Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments

132 Pages·2015·6.95 MB·English

1
Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments
CHAPTER 1 THREE COMMON QUESTIONS 5
The Three Questions 6
The First Question 6
The Second Question 9
The Third Question 10
CHAPTER 2 – INTRODUCTION TO ALTERNATIVE CANCER TREATMENTS 12
Introduction 13
A Story 14
The Explanation 17
The Importance Of The Spreading Of Cancer 18
About Alternative Cancer Treatments 20
CHAPTER 3 – INTEGRITY 21
The Key Issue - Integrity 22
What Is Going On In The Cancer Industry? 25
Why Some Alternative Cancer Treatments Are Far Superior To
Orthodox Cancer Treatments 28
An Example Of One Of The Potent Alternative Cancer Treatments 30
More On Orthodox Cancer Treatments 31
Why You Haven’t Heard These Things Before 35
CHAPTER 4 – MORE REASONS 39
An Even Bigger Reason For The Great Deception 40
A Summary 43
CHAPTER 5 – ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE QUIZ 45
The Four Parts Of Any Truth Table 46
If you are married, there is a greater than 60% probability that either you
or your spouse (or both) is going to be diagnosed with cancer in your lifetimes!
That percentage keeps going up!)
2
AN ALTERNATIVE CANCER TREATMENT QUIZ 49
Question #1 50
Question #2 50
Question #3 52
Question #4 53
Question #5 54
CHAPTER 6 - ORTHODOX MEDICINE QUIZ 57
Question #1 59
Question #2 60
Question #3 63
Question #4 66
Question #5 68
CHAPTER 7 – JUDGING ORTHODOX MEDICINE 71
Let Us Count The Ways 72
Judging Orthodox Cancer Treatments 74
More On The “5 Year Cure Rate” 76
More On Treating The Symptoms Of Cancer 78
CHAPTER 8 – CANCER DECISIONS 82
A Timeline 83
What Orthodox Medicine Is Hiding 85
Especially For Those Who Don’t Have Cancer 89
Especially For Those Who Do Have Cancer 90
Do You Know Someone With Cancer? 92
CHAPTER 9 – SUPPRESSING TRUTH 93
How The Cancer Industry Suppresses The Truth 94
CHAPTER 10 – SCIENTIFIC STUDIES 101
More On “Scientific Studies” 102
3
CHAPTER 11 – THE BIG 3 (MEDIA, PHARMA, MEDICINE) 107
Big Media 108
Big Pharma 110
Big Medicine 113
CHAPTER 12 – CANCER DRUGS 117
Cancer Drugs 118
The FDA And “Scientific Evidence” 120
CHAPTER 13 – BIG MONEY 125
What Big Pharma Has Achieved With Their Big Money 126
Other Diseases 128
4
CHAPTER 1
THREE COMMON QUESTIONS
THE THREE QUESTIONS
When someone first sees a website on “alternative cancer treatments” they almost always
have three questions.
First, is it really possible “alternative cancer treatments” can cure cancer, even the cancer of
someone who has already had extensive chemotherapy, radiation and surgery?
Second, are alternative cancer treatments more effective than chemotherapy,
surgery and radiation (the “orthodox” cancer treatments), and if they are, why doesn’t
orthodox medicine use alternative cancer treatments?
Third, what is the purpose of the Cancer Tutor website, meaning what is different about
the Cancer Tutor website?
These three questions will be very briefly answered in this chapter. But the rest of this
eBook is spread over thirteen other chapters and will go into massive detail answering
these questions.
THE FIRST QUESTION
The first question is basically how do alternative cancer treatments compare to orthodox
cancer treatments?
The late Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist turned alternative cancer treatment guru, treated
over 33,000 cancer patients with alternative cancer treatments. He had studied the masters
of alternative cancer treatments, such as Dr. Max Gerson, and then improved on their
superb protocols. Dr. Kelley kept meticulous records.
His cure rate on cancer patients who went to him, instead of orthodox medicine, was
about 90%. He did not do as well treating cancer patients who went to orthodox medicine
first, then afterwards went to him.
Do not underestimate Mother Nature’s ability to cure cancer!!
So what is a comparable cure rate for the orthodox treatments? The answer depends
on which definition of “cure” you use and what definition of “cancer” you use. These
6
definitions are changed from time to time to make it appear that orthodox cancer
treatments are far more effective than they actually are. Television advertisements also
make orthodox cancer treatments look far more effective than they really are.
Using the “man on the street” definitions of “cancer” and “cure,” the true cure rate of
orthodox cancer treatments, overall, is less than 3%. While this percentage does vary a little
according to the type of cancer, for most types of cancer the “man on the street” cure rate is
zero percent. How many people do you know who used only orthodox medicine and were
diagnosed with cancer over 10 years ago (and the cancer had spread beyond the ability of
doctors to cut the cancer out) and are still alive? I will bet the answer is none.
There is quite a difference between a 90% cure rate and a less than 3% cure rate!! Now here
is another interesting fact, Dr. Kelley did not have access to some of the recently developed
products which are far more potent than what he used (and yet they are just as safe)!!
So how does someone explain why alternative cancer treatments are far more effective
than orthodox cancer treatments? Let me explain it with a story.
Suppose you own an antique dining room table which is worth many tens of thousands of
dollars. Suppose your butler tells you that there are dozens of cockroaches crawling around
on your priceless table and you will be having dinner guests in one hour.
Your butler, as he is leaving your house, gives you four options for getting rid of
the cockroaches:
1. He offers you a chainsaw to “slash” the little critters to pieces,
2. He offers you a large and powerful flamethrower to “burn” the critters to pieces,
3. He offers you 2 gallons of a highly, highly toxic liquid chemical to “poison” the citters,
4. and He offers you an old $1 flyswatter.
Which of the four options would you pick? Would you choose one of the first three options
(slash, burn and poison) because they are highly potent at killing cockroaches or would you
choose the cheap, wimpy flyswatter?
Think about why you would make your choice.
7
Most likely you would pick the flyswatter because the other three items, which are
massively powerful at killing cockroaches; are also massively powerful at destroying your
priceless table!!
In a similar way of thinking, alternative cancer treatments (the flyswatter), while not as
“powerful” as the other items, are far more effective at treating cancer because these
treatments either target cancer cells or do not damage your non-cancerous cells, Thus
they can be given in much higher doses than any of the “orthodox” cancer treatments.
Chemotherapy (the toxic chemical above), surgery (the chainsaw above) and radiation (the
flamethrower above) do kill cancer cells, but they do not TARGET cancer cells, thus they
cannot cure cancer (which has spread) without killing the patient first.
Now a very important question. Can alternative cancer treatments cure someone who has
already had extensive orthodox cancer treatments?
Several years ago I interviewed several alternative cancer treatment experts and asked
them this very question. Every one of them, without exception, said that over 95% of their
cancer patients had already had extensive orthodox cancer treatments and that their
overall cure rate was about 50%.
The 50% was an average. Each case is different and individual cases may have an expected
cure rate of anywhere from less than 10% all the way to 80%.
Did you notice the drop from a cure rate of over 90% (for newly diagnosed cancer patients
who start with one of the top alternative cancer treatments) versus about 50% (for those
who went with orthodox medicine first and then found one of the most potent alternative
cancer treatments).
Has that 50% cure rate changed in the past several years? There are several new products
available to alternative medicine which did not exist several years ago, such as Cellect
and a superb electromedicine protocol (i.e. a “frequency generator” or “Rife Machine”).
However, while Cellect, and a few other products, have shown very, very promising early
results, to be honest no one really knows whether they will be able to push the overall cure
rate of advanced cancer patients above 50%.
8
However, there are some alternative cancer treatment clinics in Germany, Mexico and the
United States (and a few other places) which probably can beat the 50% cure rate. The
German cancer clinics have the best reputation, but there are a few Mexican clinics that are
very comparable.
THE SECOND QUESTION
Now let us talk about the second question: if the best of the alternative cancer treatments
have a 90% cure rate, and orthodox medicine has a cure rate of less than 3%, why does
orthodox medicine use chemotherapy, radiation and surgery?
To answer this question we have to go back a hundred years. In about 1910 the
pharmaceutical industry and the American Medical Association (AMA) and Congress all
agreed that anyone with the designation of “Medical Doctor” would only be allowed to
use prescription drugs (i.e. highly profitable man-made molecules) in the treatment of
all diseases.
This was a win-win situation for Big Medicine (the AMA) and Big Pharma (the
pharmaceutical industry) because the AMA was nothing more than a labor union and
Big Pharma was only interested in making massive profits.
However, for cancer patients and other patients with serious diseases, the agreement was
a disaster. Prescription drugs (and surgery and radiation) cannot cure any disease.
It gets worse.
Enter the FDA (Food and Drug Administation). The FDA made things even worse, in fact much
worse. The FDA has existed in various forms for over a hundred years, but since 1910 it has
been the “Police Force” of Big Pharma and Big Medicine. The FDA was the gift to Big Pharma
and Big Medicine by Congress for all the “benefits” Big Pharma showed to Congress.
The FDA has “rigged” their regulations to make sure that it is impossible for natural
products to be “approved” or “proven” to treat disease. In other words, anything designed
and built by God cannot be patented and no one in their right mind is going to spend a
billion dollars, out of their own pocket, to get a natural product, which cannot generate
9
huge profits, “approved” by the FDA. That is exactly the way the FDA designed things to be.
This leaves the door wide open for Big Pharma and Big Medicine to have no competition in
the treatment of diseases. Everything besigned and built by God is “unproven” to treat any
disease, especially cancer.
For example, if a medical doctor uses one of the potent alternative cancer treatments they
will almost certainly lose their license to practice medicine. This is because they are using
“unapproved” treatments, meaning natural treatments.
By using “approved” substances (i.e. prescription drugs), instead of “unapproved” substances
(i.e. natural substances) all diseases are guaranteed to be “chronic” diseases, meaning very,
very profitable for a long time. It was profits that the AMA and Big Pharma were interested in
and Congress gave them everything they wanted, even their own police force.
This mentality has forced all medical doctors, trained since 1910, to become little more
than drug salesmen.
THE THIRD QUESTION
What about the third question, what is special about the Cancer Tutor website?
First, you must understand that over 99% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients start their
cancer treatment with orthodox drugs and treatments. You can thank Big Media for that.
Almost all of the cancer patients who look into alternative cancer treatments have been
sent home to die and you can thank the media for that!! The media makes sure everyone
in America gets a full diet of televisions shows which glorify prescription-drug selling
medical doctors.
It would be time consuming, but easy to do, to find more than 400 alternative cancer
treatments discussed on the Internet. One article on this website lists more than 200
alternative cancer treatments (I got tired of changing the article several years ago so I quit
adding new treatments to it). Many of my older articles mention 300 alternative cancer
treatments instead of the newer and more accurate “400” number.
While almost all of these 400 plus alternative cancer treatments will cure or significantly
help most newly diagnosed cancer patients, very few of these treatments will be of much
10