Table Of Content

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION Volume 15 Number 1 (January 2001) pp. 1-128 Number 2 (April 2001) pp. 129-264 Number 3 (July 2001) pp. 265-404 Number 4 (October 2001) pp. 407-524 Authors: ALRED, GERALD J., “A Review of Technical Communication Programs outside the United States” [Commentary], 111. ARTEMEVA, NATASHA, and AVIVA FREEDMAN, “ ‘Just the Boys Playing on Com- puters’: An Activity Theory Analysis of Differences in the Cultures of Two Engi- neering Firms,” 164. BARTON, ELLEN, “Design in Observational Research on the Discourse of Medicine: Toward Disciplined Interdisciplinarity,” 309. BAZERMAN, CHARLES, see IText Working Group. BREUCH, LEE-ANN M. KASTMAN, MARK ZACHRY, and CLAY SPINUZZI, “Usability Instruction in Technical Communication Programs: New Directions in Curriculum Development” [Approaches and Practices], 223. CHARNEY, DAVIDA, “Guest Editor’s Introduction: Prospects for Research in Techni- cal and Scientific Communication—Part 1,” 267. CHARNEY, DAVIDA, “Guest Editor’s Introduction: Prospects for Research in Techni- cal and Scientific Communication—Part 2,” 409. CHARNEY, DAVIDA, see Paul, D. CHIAVIELLO, ANTHONY R. S., “Ethics in Technical Communication, by Paul Dombrowski” [Book Review], 254. DAVID, CAROL, “Mythmaking in Annual Reports,” 195. DOHENY-FARINA, STEPHEN, see IText Working Group. DURACK, KATHERINE T., “Research Opportunities in the US Patent Record,” 490 Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 15 No. 4 October 2001 521-524 © 2001 Sage Publications 522 JBTC / October 2001 FISHER, DAVID, see Fox, C. FOX, CATHERINE, and DAVID FISHER, “A Comment on Greg Wilson’s ‘Technical Communication and Late Capitalism: Considering a Postmodern Technical Com- munication Pedagogy’ ” [Comment and Response], 241. FREEDMAN, AVIVA, see Artemeva, N. GEISLER, CHERYL, see IText Working Group. GUINIVEN, JOHN E. “The Lessons of Survivor Literature in Communicating Deci- sions to Downsize,” 53. GURAK, LAURA, see IText Working Group. HAAS, CHRISTINA, see IText Working Group. HAAS, CHRISTINA, and STEPHEN P. WITTE, “Writing as an Embodied Practice: The Case of Engineering Standards,” 413. HARNER, SANDRA, “STC Funds Research in Technical Communication” [Commen- tary], 511. ITEXT WORKING GROUP, CHERYL GEISLER, CHARLES BAZERMAN, STEPHEN DOHENY-FARINA, LAURA GURAK, CHRISTINA HAAS, JOHNDAN JOHNSON-EILOLA, DAVID S. KAUFER, ANDREA LUNSFORD, CAROLYN R. MILLER, DOROTHY WINSOR, and JOANNE YATES, “IText: Future Directions for Research on the Relationship between Information Technology and Writing,” 269. JOHNSON-EILOLA, JOHNDAN, see IText Working Group. KAUFER, DAVID S., see Text Working Group. KENDALL, AIMEE, see Paul, D. LEVINE, MARTHA, “Guide to Managerial Communication: Effective Business Writing and Speaking, by Mary Munter” [Book Review], 252. LIMAYE, MOHAN R., “Some Reflections on Explanation in Negative Messages” [Commentary], 100. LITTLE, JOSEPH, “Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Peda- gogy, edited by John T. Battalio” [Book Review], 116. LUNSFORD, ANDREA, see IText Working Group. MILLER, CAROLYN R., see IText Working Group. NEUWIRTH, CHRISTINE M., see Wolfe, J. L. PAUL, DANETTE, DAVIDA CHARNEY, and AIMEE KENDALL, “Moving Beyond the Moment: Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science,” 372. RICKLY, REBECCA, “Electric Rhetoric: Classical Rhetoric, Oralism, and a New Literacy, by Kathleen E. Welch” [Book Review], 119. SPINUZZI, CLAY, see Breuch, L.M.K. SUCHAN, JIM, “The Effect of Interpretive Schemes on Videoteleducation’s Concep- tion, Implementation, and Use,” 133. THATCHER, BARRY, “Issues of Validity in Intercultural Professional Communication Research,” 458. TOLBERT, JANE T., “Seventeenth-Century Technical and Persuasive Communication: A Case Study of Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc’s Work on a Method of Deter- mining Terrestrial Longitude,” 29. WILSON, GREG, “Conversations about Postmodernism, Technical Communication, and Pedagogy: A Response to Catherine Fox and David Fisher” [Comment and Response], 248. WILSON, GREG, “Technical Communication and Late Capitalism: Considering a Postmodern Technical Communication Pedagogy” [Approaches and Practices], 72. WINSOR, DOROTHY, see IText Working Group. WINSOR, DOROTHY A., “Learning to Do Knowledge Work in Systems of Distributed Cognition,” 5. WITTE, STEPHEN P., see Haas, C. WOLFE, JOANNA L., and CHRISTINE M. NEUWIRTH, “From the Margins to the Center: The Future of Annotation,” 333. YATES, JOANNE, see IText Working Group. ZACHRY, MARK, see Breuch, L.M.K. Approaches and Practices: “Technical Communication and Late Capitalism: Considering a Postmodern Technical Communication Pedagogy,” Wilson, 72. “Usability Instruction in Technical Communication Programs: New Directions in Cur- riculum Development,” Breuch et al., 223. Articles: “Design in Observational Research on the Discourse of Medicine: Toward Disciplined Interdisciplinarity,” Barton, 309. “The Effect of Interpretive Schemes on Videoteleducation’s Conception, Implementa- tion, and Use,” Suchan, 133. “From the Margins to the Center: The Future of Annotation,” Wolfe and Neuwirth, 333. “Guest Editor’s Introduction: Prospects for Research in Technical and Scientific Com- munication—Part 1,” Charney, 267. “Guest Editor’s Introduction: Prospects for Research in Technical and Scientific Com- munication—Part 2,” Charney, 409. “Issues of Validity in Intercultural Professional Communication Research,” Thatcher, 458. “TText: Future Directions for Research on the Relationship between Information Tech- nology and Writing,” [Text Working Group (Geisler et al.), 269. “ ‘Just the Boys Playing on Computers’: An Activity Theory Analysis of Differences in the Cultures of Two Engineering Firms,” Artemeva and Freedman, 164. “Learning to Do Knowledge Work in Systems of Distributed Cognition,” Winsor, 5. “The Lessons of Survivor Literature in Communicating Decisions to Downsize,” Guiniven, 53. “Moving Beyond the Moment: Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science,” Paulet al., S72. “Mythmaking in Annual Reports,” David, 195. “Research Opportunities in the US Patent Record,” Durack, 490. “Seventeenth-Century Technical and Persuasive Communication: A Case Study of Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc’s Work on a Method of Determining Terrestrial Longitude,” Tolbert, 29. “Writing as an Embodied Practice: The Case of Engineering Standards,” Haas and Witte, 413. Book Reviews: “Electric Rhetoric: Classical Rhetoric, Oralism, and a New Literacy, by Kathleen E. Welch,” Rickly, 119. 524 JBTC / October 2001 “Essays in the Study ofS cientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Pedagogy, edited by John T. Battalio,” Little, 116. “Ethics in Technical Communication, by Paul Dombrowski,” Chiaviello, 254. “Guide to Managerial Communication: Effective Business Writing and Speaking, by Mary Munter,” Levine, 252. Comment and Response: “A Comment on Greg Wilson’s ‘Technical Communication and Late Capitalism: Con- sidering a Postmodern Technical Communication Pedagogy,’ ” Fox and Fisher, 241. “Conversations about Postmodernism, Technical Communication, and Pedagogy: A Response to Catherine Fox and David Fisher,” Wilson, 248. Commentary: “STC Funds Research in Technical Communication,” Harner, 511. “A Review of Technical Communication Programs outside the United States,” Alred, 111. “Some Reflections on Explanation in Negative Messages,” Limaye, 100.