DE TTK 1949 Investigations of nuclear decay half-lives relevant to nuclear astrophysics PhD Thesis Egyetemi doktori (PhD) ´ertekez´es J´anos Farkas Supervisor / T´emavezeto˝ Dr. Zsolt Fu¨l¨op University of Debrecen PhD School in Physics Debreceni Egyetem Term´eszettudom´anyi Doktori Tana´cs Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskola´ja Debrecen 2011 Prepared at the University of Debrecen PhD School in Physics and the Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (ATOMKI) K´eszu¨lt a Debreceni Egyetem Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskola´ja´nak magfizikai programja keret´eben a Magyar Tudom´anyos Akad´emia Atommagkutato´ Int´ezet´eben (ATOMKI) Ezen ´ertekez´est a Debreceni Egyetem Term´eszettudom´anyi Doktori Tana´cs Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskola´ja magfizika programja keret´eben k´esz´ıtettem a Debreceni Egyetem term´eszettudom´anyi doktori (PhD) fokozata´nak elnyer´ese c´elj´abo´l. Debrecen, 2011. Farkas Ja´nos Tanu´s´ıtom, hogy Farkas Ja´nos doktorjel¨olt a 2010/11-es tan´evben a fent megnevezett doktori iskola magfizika programja´nak keret´eben ira´ny´ıta´sommal v´egezte munka´j´at. Az ´ertekez´esben foglalt eredm´e- nyekhez a jel¨olt o¨na´llo´ alkoto´ tev´ekenys´eg´evel meghata´rozo´an hozza´- j´arult. Az ´ertekez´es elfogad´asa´t javaslom. Debrecen, 2011. Dr. Fu¨lo¨p Zsolt t´emavezeto˝ Investigations of nuclear decay half-lives relevant to nuclear astrophysics E´rtekez´es a doktori (PhD) fokozat megszerz´ese ´erdek´eben a fizika tudom´any´agban ´Irta: Farkas J´anos, okleveles fizikus ´es programtervezo˝ matematikus K´eszu¨lt a Debreceni Egyetem Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskola´ja magfizika programja keret´eben T´emavezeto˝: Dr. Fu¨lo¨p Zsolt A doktori szigorlati bizottsa´g: elno¨k: Dr. ........................................ ........................................ tagok: Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Dr. ........................................ ........................................ A doktori szigorlat ido˝pontja: 2011. .............................. Az ´ertekez´es b´ıra´lo´i: Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Dr. ........................................ ........................................ A b´ıra´lo´bizottsa´g: elno¨k: Dr. ........................................ ........................................ tagok: Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Dr. ........................................ ........................................ Az ´ertekez´es v´ed´es´enek ido˝pontja: 2011. .............................. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Radioactivity and lifetimes 5 2.1 The discovery of radioactivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 General decay characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3 Common decay modes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3.1 Nucleon emission decay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3.2 β decay and electron capture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.3.3 Nuclear de-excitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.4 Measuring lifetimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.4.1 Detection of the decay products . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.4.2 Other technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.5 Radioactive decay and astrophysics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.6 Recent questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3 Experimental investigations of the lifetime of embedded 74As 25 3.1 Nuclear reaction measurements for astrophysics . . . . . . . . 26 3.2 Electron screening of nuclear reactions and decay . . . . . . . 28 3.3 The Debye – Hu¨ckel screening model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.3.1 The foundations of the Debye – Hu¨ckel model . . . . . 30 3.3.2 Lifetime predictions based on the Debye – Hu¨ckel model 33 3.4 Experimental results in the literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.5 The outlines of our experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.5.1 The decay of 74As . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.5.2 Host materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.5.3 Model predictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.6 Experimental instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 i ii CONTENTS 3.6.1 Target evaporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.6.2 Irradiation at the cyclotron of Atomki . . . . . . . . . 40 3.6.3 γ detection and electronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.7 The course of the measurement and its results . . . . . . . . . 44 3.7.1 Measurement runs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.7.2 Data analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.7.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.8 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 74 4 The lifetime of embedded As at low temperatures 51 4.1 The predicted temperature dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.2 Experimental results in the literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3 The outlines and instrumentation of the experiment . . . . . 53 4.3.1 Cooling system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.3.2 Target preparation and irradiation . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.3.3 γ detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.4 The course of the measurement and its results . . . . . . . . . 58 4.4.1 Measurement runs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.4.2 Data analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.4.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4.5 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 133m 154m 5 Lifetime determination of Ce and Tb with γ spec- trometry 65 5.1 The astrophysical γ-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 5.2 Cross section measurements for the γ process . . . . . . . . . 67 5.2.1 The activation method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.2.2 When the half-life is incorrect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 133m 5.3 The determination of the half-life of Ce . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.3.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.3.2 Target preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.3.3 The activation chamber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.3.4 Irradiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.3.5 γ detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.3.6 Data analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.3.7 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 CONTENTS iii 154m 5.4 The determination of the half-life of Tb . . . . . . . . . . 81 5.5 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 6 The Newcomb –Benford law as a test of decay models 89 6.1 A historical review of the Newcomb – Benford law . . . . . . . 89 6.2 The Newcomb – Benford law and nuclear half-lives . . . . . . 90 6.2.1 The distribution of the first digits . . . . . . . . . . . 90 6.2.2 Ones scaling test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 6.3 Mathematical explanation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 6.4 Is the law applicable to test nuclear decay models? . . . . . . 95 7 Summary 99 7.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 ¨ 7.2 Osszefoglala´s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 Publications 108 Acknowledgements 110 Bibliography 111