Incorporating Acceptance and Mindfulness into the Treatment of Psychosis Incorporating Acceptance and Mindfulness into the Treatment of Psychosis Current Trends and Future Directions EDITED BY BRANDON A. GAUDIANO 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 © Oxford University Press 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Incorporating acceptance and mindfulness into the treatment of psychosis : current trends and future directions / edited by Brandon A. Gaudiano. pages cm Includes index. ISBN 978–0–19–999721–3 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Psychoses—Treatment. 2. Acceptance and commitment therapy. I. Gaudiano, Brandon A. RC512.I43 2015 616.89′1425—dc23 2014024190 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To my wife, Kristy, and my parents for their constant support and encouragement, and to my mentors James Herbert, Ph.D., and Ivan Miller, Ph.D., for all their guidance throughout the years. —BG CONTENTS Foreword by Kim T. Mueser ix About the Editor xiii Contributors xv SECTION I: Introduction and Background 1. An Introduction to Mindfulness and Acceptance Therapies for Psychosis 3 Brandon A. Gaudiano 2. The Evolution of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis: The Path to Integrating Acceptance, Compassion, and Mindfulness 12 Douglas Turkington, Nicola Wright, and James Courtley 3. Ecological Momentary Assessments in Psychosis: A Contextual Behavioral Approach to Studying Mindfulness and Acceptance 25 Roger Vilardaga, Michael McDonell, Emily Leickly, and Richard Ries SECTION II: Specific Treatment Models 4. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Psychosis: Applying Acceptance and Mindfulness in the Context of an Inpatient Hospitalization 57 Patricia Bach 5. Treating Depression in Psychosis: Self-Compassion as a Valued Life Direction 81 Ross G. White 6. Acceptance-Based CBT for Command Hallucinations: Rationale, Implementation, and Outcomes of the TORCH Project 108 Frances Shawyer and John Farhall 7. Person-Based Cognitive Therapy for Distressing Psychosis: Integrating a Mindfulness-Based Approach with Cognitive Therapy 150 Mark Hayward, Lyn Ellett, and Clara Strauss viii CONTENTS 8. Mindfulness Meditation in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis 170 Katherine Newman Taylor and Nicola Abba SECTION III: Synthesis and Analysis 9. A Model for the Development of Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Therapies: Preoccupation with Psychotic Experiences as a Treatment Target 203 Neil Thomas 10. Disseminating and Implementing Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Approaches to Psychosis: Challenges and Opportunities 227 Hamish J. McLeod 11. Charting the Course Ahead: Future Clinical and Research Directions in Mindfulness and Acceptance Therapies for Psychosis 253 Brandon A. Gaudiano Index 277 FOREWORD The mind is a wondrous but terrible thing—capable of giving birth to astound- ing artistic and scientific achievements, selfless caring, love and joy, but also of wreaking havoc, unspeakable cruelty and hate, and the depths of despair. But does this perspective give too much credit to the mind? Steven Hayes, whose groundbreaking work on relational frame theory led to the development of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), said, “I used to think that the most important part of my body was my brain, and then I asked ‘who is telling me this?’” Must not there be something that operates outside or beyond the mind or the brain as we know it, like a self, that is either capable of outright controlling the mind or at least influencing it and the feelings and behaviors that flow from it? In their own unique ways, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and ACT have responded to this question with a resounding “Yes!” and have sought to give people greater control over their mental and physical lives through rather differ- ent, but not incompatible, approaches to dealing with the troubling mind. The fundamental premise of CBT, often summarized with the thought–feel- ing–behavior triad, is that how one responds to a situation (e.g., calling out “hello” to a friend walking down the other side of the street who does not reply back) is largely determined by the individual’s interpretation (i.e., thoughts and beliefs) of that situation (e.g., “My friend doesn’t want to acknowledge me in public”), which leads to the associated feelings (e.g., hurt) and behaviors (e.g., avoidance of friend). For a variety of reasons, people’s interpretations of events are often inaccurate (e.g., the friend may not have heard the person), but they can learn how to correct them, and that such correcting will alleviate suffering and improve adaptable behavior. CBT assumes that the content of one’s thoughts is primarily responsible for the feelings and behaviors that ensue. Its focus is on changing the processes by which interpretations of events are made in order to change the conclusions reached and the resulting content of thought. This may include teaching people how to recognize “automatic” thoughts and to identify belief structures or schemas that can be logically examined, and refuted and changed when inaccurate, resulting in changes in associated feelings and behav- iors. The importance of the content of thoughts and beliefs in CBT is reflected not only in its theoretical role in determining feelings and behaviors but also
Description: