integrated cultural resources management plan template

218 Pages·2014·4.79 MB·English

by  Preferred Customer

I
NTEGRATED

C
ULTURAL

R Delete text and place photo here.
ESOURCES

M
ANAGEMENT

P
LAN UPDATE

For Sites and Training
Installations of the
Washington Army National Guard

Fiscal Years 2014-2018
Delete text and place
photo here.

Delete text and place
photo here.

Prepared for
Delete text and place

photo here. ARNG-ILE-T
National Guard Bureau
111 S. George Mason Drive
Arlington VA 22204

Delete text and place
photo here.
Prepared by

Rowena Valencia-Gica, Ph.D.
Environmental Programs

Camp Murray WA 98430

Delete text and place
photo here.
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AASF Army Aviation Support Facility EQCC Environmental Quality Control
ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Committee
Preservation ESOH Environmental Safety and
ACSIM Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Occupational Health
Management FGDC Federal Geographic Data Standards
AEDB-EQ Army Environmental Database – FMS Field Maintenance Shop
Environmental Quality FNSI Finding of No Significant Impact
AFB Air Force Base FY Fiscal Year
AHPA Archaeological and Historic GIS Geographic Information System
Preservation Act of 1974 HABS Historic American Building Survey
AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom HAER Historic American Engineering
Act of 1978 Record
AR Army Regulation HQDA Headquarters, Department of the
ARE Army-Environmental Army
ARNG Army National Guard ICRMP Integrated Cultural Resources
ARPA Archaeological Resources Protection Management Plan
Act IFS Integrated Facilities System
APE Area of Potential Effect INRMP Integrated Natural Resources
BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs Management Plan
BLM Bureau of Land Management IPR In-progress review
CAs Cooperative Agreements ISR Installation Status Report
CCC Civilian Conservation Corps ITAM Integrated Training Area
CEQ Council on Environmental Quality Management
CFR Code of Federal Regulations JAG Judge Advocate General
CFMO Construction and Facility Management JBLM Joint Base Lewis-McChord
Office MATES Maneuver Area Training Equipment
CRM Cultural Resources Manager Site
CSMS Combined Support Maintenance MCRC Marine Corps Reserve Center
Shop MFR Memorandum for Record
CX Categorical Exclusion MILCON Military Construction
DA Department of the Army MOA Memorandum of Agreement
DCA Departmental Consulting MOU Memorandum of Understanding
Archaeologist MVSB Military Vehicle Storage Building
DFAC Dining Facility NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection
DoD U.S. Department of Defense and Repatriation Act of 1990
DoDI Department of Defense Instruction NBC Nuclear, Biological, Chemical
DOI Department of the Interior NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of
DSCOPS Operations Manager in the Directorate 1969, as amended
of Operations NHPA National Historic Preservation Act of
EA Environmental Assessment 1966, as amended
EIS Environmental Impact Statement NPS National Park Service
EO Executive Order NRHP National Register of Historic Places
EQ Environmental Quality ODEP Office of Director of Environmental
Programs
PA Programmatic Agreement
PAO Public Affairs Office
PL Public Law
POC Point of Contact
POTO Planning Operations and Training Office
PRIDE Planning Resources for Infrastructure Development and Evaluation
RC Readiness Center
REC Record of Environmental Consideration
RMDA Records Management and Declassification Agency
RPI Real Property Inventory
SDSFIE Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer
SJA Staff Judge Advocate
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SOW Scope of Work
SPIRS State Performance Indicator Reporting System
STAT Statute
STEP Status Tool for the Environmental Program
TAG The Adjutant General
TDA Table of Distribution and Allowance
THPO Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
TOE Table of Organization and Equipment
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
UPH Unaccompanied Personnel Housing
USC United States Code
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USACERL U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory
USAEC U.S. Army Environmental Center
UTES Unit Training Equipment Site
WAANG Washington Air National Guard
WAARNG Washington Army National Guard
YTC Yakima Training Center

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
E S
XECUTIVE UMMARY
T • Introduction of new terminology for ARNG
he Washington Army National Guard (WAARNG)
infrastructure: virtual installation, training installation,
has been managing cultural resources for several site, lot, and facility
years under a previously developed Integrated • A focus on the results of the WAARNG cultural
Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP). resources program over the past 5 years and how
This revised ICRMP builds upon the original ICRMP various successes and challenges have informed
in terms of including those elements identified as the goals and projects proposed for the program
significant issues by internal and external over the next 5 years.
stakeholders during the review process for the • Streamlining of the Standard Operating
previous ICRMP, but differs from the previous Procedures (SOPs) such that guidance specific to
ICRMP in several respects. First, this ICRMP the responsibilities of the WAARNG Cultural
Revision includes the following: Resources Manager (CRM) is minimized (this
guidance is now included in a CRM’s Toolbox in
• The addition of new policies and regulations such Appendix I of the ICRMP Revision) and instructions
as Army Regulation (AR) 200-1, Executive Orders for non-environmental personnel are emphasized.
(EO) 13287 (Preserve America), EO 13327 (Federal Flow charts have been added to each SOP to make
Real Property Asset Management), and EO 13423 them more comprehensible to the non-specialist.
(Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and
Transportation Management), Department of
S
Defense Instruction (DoDI) 4710.02, the Department econdly, this ICRMP Revision was developed
of the Army’s (DA) Program Comments on from a template. The template was developed to
Unaccompanied Housing Structures and standardize ICRMP format and content throughout
Ammunition Storage Facilities, and recent the country and territories. Elements included within
amendments to the National Historic Preservation this ICRMP Revision include the input provided by
Act (NHPA) and the Native American Graves internal and external stakeholders during
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) development of the previous ICRMP, additional
• New guidance on the Army National Guard input from stakeholders obtained through the review
(ARNG) Status Tool for the Environmental Program process for the ICRMP Revision, and information
(STEP) for project funding and data calls for the provided by the WAARNG CRM. Internal and
Army Environmental Database – Environmental external stakeholders who participated in the
Quality (AEDB-EQ) report, EO 13327, the Planning development of both the original ICRMP and this
Resources for Infrastructure Development and ICRMP Revision include WAARNG and ARNG
Evaluation (PRIDE), the DoD Minimum Antiterrorism personnel, the State Historic Preservation Office
Standards for Buildings (Unified Facilities Criteria (SHPO), and representatives of Native American
[UFC] 4-010-01), sustainability, and tribal Indian tribes.
consultation

Bldg. 23 at Camp Murray before renovation Bldg. 23 at Camp Murray after renovation
Washington Army National Guard 2014-2018
ES-1
D T
epartment of Defense Instruction 4715.16 and he ICRMP also provides a brief description of the
Army Regulation (AR) 200-1, require installations to WAARNG virtual installations, an overview of all
develop an ICRMP as an internal compliance and known cultural resources across all WAARNG sites,
management tool that integrates the entirety of the the status of inventory and evaluation of resources
cultural resources program with ongoing mission at each site and training installation, and appropriate
activities. As a component of the installation master compliance and management activities for the next
plan, the ICRMP is the Washington Army National 5 years. The sites and training installations that
Guard (WAARNG) commander’s decision document comprise the WAARNG virtual installation are listed
for conduct of cultural resources management in Chapter 2 and Appendix D.
actions and specific compliance procedures. This
ICRMP is an internal ARNG compliance and C
ultural resources under the stewardship of the
management plan that integrates the entirety of the
state’s cultural resources program requirements with WAARNG can consist of archaeological sites,
ongoing mission activities. It also allows for ready cultural landscapes, documents, buildings, and
identification of potential conflicts between the structures; American Indian sacred sites and
WAARNG mission and cultural resources, and properties of traditional, religious, and cultural
identifies compliance actions necessary to maintain significance; and previously collected artifacts. An
the availability of mission-essential properties and inventory of cultural resources at the WAARNG sites
acreage. listed above has been compiled based on the
results of archaeological surveys, historic
architectural evaluations, and archival and site
T
his ICRMP Revision for the WAARNG is designed record searches that have been completed to date.
to support the military mission and assist individual To date, 24 historic buildings and structures and 6
installations in meeting the legal compliance archaeological sites that are eligible/potentially
requirements of federal historic preservation laws eligible for listing on NRHP have been recorded on
and regulations in a manner consistent with the WAARNG sites and training installations.
sound principles of cultural resources stewardship.
This ICRMP Revision establishes priorities for the
identification and standards for the evaluation of
cultural resources within the WAARNG virtual
installation, and provides a schedule to accomplish
program objectives during a 5-year program.

Pump House at Camp Seven Mile: belongs to
22 features at a former CCC camp that are
eligible for NRHP listing
1923 Memorial: a contributing resource at Camp
Murray’s historic district
Washington Army National Guard 2014-2018
ES-2
W
AARNG operational and training activities have the potential to impact cultural resources. Management actions
proposed by the WAARNG under the original ICRMP to avoid or minimize impacts to cultural resources included:
Projects Status
Development of historic preservation plan for maintenance of historic Not initiated- Proposed for FY14
buildings at Camp Murray
On-going - Statewide master plan
Integrate historic buildings, structures, landscape features, and eligible
preparation is underway and cultural
and unevaluated archaeological sites into the master plan as
resources considerations are being
constraints. If any undertaking is proposed, conduct a review under
integrated
section 106 of the NHPA and consult the Washington SHPO if an
adverse effect on the property is likely.
Conduct a literature search, archaeological and architectural inventories, On-going/Recurring
and consult with the appropriate federally recognized American Indian
tribes to identify the presence of resources of concern to the tribe(s) when
acquiring new land or buildings
Proposed location of Seattle readiness center – conduct archaeological Not initiated- Management has not
inventory and consult with the appropriate federally recognized American identified specific location of the new
Indian tribes to identify the presence of resources of concern to the Seattle RC
tribe(s).
Proposed location of Olympia/Thurston County Readiness Center – On-going- Management has identified
conduct archaeological inventory and consult with the appropriate location of the new RC but under
federally recognized American Indian tribes to identify the presence of negotiation
resources of concern to the tribe(s).
Proposed location of Pierce County Readiness Center – conduct On-going- Management has identified
archaeological inventory and consult with the appropriate federally location of the new RC but under
recognized American Indian tribes to identify the presence of resources of negotiation
concern to the tribe(s).
On-going
Native American Consultation – determine tribal interest through the
ICRMP development process.
Coordinate with the U.S. Army at Fort Lewis (now Joint Base Lewis- On-going
McChord or JBLM) and Yakima Training Center; the U.S. Air Force at
Fairchild Air Force Base (AFB); and Washington State Parks Department
at Camp Seven Mile to conduct joint efforts in Native American
consultation, when appropriate.
On-going
Tribes, including tribal historic preservation officers, were provided with an
opportunity to review the draft ICRMP and comment on the EA.
Develop a memorandum of agreement with a curation facility that meets Not initiated – Most of WAARNG
the standards outlined in 36 CFR 79 at such time as an archaeological facilities have low potential for
inventory results in the collection of artifacts. archaeological resources.
Work with Camp Murray museum personnel to curate, store, and preserve On-going
building drawings, plans, and other documents.
Initiated
Coordinate with the NGB records manager regarding collections and
records.
Assist in museum planning to make it and history a viable part of the On-going
WAARNG mission.
Washington Army National Guard 2014-2018
ES-3
O • Continue coordination with WA National Guard State
f these, nine has been implemented. The remaining
Historical Society regarding museum planning and
management actions were not implemented for collections management.
reasons such as lack of site identified for the proposed • Conduct energy efficiency evaluation for 24 NRHP-
construction project (e.g., new Seattle RC, Olympia eligible historic structures statewide to identify areas for
RC) and changes in funding priority (e.g., preparation and recommended actions that could help in energy
of historic preservation plan). A full discussion of the conservation.
successes and challenges of the WAARNG cultural • Conduct annual cultural resources training for site
resources program over the past 5 years is provided in managers, field commanders and their troops,
Chapter 2 of this ICRMP Revision. maintenance staff, and others who may encounter
cultural resources in the course of performing their
R work.
eview of these successes and challenges with
• Develop cultural resources educational and
internal and external stakeholders has led the
promotional material – e.g., informational posters,
development of the following goals and proposed
signage, training exercises/presentation materials, and
management actions for the WAARNG cultural
classes – for soldiers and other WAARNG personnel.
resources program over the next 5 years:
• Incorporate cultural resources information in new

employee orientation presentation and Unit
• Prepare maintenance/rehabilitation plans for the 24
Environmental Compliance Officer training.
NRHP-eligible historic buildings statewide.
• Conduct an assessment of potential archaeological
•Evaluate all buildings, sites, structures and objects
collections facility at Camp Murray by evaluating the
that will turn fifty years old for National Register
existing historical museum (Bldg. 2) for meeting the
eligibility after 2012.
requirements of 36 CFR Part 79.
• Continue collections assessment agreement with the
• Conduct an archaeological survey for areas where
University of Washington for the curation of WA
structures were demolished.
National Guard Museum records/collections.

• Develop a statewide archaeological predictive model
I
for Wenatchee U.S. Army Reserve Center and Yakima mplementation of these actions over the next five
U.S. Marine Corps Reserve to best determine where to years will allow the WAARNG to efficiently meet their
conduct archaeological resource surveys obligations of compliance with cultural resources
• Compile and organize all maps, drawings, plans for legislation, while supporting the vital military mission at
all 24 NRHP-eligible historic structures statewide. each of its sites and training installations. By
• Continue integrating cultural resources issues in implementing the management actions in this plan, the
NEPA documentations and installation planning WAARNG goes beyond minimal compliance to accept
documents the leadership role that the National Historic
• Section 106 consultations for divestitures, demolition, Preservation Act envisions for federal agencies to
maintenance and treatment plans for NRHP-eligible manage cultural resources in a spirit of stewardship for
buildings, construction/renovation projects on historic the inspiration and benefit of present and future
structures, new land/structure acquisition, and any generations.
other future projects that involve ground disturbance or
may impact historic structures.

Washington Army National Guard 2014-2018
ES-4