ebook img

IS 14580-2: Use of network analysis for projects management, Part 2: Use of graphic technique PDF

2006·2.5 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview IS 14580-2: Use of network analysis for projects management, Part 2: Use of graphic technique

इंटरनेट मानक Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public. “जान1 का अ+धकार, जी1 का अ+धकार” “प0रा1 को छोड न’ 5 तरफ” Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan Jawaharlal Nehru “The Right to Information, The Right to Live” “Step Out From the Old to the New” IS 14580-2 (2006): Use of network analysis for projects management, Part 2: Use of graphic technique [MSD 4: Management and Productivity] “!ान $ एक न’ भारत का +नम-ण” Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda ““IInnvveenntt aa NNeeww IInnddiiaa UUssiinngg KKnnoowwlleeddggee”” “!ान एक ऐसा खजाना > जो कभी च0राया नहB जा सकता हहहहै””ै” Bhartṛhari—Nītiśatakam “Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen” IS 14580 (Part 2) :2006 Indian Standard USE OF NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PART 2 USE OF GRAPHIC TECHNIQUES ICS 03.100.40 0 BIS2006 BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHA”DUR SHAH ZAFAR MAR”G NEW DE LHI 110002 October 2006 6 Price Croup 11 Management and Productivity Sectional Committee, MSD 4 FOREWORD This Indian Standard (Part 2) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian.Standards, after the draft finalized by the Management andProductivity Sectional Committee hadbeenapproved bythe Management andSystems Division Council. Aproject isdescribed as aone time activity with an identifiable beginning and an identifiable end unlike other routine activities that are repetitive. It has a well defined purpose and scope and a.detinite set of separate but interrelated and interdependent activities that must becompleted to achieve the objectives for which the project is instituted. It has a well defined project product, including product performance criteria and well defined completion criteria. This standard ispublished intwo parts. Other part inthe series is: Part I Management, planning, review, reporting andtermination procedures Part 1ofthisstandard dealt withthe basicaspectsofproject management thatwereapplicable totheprojects from conception to completion/termination using network techniques. Project network techniques asused now, have developed sincethe mid 1950s.These developments include both activity-on-arrow and activity-on-node systems. The technique as developed aimed at improving the ability to planandcontrol complex engineering projects andwascalledCritical PathMethod (CPM). Probabilistic elelments appropriate to the research and development (R&D) area were also included in a modified technique called Programme Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT). This standard provides guidance on the factors that are to be considered while choosing between the various networking techniques. Itdeals with the drawing methods tobeusedforpresentation ofthese techniques and inparticular forpresentation ofactivity-on-arrow andactivity- on-node diagrams including the conventions to be used. Activity-on-arrow networks were quite popular inthe manual handling of networks. With the increasing useof computers for processing, activity-on-node or precedence networks have now become more popular. Anumber ofready-made sofiware packages areavailable foruseoncomputers which provide support notonly forplanning but also for updating and monitoring of progress from time-to-time. The technique has since been extended to handle scheduling of resources, uncertainty of outcome aswellas duration and many other specific parameters. Systems based on network analysis provide various advantages over the conventional methods of planning and control based on bar charts. These advantages may include: a) Clearer definition ofthe scope ofthe project andthe complex interrelationships between itsconstituent activities; b) Better coordination between different agencies engaged in the project and provision of information about each agencies progress and future plans to the others; c) Ease of preparing schedules of activities and adjusting these schedules to last minute developments; d) Ready means of reviewing the project and exercising control over time, resources and costs; and e) Clearer identification of critical and risk areas, besides providing an excellent model for generating ‘what-if scenarios for making management decisions. 1S14580(Part 2) :2006 Indian Standard USE OF NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PART 2 USE OF GRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 1 SCOPE activities together and may also show major eventsl milestones. This standard (Part 2) deals with the various graphic techniques used in project management in its various 3.3 For drawing the bar chart, start with listing down aspectsandduring itsvarious phases ofexecution. The theactivitiesalongwiththeirtimeduration. Depending methodology ofusingthese various graphic techniques on the project duration and duration of each of the as covered inthis standard, include the following: activities, asuitable time scale maybeselected. Abar chart would then be drawn as a two-dimensional a) Bar charts (Gantt charts), representationofvariousactivitiesoftheprojectplotted b) Milestone charts, on the vertical axis and their duration flowing from c) Activity-on-arrow charts, Ietl to right on the horizontal axis. d) Activity-on-node charts, 3.4 Bar charts can also be drawn to reflect resource e) Squared network, scheduling, where instead of listing activities inrows o Histogram, inthe left margin, these are substituted with the name i?) Time variance charts, of the specific resource element like persons h) Cost variancecharts, responsible, department namesorpiecesofequipment. Clause 9 pertaining to resource utilization charts can j) Resource utilization charts, and bereferred for more details. k) Resource productivity charts. 3.5 Figure I shows representation of a bar chart 2 REFERENCE pertaining to a simple house building project. The The following standard is a necessary adjunct to this lowerlinewithtroughed endsrepresent scheduled start andthe~cheduled finishoftheplanned progress, while standard: the darker upper straight line represents the part of 1SNo. Title activity that has been completed as on the date of IS 14580 Use ofnetwo rk analysis for project review. The review point in Fig. I reflects the status (Part 1):1998 management : P art I Management, ofvarious activities.atthetime ofreview. Areview of planning, review, reporting and the status indicates that though excavation started a termination procedures bit late but was completed on time. The foundation work was completed ahead of schedule. !,The 3 BAR CHARTS superstructure activity though started ahead of schedule, went beyond planned schedule, thereby 3.1 A bar chart is one of the easiest, convenient and delaying the start of the roofing activity. mostwidelyusedmeansofgraphical display ofproject activities onatime scale. Abarchart canbeusedboth 3.6 The value of barchart can befurther enhanced by for displaying the plan and status report to track and quanti~”ing the total work for an activity and also monitor progress and provide important feed back to allocating appropriate quantities on the bar for each the team members for appropriate action. It isa two time unit. This quantity could be interms of physical dimensional representation showing the various parameters likeasshown inFig.2or infinancial terms activities on the vertical axis and their time on the asshown inFig. 3. horizontal axis. 1S14580(Part I) mayalso%ereferred 3.7 Incorporating the quantity of each activity, in for guidance ingraphical representation pertaining to relevant measurement units, with their planned/actual typical bar charts. periodic break-ups under or over the respective bars 3.2 Typically abar chart isdrawn onasingle sheet so canfurther enhance the usefulness ofabar chart. This that the entire project and the accompanying set of has been shown in Fig. 2, which depicts physical activities including the project goal can be seen at a progress quantified bar chart. Figure 2 is also called glance. Abar chart for anentire project, groups many themilestone barchart (see3). Depiction ofmilestones I . REVIEW POINT Months SL TIME + Period I No. REMARKS ACTIVITY $ JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY 1 EXCAVATION 2 FOUNDATION t I 3 SUPERSTRUCTURE I I 4 ROOFING I 5 PLASTERING N 6 FLOORING I I 7 DOORh/VINDOW/ I SERVICE I I 8 FINISHING LEGEND:- — ACTUALSTARTANDFINISHOFTHEACTIVITY. U SCHEDULEDSTARTANDSCHEDULEDFINISHOFTHEACTIVIm. FIG. 1 BARCHARTFORCONSTRUCTIONOFAHOUSESHOWING STATUS— PLANNED versus ACTUALCOMPLETIONTIME ATTHEREVIEWPOINT REVIEW POINT Period I Months g-fJ UNITOF JANUARY FEBRuARY M~ARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY REMARKS MEASUREMENT I1 EXCAVATION 500 ~3 * r w I I 100 4 I , , 1 1 70 3 SUPERSTRUCTURE 300 ~3 f% 175 11 I 90 160 4 ROOFING 250 ~2 1’100 , I5 I Plastering 1350 I I I I I I I I I I 6 FLOORiNG 300 w El=== 1 I 1 1 t I I I1 4.0 Rs.Lakhs I I I I I Y I8 I FINISHING 1.5d Rs.Lakhs I LEGEND:\- ! ACTUMQUANTOITFYWORK. u PLANNEQCUIANTIWOFWORK. V MILESTONE FIG. 2 MILESTONEBARCHARTFORCONSTRUCTIONOFAHOUSESHOWINGACTIVITY-WISE PLANNEDversus ACTUALQUANTITIESCOMPLETEDATTHEREVIEWPOINT REVIEW POINT SL !3m. I Months No< BUDGETED REMARKS ~ ACTIVITY~ COST(Rs.Lakhs~ JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY 1 EXCAVATION 0.40 0.4J 2 FOUNDATION 1.60 I::; $% 1.0 I 3 SUPERSTRUCTURE 4“0 ‘1:: 2.0 3.0 1r 4 ROOFING 5.0 t‘ 1.6 5 PLASTERING 1.50 1.50 Y 6 FLOORING 2.00 I 1.20 0.8 7 DOOIVWINDOW/ 4.00 I 1.0 3.0 SERVICE 6 FINISHING 1.50 \0.1 1.0 0.4 1 TOTAL 20.0 ACTUAL 1.30 3.70 3.00 3.00 3.8d 4.60 0.40 8UbGETED 1.80 3.50 2.70 3.20 LEGEND:-1 [ ACTUACLOST. L I BUDGETEmD= FIG. 3 BAR CHARTFORCONSTRUCTIONOFAHOUSESHOWINGACTIVITY-WISE BUDGETEDANDACTUALCOST BOOKED 1S14580(Part 2): 2006 on bar charts greatly enhances their usefulness, since milestone may also indicate the percent progress of theimplicationsofanyslippageintheiraccomplishment project achieved on completion of the milestone. could leadtodelay inproject completion. They should Affixing the symbol atthe actual row likewise shows bespecifiedclearly and refer to completion ofdetlned the actual date ofaccomplishment ofa milestone. For activitiesormajor deliverables. milestones yet to be accomplished, the anticipated completion date wilI be shown as hollow inverted 3.8 The health of aproject can begauged bytracking triangle onthe dotted line. expected changes inthe dates on which the milestone events are expected to occur. Appropriate corrective 4.3.2 Forexample inFig.4whichshowsthemilestone measures could then be taken to control the slippage, chart for a small project involving placement of ifany. purchase order. The issueof order isscheduled inthe month of July. This means that if the output of the 3.9 Figure 3 showing financial progress, presents a group ismeasured interms of the issue of this order, slightlydifferentversion ofthesamebarchart,inwhich the measurable output would come only after 6 theactivitieshavebeenevaluated aspertheir budgeted months. Now ifthe milestones involved inthis work costprovisions fortheplanned schedule andtheactual are scheduled asshown and ifthe percentage of total cost booked for the part executed. The periodic work involved upto a miIestone can be settled in (monthly inthis case) summations inthe bottom row advance then on achievement ofamilestone itcan be ofthe forecast provisions and the actual cost incurred assumed as if that fraction of the work has been during -execution reflect the overall picture of the completed. performance oftheproject infinancial terms.Areview 4.3.3 Figure 4 shows the milestones completed as on of the referred project as at end of April indicates end March, which isthe review point. The requisition achieved progress of 1.30Iakhs,3.70 lakhs,3.00 Iakhs foritemhasbeen received inmiddleJanuaryasagainst and 3.00 lakhs against corresponding planned targets target ofbeginning ofJanuary. Similarly receiptofbid ofRs.1.60Iakhs,3.50 Iakhs,2.70 lakhsand3.20 Iakhs has taken place in March as against schedule of forthemonths ofJanuary, February, March andApril February. Asper this milestone chart, byend of April respectively. ‘recommendation to client’ milestone equivalent to 3.10 A limitation of bar.charts is that they do not about 85 percent of the work should have been contain dependency relationships. For small projects, completed, As against this only ‘receipt of bid’ thesecan be visualized but for bigger projects itmay milestoneequivalent to 15percentoftheworkhasbeen notbe so. completed. The projected completion date of the project gets shifted to August end. 4 MILESTONE CHART 4.3.4 A milestone by definition is an event which 4.1 Incaseofbarchartstheassu m ption isthatphysical enables usto know when something should occur, but progress is only resource depend e nt. But in actual notwhatshould bedone to make itoccur. Forthetotal practice, the physical progress isnot always resource project the milestone chart can serve as a document dependent,theremaybeother dependency constraints. giving anoverview of the project and itsstatus atany Milestonechartscaneliminate this shortcoming ofbar point of time. It is mostly used for providing chart by associating percentage progress towards the information to senior management. Figure 5 shows a completion of project with achievement of every typicalmilestonechartofalonggestation periodpower milestone. project at the scheduling stage, wherein only major 4.2 Milestones are event of significant events of the project have been shown as milestones. accomplishment inthe progress of the project. These The horizontal time scale is like a normal bar chart events canbe recognized by all concerned. These are while the milestones have been listed in the column physically verifiable and hence can form check points onthe.Ieftside. forevaluation andreporting ofprogress. Foraproject 4.3.5 Another usefhl variation of milestone chart is where final finished output is likely to be available the milestone slip chart. In this; while the horizontal onlyafter alongtime, the milestones canbetreated as time scale is like a normal bar chart, the vertical axis intermediate targets. also represents time, with each line reporting a particular reportheview date. The chart is read from 4.3 Forms of Presentation top to+ottom and allows us to see at a glance how 4.3.”1 Instead of indicating the progress to be datesofanyspecific milestone haveslippedhecovered achieved in the form of a bar, the milestones to be astheproject progresses. Atypical milestoneslipchart completed are shown on the chart in Fig. 4 in the is shown in Fig. 5 where ‘the key events are the form of an inverted triangle. The description of milestones. 5

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.