ISLAM AND THE POST-REVOLUTIONARY STATE IN IRAN Islam and the Post Revolutionary State in Iran HomaOmid © Homa Omid 1994 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1994 978-0-333-48446-3 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written pem1ission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the tem1s of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WI P 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published in Great Britain 1994 by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-349-23248-2 ISBN 978-1-349-23246-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-23246-8 First published in the United States of America 1994 by Scholarly and Reference Division, ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-10737-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Omid, Homa. Islam and the post-revolutionary state in Iran I Homa Omid. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-10737-6 I. Islam and politics-Iran. 2. Iran-Politics and government-1979- I. Title. DS318.825.046 1994 306.6'97'0955-{!c20 93-31444 CIP 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 This book is dedicated to my beloved mother, who set me an example which was hard to follow and impossible to forget, and to my adored father, who remained philosophical about my indiscretions and tolerant of our different views, politics and interpretations. Despite his constant fear for my life, he always retained his sense of humour and continued to be supportive, patient and loving throughout his life. This book is a small token of my immense love and gratitude to them both. Contents Acknowledgements ix Map X 1 Introduction 1 Ulema and Secularisation: Conflict or Coincidence 3 of Interest 2 The Arms of the Bureaucracy and the Embrace of 18 Theocracy 3 Valayateh Faqih: A Blueprint for Islamic Government? 40 4 Theocracy Defeats its Opponents 63 5 The Revolution Betrayed 85 6 The Armed Forces: Divided We Rule 106 7 Valayateh Faqih in Disarray 130 8 Freedom, Culture and Education in Khomeini's State: 153 What Price Islam? 9 Women and the Post-Revolutionary State 178 I 0 Islam for the People and Mammon for the Economy 205 Notes 220 Bibliography 243 Glossary 249 Index 253 Acknowledgements I am most grateful to RAW R for his encouragement and for cheerfully reading through the earlier draft of this book and finding out more than he ever wished about Iranian politics - a kindness well beyond the call of duty. His prompt and incisive comments have been invaluable. I should also like to thank PK for his detailed and extensive comments on Chapter 3, I very much appreciate his help and advice. Similarly many thanks to VP for information concerning the Iranian government's debt and foreign currency loans. Of course all mistakes, and misrepresentations remain entirely my responsibility. I would also like to thank T.F. who accepted the very first book that I ever did and has remained optimistic and kind ever since; he continued to believe in the arrival of this book, despite the numerous delays and never-ending shifts of deadline. Now I will not need the special room for delinquent authors that he had reserved for me in the Tower of London! Last but not least I would like to thank my children for giving me the time to work and MMD for holding the fort throughout. Without his constant help this work would not have been completed. ix N A T S I N A H G R SS AF ~ ~ ~'1--- U Kaslnnar • Talllal • llelldoldll Gonaba~ Delal • Jalmaad • • Jangal Fenlaws• Gaisa• r • Qa'ea • •Ta'Oa Qa'enll \ \ \ ...... --.. ' ' ....... KERMAN BALUCH ' .($> 1': ' I •.linJit ("<:, --.., ·'-~ ~~' t1L : \1 I 1 Atma' ._B aadar \ I ... , .. , I \ ' \ I \ Q A Y R E I K R U T >c Introduction The 1979 revolution in Iran is a landmark in the implementation of revivalist Islamic policy. It enabled the Iranian religious institution, ulema, to set up the Islamic Republic and to claim to be the first truly populist Shia rule since the death of the first Imam, Ali ibn Abu Taleb. The Shia ulema who have through the centuries proclaimed themselves to be the defenders of the poor and dispossessed, have traditionally contested secular rule in Iran and twice in the twentieth century have joined forces with the intelligentsia to form a revolutionary force. But the diffuse political aims of the revolutionaries - and the religious institution itself-have resulted in a political and economic flux which has continued throughout the decade. The diffuse polity is a reflection of the hierarchy and the ambivalent approach of the ulema to the twentieth-century state formation in Iran. It is in part the result of the rejection of temporal power by the twelver Shia. In principle the doctrine accepts only the legitimacy of the rule of the Prophet and the twelve imams that followed and reject all other rulers as usurpers. The true believers should await the rule of the twelfth imam who will return from occultation to bring justice to the world. But such rejection has had to coexist with the reality of tacit collaboration of the ulema with dynasties of rulers in Iran. The post-revolutionary State in Iran has been characterised by a profusion of administrative and theocratic institutions working, not always harmoniously, with the newly emerging revolutionary organisations, which occasionally du plicate, often compete with, or even work against, the older established bureau cracy. At the level of government there is a similar development of pre- and post-revolutionary decision-making bodies and command structures coexisting uncomfortably. In the first decade of the revolution, the inherent conflicts that arose were often resolved by the personal intervention of the Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini, whose directives were to be obeyed to the letter. With the demise of the leader of the revolution, the political containment of these differing chains of command is becoming more difficult. Such bureaucratic pluralism is rooted in the character of the religious establishment in Iran and therefore difficult to alter in the context of the current theocracy. The post-revolutionary political structure is the product of the fragmented, competitive and sometimes contradictory attempts of the ulema at curbing and controlling the process of secularisation. It is the contention of this author that the form of conservative, theocratic, government that has emerged in Iran, does not only counter the vision of the revolutionaries, but also goes against the very core of Shiism. The conservatism of the religious institution has stripped Shiism of its embattled, egalitarian and progressive impetus. As a result, what has emerged over the past decade and a half is a stumbling, self-serving administration, that has failed its people and has chosen to forget the high-minded aims and ideals that Islam and Shiism had set. 1 2 Introduction After a long revolution, an eight-years war and untold bloodshed, Iranians-men and women-find themselves poorer, less educated, more numerous and, in the case of women, considerably more oppressed than before. This was a revolution that betrayed its cause and its people.