John Duns Scotus Illuminating Modernity Illuminating Modernity is dedicated to the renewal of faith in a world that is both Godless and idolatrous. This renewal takes the legacy of faith seriously and explores the tradition in the hope that the means of its contemporary development are to be found within it. This approach takes the historical crisis of faith seriously and makes sincere efforts to receive the strength necessary for a renewal. We call our way the Franciscan option. And yet, one of the greatest resources upon which we hope to build is Thomism, especially those hidden treasures of modern Thomistic thought to be found in Continental and phenomenological philosophy and theology. The Franciscan option takes the history of faith seriously both in its continuity and in its change. It takes seriously the tragic experiences of the history of faith since the Wars of Religion and especially in late modernity. But it also takes seriously the rich heritage of faith. As Michael Polanyi argued, faith has become the fundamental act of human persons. Faith involves the whole of the person in his or her absolute openness to the Absolute. As Hegel saw, the logic of history is prefigured in the story of the Gospels, and the great and transforming experience of humanity has remained the experience of resurrection in the aftermath of a dramatic death. The series editors are boundlessly grateful to Anna Turton, whose support for this series made a hope into a reality. We also owe a huge debt of gratitude to Notre Dame’s Nanovic Institute for European Studies for giving us financial and moral support at the outset of our project. Many thanks to Anthony Monta and James McAdams for caring about the ‘Hidden Treasures’. John Duns Scotus Introduction to His Fundamental Positions Étienne Gilson Translated by James Colbert Contents Foreword: Étienne Gilson and Jean Duns Scot Robert Trent Pomplun Translator’s Preface Preface 1 The Object of Metaphysics A The limits of metaphysics B Theology and metaphysics C Common being 2 The Existence of the Infinite Being A That God’s existence is not evident B The first cause C The last end and the supreme being D The infinite being a Preambles to the proof b The path of efficiency c The paths of intellect, will, and eminence E Unicity of the infinite being F Nature and scope of the proofs 3 Divine Nature A The plurality of divine names B Simplicity of the divine essence C The doctrine of divine attributes D Divine immutability 4 Origin of the Contingent A The divine ideas B The possible and the contingent C Selection of contingents D Creation of the contingents E The production of being F Divine omnipotence G Omnipresence and providence 5 Angels A Nature of angels B Angels and duration C Angels and place D Angels and movement E Angels and intellection 6 Matter A The being of matter B Matter and individuation a Is matter naturally individual? b Is matter individuated by a positive intrinsic constituent? c Individuation by existence d Individuation by quantity e The principle of individuation C Unity of the concrete 7 The Human Soul A Origin and immortality of the soul B The soul and the form of corporeality C Soul and faculties 8 Intellectual Knowledge A Intellect and intelligible species B The cause of intellection C Knowledge of the singular D Knowledge and divine illumination 9 The Will A The cause of willing B The term of the voluntary act C Will and morality 10 Duns Scotus and the Philosophers Appendices A Bibliographical information B Biographical information C Alphabetum Scoti Afterword: The Dissolution of Divine Government: Gilson and the “Scotus Story” John Milbank A Acquiring perspective B The Cartesian ambivalence C Gilson on Scotus D Assessing Gilson on Scotus E Gilson and the “Scotus story” F Beyond Gilson Bibliography Index of Names Index of Terms Foreword: Étienne Gilson and Jean Duns Scot Robert Trent Pomplun Étienne Gilson needs no introduction. Arguably the most influential medievalist in the twentieth century, he might well have also been— especially at the height of his powers—one of its most influential philosophers. Henri Bergson’s star had faded by the 1950s. Heidegger had eclipsed Husserl—who was too technical for the general reader anyway—but Heidegger’s own influence would not extend beyond the continent until the 1960s. Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault, of course, were arrivistes. Beyond Jean-Paul Sartre and Gilson’s own friend Jacques Maritain, one is hard pressed to find a serious competitor for the title. Gilson owed his dominance from the 1920s through the 1960s to a steady stream of elegantly written masterpieces, ranging from definitive treatments of Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and Bonaventure to monumental surveys of medieval, modern, and contemporary philosophy. Gilson’s works were revised and enlarged, reprinted vigorously, and translated swiftly. By the end of his career Gilson’s volumes were, like those of Flannery O’Connor, Thomas Merton, or Teilhard de Chardin, on the bookshelves of any educated Catholic —and more than a few educated non-Catholics. Mortimer Adler, Lionel Trilling, and Alfred North Whitehead considered themselves lucky to be his correspondents. Yet, few are familiar with Gilson’s monumental work on John Duns Scotus (c. 1266–1308). Published in 1952, when Gilson was sixty-seven years old, Jean Duns Scot: introduction à ses positions fondamentales was in many respects his crowning achievement.1 Since the second revised and enlarged edition of Le thomisme: introduction au système de. S. Thomas d’Aquin (1922), Gilson had written—and Joseph Vrin had published—the fruits of his seminars on several great medieval thinkers during the 1920s and early 1930s. For many, La philosophie de Saint Bonaventure (1924), Introduction à l’étude de Saint Augustin (1929), La théologie mystique de Saint Bernard (1934), Héloïse et Abélard (1938), and Dante et la philosophie (1939) form the backbone of any study of medieval philosophy.2 With L’esprit de la philosophie médiévale (1932), however, Gilson expanded his expertise to encompass more general philosophical issues. In the French works of the 1930s and 1940s—Christianisme et philosophie (1936), Réalisme thomiste et critique de la conaissance (1939), L’être et l’essence (1948)—and in the English—The Unity of Philosophical Experience (1937), God and Philosophy (1941), and Being and Some Philosophers (1949)—Gilson developed the interpretation of Thomas Aquinas’s metaphysics for which he is best known today. He came to see the history of philosophy—indeed the history of being—as a contest between the dynamic, person-oriented existentialism of Thomas Aquinas and the static, concept-driven essentialism of Augustine, Scotus, Descartes, and Kant. In Jean Duns Scot, these two currents in Gilson’s career join in a single river, reflective of the whole. It was Gilson’s last, largest, fully original monograph devoted to a major medieval philosopher. It was the crucible in which he put his so-called philosophical history of philosophy to the test. Jean Duns Scot is also— among the dozen or more classic studies authored by Gilson—the only one not translated into English. * * * Étienne Gilson (1884–1978) did not begin his career as a medievalist.3 He learned Latin and catechism in primary school with the Christian Brothers at Ste-Clotilde’s, and attended the best Catholic secondary school in Paris,