The Immunoassay Handbook Theory and applications of ligand binding, ELISA and related techniques Fourth Edition Edited by David Wild Associate Editors Rhys John, Chris Sheehan, Steve Binder and Jianwen He AMSTERDAM (cid:127) BOSTON (cid:127) HEIDELBERG (cid:127) LONDON (cid:127) NEW YORK (cid:127) OXFORD (cid:127) PARIS (cid:127) SAN DIEGO (cid:127) SAN FRANCISCO (cid:127) SINGAPORE (cid:127) SYDNEY (cid:127) TOKYO Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands Fourth Edition 2013 © 2013, 2005 David G. Wild. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http:// elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material First Edition published by Macmillan Press (Basingstoke, UK) and Stockton Press (New York, USA) 1994 Second Edition published by Nature Publishing 2001 Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN: 978-0-08-097037-0 For information on all Elsevier publications visit our web site at store.elsevier.com While every care has been taken in compiling the information contained in this publication, the publishers and editor accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions. The reference intervals provided in this book are for specific methods, determined at a particular time, and using a single population of patients. Because of the inherent variability of immunoassays, they should not be applied to clinical situations. Therapeutic and toxic doses, and therapeutic ranges for drugs are only provided as a guide. They are not for clinical use. Printed and bound in Great Britain 13 14 15 16 17 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cover Credit: Rajeev Doshi (cid:3) Preface “There’s a place….” (((John Lennon and Paul McCartney, without purification. The most sensitive commercial ana- 1963). lyzers in hospital laboratories attain this level of specificity and sensitivity routinely. Research immunoassays have First thing in the morning, I walk to the Dee estuary, detected concentrations as low as 10−21 mol, the concen- which lies between England and Wales, to gain a clearer tration of a bucketful of chemical dispersed across all the perspective on the day ahead and organize my thoughts. world’s oceans, and immunoassays are now an important I stroll along a footpath by a hedgerow and cross a track tool in the investigation of pollution, a negative conse- where a steam railway once pounded down a long aban- quence of man’s interaction with nature. doned route. I listen to birds singing in the trees and walk The core elements of immunoassays have undergone onto a cliff top with a view of the Welsh hills across the many incremental changes. Immunoassay signals have estuary, which is home to thousands of wading birds in the transitioned from radioactive to enzymatic to chemilumi- winter. nescent, antibodies have progressed from polyclonal to As I take my morning constitutional, I often think about monoclonal to recombinant, and protein assays have con- immunoassays and how best to present them in this book. verted from competitive to immunometric. In just one All around me, I can see how our ancestors have been 10-year period, separation methods evolved from antibody harnessing nature for centuries. My neighbor’s dogs are a precipitation and centrifugation, through centrifugation of product of selective breeding, as are the cows and sheep. latex particles, to magnetic separation of paramagnetic The estuary attracts birds because the river was channeled particles, diverging into microtiter plate washing in some to provide a constant supply of cooling water to a power sectors. In the same period, homogeneous assays appeared station, creating large expanses of food-rich tidal mudflats that do not require a separation at all. Advances in automa- and salt marsh. Seaward, I can see the ferries to Ireland tion have traced another innovation pathway, documented passing a wind farm. I realize that I am continuing this for posterity in the technology sections of the four editions human compulsion to take advantage of nature, even as I of this book. The diversity of technical approaches in use walk. During the Spring, I can prompt a vocal response today indicates that immunoassays are far from being a from hidden warblers by playing mp3 versions of their mature technology. songs through the powerful but tiny speakers on my A rapid pace of change has resulted from pushing the iPhone. integration of biochemistry and engineering to the limit, I find myself wondering: where do immunoassays rank made possible by the combined efforts of thousands of on the scale of human technological achievement, which is engineers, biochemists, chemists, clinical chemists, physi- all based on our understanding of the natural world? cists, mathematicians, doctors, programmers, marketers, They are based on a broad and deep scientific knowl- accountants, managers, and business strategists. The indus- edge in physics, chemistry, and biology. The engineering try has provided employment for an estimated 100,000 and biochemistry have become highly complex, and the manufacturing workers. What has been the broader eco- pace of innovation is faster than in many industries, nomic impact? including automobiles, construction, pharmaceuticals, and The invention of immunoassay is almost unknown to protection of the environment. The dual application of the general public, in contrast to the breaking of the cutting-edge biochemistry andd engineering places immu- genetic code in the same decade. But the immunoassay noassay into a select subgroup of highly advanced biotech- business is considerably larger in dollar terms than all nology products. DNA-related businesses combined. Att the time of writing, Edward Jenner discovered the process of vaccination in immunoassay sales (at least $20 billion pa) correspond to 1796, exploiting the natural process of immunity for the 70% of global computer and video game sales revenues. first time. Immunoassay, as defined in this book, was Although the immunoassay market is dwarfed by the invented in the 1950s, building on earlier applications of sales of pharmaceuticals, many of the latest biological antibodies as reagents to quantify molecules in blood sam- drugs now transforming medicine are based on advances in ples. Since antibodies resulted from millions of years of monoclonal antibody bioengineering that have their roots evolution in animals, as part of the body’s defense against in immunoassay research and development, documented parasites, bacteria, viruses, toxins, and other hazards, why since the first edition of this book. not adopt them to provide assays of exquisite specificity Immunoassays have had a profound influence on medi- and sensitivity? This book explains how it is done. cine, explained in the final section (part 9) of the book. Immunoassays are remarkable examples of biotechnol- The pivotal role of immunoassays in clinical diagnosis and ogy. Using a minute quantity of an immunized animal’s follow-up remains their primary contribution to society, blood, an immunoassay can detect and quantify 1 part in much influencing the effectiveness and cost of medical 1,000,000,000,000 of a substance in a complex sample, treatment, which is the largest budgetary expenditure xi xii Preface category in developed world economies. This edition has was 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration, with large teams been extensively revised to reflect recent changes in clini- working together as immunoassay systems became ever cal practice related to immunoassays. more complex. The last immunoassay development pro- This book is only possible because many experts made gram I worked on involved three large development teams time in their busy schedules to write about the theory and in the USA and the UK, with a budget of $250 million. applications of the extensive range of immunoassays Only someone who has worked on a new product intro- described, including glimpses at what is on the drawing duction can understand how demanding the process is and board for the future. Because of the pace of innovation and how deep the satisfaction when the first customers express the competitive spirit in the immunoassay industry and their delight with the outcome. academia, we have all experienced ups and downs in our If you enjoy reading about the application of science, careers and had mixed feelings when our peers have made you have come to the right place. Immunoassay provides a breathtaking leaps forward. But we have each been grateful master class in the life cycle of a technology business that to play a small part in immunoassay history. I am deeply is still unfolding. grateful to the many contributors, past and present, for Just a brief note on nomenclature. In The Immunoassay their commitment to immunoassay education through the Handbook, assays are described either as competitive or immu- pages of this book. nometric most of the time. I like the term “competitive” The fourth edition has involved a team of more than because it has a strong descriptive element that helps new- 90 authors, with 12 new chapters and significant revisions comers to remember how these assays work. However, it is made to most of the existing chapters. Some of the original not universally accepted as a scientific description, as some- book authors have retired. Their chapters have been times the tracer is added after the antibody has had time to revised in this edition by new leaders in their fields, and in bind to analyte in the sample. I also have a bias toward some chapters, we have brought together experts from dif- “immunometric” because the somewhat negative connota- ferent institutions because of their complementary knowl- tions of “noncompetitive” or “reagent excess” belie their edge and experience. In a handful of cases, chapters written superior performance compared to their competitive coun- by intellectual giants of the field that received great acclaim terparts. I also think the popular term for the immunomet- when the book was first published have been retained with ric format “sandwich assay” is potentially misleading, minimal changes because of their high reputation and although it is descriptive, as competitive immunoassays may timeless content. These chapters are still used for refer- also have three or more layers of molecules bound together. ence as breathtaking new technologies, such as digital Having justified the use of these terms in the book, I must ELISA, are developed for the future. In total, 124 authors, also point out that although most immunometric assays are past and present, contributed material to this edition. also noncompetitive, the term immunometric was origi- There has been no let up in the pace of innovation since nally introduced to describe any immunoassay that uses a the previous edition of The Immunoassay Handbook was labeled antibody, and there are some assays that are com- published in 2005. Many believed that the publication of petitive and use labeled antibodies. In these cases, the assays the human genome would signal the end of immunoassays are described in the book as competitive rather than immu- as the dominant medical research tool, as researchers nometric. I hope the experts will forgive these attempts to prepared to switch from analysis of proteins to genes. simplify and unify nomenclature in order to standardize the I thought that the third edition might be the last. But the book across a range of fields that have sometimes developed surprising finding that there are only about 25,000 genes independently. Many times in the book you will see the in the human genome has brought the spotlight back onto term sandwich alongside immunometric because in some immunoassays, as the genes code for multiple variants of applications it is much more commonly used. proteins. In the field of proteomics, immunoassays can ELISA is a term used in its correct context in the book. help to trace metabolic pathways and control mechanisms It describes solid-phase immunoassays with enzyme-based in cells, to understand how genes can control so many labels. This is a subset of immunoassays that became intricate biological functions and how gene expression is prominent when radioactive labels fell out of favor. But the controlled. In this edition of The Immunoassay Handbook, majority of immunoassays performed on hospital analyzers the fields of immunohistochemistry and immunocyto- now have chemiluminescent labels, because of their chemistry have been added, as they are closely related to improved reagent stability and the need for signal genera- immunoassay in life science research. tion to occur quickly. So ELISA should not be used as a A tool that threatened to topple immunoassay from its generic term for all immunoassays. high perch was mass spectrometry, which has been refined This book is packed with information about immunoas- to the point where it can analyze protein mixtures with says. The contributing authors have condensed an amaz- great specificity, using a more direct approach than immu- ing amount of information into their chapters without noassay. But for generating an assay that can be used to making the subject indigestible. They have taken the time screen large numbers of samples at low cost with compara- to tell the story of immunoassay in an accessible way, so tively cheap equipment, immunoassay continues to reign that readers at all levels can be let into its secrets. The col- supreme. laboration between the experts writing in this book contin- What this book shows is that when industry and aca- ues the spirit that began when Rosalyn Yalow and Solomon demia work together there is no end to the sparkling bril- Berson, who refused to patent their invention, trained the liance of the innovation that can be achieved. Again and founders of the immunoassay industry, leading to its rapid again, incremental improvements have been made that growth (see FOREWORD). The authors of this book, from moved the field forward. Much of the time, the innovation industry, medicine and academia, have set a wonderful Preface xiii example by sacrificing their time and passing on their As I return from the estuary and climb the gentle incline to knowledge and experience in a digestible form. my house, I reflect on 25 satisfying years working on this I hope you find this book a welcome source of informa- book, from the first edition to the fourth, as the immunoas- tion and insight and discover for yourself something new say field has taken me on an exciting and rewarding journey. and exciting in the field of immunoassay and its many applications. If you do, you will be continuing a long tradi- David Wild, tion of scientific fascination with this intriguing subject. [email protected] Contents Foreword ix 2.10 Lab-on-a-Chip,Micro-andNanoscale Preface xi ImmunoassaySystems,andMicroarrays 175 Acknowledgements xv Simon Rattle, Oliver Hofmann, Christopher P. Price, ListofContributors xvii Larry J. Kricka, David Wild AbouttheEditors xxi 2.11 ImmunologicalBiosensors 203 Jason Reed, James K. Gimzewski 1 2.12 SurfacePlasmonResonanceinBinding P A R T Site,Kinetic,andConcentration Analyses 209 Immunoassay Fundamentals Robert Karlsson 1.1 HowtoUseThisBook 3 2.13 MeasurementofSingleProteinMolecules UsingDigitalELISA 223 David Wild David M. Rissin, David H. Wilson, David C. Duffy 1.2 ImmunoassayforBeginners 7 David Wild 1.3 ImmunoassayPerformanceMeasures 11 3 P A R T Chris Davies Immunoassay Components 2 P A R T 3.1 Antibodies 245 Eryl Liddell Immunoassay Configurations 3.2 SignalGenerationandDetection 2.1 PrinciplesofCompetitiveand Systems(ExcludingHomogeneous ImmunometricAssays(IncludingELISA) 29 Assays) 267 Chris Davies Ian Weeks, Larry J. Kricka, David Wild 2.2 Non-competitiveImmunoassaysforSmall 3.3 SeparationSystems 287 Molecules—theAnti-complexandSelective David Wild, Wlad Kusnezow AntibodySystems 61 3.4 ConjugationMethods 301 Colin H. Self, Stephen Thompson, Theresa Street, Kelly J. Alastair H. Dent Lamb, Gordon Duffin, John L. Dessi, Maggie Turnbull 3.5 StandardizationandCalibration 315 2.3 HomogeneousImmunoassays 67 David Wild, Chris Sheehan Edwin F. Ullman 3.6 CalibrationCurveFitting 323 2.4 LateralFlowImmunoassaySystems: John Dunn, David Wild EvolutionfromtheCurrentStateofthe ArttotheNextGenerationofHighly Sensitive,QuantitativeRapidAssays 89 4 P A R T Brendan O’Farrell 2.5 AmbientAnalyteAssay 109 Related Techniques Roger Ekins 4.1 TheFoundationsofImmunochemistry 339 2.6 FreeAnalyteImmunoassay 123 Robert F. Ritchie Nic D. Christofides 4.2 Immunohistochemistryand 2.7 QualitativeImmunoassay—Featuresand Immunocytochemistry 357 Design 139 Simon Renshaw Jianwen He, Simon Parker 2.8 DetectionofAntibodiesRelevantto InfectiousDisease 149 5 P A R T Steven Binder, Jennifer A. Isler 2.9 Microsphere-BasedMultiplexImmunoassays: Immunoassay Development DevelopmentandApplicationsUsing Luminex®xMAP®Technology 157 5.1 PracticalGuidetoELISADevelopment 381 Sherry A. Dunbar, Michaela R. Hoffmeyer Jianwen He v vi Contents 5.2 Method Evaluation—A Practical Guide 395 7.10 ADVIA Centaur® XP 567 Chris Sheehan, Jianwen He, Mari Smith Jean Metzar 5.3 Interferences in Immunoassay 403 7.11 IMMULITE® and IMMULITE 1000 571 Jason Y. Park, Larry J. Kricka Arthur L. Babson 5.4 Immunoassay Development in the In Vitro 7.12 Immulite® 2000 and Immulite 2000 XPi 575 Diagnostic Industry 417 Arthur L. Babson Doug Brandt, Steve Figard 7.13 VITROS® ECiQ Immunodiagnostic System, VITROS® 3600 Immunodiagnostic System, and VITROS® 5600 Integrated System 579 6 John W. Backus, David Wild P A R T 7.14 VITROS® Immuno-Rate and MicroTiptm Immunoassay Implementation Assays 585 John W. Backus, Susan J. Danielson, David A. Hilborn 6.1 Sample Collection, Including Participant 7.15 Access 2 589 Preparation and Sample Handling 427 Katherine M. Leith Colin Wilde, Dorothée Out, Sara Johnson, 7.16 DxI 600 and DxI 800 597 Douglas A. Granger Katherine M. Leith 6.2 Quality Assurance 441 7.17 Elecsys® Immunoassay Systems 603 Catharine M. Sturgeon Mary Beth Myers 6.3 Point-of-Care Testing 455 7.18 PRISMtm 609 James H. Nichols Dinesh Shah, Jim Stewart 6.4 Choosing an Automated Immunoassay 7.19 Phadia Laboratory Systems 617 System 465 Angela Gore, Gareth Evans, Mats Rilvën Lori J. Sokoll Daniel W. Chan 8 6.5 Immunoassay Troubleshooting Guide 469 P A R T David Wild, Jianwen He Immunoassay Applications other than Clinical Chemistry 7 P A R T 8.1 Immunoassay Applications in Veterinary Diagnostics 623 Immunoassay Product Technology Thomas P. O’Connor, Jr., John Lawrence, Philip Andersen, 7.1 Introduction to Immunoassay Product Valerie Leathers, Erwin Workman Technology in Clinical Diagnostic 8.2 Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Testing 509 Development 647 David Wild, Chris Sheehan, Steve Binder Jeffrey M. Sailstad, Ronald R. Bowsher, Omar F. Laterza, 7.2 Market Trends 517 William Nowatzke David Huckle 7.3 Lateral Flow and Consumer 9 P A R T Diagnostics 533 Sarah Tiplady Immunoassay Clinical Applications 7.4 Consumer Diagnostics—Clearblue (Human) Pregnancy and Fertility Testing 537 Sarah Tiplady 9.1 Clinical Concepts 661 7.5 The Triage® System 541 Chris Davies Thomas I. Koshy, Kenneth F. Buechler 9.2 Thyroid 673 7.6 Stratus® CS Acute Caretm STAT Fluorometric Rhys John, Nic Christofides, Carole A. Spencer, David Wild Analyzer 545 9.3 The Adrenal Cortex 695 Amy Sarli, W.N. McLellan Les Perry, Sami Medbak 7.7 IMx® 549 9.4 Bone and Calcium Metabolism 705 Kent Ford William D. Fraser, Kay W. Colston, John C. Stevenson 7.8 AxSYM® 555 9.5 Infertility 721 Theresa Donahoe Michael J. Wheeler 7.9 Abbott ARCHITECT® Family of 9.6 I n Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Analyzers 561 (IVF-ET) 735 Frank A. Quinn, David A. Armbruster Richard Fleming, Sherry Faye Contents vii 9.7 Hirsutism and Virilization in the 9.16 Gastrointestinal Tract 891 Female 745 Arne Røseth, Richard Chapman, Radra Ramachandran, Michael J. Wheeler Chris Sheehan 9.8 Pregnancy 757 9.17 Hepatitis 901 Kevin Spencer, Tim Chard Ravi Kaul 9.9 Growth and Growth Hormone 9.18 HIV-1 and HIV-2: Causative Agents of Deficiency 777 AIDS 913 Gill Rumsby, Peter Hindmarsh, Michael Preece, Catherine A. Brennan, Sushil G. Devare Jane Pringle 9.19 Viral Diseases 919 9.10 Diabetes Mellitus 783 Carey-Ann D. Burnham, Christopher Doern, Steven R Binder Penny Clark, Tim McDonald 9.20 Bacterial Diseases 929 9.11 Hematology 795 Carey-Ann D. Burnham, Christopher Doern, Steven R. Binder Katy Evans, Zane Amenhotep, Derek Dawson, 9.21 Parasites and Fungi 939 Harry Waters, John Ardern Steven R. Binder, Patrice D. Sarfati 9.12 Cardiac Markers 817 9.22 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) 945 Deborah French, Alan H.B. Wu Philip A. Routledge, Alun D. Hutchings 9.13 Cancer Markers 833 9.23 Drugs of Abuse 963 Hoon H. Sunwoo, Mavanur R. Suresh Alun D. Hutchings, Brian Widdop 9.14 Allergy 857 Marcos Alcocer, Lars Yman Index 989 9.15 Autoimmune Disease 869 David F. Keren Color version of figures in this book can be found at www.immunoassayhandbook.com 1 P A R T IMMUNOASSAY FUNDAMENTALS How to Use This Book C H A P T E R 1.1 David Wild ([email protected]) The Immunoassay Handbook is a comprehensive source only the bound fraction results in a measurable signal from of information about immunoassays and their applications. the label. Homogeneous immunoassays are designed to This chapter explains how the book is structured to help discriminate bound from unbound label without requiring you find the information you need. a separation, by a range of ingenious approaches. This simplifies assay automation. They can be competitive or immunometric. This is an innovative area, receiving con- Using the Index siderable attention from researchers. 2.4 Lateral flow immunoassay systems. This type of In the index, if a page reference is in bold type, the topic is immunoassay is widely used and deserves a special chapter. usually explained in more detail. A well-known example is the home pregnancy test. The format is used in point-of-care, forensic, environmental, and food applications. A key characteristic is accomplish- Book Structure ment of the mechanical steps, including separation, on an inert test strip through capillary action without interven- The book content is separated into parts, each one build- tion by the user. This is a field that is the subject of inten- ing on the previous body of information. sive development activity. 2.5 Ambient analyte immunoassay. Professor Roger Ekins applied immunoassay theory to achieve something PART 1 – IMMUNOASSAY that intuitively sounds impossible: a quantitative assay FUNDAMENTALS that is independent of the sample volume. Small, immobi- 1.2 Immunoassay for beginners is a good place to start lized microdots of antibody sample the analyte in solution, for newcomers, explaining the basic principles of rather like a thermometer measuring the surrounding immunoassay. temperature without affecting it. 1.3 Immunoassay performance measures explains the 2.6 Free analyte immunoassay. This is a special family terminology and methodology that define the performance of assay formats, designed to measure free analyte in blood of an immunoassay. samples, i.e., the fraction that is not bound to carrier pro- tein. This is important if the free analyte is the metaboli- cally active fraction. Free thyroxine is the best known PART 2 – IMMUNOASSAY example, with a free fraction of just 0.02% of the total. CONFIGURATIONS 2.7 Qualitative immunoassays—features and design. 2.1 Principles of competitive and immunometric assays As immunoassays have evolved to meet specific clinical (including ELISA). Nearly all immunoassays are competi- needs, qualitative tests that give a yes/no answer have tive or immunometric in configuration. They are explained become more common. Home pregnancy tests are qualita- in the same chapter because they share some common tive as are some blood-screening tests, which sometimes characteristics. ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent also have a gray zone between the positive and negative Assay) is a subgroup of immunometric assays although the classification areas. Although qualitative immunoassays are term is sometimes used loosely (but incorrectly) to describe simple for the user, they have unique design requirements, any immunoassay. Immunometric assays are commonly because the test provides clinical interpretation, rather known as sandwich assays because the analyte becomes than simply the analyte concentration. sandwiched between the two antibodies (the capture and 2.8 Detection of antibodies relevant to infectious dis- labeled antibodies). ease. Conventional immunoassays utilize antibodies to 2.2 Non-competitive immunoassays for small mole- “fish” for complementary antigens: the target analytes. cules. Usually the competitive assay configuration is used The same principles apply when antibodies are the targets, for small molecules, such as steroid hormones and many and antigens are used as the “bait,” but in practice anti- drugs, because of the technical difficulties involved in cre- body assays have unique challenges. In a conventional ating an antibody sandwich with the relatively small ana- immunoassay, the developer can select a clone or pool of lyte between them. But immunometric assays have antibodies to engineer the desired assay performance char- significant performance advantages. This chapter explains acteristics. But in an antibody assay, the antibody popula- how immunometric assay performance can be achieved tions may be highly variable between samples. with low-molecular-weight analytes by creating a pseudo- 2.9 Microsphere-based multiplex immunoassays: devel- immunometric assay format. opment and applications using Luminex® xMAP® tech- 2.3 Homogeneous immunoassays. Conventional immu- nology. Luminex pioneered the use of antibody-coated noassays are heterogeneous, relying on separation of mate- microspheres and cell sorting, and this is now an important rial bound to antibody from the unbound material, so that immunoassay class, with many applications. © 2013 David G. Wild. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097037-0.00001-4
Description: