INTERROGATING MASCULINITIES IN SELECTED KENYAN POPULAR FICTION By ANTONY MUKASAMATE Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject THEORY OF LITERATURE at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: DR RA NORTHOVER JULY2017 Declaration I declare that Interrogating Masculinities in Selected Kenyan Popular Fiction, is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. ……………………….. ……………………….. A.M.MATE DATE ii Acknowledgements I would like to recognise the following people who made it possible for me to research and write this thesis: my supervisor, Dr Alan Northover and Mrs Napaai at the UNISA Library who assisted me with research materials. Moreover, I appreciate the immense support UNISA has given me through its bursary programme. I would also like to thank my family for the moral and financial support. Finally, I would like to thank God for giving me the gift of well being. iii Abstract Interrogating Masculinities in Selected Kenyan Popular Fiction By Antony Mukasa Mate The purpose of this study is to examine the presentation of masculinity in selected popular works. The novels under discussion include: Henry ole Kulet’s To Become a Man (1972), Yusuf Dawood’s One Life Too Many (1991), Peter Kimani’s Before the Rooster Crows (2002) and David Maillu’s Man from Machakos (2010). The writers are representative of a diversity of Kenyan ethnicities: Dawood (Asian-African), while the rest comprise Kenyan men of black descent though different ethnicities. The study attempts to interrogate the various strands of masculinity in Kenyan society as presented in the selected works. The study also seeks to investigate how different men negotiate/manifest their masculinity in different settings. It also interrogates factors and trends that shape and influence masculine behaviour in the selected texts. The study also explores the ramifications of various manifestations of masculinity on the family. The study adopts masculinities theory as the theoretical framework. The theory is applied in the interpretation of issues that relateto this study. iv Key Terms: Masculinity, Gender, Patriarchy, Feminism, Popular works, Hegemony, Subordinate, Patriarchy, Gender Construction. v Table of Contents Declaration......................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................iii Abstract..........................................................................................................................................iv Key Terms:......................................................................................................................................v Table of Contents...........................................................................................................................vi Chapter One..................................................................................................................................1 The Problem, Research Goals and Conceptual Foundation............................................................1 Statement of the problem..............................................................................................................13 Objectives of the Study.................................................................................................................13 Research Questions.......................................................................................................................13 Research Assumptions..................................................................................................................14 Justification for the Study.............................................................................................................14 Literature Review..........................................................................................................................15 Theoretical Framework.................................................................................................................21 Methodology.................................................................................................................................27 Organisation of the study..............................................................................................................28 Chapter Two................................................................................................................................29 Masculinity in Henry ole Kulet’s To Become a Man....................................................................29 The Gendered Social, Historical and Cultural Context of Maasai Masculinity...........................30 Rebellion or Revolution: Masculinities and Cultural Conflict.....................................................38 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................59 Chapter Three.............................................................................................................................61 White Masculinity in Yusuf Dawood’s One Life Too Many........................................................61 Socio-Historical Context of Colonial Kenyan Society.................................................................67 vi “Reversal of Fortunes”: Diminishing White Power and the Rising Black Other.........................71 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................90 Chapter Four...............................................................................................................................92 Post-colonial Black Masculinity in the Metropolis: Peter Kimani’s Before the Rooster Crows..92 Re (Historicizing) Post-colonial Kenyan Black Masculinity........................................................93 The Price of Manhood..................................................................................................................98 “Encounter with the Female Matador”: Reversed Roles............................................................108 Masculinity as a Tragic Mode.....................................................................................................111 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................117 Chapter Five..............................................................................................................................119 Breaking Barriers: Post-Colonial Rural Masculinity in David Maillu’s Man from Machackos 119 A Famished Existence.................................................................................................................120 Behave like a “Real Man”: The Father Figure and Construction of Masculinity.......................128 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................140 Chapter Six................................................................................................................................142 Summary of Major Findings.......................................................................................................142 Bibliography..............................................................................................................................149 vii Chapter One The Problem, Research Goals and Conceptual Foundation Issues of gender have been on the centre stage globally for many years. Initial major concerns on gender have focused more on the subjugation of women. However, recent gender studies have also included men. Thus there has been an emerging field of men and masculinities worldwide to address the issues affecting men. Scholars worldwide have begun addressing this issue; Connell (1995; 2002), Kimmel (1987), Messner (1992) and Seidler (2010) in the West. In the Caribbean, scholars like Lewis (2009) and Reddock (2004) have extensively interrogated Caribbean masculinities. Various scholars have strived to explain why studies on masculinities have been put on the periphery while there has been a proliferation of studies on women. Crous (2005) points out that the proliferation of an interest in issues pertaining to men and the role within a new genderised perspective on society necessitated the need for studies in masculinities. He notes that gender studies that focused on women’s issues have now expanded to include all facets of gender inquiry, including masculinity. Unfortunately, studies on masculinities have not been given considerable focus. Chow (2003) argues that gender studies should include both men and women, so as better to understand the gender dynamics in the society. She notes that: “Gender is relational and social: hence the focus of gender is not on women per se but on power relations between women and men…”(446). Therefore, gender issues also concern men. 1 In Africa, there has been much advocacy on the rights of women as a vulnerable group. However, men’s concerns have been left on the periphery. Silberschmidt (2001) justifies this assertion by affirming that: “While the impact of socioeconomic change on women’s lives in East Africa has been widely documented, such documentation does not exist of men’s lives” (657). Silberschmidt came up with this conclusion after she undertook a study that sought to investigate the disempowerment of many men in rural and urban East Africa. Kabaji (2008) concurs with Silberschmidt’s assertion when he posits that: Gender relations are constructed in terms of the relations of power and dominance that determine the opportunities and circumstances of both men and women. Nevertheless, gender research in Africa has tended to focus only on women. This skewed attention has given rise to the popular but fallacious attitude that gender issues are synonymous with women issues. (34) Lahoucine and Morell (2005) argue that African feminism and womanism, while departing from Western feminism, have largely ignored African men and masculinity. Onyango (2007) argues that: “for a long time gender studies have predominantly targeted women in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is of course a truism that gender is both about femininities and masculinities” (1). He justifies the need to include masculinities as part of gender studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Silberschmidt (2001) explains that patriarchal structures and stereotyped notions of gender hide the increasing disempowerment of many men in rural and urban East Africa (657). She notes that disempowerment is caused by high levels of unemployment and poverty, leading to the inability of men to meet the cultural expectations of normative masculinity. There is also the question of women’s empowerment which is a challenge to the traditional male hegemony. Her study calls for more research in this region to correct the fallacy that all men in Africa enjoy patriarchal 2 privilege. This image of masculinised African societies is evident in African literature. Fornchingong (2006) study of gender narratives in African literature corroborates this assertion: Male writers like Chinua Achebe, Elechi Amadi, Wole Soyinka, Ngugi Wa Thiongo, and Cyprain Ekwensi in their literary mass are accused of condoning patriarchy, are deeply entrenched in a macho conviviality and a one dimensional and minimalised presentation of women who are demoted and assume peripheral roles. Their penchant to portray an androcentric narrative is at variance with the female gender that are (sic) trivialized through practices like patriarchy, tradition, culture, gender socialization process, marriage and domestic enslavement. (135) Female writers like Flora Nwapa, Buchi Emecheta, Mariama Ba, Bessie Head and Ama Ata Aidoo struggle to deconstruct this masculine order in their writings. Patriarchy is an ideology that perpetuates hegemonic masculinity. Onyango (2008) defines hegemonic masculinity as “the dominant form of masculinity that influences boy’s and men’s understanding of how they have to act in order to be acceptably male and that this dominant male is associated with heterosexuality, toughness, power, authority, competitiveness and subordination of gay men” (247). It is the socially and culturally exalted form of being a “real man” (5). Kimmel et al (2005) explain that the hegemonic image of masculinity is constructed often through articulation of difference with the “others”. The “other” are the racial, sexual and gender minorities. Racial minorities are like the blacks in a colonial context. Sexual minorities are the homosexuals, while gender minorities are women. He explains that hegemonic masculinity is homophobic. Therefore, homosexual men impose certain boundaries and use their power to maintain it. Thus men and women who do not confirm to heterosexuality are vilified. Kimmel et al (2005) argue that dominant races created an ideal hegemonic masculinity against a screen of “others”, whose masculinity was devalued. Hence hegemonic and subaltern emerged in mutual but unequal interaction in a gendered social and economic order (4). Ratele (2001) in discussing power 3
Description: