ebook img

Josef Albers, Late Modernism, and Pedagogic Form PDF

225 Pages·2022·23.264 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Josef Albers, Late Modernism, and Pedagogic Form

Josef Albers, lAte ModernisM, And PedAgogic forM Jeffrey Saletnik the University of chicAgo Press chicAgo And london The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2022 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission, except in the case of brief quotations in critical articles and reviews. For more information, contact the University of Chicago Press, 1427 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637. Published 2022 Printed in China 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN- 13: 978- 0- 226- 69917- 2 (cloth) ISBN- 13: 978- 0- 226- 81939- 6 (e- book) DOI: https:// doi .org /10 .7208 /chicago /9780226819396 .001 .0001 This publication is made possible in part by the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung/Foundation. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Saletnik, Jeffrey, author. Title: Josef Albers, late modernism, and pedagogic form / Jeffrey Saletnik. Description: Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 2022. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2021054315 | ISBN 9780226699172 (cloth) | ISBN 9780226819396 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Albers, Josef. | Albers, Josef—Influence. | Artists as teachers. | Art—Study and teaching—History—20th century. | Form (Aesthetics)—Study and teaching—History—20th century. | Art, Modern—20th century—History. | Modernism (Art) Classification: LCC N6888.A5 S25 2022 | DDC 709.04—dc23/eng/20211231 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021054315  ∞ This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48- 1992 (Permanence of Paper). Introduction: “Bye, bye, Bauhaus” 1 a Linear Constructions 15 1 From Object to Process: On Albers’s Pedagogic Forms 27 Learning by Doing 28 Progressive Education 32 Educating Albers 38 Pedagogic Form 47 b Photography 67 2 Fold/Manifold: On Eva Hesse and Albers 81 Lightweight and Weighted Down 84 Folding and Unfolding 99 c Painting 119 3 Color Aid: On Richard Serra and Albers 127 Working Methods 130 Disciplined Disorientation 141 Epilogue: Playtime 155 Acknowledgments 157 Notes 161 Selected Bibliography 199 Image Credits 212 Index 213 “bye, bye, bAUhAUs” In the late 1960s proponents of the Bauhaus mounted a touring exhibition to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the design school’s founding. 50 Years Bauhaus, presented at venues in Stuttgart, London, Paris, Toronto, Chicago, Pasadena, Tokyo, and Buenos Aires between 1968 and 1971, was intended to “[trace] the history of the Bauhaus and [show] how the teachings of the Bau- haus are being perpetuated.”1 To the astonishment of Walter Gropius and the exhibition’s principal organizer, Ludwig Grote, Josef Albers refused to participate. He rebuffed requests to lend work and other materials to the exhibition and went so far as to write to select museums asking that they too deny loan requests for works by him in their collections.2 He referred to his nonparticipation as a “protest.”3 Albers objected to what he saw as the distortion of the school’s history in service of “Bauhaus propaganda.”4 More to the point, he was displeased both by the portrayal of his own position in accounts of the school and by the notion that his work and teaching since emigrating to the United States in 1933 were derivative of the Bauhaus.5 His competing desires—t o be acknowledged as a vital pres- ence at the Bauhaus, and for his current practice to be viewed apart from the school— are clear in his response to an invitation to participate in a symposium planned to coincide with the Chicago installation of 50 Years Bauhaus. “As is well known,” Anni Albers wrote the organizers, “Josef Al- bers, from the very start of the 50 year program did not wish to be involved in it.” Nonetheless, she continued, “We are wondering why the Chicago [exhibition] announcement leaves out [Albers’s] name and thus adds to the distortion that for years has plagued the Bauhaus history.”6 Among the reasons for these dueling desires was Albers’s determina- tion to have his work and teaching appreciated as relevant to contempo- rary artistic practice in the late 1960s and early 1970s—w hich, as this book elaborates, it certainly was.7 Albers’s life spanned the entire historical arc of modernism. Having taught at the Bauhaus, Black Mountain College, and Yale University, he partook in the development of modernist tropes on both sides of the Atlantic and witnessed their decline.8 Yet, despite Albers’s far-r eaching career, his close association with perceptual abstrac- tion and the modernist aesthetics and educational traditions affiliated with the Bauhaus have occluded his importance to artists like Eva Hesse 2 and Richard Serra. Hesse, Serra, and many lesser- known artists who had experienced Albers’s curriculum faced the challenge of making art in mod- ernism’s wake—a s the terms of discourse used to contextualize ever more broadly defined artistic practices shifted and as learning structures were reconfigured in light of postmodern educational thought. For his part, Albers remained a steadfast abstract modernist throughout his career, avoiding personal expression and explicit reference to content beyond that generated by a work’s form. Indeed, once he determined— nearly two decades after departing the Bauhaus— that a composition of three or four nested squares was best suited for demonstrating the inter- action of color, he used this format almost exclusively for the rest of his life, in his Homage to the Square series of over two thousand paintings and prints (fig. 0.1). He was similarly consistent in examining how various combinations of lines produced destabilizing visual effects in his linear constructions, a series of drawings, engravings, and prints that also num- ber in the thousands (fig. 0.2). Albers’s post-B auhaus pedagogy—w hich Fig. 0.1. Josef Albers, Homage to the Square, 1952. Oil on Masonite, 40.6 × 40.6 cm. Private collection. Image courtesy the Josef and Anni Albers Foundation. © The Josef and Anni Albers Founda- tion/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. introdUction included material study (fig. 0.3), matière (haptic collage; fig. 0.4), color Fig. 0.2. Josef Albers, study (fig. 0.5), drawing (fig. 0.6), and painting—f unctioned similarly inso- Structural Constellation IV, ca. 1955– 1960. Ink on far as its exercises provided opportunities for productive disorientation as paper, 45.7 × 58.4 cm. Josef students created (or attempted to resolve) unstable visual circumstances and Anni Albers Founda- through measured material inquiry. Yet, although obsessive in its regular- tion, 1976.3.363. © The ity, Albers’s practice was positioned erratically in critical discourse.9 And Josef and Anni Albers Foundation/Artists Rights the Bauhaus dogged the artist- educator. Clement Greenberg (in 1949) con- Society (ARS), New York. sidered Albers to be doctrinaire, a “victim of Bauhaus modernism” and thus an outlier to his own modernist doctrine; the school lay in wait as Albers belatedly found popular recognition in the 1960s.10 William C. Seitz made Albers central to his 1965 exhibition The Respon- sive Eye, in which he prioritized the optical power of the artist’s practice, referring to him as a “master of perceptual abstraction” and devoting one room— contiguous to but separate from the hang—t o Albers’s work. Albers, Victor Vasarely, and, although not exhibited, Giacomo Balla, Kazi- mir Malevich, and Piet Mondrian, were cast as old masters, in which role they legitimized the current trends Seitz observed in perceptual art.11 For Seitz, the absence of personal marks on the surfaces of works shown in The Responsive Eye, as well as the new materials (like plastics) involved “bye, bye, bAUhAUs” Fig. 0.3. Material studies (paper, bent; metal, cut), Bauhaus, ca. 1925– 1933. Photographer unknown. Gelatin silver print, 12.1 × 16.3 cm. Courtesy the Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, 1976.34.133. Fig. 0.4. Matière (fabric, feathers, rag lichen), Black Mountain College, ca. 1940. Photographic nega- tive by Josef Albers. Josef and Anni Albers Founda- tion, 1976.19.3923. © The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.