Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric Philosophia Antiqua A Series of Studies on Ancient Philosophy PreviousEditors J.H. Waszink† W.J. Verdenius† J.C.M. Van Winden Editedby K.A. Algra F.A.J. De Haas J. Mansfeld C.J. Rowe D.T. Runia Ch. Wildberg VOLUME105 60 chapter two Bill Fortenbaugh Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric Essays in Honor of William W. Fortenbaugh Editedby David C. Mirhady LEIDEN•BOSTON 2007 Thisbookisprintedonacid-freepaper. ISSN: 0079-1678 ISBN:978-90-04-15668-5 Copyright2007byKoninklijkeBrillNV,Leiden,TheNetherlands. KoninklijkeBrillNVincorporatestheimprintsBrill,HoteiPublishing, IDCPublishers,MartinusNijhoffPublishersandVSP. Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,translated,storedin aretrievalsystem,ortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical, photocopying,recordingorotherwise,withoutpriorwrittenpermissionfromthepublisher. AuthorizationtophotocopyitemsforinternalorpersonaluseisgrantedbyKoninklijkeBrillNV providedthattheappropriatefeesarepaiddirectlytoTheCopyrightClearanceCenter, 222RosewoodDrive,Suite910,Danvers,MA01923,USA. Feesaresubjecttochange. printedinthenetherlands CONTENTS Preface............................................................... vii ANoteonAbbreviations ........................................... ix IntroductionbyDavidC.Mirhady................................. 1 PublicationsofWilliamW.Fortenbaugh.......................... 19 1. TheoryandPracticeinFourth-CenturyEloquence. TheCaseoftheSpeakerasaTeacheroftheDemos ........ 25 DirkM.Schenkeveld FreeUniversityAmsterdam 2. Êthos inPersuasionandinMusicalEducationinPlatoand Aristotle ......................................................... 37 EckartSchütrumpf UniversityofColorado,Boulder 3. Aristotle’sEnthymeme,Thymos,andPlato ................... 53 DavidC.Mirhady SimonFraserUniversity,Burnaby 4. ReasoninSpeech?logos andMeansofPersuasionin Aristotle’sRhetoric .............................................. 65 JohannesM.vanOphuijsen UniversityofUtrecht 5. TechniquesofProofin4thCenturyRhetoric: Ar.Rhet.2.23–24andPre-AristotelianRhetoricalTheory .. 87 TobiasReinhardt SomervilleCollege,Oxford 6. ArgumentativeDevicesintheRhetoricaadAlexandrum ..... 105 LuciaCalboliMontefusco UniversityofBologna 7. TheMetaphorafterAristotle ................................. 123 GualtieroCalboli UniversityofBologna 8. Aristotle:theWrittenandthePerformativeStyles .......... 151 DoreenC.Innes St.Hilda’sCollege,Oxford 9. TeodettediFaselide,retore ................................... 169 ElisabettaMatelli UniversitàCattolica,Milan 10. TeodettediFaselidepoetatragico:riflessioniattornoal fr.6Snell ....................................................... 187 AndreaMartano UniversitàCattolica,Milan vi contents 11. DereuripideischePhiloktet unddieRhetorikdes 4.Jahrhunderts ................................................ 201 CarlWernerMüller UniversityofSaarbrücken 12. TheophrastusandCallisthenes ............................... 211 StephenA.White UniversityofTexas,Austin 13. TopicsofVituperation:SomeCommonplacesof 4th-CenturyOratory ........................................... 231 ThomasM.Conley UniversityofIllinois,UrbanaChampaign 14. TheEmotioninAristotleRhetoric 2.7:Gratitude,not Kindness ........................................................ 239 DavidKonstan BrownUniversity Indices IndexLocorum ..................................................... 251 IndexRerum ........................................................ 267 PREFACE These papers were written by friends and colleagues of Bill Forten- baugh. On the occasion of his retirement from Rutgers University in 2001, at the age of65, John Bodel and Corey Brennan, his col- leagues in the Rutgers Classics Department—where Bill had taught formorethan35years—conceivedtheplanforaconferenceinhis honor, which was held September 27–28, 2002.1 They kindly asked metotakearoleinitsplanning. What was to be the theme for this conference? Bill’s enormous skills and energies as a team builder and conference organizer had already exhausted, for the present, many areas that might have includedabroadergatheringofpeople.UnderhisleadershipProject Theophrastus has held biennial conferences for more than twenty- five years on a vast array of topics related to his interests. However, one area that suggested itself as being particularly timely for Bill’s workonhiscommentaryontherhetoricalwritingsofTheophrastus wastheinfluencesonPeripateticrhetoricalthinking,whatactivities in the generation before and during Aristotle and Theophrastus’ lifetimes shaped what we receive as Peripatetic rhetoric. In 1991, Billhadhimselfco-organizedaconferenceontheNachleben ofPeri- pateticrhetoric.Thisconference,asisthemodelnowinHollywood moviemaking, would be its prequel. Almost all the papers in this collectionwerepresentedindraftformatthatconference. The choice of rhetoric as a theme for the Rutgers conference, itstiming,andlocationunfortunatelyexcludedseveralofBill’smany friends. However, a parallel conference to honor him, on a smaller scale, was held in London at the end of June 2003. The papers presented there, by Andrew Barker, Pamela Huby, Richard Sorabji, RobertSharples,andElisabettaMatelli,havebeenpublishedinThe BulletinoftheInstituteforClassicalStudies 47. AsthebibliographyofBill’sworksindicates,hisscholarlyactivity has been prodigious. Over the lasttwenty-five years, this activityhas chiefly centred around Project Theophrastus, which sought to col- 1ForconferencesupportthanksareduetotheKelloggFoundation,theRutgers UniversityFacultyofArtsandSciences,andtheRutgersUniversityDepartmentof Classics.
Description: