ebook img

John Abbot's butterfly drawings for William Swainson, including general comments about Abbot's artistic methods and written observations PDF

2007·9.7 MB·
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview John Abbot's butterfly drawings for William Swainson, including general comments about Abbot's artistic methods and written observations

Volume 61, Number 1 \ Journal of ; The Lepidopterists' Society Volume 61 2007 Number 1 JournaloftheLepidopterists'Society 61(1),2007,1-20 JOHN ABBOT'S BUTTERFLY DRAWINGS FORWILLIAM SWAINSON, INCLUDING GENERAL COMMENTS ABOUTABBOTS ARTISTIC METHODS ANDWRITTEN OBSERVATIONS JohnV. Calhoun1 977WicksDr.,Palm Harbor, FL 346S4 ABSTRACT. Between 1816and1818,artist-naturalistJohnAbbotcompleted 103drawingsofinsectsforEnglishnaturalistWilliam Swain- son. Thehistoryoftheseillustrationsisreviewed,leadinguptotheirrediscoveryin 1977intheAlexanderTurnbull Library,Wellington.New Zealand. Fourofdiesedrawingsarefigured. Theadultsinthe21 butterflydrawingsareidentifiedandthefiguresoflarvaeandpupaeareas- sessedforaccuracy. Theillustratedplantsarealsoidentifiedandtheirstatusashostsisexamined. AspectsofAbbot'slifehistorynotesaredis- cussed,includinghisspelling,grammar,anduseofLatinnames. HisnotesforSwainsonaretranscribedandanalyzed. AreviewofAbbot'sart- workindicatesthatheduplicatedmanvofhiscompositionsfor20-25years. Hesometimesportrayederroneousfiguresoflarvae,pupae,and hostplants. Figuresofimmaturesweresometimesfabricatedusingotherspeciesasmodels. Healsoappliedduplicatefiguresoflarvaetomore thanonespecies. AbbotmayhavesentanodrersetofinsectdrawingstoSwainsonin 1830. Ninety-ninesmallerdrawingsattheTumbull Li- braryareattributedtoboth AbbotandSwainson. Sixoftheseillustrationsarefigured. Abbot'snotesforSwainsonsuggestdiatatleastthree butterflyspeciesarenowmoreabundantthanduringdieearlynineteenthcentury,whilethreeothersareprobablylesswidespreaddianfor- merly. Additionalkeywords: Georgia,larvae,Lepidoptera,pupae,hostplants,watercolors "To the scientist and the naturalist comes, then, the Lepidoptera long before they were scientificallv artist, to wait upon both, ever reach/ to translate into described. His drawings and specimens contributed to form and line the forms o—f the butterflies, to fix the theoriginaldescriptions ofnumerous species. Formany colours ofbrocadedwings" VereTemple. years, Abbot's illustrations and notes were the primary Thousands of natural history illustrations were source oflifehistoryinformation forthe Lepidopteraof rendered by Georgia artist-naturalist John Abbot America. Edwards (1868-1872) stated, "Even among (1751-ca.1840), but relatively few have been analyzed our old and common species, the larvae are but little by more recent authors. Abbot's bird drawings have more knownthan inthedaysofAbbot." Scudder(1888, received the most attention through the studies of 1888-1889) similarly remarked, "the transformations of Faxon (1896), Rhodes (1918), Allen (1951), Larson & not a few of our butterflies are even now known onlv Rogers-Price (1983), Simpson (1984, 1993), Griffin through the observations and illustrations of Abbot." ([1990]), and Rogers-Price (1992, 1997). Spider Abbots work is still valuable in understanding the life drawings were reviewed by Chamberlin & Ivie (1944). histories ofpoorlyknown species. His original drawings Scudder (1872, 1888-1889) documented a large also help to clarify taxonomic concepts and historical numberofAbbot's unpublished butterfly drawings, but distributions (Calhoun 2003). However, some of his his identifications were incomplete and partially illustrations and written observations are the source of inaccurate. Miscellaneous drawings of birds, insects, dubious information that continues to plague die and spiders were figured and identified in biographical literature. Authors have repeated manv of Abbot's accounts, most notably by Rogers-Price (1983) and erroneous hostplant associations without realizingtheir Gilbert (1998,2000). origin. Because ofthese discrepancies, extreme caution While conducting research for Calhoun (2003) I mustbeexercisedwhen consultingAbbot's drawings for realizedAbbot'sprofoundinfluenceon NorthAmerican life history information. To fullv appreciate Abbot's entomology. Abbot documented many species of contributions, itisessentialtoanalyzehisartworkwithin 'Research Associate, Florida State Collection of Arthropods, its original context and over the course ofhis career in DPI, FDACS, Gainesville,Florida32614,USA Journalofthe Lepidopterists' Society America. I previously discussed Abbot's work in Swainson wanted, but stated that he could "readily Calhoun (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006). I now present a make at least 200 such Drawings not figured in Smiths review ofAbbot's butterfly drawings in the Alexander work, amongthem is manyoftheprincipal Insects both Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. I also forsize & beauty" (Linnean SocietyofLondon). Bythe continue to investigate the artistic methods and time Abbot sent his reply, Swainson had already manuscript notes that Abbot used to document his departed London for a two-year expedition to Brazil. observations ofAmerican Lepidoptera. His letterwas forwarded to Brazil by Swainson's father, JohnTimothy Swainson. Methods Abbot hoped that more of his drawings would Digital images of drawings were received from the eventually be published like those in The Natural AlexanderTurnbull Library. The adultbutterflies were History ofthe Rarer Lepidopterous Insects ofGeorgia identified and the figures comparedwith those in other (Smith & Abbot 1797). Abbotwas probablyunaware of sets ofAbbot's drawings that are deposited elsewhere. thisbookforsometime,butwas familiarwithitby1813 Figures ofbutterflylarvae andpupaewere analyzedfor when he referredto "Smiths Lepidoptera" in aletterto accuracyusingwritten descriptions, line drawings, and Escher-Zollikofer. Abbot also wrote Latin names from photographs of living specimens. Botanist Mark A. this book on drawings that he began in 1813 (Calhoun Garlandprovided identifications ofthe depictedplants, 2004). He repeatedlyreferred tohis sets ofdrawings as whichwerethenevaluatedashosts. Alsoconsultedwere "a continuation ofSmiths Lepidoptera," presumablyto relevant manuscripts preserved in the Carl A. Kroch induce patrons to publish them as such. The proposed Library (Cornell University), Ernst Mayr Library Lepidoptera drawings for Swainson were to be (Museum ofComparativeZoology, HarvardUniversity), completed in a comparable format, which Abbot GrayHerbarium (HarvardUniversity), andthe Linnean described as "Quarto, containingthe larva, & Fly, Male SocietyofLondon. & female ifany difference, on one ofthe plants it feeds on, orthe particularplant, inWatercolors" (letterto H. Results Escher-Zollikofer, Kroch Library). Like his other life Background. Since his youth, the English naturalist history illustrations, theywould invariablyportray only William Swainson (1789-1855) was familiar with John mature larvae andinclude pupae. Abbot through the published drawings in Smith & When Abbot was working on his drawings for Abbot (1797) and Abbot's numerous specimens that Swainson, he was also attempting to complete a set for were contained in the natural history cabinets of Escher-Zollikofer. In April 1817, Abbot sent 50 London. Swainson obtained some of Abbot's insect drawings to Escher-Zollikofer and applied 48 others to specimens in 1813throughAbbot's London agent, John Swainson's order. Abbot often juggled specimens and Francillon (Swainson correspondence, Linnean Society drawings between patrons. By August 1817, he had of London). In September 1816, Swainson wrote completed at least 56 more drawings, telling the South directlytoAbbotabouthis desiretopurchase additional Carolina botanist Stephen Elliott, "I have now 104 specimens, aswellas drawingsofdieinsects ofGeorgia [drawings], finished for a 2d Vol. [of "Smiths He lateraskedspecificallyforillustrations ofbutterflies Lepidoptera"] (Gray Herbarium, Harvard University). and sphinx moths that were not figured in Smith & Upon completion of the set for Swainson, Abbot Abbot (1797). Without divulging Swainson's name, entered notes about the habits and biology of each Abbotboasted to the Swiss naturalist Heinrich (Henry) species in aseparate manuscript. Escher-Zollikofer (1776-1853) that he had received a Abbot finallysent his watercolors and accompanying letter from "a Gendeman in England of my notes to Swainsonwith 900 insect specimens on 1 May acquaintance, who desires me to collect for him a 1818. He advised, "I have sent under the cork at the General collection of Insects, and also wants to bottom ofthebox (beingafalsebottom) 104 Q [quarto] purchase a collection of Drawings" (Kroch Library, Drawings of the changes of the Insects of Georgia Cornell University). Abbot replied to Swainson in making a 2d Vol. of Smith" (Linnean Society of December 1816 that he had "commenced making aset London). The drawings were placed under the corkto of Quarto (large size) Drawings of the changes of conceal them from customs inspectors and avoid duty Insectswidinotes, ofsuchInsectsthatarenotfiguredin fees. Abbot asked Swainson, "Ifyou shou'dnot approve Smiths Lepidoptera Insects of Georgia, indeed it is a ofthemyourself, begthefavortodisposeofthemtothe continuation of that Work" (Linnean Society of best advantage for me" (Linnean Society of London). London). Abbot expected to complete about 100 Although Abbot intended to provide 104 drawings, the drawings by the time he collected all the insects that same number published in Smith & Abbot (1797), he Volume 61, Number 1 apparently misplaced one of them prior to shipment. abandoned" (Swainson 1840). It is uncertain what DespiteAbbot'sdescription, thesetincluded morethan species would have been includedin such abook, since just Lepidoptera. Swainson would likely have used the replacement Swainson examined the drawings upon his return to drawings that Abbot intended to send. Because ofhis LondoninAugust ISIS. Hewas immediatelycritical. In dissatisfaction with the drawings, Swainson missed a his reply to Abbot, Swainson complained that die perfect opportunity to describe the numerous drawings were "not so highly finished as those must "nondescript" species that they portrayed, most of have been from which the Plates in Dr Smiths work which remainedunnamedformanyyears. Nonetheless, were taken," adding, "die greatest objection is thatthey Swainson (1821) published an abbreviated version of are much smaller in size so thev can never be bound one ofthe moth drawings to accompanyhis description j uniformlywith diatwork" (Linnean SocietyofLondon). of Thyreus abbottii (now Sphecodina abbottii), which In Abbot's defense, his original drawings for Smith & dubiously honored Abbot with an incorrect double-t — Abbot (1797) were of a comparable size, but the spelling of his name a common mistake still made published plates were printed on larger paper. Per his today. Abbotand Swainsoncontinuedtocorrespondfor earlier request, Swainson argued that he wanted only manyyears. A letter that Abbot wrote in January 1835 drawings ofbutterflies andsphinxmoths, notthevariety was possibly his last to Swainson (Alexander Turnbull of insects that Abbot had included. As a friendly Library). In November 1836, after learning that yet gesture, Abbot had already discounted the cost ofthe another shipment of Swainson's Brazilian insects for drawings from seven shillings and six pence to six Escher-Zollikofer had arrived in deplorable condition, shillings, but Swainson offered to payonly five shillings Abbot remarked, "I have had no dealings with him in fight ofhis objections. At five shillings each, the cost since" (letter to H. Escher-Zollikofer, Cornell ofthe drawings would have totaled £25 15s, currently University). valued at about £1,340 ($2,520 US). Swainson also Swainson moved from England to New Zealand in complained about Abbot's insect specimens, stating, "I 1840. After Swainson's death, his extensive should have liked a greatervarietyinstead of4 & 5 ofa correspondence was brought to England by one ofhis species." Swainson askeddiat replacement drawings be daughters and placed in the care of the botanist Sir sent with another shipment of insect specimens. If Joseph D. Hooker. In 1900, the 934 letters, including Abbot could not provide more drawings, Swainson nine from Abbot,wereacquiredfor£50bythe Linnean proposedtokeepsomefromthefirstsetand"disposeof Society ofLondon (Gunther 1899-1900)' Albert C. L. dieremainderifpossible" (Linnean SocietyofLondon). G. Gunther, then President of the Linnean Society, Abbot acquiesced in June 1819, writing, "I will draw knew from these letters that Swainson had received over again foryou those diat you want. .and will leave drawings from Abbot, but their whereabouts w-ere . youtodisposeofthosealreadysentatthebestpriceyou unknown. Priortohis departureto NewZealand, alarge can get" (Linnean Society of London). In lieu of portion of Swainson's library and natural history monetary payment for the drawings and specimens, collections were auctioned in June 1840 (Chalmers- Swainson offeredto exchange Brazilianinsects fromhis Hunt 1976). Abbot's drawings, however, were not part recent expedition. Swainson collected about 20,000 of this sale. In September 1841, four months after insect specimens during his trip (Natusch & Swainson Swainson's arrivalin NewZealand, ashipearningmuch 1987). Abbot graciously accepted and arranged forthe of the remainder of his library sunk off die coast of Brazilian insects tobe sent directlyto Heinrich Escher- South Africa en route to his new home (Parkinson Zollikofer in Switzerland, who would then pay Abbot. 1984). Giinther (1899-1900) bemoaned die possibility However, Abbot apparently never completed the that Abbot's drawings were forever lost in diis disaster, replacementdrawings andSwainsonkepttheentirefirst stating, "Noonecouldappreciatedieirvaluebetterdian series. As payment for Abbots specimens, Swainson Swainson, andtheirexquisitebeaut)'andaccuracymust later sent Brazilian insects to Escher-Zollikofer, but have exercisedaveiybeneficialinfluenceon dieworkof Abbot was mortified to learn that the shipment was his own pencil and brush." Swainson w'as also an heavilydamaged upon receipt. accomplished artist who personally illustrated most of Swainson ultimately lost interest in a project to hispublications (see Parkinson 1989). publish more ofAbbots drawings, relating manyyears The fate of these Abbot watercolors remained a later, "another series of 10.3 subjects, not included in mystery until 1977 when a librarian at die Alexander that which has been published, was executed for us, Turnbull Library discovered an uncataloged collection withthe intention offormingtwo additionalvolumes to ofdrawings. Parkinson (1978) initially associated diem those edited by Dr. Smith, but the design is now with drawings that Abbot supposedly shipped to Journalofthe Lepidopterists' Society Swainson in 1835, but Wilkinson (1982) correctly until 1837 (Gravell & Miller 1979). Three other sheets identified them as those completed between 1816 and bearthewatermarks of"Ruse & Turners 1810" and "W 1818. In 1866, elevenyears after Swainson's death, the B."The Ruse &Turnerspapermilloperatedin England drawings were deposited into the Colonial Museum in from 1805 until 1845 (Churchill 1935). Beginning in Wellington, New Zealand. There they remained until 1808, William Barber (Barbour) produced paper with 1876whentheyweregiventoWalter B. D. Mantell, son the "W B" watermark from mills located in Berks offamed Britishpaleontologist Gideon A. Mantell. The County, Pennsylvania (Gravell & Miller 1979). This Turnbull Library acquired the library of W. B. D. reveals that Abbot was using American paper by this Mantell in 1927 from the widow ofhis son, Walter G. time, which he probably purchased in Savannah. He Mantell (Parkinson 1983a, 1984, Parkinson & Rogers- initially employed English papers, such as those from Price 1984). theWhatman mills (Calhoun2006a). During the early 1980s, the Alexander Turnbull Although high in quality, thesewatercolors are notas Library Endowment Trust embarked on an ambitious detailed as the original drawings for Smith & Abbot project to publish these drawings as Abbot had hoped. (1797), which were completed ca. 1783-1792 (see They would be issued in annual fascicles consisting of Calhoun 2006a). At the top right ofeach drawing are six to ten plates each. The text would be formatted numbers written by Abbot that correspond to the similar to that of Smith & Abbot (1797), but Abbots entries in his notes. Several drawings bear names and notes for each drawing would be photographically othernotations in Swainson's hand. reproduced from his manuscript. The drawings The set includes illustrations ofColeoptera (7 spp.), themselves would be reproduced as six-color Hemiptera (1 sp.), Hymenoptera (1 sp.), Lepidoptera photolithographicprints measuring40.0 x 25.0cm (15.7 (85 spp.), and Orthoptera (2 spp.). Seventeen of the x 9.8 in) and printed on Process Dove 25 percent rag watercolors (nos. 3, 6, 8, 10-12, 14, 17, 18, 21, 32, 35, paper. Thefirstfasciclewas offeredin May 1983for$50 37, 49, 53, 72, 78) were figured by Parkinson (1978), NZ. Individual plates could be ordered for $10 NZ Reynolds (1983), Rogers-Price (1983, 1984), Parkinson (editor's note in Rogers-Price 1984). Six plates were & Rogers-Price (1984), and Calhoun (2003, 2004). The includedinthis fascicle: one katydid and five butterflies Lepidopteradrawings are like thosepublishedin Smith from drawing nos. 6, 10, 11, 12, 21, and 28 (ATLET & Abbot (1797), depicting adults, early stages, and a 1983). The insects were identified by Matthew E. supposedhostplant (Figs. 1-4). Theyinclude21 species Dakin, John G. Franclemont, and Paul E. S. Whalley. ofbutterflies. The plants were determined by C. Richie Bell. The The accompanying eleven pages of annotations, secondfascicleoftenplateswasbeingpreparedin 1984 entitled "Notes to the Drawings ofInsects," arewritten forpublication the followingyear, but poor sales ofthe inAbbot's handon creamwovepapermeasuring34.0 x first fascicle forced the discontinuation ofthe project, 20.5 cm (13.4 x 8.1 in). The entries are numbered to leavingthe remainderofthe drawings unidentified (M. correspond to the drawings and several sheets bear Calderperscomm., P. Parkinsonpers comm.). Although undated watermarks of "J M," indicative of paper Parkinson (1978) listed all the drawings, he tentatively munfactured after 1817 by John Matthews of identifieddiem usingonlyAbbot's manuscript names. Pennsylvania (Gravell & Miller). The pages have been Analysis. In January 2003, I received digital images stitched into a fawn wove paper cover. The front cover of all 103 drawings, as well as photocopies ofAbbots bears a misspelled ink title, probably written by accompanying notes. The drawings are unbound, but Swainson, reading, "DISCRIPTION OF ABBOTTS appear to have once been protected between pink DRAWINGS." Preservedwidithis collectionisaleather marbledboards,which arepreservedwithdiedrawings. cover that may have been removed from boards that The front board bears a pasted paper label, probably once protected the notes. It bears gilt tooling and created by Swainson, reading, "Original drawings of edging, as well as a gilt crest in the center. The crest insects byJ. Abbott." On the verso ofthe board is the possiblypertains to the Mantell family. bookplate ofW. B. D. Mantell and a Turnbull Libraiy With the help of six other specialists, I compiled a classification label dated 1929. nearlycomplete list ofidentifications for all the insects The drawings are rendered in watercolor and and plants in these drawings. This list was provided to graphite on cream-colored wove paper and most the Turnbull Libraiyin September 2003. As part ofmy measure 34.2 x 24.6 cm (13.5 x 9.7 in). Twenty-five of study ofJohn Abbot's butterflies, I present a review of thempossesswatermarksof"TG&Co."Thispaperwas the butterfly drawings that are preserved in the manufacturedbyThomas andJoshuaGilpin,whose mill Turnbull Libraiy with transcriptions of Abbot's was located north ofWilmington, Delaware from 1787 accompanying manuscriptnotes (Table 1). Volume 61, Number 1 FIGS. \-i. JohnAbbotbutterflydrawings intheAlexanderTumbull Library. 1,Papiliopalamedes (E-272-f-009) (erroneoushostplant). 2, Asterocampaclylon (E-272-f-016) (erroneouslarva,pupa,andhostplant). 3,Pyrguscommunis (E-272-f-023). 4.Callophnjshenrici (E-272- f-027). Journalofthe Lepidoptepjsts' Society Table 1. Adultbutterflies,earlystages, andplantsdepicted inJohn Abbotdrawings intheAlexanderTurnbull Library. AlsoAbbot'soriginal manuscriptentriesforeach (Abbot'sgrammarandspellingarepreserved). InsectnomenclaturefollowsOpler6cWarren (2002). Adultinsect figures: D=dorsal,V=ventral, m=male, f=female. Earlystages: L=larva, P=pupa,a=aeceptable.u=unacceptable. Statusoffiguredhostplants (inbrackets):C=confirmed, NC=needsconfirmation,E=erroneous. Drawing Figuredadults Plant speciesand Manuscriptentryby Abbot J. No. andearlystages hoststatus PapilioglaucusL. StyraxamericanusLam. (Styracaceae)[C] 6'. PapilioGlaucus. TheCaterpillarfeeds on theStyraxlaevigata. SwampAshand Df Vf La Pa a"mSetyrriacxanluase.vig"aStaw"aimspaAssyhn"on(yprmoboafbSl.y HCihcacnognje,dT1y3'e1d'birtseedlf2udpAprIiVl.1'OIcttarlsobreeds Fraxinuspennsi/lvanica Marsh.) again in theSummer. TheCaterpillaris (Oleaceae)and"Hiccory"[hickory] (Carya veryrare,andtheButterflynotcommon. sp.)(Juglandaceae)arealsoconfirmed hostplants. NOTES:onlythedarkformofthefemaleisportrayed. ThisdrawingwasfiguredbyParkinson(1978)andParkinson&Rogers-Price(1984) DuplicatefiguresbyAbbotwerereproducedforPlates8and9of BoisduvalckLeConte(1S29-[1837]). "Glaucus"ispenciledonthe drawinginSwainson'shand. ItisinterestingthatAbbotfollowedcontemporarywisdomintreatingthisformasaseparatespeciesfromthe butterfliesindrawingno. 10,especiallysinceherearedbothandnotedthateachfedon"SwampAsh". Moreover,heportrayedslightly differentimmaturesinthesedrawings. Abbotpossiblyknewthetruthaboutthisform,butwashesitanttorefutemore"learned"naturalists whowerealsopayingcustomers. 9 PapiliopalamedesDrury Magnolia virginiana L. (Magnoliaceae) [E] 9. Largeyellowspottedblackswallow tailedButterfly. FeedsontheBay figured, Tyedup30"'May,changedthe Dm.Vm,La,Pa 31stbred14thJune.Anotherthatchanged the18th Seprwasbredthe24"'March. TheCaterpillarisnotcommontobemet with. ButtheButteifli/isfrequentall overtheCountry. NOTES:seeFig. 1. DuplicatefiguresofthelarvaandpupabyAbbotwerereproducedforPlate5ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]). "Calchas,"amisspellingofthejuniorsynonymPapiliochoicesFabricius.ispenciledonthedrawingin Swainson'shand. Magnoliavirginiana isoftenlistedasahostplantofthisspecies,butitistoxictothelarvae(Scriber1986,Scriberetal.2000). Brooks(1962)notedthatlarvaeof P.palamedeswouldnotacceptthisplantinGeorgia. TwootherAbbotdrawingsofP.palamedeswithM. virginianaarepreservedatThe NaturalHistoryMuseum,London. Theyareduplicatesofoneanother,butslightlydifferentfromthedrawinginNewZealandandprobably completedaboutadecadeearlier. Scudder(1S88-1S89)examinedoneoftheseandidentifiedthedepictedplantasMagnoliaglauca (L.), nowconsideredtobeasynonymofM. virginiana. ThisdrawingwasfiguredbvRogers-Price(1984)andGilbert(1998,2000). Scudder's discussionofthisdrawingisthesourceofallsubsequentclaimsthatthisbutterflyfeedsonM. virginiana. Abbotportrayedthisbutterflyonly withM. virginiana. Heidentifiedtheplantintwoduplicatedrawingsas"Magnoliaglauca,"butthisappearstohavebeenanaesthetic substitutionorheincorrectlyrecalledthehostwhenhelaterillustratedthelifehistoryofthisbutterfly. Scudder(1888-1889)alsoremarked thatFloridanaturalistWilliamWittfeldreportedthehostplanttobe "redbay,"whichWittfeldidentifiedas"Magnoliaglauca." However, WittfeldprobablyassociatedthewrongLatinnamewithhisreportof"redbay,"whichisapplicabletoPerseaborbonia (L.)Spreng.,theonly acceptablehostofthisbutterflyin Florida(Scriberetal.2000). Magnoliavirginianaisknownas"sweetbay." Thepupaistoocolorful,but conceptuallyaccurate. 10 Papilioglaucus L. Ptcleatrifoliata L. (Rutaceae) [C] 10. Papilio Turmts. Feedson thePtelia trifoliata,andSwampAsh, Tyeditselfup Dm,Vm,La,Pa p"eSnwnsaim/plvAansihc"a(Mparrosbha.b)ly(FOrleaaxcienaues)isalsoa b19e"'mJeutnew,itchhtahnignelyds2c0a't1'tberreedd4o"v'eJrulayl.lMay confirmedhostplant. partsoftheCountry. NOTES:seedrawingno.8. ThisdrawingwasreproducedinATLET(1983)andfiguredbyRogers-Price(19S3). DuplicatefiguresbyAbbot werereproducedforPlates6and7ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837])."Turnis",amisspellingofthejuniorsynonymPapilioturnus L.,is penciledonthedrawinginSwainson'shand. Abbotalsousedthisname. 11 PapiliocresphontesCra Zanthoxylwnclava-herculisL. 11. PapilioThoas. FeedsonthePrickly (Rutaceae) [C] Ash,andtheOrangetree, Tyedupthe6"' Dm,Vm,La,Pa May,changedthe7"'bredthe27"' "PricklyAsh"referstoZ. clava-herculis. anotherthatchangedthe15"'May,was "Orangetree"(Citrussp.) (Rutaceae)is bred3"June,andanotherthatchanged alsoaconfirmedhostplant. the30,hJune,bred19"'July. Istobemet intheGardensoftheCityofSavannah, andtheneighbourhood,butnotafew milesbackintheinlandparts. NOTES:thisdrawingwasreproducedinATLET(1983)andfiguredbyParkinson&Rogers-Price(1984). DuplicatefiguresbyAbbotwere reproducedforPlates 12and 13ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]). Thecultivationoforangetreeswasprobablyresponsibleforthe occurrenceofthisbutterfly"intheGardensoftheCityofSavannah." Thename"PapilioThoas"(i.e.PapiliothoasL.)wasusedforP. cresphontesuntiltheseveiysimilarbutterflieswererecognizedasdifferentspeciesmanyyearslater. Volume 61. Number 1 Table 1. Continued. Drawing Figuredadults Plant speciesand Manuscriptentry by Abbot J. No. andearlystages hoststatus 12 Asciamonuste(L.) Cleomegynandra L. (Cappa 3)[C] 12. PapilioDanaiCleome. Feedsonthe Cleomepentaphilles. Tyedup16thJuly, Dm,Df(2),Vf,La,Pa "C.ClpeeonmtaeppheynltlaaphLi.,lliessa"saymniosnsypemlloifngof fcehmaanlgeedBu1t7t"e'r,flbireesdv2ar3ide.sMbaeniyngoofftahedingy C.gynandra blackasfigured. ThisButterflyissome Summersveryplentyin Savannah breedingintheGardensi?yardswhere theplantgrowsinplentybutisrarein theInlandparts. NOTES:thisdrawingwasfiguredbvCalhoun(2004)andaduplicatedrawingwasfiguredbyGilbert(1998). DuplicatefiguresbyAbbot werealsoreproducedforPlate16ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]) (Calhoun2004). PenciledonthedrawinginSwainson'shandis "no12". Abbot'snameforthisspeciesisderivedfromtheLinnaeanclassificationsystem,wherePapilioisthegenusandDanaiisagroup thatincludesthePieridae. "Cleome"isanamethatAbbotcoinedbasedonthehostplant. Abbot'snotesaptlydescribetheirregular migratorypresenceofthesubspeciesA. m,phileta (Fabricius)incoastalGeorgia(Calhoun2004). 13 Cercyonispegala(Fabricius) Panicvmsp,possiblyP. dichotomiflonm 13. GreatmeadowbrownButterfly. Michx.orP. rigidulum Nees(Poaceae) Feedsonthegrassfigured,andother Dm, Df,Vf,La,Pa [NC] grasses, Tyedup79'''June,changed20'h bred5'1'Jidy. Frequentsthepinewoods ire. Isnotcommon. NOTES:portionsofaduplicatedrawingbyAbbotwerereproducedforPlate59ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]) (thefigureofthe larvawasreversed). TheplantwasidentifiedinATLET(1983)asPanicium[sic]agrostoidesSprengel,nowconsideredtobeasynommof P. rigidulum. ThisdrawingpromptedParkinson(1983b)toquestionthesubspecificarrangementofC.pegala,particularlvtheidentityofC. pegalaabbotti Brown. ThissubspecieswasnamedinhonorofJohnAbbotbyBrown(1969),whobelievedthatthebutterfliesfiguredby Boisduval&LeConteasSatyrusalope(=C.pegalaalope Fabricius)actuallyportrayedanundescribedsubspeciesfoundinsoutheastern GeorgiaandnorthernFlorida. ParkinsonarguedthatdieadultfiguresinthedrawinginNewZealand,aswellastheduplicatesinBoisduval &LeConte(1829-[1837]),areinconsistentwiththisphenotypeasdefinedbyBrown(1965). Iagree,asAbbot'sfiguresareconsistentwith C.p.pegalathatoccursineasternGeorgia. Abbot'sEnglishnamefortliisbutterflywasderivedfromitssuperficialresemblancetothe commonEuropeanbutterfly,Maniolajurtina (L.),knowninBritainasthe"meadowbrown"sincetheearlyeighteenthcentury. In 1769, AbbotillustratedspecimensofthisspeciestiiathehadcollectedinEngland,usingthisnametoidentifythem(LibraryoftheCarnegie MuseumofNaturalHistory). 14 Hermeupychiasosybius(Fabricius) Carex sp.,possiblyC. hyalinolepis 14. SmallRinglet. FeedsontheTwi.rtc-d Steudel(Cyperaceae) [NC] Grass,figured,andotherGrasses, Tyed upAug23dchanged24thbredVSepr. Dm,Df,Vm,Lu,Pa FrequentstheSwampsandfields, isnot verycommon NOTES:thisbutterflyisknowntofeedonlyongrasses(Poaceae). Abbotmayhavecollectedthewrongplantforhisillustration,possiblv confusingitwiththehostofNeonymphaareolatus(J.E. Smith),whichfeedsonsedges(Cyperaceae). Abbotsupplieddiesamenotesand usedthename'TwistedGrass"fortheplantillustratedinanotherdrawingofH.sosybiusnowdepositedatTheNaturalHistorvMuseum, London. Thatdrawingportraysatwisted-leavedspeciesofyelloweyedgrass,probablyXyriscarolinianaWalter,notatruegrassbuta memberoftheXyridaceaeandanerroneoushost. BecauseAbbotfiguredadifferentplantforSwainson,hecrossed-out"Twisted"toreflect thischange. ToAbbot,sedgesweresimply"grasses." Thedepictedlarvalacksthepairofposteriorappendagestiiatarepresentintliis species. Abbotincludedamoreaccuratelarvainatleasttwootherdrawingsofthisspecies,butlaterappliedittoCyllopsisgemma (Hiibner).Abbot'sEnglishnameforthisbutterflywasderivedfromitsremotesimilaritytothewidespreadEuropeanspecies,Aphantopus hyperantws(L.),whichhasbeenknownasthe"ringlet"inBritainsincethemid-eighteenthcentury. In 1769,Abbotillustratedspecimensof thisspeciesthathehadcollectedinEngland,usingthisnametoidentifythem(Library'oftheCarnegieMuseumofNaturalHistory). 15 Asterocampaceltis(Boisduval&:Le Celtiscf.tenuifoliaNutt. (Celtaceae) [C] 15. PapilioPortlandia. Feedson the Conte) Sugarberry,tyedup8hMay,changed7lh "Sugarberry"referstothefiguredCeltis. bred20'1'. Isveryrare. Dm,Df,Vm,Lu,Pa NOTES:portionsofaduplicatedrawingbyAbbotwerereproducedonPlate57ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1S37]1toaceompanvthe originaldescriptionofthisspecies. Thelarva,andpossiblyalsothepupa,isA.clyton (drawingno. 16). Boisduval&LeConte (1829-[1837])andScudder(1888-1889)identifiedthedepictedplantasCeltisoccidentalisL. (Celtaceae). Abbotrepeatedlvmisapplied thename"PapilioPortlandia"(i.e.Papilioportlandia Fabricius)tothisspecies(seetext). Journalofthe Lepidopterists" Society Table 1. Continued. Drawing Figuredadults Plant speciesand Manuscriptentrybv Abbot J. No. andearlystages hoststatus 16 Astererocampachiton (Boisduval& Vacciniumstamineum L. (Ericaceae)[E] 16. OrangecolouredButterfly. Feedson LeConte theSugarberry, Tyeclup20"'May. ) changed2Vbred9'1'June. Isveryrare "Sugarberry"referstoCeltis. Dm,Vm,Lu,Pu NOTES:seeFig.2. Theimmaturesandplantinthisdrawingareallunrelatedtotheadults(seetext). DespitethefiguredVaccinium,this butterflyisknowntofeedonlyonCeltistrees(Celtaceae). Abbotidentifiedtheplantinaduplicatedrawingas"Wildgooseberry." Two additionaldrawingsofthisspeciesbyAbbotportraythesamefigures. Abbotincorrectlyassociatedthelarva,andpossiblyalsothepupa,with thecloselyrelatedA.celtis,whichfeedsonthesamehosplants(seedrawing15). Heprobablyfoundfewimmaturesofthesespeciesand misidentifieddiosethathelatercollectedforhisdrawings. AbbotultimatelyfabricatedimmaturesforA. chjton,modelingthemafter Polijgoniainterrogations(Fabricius) (seetext). Abbotprobablyobservedthattheadultsofdiesespeciesevensharedsimilarcolorforms, reinforcingthisperceivedrelationship. HeduplicatedtheseerroneousfiguresforallhissubsequentlifehistoryillustrationsofA. chjton. Boisduval&LeConte(1S29-[1837])apparentlyrecognizedthismistake. AlthoughtheirPlate56ofApaturachjtonwascreditedtoAbbot,it appearstohavebeenconstructedusingfiguresfromothersources,includinganalteredversionofAbbot'slarvaofA.celtis(actuallyA. chjton). Thehostplantonthepublishedplatewasequallyerroneous,beingaspeciesofHex,possibly/. dedd.uaWalt. (Aquifoliaceae). Scudder(1888-1889)identifiedthelarvaasP. interrogationisandthepupaasPoh/goniacomma (Harris). Ihavefoundnoevidencethat AbbotencounteredP. commainGeorgia,nordoesthedepictedlarvaresemblethatspecies. 17 Chlosynegorgone(Hlibner) Helianthusdivaricatus L. (Asteraceae) [C] 17. CrosswortFrittilan/Butterfly. Feeds ontheCrosswort,andsunflower, Ti/ed Dm, Df,Vf,La,Pa d"iCvreorsiscaytvuorst"(saepepCaarelnhtoluynr2ef0e0r3s).toTHh.isis 1it7s"e'lfbruepdb2y6't1h'.eFtraeiqlu1e6'n''tsMatyhe,OcahkanWgoeodds possiblyamisapplicationofan English ofBurkeCountybutisnotcommon. namefortheBritishyellow-floweredherb, CruciatalaevipesOpiz(Rubiaceae). "Sunflower"probablyindicatesanother speciesofHelianthus. NOTES:thisdrawingwasfiguredinParkinson&Rogers-Price(1984)andCalhoun(2003). DuplicatefiguresbyAbbotwerereproducedfor Plate46ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837])toaccompanytheoriginaldescriptionofdieenigmatictaxonMelitaeaismeria(Calhoun 2003,2004,2005,2006b). ThedepictedlarvaisconceptuallyconsistentwithC.gorgone. "Frittilary"isamisspellingoftheBritishname "Fritillary." 18 Libytheanaearinenta (Cramer) Celtiscf.tenuifolia Nutt. (Celtaceae) [C] 18. SnoutButterfly. Feedson the Sugarberry,orHackberry, Tycdup28"' _ "Sugarberry"and"Hackberry"referto April,changed29"'bred8"'May. Israre. Dm,Vm,La,Pa Celtis. NOTES:thisdrawingwasfiguredinCalhoun(2004). Withtheexceptionoftheadultfigures,mostoiaduplicatedrawingbyAbbotwas reproducedforPlate64ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837])(Calhoun2004). Scudder(1888-18889)identifiedtheplantinduplicate drawingsasCeltisoccidentalis. SpeciesofLibytheinaehavelongbeencalled"Snout"butterflies. 19 Pyrisitialisa (Boisduval&LeConte) Sennaoccidentalis(L.)Link(Fabaceae) [C] 19. LittleyellowButterfly. Feedsonthe Cassiatochidapersonabutismost Dm,Df,Vm,La,Pa "Cassiatochidapersova"isanallusionto frequentontheCassiachamacusta. Tyed Cassiafoetidaanditsauthor,C. H.Persoon up61'' Seprchanged7"'bredthe13"'. (seetext);asynonymofS. occidentalis. "Cassiachamacusta"isamisspellingof Cassiachamaecrista L.,whichisasynonym ofChamaecristafasciculata (Michx.)Green (Fabaceae). Thisisalsoaconfirmed hostplant. NOTES:duplicatefigureswerereproducedforPlate 19ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837])toaccompanytheoriginaldescriptionofthis species. Volume 61, Number 1 Table 1. Continued. Drawing Figuredadults Plantspeciesand Manuscriptentry bvJ.Abbot No. andearlystages hoststatus 20 Euremadaira(Godart) Chamaecristafasciculata (Michx.)Greene[C] 20. BlackstreakedlittleyellowButterfly. FeedsontheCassiachamacustaTyed "Cassiachamacusta"isamisspellingofCassia itselfup27'''Augustchanged28''bredo'h Dm,Df,La,Pa chamaecristaL.,whichisasynonymof Sep. Boththesekinds[thisandE.lisa; Chamaecristafasciculata. drawingno. 197^common inallpartsof theCountryinAutumn,andsettlesso manytogetherattimestosuckmoist placesinroadsb-c,thatIseen20inthe compassofahat,butthisspeciesIsnot quitesocommonasthelast. NOTES:thewinter(dryseason)formofthespeciesisportrayed. AportionofaduplicatedrawingbyAbbotwasreproducedforPlate 18of Boisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]) (Calhoun2004). 21 Thonjbesbathyllus(J.E.Smith) Desmodiumsp.,possiblyD.paniculatum 21. Brown Skipper. FeedsontheBeggers (L.)DC.(Fabaceae) [C]' lice,spun upintheleavesIS111Octrbred Dm,Df,Vf. La,Pa "Begger'slice"referstothefigured 20thApril, isnotverycommon. Desmodium. NOTES:tillsdrawingwasreproducedinATLET(1983). ItwasalsofiguredbyReynolds(1983)andRogers-Price(1983). Portionsofa duplicatedrawingbyAbbotwerereproducedforPlate74ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]). LiketheAbbotdrawingusedforthe originaldescriptionoiPapiliobathyllusinSmith6cAbbot(1797),thefemalesinthiscompositionmayportrayThonjbesconfusis Bell (Calhoun2006a). TheplantwasidentifiedinATLET(1983)asDesmodiumfernaldii B.G.Schub. (Fabaceae). Erynnismartialis(Scudder) Indigoferacaroliniana Mill. (Fabaceae) [E] 22. LeastDingy Skipper. Feedsonthe WildIndigo,spun upintheleaves25'1' Dm,Df,Vf,La,Pa IInndtihgiosfecraas,e,n"oWtialdspIencdiiegsoo"faBpappatriesnitalyreferstoJwuonoed,s,briesdm8utchJhullye.ssFcreoqmumeontnstthhaenOtahke (Fabaceae). otherDingySkippers. NOTES:thisspeciesisknowntofeedonlyonCeonothusamericanusL. (Rhamnaceae)ineasternNorthAmerica. Infact,Abbotillustrated thisskipperwithC. americanusforanearliercomposition,callingtheplant"RedshankorredRoot." Hisnotesforotherdrawingsalsorefer to"RedRootorredshank." Abbot'smistaken recollectionofanalternatehostmayhaveresultedindieinclusionof/, caroliniana. Hecalled allthespeciesofthegenusErynnis"Ding)'Skippers,"aftertheEuropeanErynnistages (L.),whichhaslongbeencalleddie"dingyskipper" inBritain 23 Pyrguscommunis(Grote) Sidaacuta Burm.f. (Malvaceae) [C] 23. BlackandwhiteSkipper. Feedson theplantfigured. Spun upin theleaves Dm. Df.Vf, La, Pa 25thJunebred7"'July. Istobemetwith intheOakwoodsandfields,isnot common. NOTES:seeFig.3. "Thyniale"(amisspellingofthegenusnameThymeleFabricius)ispenciledonthedrawing,probablyinSwainson'shand. TheskippersportrayedinthisdrawingarealmostcertainlyP. communis,asdiereisnoevidencediatdiesimilarPyrgusalbescensPlotz occurredinGeorgiaduringAbbot'slifetime(seetext). 24 Problemahulenta (Boisduval& Le Panicumsp.,possiblyP. dichotomiflorum 24. FeedsontheBroadgrass,Xozani Conte) Miclix.orP. virgatumL. (Poaceae) [NC/ aquaticafoldingitselfupintheleaf, changed25'''bred6"'Augt. Frequents Dm,Df,Vm,La, Pa "Broadgrass"referstotliisorasimilarspecies Ricefields,ditches,andthesidesof— ofgrass. Abbotmisidentifiedthefiguredplant pondsinthelowerpailsofGeorgia i, as "Zozaniaquatica", amisspellingofZizania notcommon. aquaticaL. (Poaceae). NOTES:duplicatefiguresbyAbbotwerereproducedforPlate67ofBoisduval&LeConte(1S29-[1837]),representingdie"original description"ofthisspecies(seetext). Litdeisknownaboutthebiologyofdiisskipper. LarvaehavebeenfoundonSpartinacynosuroides (L.)Roth(Poaceae)inNewJersey(Cromartie&Schweitzer1993)andsoudiwardithasbeenassociatedwithZizaniopsismiliacea (Michx.) Doll&Asch.(Poaceae) (Opler&Krizek1984). LarvaehavealsobeenfoundandrearedonPhragmitesaustralis(Cav.)Trin.ex. Steud. (Poaceae) (Schweitzer2006). AlthoughconfinedfemaleswillovipositonPanicum (Cromartie&Schweitzer1993),Abbotprobablydidnot findlarvaeonit. ThisskippermayfeedonZ. aquaticaasAbbotindicated,orheconfusedthisgrasswididiesimilarZ. miliacea. Problema bulentawaspossiblymoreplentifulinsouthernGeorgiawherericeplantationsofferedadditionalwetlandhabitat(seetext). AldioughAbbot didnotprovideanEnglishnamefortheinsectinthisdrawing,heused"BroadgrassSkipperButterfly"forduplicatedrawings. 10 Journalofthe Lepidopterists' Society Table 1. Continued. Drawing Figuredadults Plantspeciesand Manuscript entrybvJ.Abbot No. andearlystages hoststatus 25 Ancyloxyphanumitor(Fabricius) justiciaovata(Walter)Lindau 25. LeastSkipper. Feedson theplant (Acanthaceae) [E] figured,changed12"'Scprbred22'1. Is frequentinRicefieldsandMeadowy Dm,Df,Vm,La, Pa partsofbrooks NOTES:thisspeciesisagrass-feeder. Justiciagrowsinthewethabitatswherethisskipperoccurs,thusAbbotmayhaveconfusedthehost. However,anearliercompositionofA. numitorincludesadifferenterroneoushost,Asclepiasverticillata L.(Apocynaceae),whichoccursin drysoils. Abbotambiguouslyreferredtobothplantsas"theplantfigured,"suggestingthathedidnotrecalltheproperhostorinsertedthese morecolorfulplantstoenhancehiscompositions. 26 Satyriumliparops(LeConte) Crataegussp.,possiblyC. nitidisL. 26. BrownhairStreakButterfly. Feeds (Rosaceae) [C] ontheParsley haw,andOaks, Tyedup 16"'April,changed18thbred5"'May. Dm,Df,La,Pa "Parsleyhaw"referstoCrataegus. ThisspeciesfrequentstheOakwoodson "Oaks"(Quercus) (Fagaceae)arealsofedtheedgeofOgecheeRiverswamp, isvery uponbyS. liparops. rare. NOTES:unlikehisotherbutterflycompositions,theventralsurfaceofdieadultisnotportrayed. AnotherdrawingbyAbbotwasreproduced onPlate31ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837])toaccompanytheoriginaldescriptionofthisspecies,whichremainedpoorlyunderstood foroveracentury(SeeCalhoun2004,2005). Forotherdrawings,Abbotcalledthisspeciesdie"OgecheeBrownhairStreakButterfly,"a misspelledreferencetotheoccurrenceofthisspeciesindievicinityofdieOgeecheeRiverofeasternGeorgia. 27 Callophryshenrici(Grote& Robinson) VacciniumcorymbosumL.(Ericaceae) 27. BlackbrownhairstreakButterfly. [C] FeedsontheSwamphuckleberry,tied itselfupIS"'April,changedthe20"'bred Dm, Df,Vm,La,Pa "Swamphuckleberry"probablyrefersto 6"'May. TheButterflyfrequentsthe thefiguredVaccinium,butthesame blossomsoftheRedbudorJudastree,on plantisportrayedindrawingno.28 thebordersofSwamps,isfarfrom underadifferentname. "Judastree" referstoredbud(CerciscanadensisL.) (Fabaceae). TheadultsthatAbbotsaw frequentingtheblossomsofredbudmay haveincludedovipositingfemales,asthis treeisalsoaconfirmedhost. NOTES:seeFig.4. DuplicatefiguresbyAbbotofthelarvaandpupawerereproducedforPlate31ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]). Abbotspelled"tied"inthenotesfordiisdrawing,butspelledit"Tyed"elsewhere. SeedietextandCalhoun(2006a)fordiscussionsof Abbot'sunevenspellingandgrammar. Pupaeofthisspeciestypicallyoverwinter,butAbbot'snotessuggestthathislarvadevelopedintoan adultduringthesameseason. 28 Calycopiscecrops(Fabricius) VacciniumcorymbosumL. (Ericaceae) 28. SmallpurpleHairstreakButterfly. [NC] FeedsontheBlackHuckleberryire. tyed Dm, Df,Vm,Lu,Pa up 28,hApril,changed20"'bred20"' "BlackHuckleberry"apparentlyrefersto May. theButterflyisfrequentinmost thedepictedVaccinium,butthesame partsoftheCountry. plantisportrayedindrawingno.27 underadifferentname. NOTES:thefemalebutterflyinthisdrawingwasmisidentifiedinATLET(1983)asdieNeotropicalspeciesStrymonmartialis Herrich- Schaffer. ThedepictedplantwasidentifiedinATLET(1983)asGaylussaciafrondosa(L.)Torrey&A. GrayexTorrey. Thelarvaofthis speciesisnotgreen,butratherbrownorpinkish-brown. 29 Cupidocornyntas(Godart) Phaseoluspolystachios(L.)Brittonetal. 29. LeastblueButterfly. Feedsonthe (Fabaceae) [C] kindofwildpeafigured,RedRootor Dm,Df,Vm,Lu,Pa redshankire. Tyeditselfup]une16"' "RedRootorredshank"wasAbbot's bred24"'isnotcommon inthelower nameforCeonothusamericanusL. partsoftheCountry. (Rhamnaceae),anunlikelyhostforthis legume-feeder. NOTES:duplicatefigureswerereproducedforPlate36ofBoisduval&LeConte(1829-[1837]). Thelarvaexhibitsdarkpatternelements diatarenotassociatedwiththisspecies.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.