John Jewel and the English National Church For my Mother, and the memory of my Father: In memoria aeterna erit iustus, ab auditione mala non timebit. John Jewel and the English National Church The Dilemmas of an Erastian Reformer GARY W. JENKINS © Gary W. Jenkins, 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopyed, recorded or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Gary W. Jenkins has asserted his moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Gower House Suite 420 Croft Road 101 Cherry Street Aldershot Burlington, VT 05401-4405 Hants GU11 3HR USA England Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Jenkins, Gary W. John Jewel and the English national church: the dilemmas of an Erastian reformer – (St Andrews studies in Reformation history) 1. Jewel, John, 1522–1571 2. Bishops – England – Biography 3. Reformation – England 4. England – Church history – 16th century I. Title 283'.092 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jenkins, Gary W., 1961– John Jewel and the English National Church: the dilemmas of an Erastian reformer / Gary W. Jenkins p. cm. — (St Andrews studies in Reformation history) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0–7546–3585–6 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Jewel, John, 1522–1571. 2. Church of England – History – 16th century. 3. England – Church history – 16th century. I. Title. II. Series. BX5199.J4J46 2005 283'.092—dc22 2005007479 ISBN 0 7546 3585 6 Printed on acid-free paper Typeset in Sabon by Express Typesetters Ltd, Farnham Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books, Bodmin, Cornwall Table of Contents Preface and acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 1 Oxford and exile, Jewel till 1558 6 2 Jewel and the struggle for the Elizabethan Church 51 3 The Catholic reaction to Jewel 115 4 A prelate public and private: Jewel caught between Puritans and princes 155 5 Life as a bishop in Salisbury 203 6 Jewel and the identity of the English national Church 225 Appendices 251 Bibliography 255 Index 287 Preface and acknowledgements Among the great blessings of this mortal life, very near to family and friends, one must rank the aid, comfort, encouragement, and support rendered by the myriad people and institutions that make the production of a book a reality. This affinity becomes more true when the author finds many friends and family among those who have been abetters, comforters and cheerleaders in the enterprise. Honor of place in the academic arena must go to Professor William J. Tighe of Muhlenburg College, whose constant support, vast memory, familiarity with sources and grand companionship have never ceased to animate this work. He provided insight right up to the end, reading the manuscript both as it originally appeared as a dissertation, and now in its much altered and I hope improved version. Along with Bill I need to single out those who at various stages of its life also read the manuscript and provided both criticism and encouragement. Professor Frank James (president of Reformed Theological Seminary, Orlando, Florida) supplied bibliographic and correctives in my knowledge of Peter Martyr Vermigli, especially as regards his Eucharistic thought. Torrance Kirby (McGill University) graciously provided both insight and a copy of his forthcoming article ‘Relics of the Amorites’ for my perusal. John Craig (Simon Fraser University), kindly supplied me with his entry on Jewel to the new DNB as well as use of his paper ‘Erasmus or Calvin? The Politics of Book Purchase in the English Parish, 1538–1640.’ Professors Norm Jones (Utah State University) and Daniel Eppley (McMurray University) freely gave numerous criticisms and suggestions. Professors Donald Kelley, Phyllis Mack, and Maurice Lee, all of Rutgers University, read this when it was but a meager dissertation, and each helped me when I made the transition from the study of Medieval Europe to the disciplines of an Early Modern historian. Numerous others aided in other respects: Fr Keith Wyer, rector of St Peter’s Church Berrynarbor and the churches of Berrynarbor parish was most kind with his insights about the topography and situation of Jewel’s earliest years; Mr Joseph Sirotnak twice provided me free airfare to England for research; Dr Bob Schuettinger played my gracious host during my time in Oxford in 2003; Mr Mark Kelly, over numerous pints, allowed me to bounce my thoughts off him and was gracious with his insights; Professor Richard Rex whose comments over lunch led me to look into a certain item regarding Thomas Harding; Professor Tom Freeman provided insights on all things PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii related to that Salisbury prebend, John Foxe; and Tom Mayer who prodded me in the direction of Andrew Pettegree and St Andrews Studies in Reformation History, published under the auspices of Ashgate Publishing. I must thank as well, having mentioned them, all those at St Andrews and Ashgate, especially Ellen Keeling, for their patience and work on this text. All of the above have given me freely of their insights and aid, and I have frequently incorporated their judgments into the text. Any errors that persist, however, of both fact and interpretation, are mine alone. Among the libraries and librarians I must first acknowledge the kindness, thoroughness and professionalism of Dr Christine Ferdinand of Magdalen College, Oxford, who was gracious on more than one occasion, and who sat with me through the heat of the summer of 2003 in Magdalen’s old library as I poured over Jewel’s personal library: even separated by an ocean, she never was more than a quickly answered email away with information. I must also acknowledge the librarians of the Bodleian Library, Oxford, especially those connected with the Duke Humphrey Library and reading room; the librarians of the Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington DC; the librarians of the Warner Memorial Library, Eastern University, notably Jim Sauer, Jonathan Beasley, and Susan Joseph, who freely gave their time in tracking down odd purchases and acquiring microfilm; the librarians of the Alexander Library of Rutgers University, especially the late Stan Nash who was invaluable in the initial heuristic stages of this work; the librarians of the Sage Library of the New Brunswick Theological Seminary, as the library proved a wealth of resources for the late medieval theological landscape, as well as that of the Reformation; the Warden and librarians of Pusey House, Oxford; and finally the librarians of the Ryan Memorial Library of St Charles Borromeo Seminary, who allowed me to keep numerous copies of works by various Recusants for an overly long time. Organizationally I must thank Eastern University, which provided a number of faculty development grants that allowed me to explore some of the ideas in the text, the Harold Howard Provost’s Fellowship for the academic year 2003–04 which helped underwrite my sabbatical, and for the benefits of the Charles Van Gorden Professorship which helped with this book, and continues still to underwrite other areas of my research. At Eastern has come as well the support of my provost, Dr David Fraser, a real champion for faculty who wish to pursue scholarship. Also at Eastern I should note my grand colleagues in the history department, professors Price, Gatlin, Joseph and Boehlke. On the personal level I must thank first of all my wife Carol, always patient beyond reason in the process, tamquam et coheredibus gratiae vitae, and a light at the end of the tunnel. Along with Carol I must thank viii JOHN JEWEL AND THE ENGLISH NATIONAL CHURCH our daughter Kristen, who was always considerate of a father who needed quiet to think and write. Professors Gary and Marjorie Hafer (along with all the faculty irregulars) were free with their encouragement and hospitality, as were Cyril Quatrone, Professor Valerie Sajez, the late Fr Adrian Pollard, Fr Thomas Edwards, Fr Eugene Vansuch, Ed Bartholomew, Jesse O’Hare, Chris Butynskyi, Athanasia Ellmore, and the members of St Nicholas Parish. I must thank Professor Allen C. Guelzo of Gettysburg College, whose scholarly habits have inspired me, whose friendship has emboldened me, who has acted at times as the hound of heaven (and other places) in my completing this project, who first gave me the idea to write about Jewel, and who I believe could have done a much better job. Lastly I must thank my mother, who first taught me hard work, who no doubt is surprised that I of her sons wrote such a book, and who with my late father showed me what it took to put my hand to the plow and not to look back. I wish he could have seen it. Gary W. Jenkins 22 June 2005 Feast of St Alban, protomartyr of Britain Allentown, Pennsylvania INTRODUCTION The Image of Jewel: an icon of a dice player The debate about the English Reformation, what prompted it, how it was effected, how fast it spread and how thoroughly, assumes only an ancillary part of this study. The significance of this work’s subject, namely John Jewel, the bishop of Salisbury from 1560 to 1571, capacious in his own day, reaches far beyond his time even to the present distress that afflicts the worldwide Anglican Communion. This study is not, however, an apologia for either side of that debate. Instead it is an attempt to see in Jewel more than merely a champion of some abortion of an agreement which allowed him to again live in England having spent four years in exile. Jewel in fact agreed with what occurred in 1559 just as much as he adhered to the theology of his Swiss Reformed hosts in the city of Zurich: to Jewel the Elizabethan Settlement made no virtue of a necessity. The real significance of Jewel then is not so much his impact upon the spread of the Protestant faith in his own day, however much he may have desired that and bent his energies toward it, but rather the legacy he bequeathed – an ambiguous one I shall argue – to the Church of England, an ecclesiastical entity he worked so hard to defend and did so much to define, however much this definition lacked specificity. In his own day Jewel stood as an icon, and his death only enhanced the image. Intimate with the most prominent Reformers, both English and continental, and party to a number of the more pointed controversies of the Reformation, the peripeties of his life mirrored the course of the English Reformation, and were greatly influenced by the fortunes of the Reformation on the continent as well. Jewel also stands as a fulcrum between England’s two reformations: present at the trial of Cranmer, Latimer and Ridley,1 his last written piece formed the very contours of the arguments between Whitgift and Cartwright about the proper polity of the church.2From the beginning of his academic career, 1 John Strype, Remains of Thomas Cranmer(Oxford, 1840), I.483, named Jewel as the notary at Cranmer and Ridley’s Oxford disputation with the Catholic doctors in 1554. In all probability it was Jewel who carried Cranmer’s anonymous letter to Martyr in late 1554 or early 1555. Humphrey records that Jewel was known to the household of Latimer, Laurence Humphrey, Ioannis Iuelli Angli, Episcopi Sarisburniensis vita & mors. (London: John Day, 1573), p. 84. 2 John Whitgift, An Answere to a Certen Libell, intituled, An Admonition to the
Description: