial Authority 1446 Ronald |. Allen, Foreword: *fontana \v Tom W. Smith, A Egelhoff—Reflections on the Limits of DGU War (A), p Legislative Imagination and Judicial Au Forfeiture thority (A) p 63522 jami Brodey, The Supreme { url Rejects Juries Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Protection Shari Seidman et al., Juror Reactions to At Against the Forfeiture of an Innocent lorneys at Trial { 4) p 17 Owner's Property N) p 692 Matthew Costigan Go Directly to Jail, Do M Not Pass Go, Do Not Keeb House (N p 719 Mens Rea Angela Crawford, Pleas, Plain La Larry Alexander & Kimberly D Kessler and Precedent Applicability of Rules 11 Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes { 4) Pp and 31(e) to Criminal Forfeiture Provision 1138 1519 Pp turn to Rationality? (A), p. 395. Pre-textual Traffic Stops Craig M. Glantz, “Could” This Be the End of Fourth Amendment Protections for Motor- ists? (N), p. 864. Selective Prosecution David A. Harris, “Driving While Black” and Melissa L. Jampol, Goodbye to the Defense of All Other Traffic Offenses: The Supreme Selective Prosecution (N), p. 932. Court and Pretextual Traffic Stops (A), p. Sentencing 544 Joseph L. Gastwirth & Tapan K. Nayak, Procedure Statistical Aspects of Cases Concerning Ra- Barry Latzer, Toward the Decentralization of cial Discrimination in Drug Sentencing: Criminal Procedure: State Constitutional Stephens v. State and United States v. Law and Selective Disincorporation (A), p 63 Armstrong (A), p. 583 Silence Dawn M. Phillips, When Rules Are More Im Gregory W. O'Reilly, Comment on Ingra- portant than Justice (N), p. 1040. ham’s “Moral Duty” to Talk and the Right to Silence (A), p. 521 R Social Science Rape Christopher Slobogin, Js Justice Just Us?: David P. Bryden & Sonia Lengnick, Rape Using Social Science to Inform Substantive in the Criminal Justice System (A), p Criminal Law (BR), p. 316. 1194 Strict Liability Rationality Kenneth W. Simons, When is Strict Crimi- Michael Vitiello, Three Strikes: Can We Re- nal Liability Just? (A), p. 1075.