Introducing Morphology Morphology is the study of how words are put together. A lively introduction to the subject, this textbook is intended for undergraduates with relatively little background in linguistics. Providing data from a wide variety of languages, it includes hands-on activities such as “Challenge Boxes,” designed to encourage students to gather their own data and analyze them, work with data on websites, perform simple experiments, and discuss topics with each other. There is also an extensive introduction to the terms and concepts necessary for analyzing words. Topics such as the mental lexicon, derivation, compounding, inflection, morphological typology, productivity, and the interface of morphology with syntax and phonology expose students to the whole scope of the field. Unlike other textbooks it anticipates the question “Is it a real word?” and tackles it head-on by looking at the distinction between dictionaries and the mental lexicon. rochelle lieber is Professor of Linguistics in the English Department at the University of New Hampshire. Her recent publications include The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (2009), Morphology and Lexical Semantics (Cambridge, 2004), and The Handbook of Word Formation (2005). Cambridge Introductions to Language and Linguistics This new textbook series provides students and their teachers with accessible introductions to the major sub- jects encountered within the study of language and linguistics. Assuming no prior knowledge of the subject, each book is written and designed for ease of use in the classroom or seminar, and is ideal for adoption on a modular course as the core recommended textbook. Each book offers the ideal introductory material for each subject, presenting students with an overview of the main topics encountered in their course, and features a glossary of useful terms, chapter previews and summaries, suggestions for further reading, and helpful exercises. Each book is accompanied by a supporting website. Books published in the series Introducing Phonology David Odden Introducing Speech and Language Processing John Coleman Introducing Phonetic Science John Maidment and Michael Ashby Introducing Second Language Acquisition Muriel Saville-Troike Introducing English Linguistics Charles F. Meyer Forthcoming: Introducing Semantics Nick Riemer Introducing Psycholinguistics Paul Warren Introducing Morphology ROCHELLE LIEBER English Department University of New Hampshire CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK First published in print format ISBN-13 978-0-521-89549-1 ISBN-13 978-0-521-71979-7 ISBN-13 978-0-511-77018-0 © Rochelle Lieber 2009 2009 Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521895491 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Paperback eBook (NetLibrary) Hardback Preface ix The International Phonetic Alphabet xi Point and manner of articulation of English consonants and vowels xii 1 What is morphology? 1 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 What’s a word? 3 1.3 Words and lexemes, types and tokens 4 1.4 But is it really a word? 5 1.5 Why do languages have morphology? 6 1.6 The organization of this book 8 Summary 8 Exercises 9 2 Words, dictionaries, and the mental lexicon 11 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 Why not check the dictionary? 13 2.3 The mental lexicon 15 2.4 More about dictionaries 21 Summary 30 Exercises 30 3 Lexeme formation: the familiar 31 3.1 Introduction 32 3.2 Kinds of morphemes 32 3.3 Affixation 35 3.4 Compounding 43 3.5 Conversion 49 3.6 Minor processes 51 3.7 How to: morphological analysis 53 Summary 55 Exercises 56 4 Productivity and creativity 59 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Factors contributing to productivity 61 4.3 Restrictions on productivity 64 4.4 How to: finding words 65 4.5 Ways of measuring productivity 66 4.6 Historical changes in productivity 67 4.7 Productivity versus creativity 70 Summary 71 Exercises 72 Contents vi CONTENTS 5 Lexeme formation: further afield 75 5.1 Introduction 76 5.2 Affixes: beyond prefixes and suffixes 76 5.3 Internal stem change 79 5.4 Reduplication 80 5.5 Templatic morphology 81 Summary 83 Exercises 83 6 Inflection 87 6.1 Introduction 88 6.2 Types of inflection 88 6.3 Inflection in English 99 6.4 Paradigms 103 6.5 Inflection and productivity 106 6.6 Inherent versus contextual inflection 107 6.7 Inflection versus derivation revisited 107 6.8 How to: morphological analysis 110 Summary 113 Exercises 113 7 Typology 117 7.1 Introduction 118 7.2 Universals and particulars: a bit of linguistic history 118 7.3 The genius of languages: what’s in your toolkit? 119 7.4 Ways of characterizing languages 132 7.5 Genetic and areal tendencies 138 Summary 139 Exercises 140 8 Words and sentences: the interface between morphology and syntax 143 8.1 Introduction 144 8.2 Argument structure and morphology 144 8.3 On the borders 149 Summary 153 Exercises 154 9 Sounds and shapes: the interface between morphology and phonology 157 9.1 Introduction 158 9.2 Allomorphs 158 9.3 How to: analyzing allomorphy 165 9.4 Lexical strata 168 Summary 173 Exercises 173 Contents vii 10 Theoretical challenges 177 10.1 Introduction 178 10.2 The nature of morphological rules 180 10.3 Lexical integrity 184 10.4 Blocking 186 10.5 Constraints on affix ordering 188 10.6 Bracketing paradoxes 190 10.7 The nature of affixal polysemy 193 10.8 Reprise: what’s theory? 195 Summary 195 Exercises 195 Glossary 197 References 207 Index 211 For Matthew Young man going east One of the things that drew me to linguistics several decades ago was a sense of wonder at both the superficial diversity and the underly- ing commonality of languages. My wonder arose in the process of working through my first few problem sets in linguistics, not surpris- ingly, problem sets that involved morphological analysis. What I learned first was not theory – indeed at that moment in linguistic history morphology was not perceived as a separate theoretical area in the US – but what languages were like, how to analyze data, and what to call things. I love morphological theory, but for drawing beginning students into the field of linguistics, I believe that there is no substitute for hands-on learning, and that is where this book starts. This book is intended for undergraduate stu- dents who may have had no more than an intro- ductory course in linguistics. It assumes that stu- dents know the International Phonetic Alphabet, and have a general idea of what linguistic rules are, but it presupposes little else in the way of sophistication or technical knowledge. It obvi- ously assumes that students are English-speakers, and therefore the first few chapters concentrate on English, and to some extent on languages that are likely to be familiar to linguistics students from language study in high school and universi- ty. As the book progresses, I introduce data from many languages that will be “exotic” to students, so that by the end of the book, they will have some sense of linguistic diversity, at least with respect to types of morphology. There are some aspects of the content of this text that might seem unusual to instructors. The first is the attention to dictionaries in chapter 2. Generally, texts on linguistic morphology do not mention dictionaries, but I find that beginning students of morphology retain a reverence for dictionaries that sometimes gets in the way of thinking about the nature of the mental lexicon and how word formation works. Instructors can skip all or part of this chapter, but my experience is that it sets students on a good footing from the start, and largely eliminates their squeamishness about considering whether incent, or bovineness or organizationalize or the like are ‘real’ words, even if we can’t find them in the dictionary. Another section that might seem odd is the part of chapter 7 devoted to snapshot descriptions of five different languages. These also might be skipped over, but they serve two important pur- poses. One purpose is simply to expose students to what the morphology of a language looks like overall; much of what they’re exposed to in the rest of the book (and in most other morphology texts that I know of) are bits and pieces of the morphology of languages – a reduplication rule here, an inflectional paradigm there – but never the big picture. More importantly, having looked at the ‘morphological toolkits’ of several languag- es, students will be better prepared to understand both the traditional categories used in morpho- logical typology and more recent means of classi- fication. The final thing that might strike instructors as unusual is that I largely hold off on introduc- ing morphological theory until the last chapter. Clearly, no text is theory-neutral, and this text is no exception. It fits squarely in the tradition of generative morphology in the sense that I pre- sent morphology as an attempt to characterize and model the mental lexicon. I presuppose that there is much that is universal in spite of appar- ent diversity. And I believe that the ultimate aim of teaching students about morphology (indeed about any area of linguistics) is to expose them to what is at stake in trying to characterize the nature of the human language capacity. Nevertheless I start by presenting morphological rules in as neutral a way as possible, and hold off on raising theoretical disputes until students have enough experience to understand how Preface x PREFACE morphological data might support or refute the- oretical hypotheses. In a sense I believe that stu- dents will gain a better understanding of theory if they already have the ability to find data and analyze it themselves. Therefore the bulk of the morphological theory will be found in the last chapter, where I have tried to pick a few theoreti- cal debates and show how one might argue for or against particular analyses. Having read this chapter, students will be able to go on and tackle some of the texts that are intended for advanced undergraduates or graduate students. Since one of my main goals in this text is to teach students to do morphology, there are a number of pedagogical features that set this book apart from other morphology texts. First, each chapter has one or more ‘Challenge’ boxes. These occur at points in the text where stu- dents might take a breather from reading or class lecture and try something out for them- selves. Challenge exercises are ideal for small teams of students – either outside of class, or as an in-class activity – to work on together. Some involve discussion, some analysis, some doing some work on-line or at the library. But all of them involve hands-on learning. Instructors can use them or skip them or assign them as homework instead of, or in addition to, the exercises at the ends of chapters. I have tried most of them myself as in-class activities, and have found that they get students excited, stimulate discussion, and generally give stu- dents the feeling of really ‘doing morphology’ rather than just hearing about it. A second pedagogical feature that sets this book apart are the “How to” sections in chapters 3, 4, 6, and 9. These are meant to give students tips on finding or working with data. Some stu- dents don’t need such tips; they have the intuitive ability to look at data and figure out what to do with it. But I’ve found over years of teaching that there are some students who don’t have this knack, and who benefit enormously from being walked through a problem or technique system- atically. The “How to” sections do this. Instructors and students will also find what they would expect to find in any good text. First, there are several aids to navigating the text – chapter outlines and lists of key terms at the beginnings of chapters and brief summaries at the end, as well as a glossary of the terms that are highlighted in the text. A copy of the International Phonetic Alphabet is included at the beginning for easy reference. And each chapter has a num- ber of exercises that allow students to practice what they’ve been exposed to. A general point about examples in this text. Where I have cited data from different books, grammars, dictionaries, and scholarly articles, I have chosen to keep the glosses provided in the original source even if this results in some incon- sistency in the use of abbreviations. In other words, slightly different abbreviations may occur in different examples ( for instance, N or Neut for ‘neuter’). Although students may be confused by this practice at first, it does give them a taste of the linguistic “real world.” Any student going on and doing further work in morphology is bound to find exactly this sort of variation in the use of abbreviations in sources. My goal in this text is to bring students to the point where they are not only ready to confront morphological theory but also have the skills to begin to think independently about it, and per- haps to contribute to it. This text has benefitted from the help of many people. I am grateful to John McCarthy and Donca Steriade for suggesting examples, to Charlotte Brewer for supplying me with statis- tics about citations in the OED, to Marianne Mithun for suggesting Nishnaabemwin as a polysynthetic language to profile, and to several classes of students at UNH both for serving as guinea pigs on early drafts and for supplying me with wonderful examples from their Word Logs. Thanks go as well to the College of Liberal Arts at the University of New Hampshire for the funds to hire a graduate student assistant at a critical moment, and to Chris Paris for supplying assis- tance. I am especially grateful to several anony- mous reviewers who made excellent suggestions on the penultimate draft of the text. Finally, thanks are due as well to Andrew Winnard at Cambridge University Press for inviting me to write this text and for his patience in waiting for it. Reproduced with the kind permission of the International Phonetic Association (Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece). The International Phonetic Alphabet (revised to 2005) Labial Labio-dental Interdental Alveolar Alveo-palatal Palatal Velar Glottal Stop p,b t,d k,g ʔ Fricative f,v θ, s,z ʃ, h Affricate ʧ, Nasal m n Liquid ,l Glide (w) j (w) Consonants Front Central Back High i u ɪ ʊ Mid e ʌ,ə o ɛ ɔ Low æ ɑ Characters in boldface are voiced. [w] is labio-velar in articulation. Tense vowels: i, e, u, o, ɑ Lax vowels: ɪ, ɛ, æ, ʊ, ɔ, ʌ Reduced vowel: ə Point and manner of articulation of English consonants and vowels Vowels CHAPTER What is morphology? 1 In this chapter you will learn what morphology is, namely the study of word formation. ◆ We will look at the distinction between words and mor- phemes, between types, tokens, and lexemes and between inflection and derivation. ◆ We will also consider the reasons why languages have morphology. CHAPTER OUTLINE morpheme simplex complex type token lexeme word form inflection derivation KEY TERMS 2 INTRODUCING MORPHOLOGY 1.1 Introduction The short answer to the question with which we begin this text is that morphology is the study of word formation, including the ways new words are coined in the languages of the world, and the way forms of words are varied depending on how they’re used in sentences. As a native speaker of your language you have intuitive knowledge of how to form new words, and every day you recognize and understand new words that you’ve never heard before. Stop and think a minute: • Suppose that splinch is a verb that means ‘step on broken glass’; what is its past tense? • Speakers of English use the suffixes -ize (crystallize) and -ify (codify) to form verbs from nouns. If you had to form a verb that means ‘do something the way ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair does it’, which suffix would you use? How about a verb meaning ‘do something the way ex- President Bill Clinton does it’? • It’s possible to rewash or reheat something. Is it possible to relove, reexplode, or rewiggle something? Chances are that you answered the first question with the past tense splinched (pronounced [splɪnʧt])1, the second with the verbs Blairify and Clintonize, and that you’re pretty sure that relove, reexplode, and rewiggle are weird, if not downright impossible. Your ability to make up these new words, and to make judgments about words that you think could never exist, suggests that you have intuitive knowledge of the principles of word formation in your language, even if you can’t articulate what they are. Native speakers of other languages have similar knowledge of their lan- guages. This book is about that knowledge, and about how we as linguists can find out what it is. Throughout this book, you will be looking into how you form and understand new words, and how speakers of other languages do the same. Many of our examples will come from English – since you’re reading this book, I assume we have that language in common – but we’ll also look beyond English to how words are formed in languages with which you might be familiar, and languages which you might never have encountered before. You’ll learn not only the nuts and bolts of word formation – how things are put together in various languages and what to call those nuts and bolts – but also what this knowledge says about how the human mind is organized. The beauty of studying morphology is that even as a beginning student you can look around you and bring new facts to bear on our study. At this point, you should start keeping track of interesting cases of new words 1. In this text I presuppose that you have already learned at least that part of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) that is commonly used for transcribing English. You’ll find an IPA chart at the beginning of this book, if you need to refresh your memory.