NASA/TMm2002-211357 AIAA-2002-0244 Ice Accretion Formations on a NACA 0012 Swept Wing Tip in Natural Icing Conditions Mario Vargas, Julius A. Giriunas, and Thomas P. Ratvasky Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio January 2002 The NASA STI Program Office... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientific and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part meetings sponsored or cosponsored by in helping NASA maintain this important role. NASA. The NASA STI Program Office is operated by SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, Langley Research Center, the Lead Center for technical, or historical information from NASA's scientific and technical information. The NASA programs, projects, and missions, NASA STI Program Office provides access to the often concerned with subjects having NASA STI Database, the largest collection of substantial public interest. aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The Program Office is also NASA's institutional TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- mechanism for disseminating the results of its language translations of foreign scientific research and development activities. These results and technical material pertinent to NASA's are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report mission. Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services that complement the STI TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of Program Office's diverse offerings include completed research or a major significant creating custom thesauri, building customized phase of research that present the results of data bases, organizing and publishing research NASA programs and include extensive data results.., even providing videos. or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and For more information about the NASA STI information deemed to be of continuing Program Office, see the following: reference value. NASA's counterpart of peer- reviewed formal professional papers but • Access the NASA STI Program Home Page has less stringent limitations on manuscript at http://www.sti.nasa.gov length and extent of graphic presentations. E-mail your question via the Internet to TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific [email protected] and technical findings that are preliminary or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release Fax your question to the NASA Access reports, working papers, and bibliographies Help Desk at 301-621-0134 that contain minimal annotation. Does not contain extensive analysis. Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at 301-621-0390 CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and technical findings by NASA-sponsored Write to: contractors and grantees. NASA Access Help Desk NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076 NASA/TM--2002-211357 AIAA-2002-0244 Ice Accretion Formations on a NACA 0012 Swept Wing Tip in Natural Icing Conditions Mario Vargas, Julius A. Giriunas, and Thomas P. Ratvasky Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Prepared for the 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reno, Nevada, January 14-17, 2002 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center January 2002 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank all of the personnel at Aircraft Operations for their help in all phases of the experiment and Mr. Chris Lynch from the Imaging Technology Center for his assistance with the photographic work. Available from NASA Center for Aerospace Information National Technical Information Service 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22100 Available electronically at http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/GLTRS AIAA-2002-0244 ICE ACCRETION FORMATIONS ON A NACA 0012 SWEPT WING TIP IN NATURAL ICING CONDITIONS Mario Vargas', Julius A. Giriunas", Thomas P. Ratvasky"" NASA G/enn Research Center, C/eve/and, Ohio Introduction Abstract Past experimental investigations on the formation An experiment was conducted in the DeHavilland of ice accretions on swept wings at glaze ice DHC-6 Twin Otter Icing Research Aircraft at NASA conditions provided understanding of the Glenn Research Center to study the formation of mechanisms of formation, the role of local effects ice accretions on swept wings in natural icing on roughness elements, the role of feather growth, conditions. The experiment was designed to obtain and allowed identification of some of the important ice accretion data to help determine if the parameters involved. Since nearly all of those mechanisms of ice accretion formation observed in investigations were conducted in icing tunnels, it is the Icing Research Tunnel are present in natural critical to determine if the formation of ice icing conditions. The experiment in the Twin Otter accretions in natural icing conditions (in-flight) was conducted using a NACA 0012 swept wing tip. shows the same mechanisms observed in tunnel The model enabled data acquisition at 0°, 15°, 25°, experiments. 30°, and 45 o sweep angles. Casting data, ice shape tracings, and close-up photographic data This report presents the results of an experimental were obtained. The results showed that the investigation carried out in the DeHavilland DHC-6 mechanisms of ice accretion formation observed Twin Otter Icing Research Aircraft at NASA Glenn in-flight agree "well with the ones observed in the Research Center to study the formation of ice Icing Research Tunnel. Observations on the end accretions on swept wings in natural icing cap of the airfoil showed the same strong effect of conditions. The experiment in the Twin Otter was the local sweep angle on the formation of scallops conducted using a swept NACA 0012 wing tip. The as observed in the tunnel. model enabled data acquisition at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° sweep angles. When the plane was in icing Nomenclature conditions, a hatch port on the upper part of the fuselage of the plane was opened and the airfoil A Sweep angle, degrees was moved into the air stream using a specially Critical distance, millimeters designed stand. After the ice encounter the airfoil FSSP Forward Scattering Spectrometry Probe was lowered back into the aircraft cabin, and LWC Cloud liquid water content, g/m3 photographic data was taken at a location on the MVD Water droplet median volume diameter, leading edge and along the end cap of the airfoil. pm After the photographic data was taken, ice tracings T Temperature, °F were made and the ice accretion was removed and Ice accretion time, minutes stored in a freezer. At the end of the flight, a wax V Velocity, mph mold was made of each ice accretion. Later a casting of the ice accretion was obtained from the * Aerospace Engineer, Icing Branch, NASA Glenn Research wax mold. Over a period of two and half weeks, Center, Member AIAA data was obtained from 25 icing encounters. ** Aerospace Engineer, Icing Branch, NASA Glenn Research Center, Member AIAA Previous work on ice accretions in a natural icing *** Aerospace Engineer, Icing Branch, NASA Glenn Research Center, Member AIAA environment on a swept wing was done by Reehorst 1. He conducted an experiment in the Copyright © 2002 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and DeHavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter Icing Research Astronautics, Inc. No copyright is asserted in the United States under Title 17, U.S. Code. The U.S. Govemment has a royalty- Aircraft using a swept NACA 0012 wing tip airfoil. free license to exercise all rights under the copyright claimed He obtained ice tracings and photographic data. herein for Governmental Purposes. All other rights are The sweep angles employed were 0°, 30° and 45°. reserved by the copyright owner NASA/TM--2002-211357 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics He reported that the ice accretions were mostly of definition of the glaze ice feathers zone. When the the glaze type and he observed scallop formations critical distance is zero only the glaze ice feathers at 30° and 45osweep angles. LEWICE 3D was zone ispresent. modified and code predictions were compared to ice accretion flight data. The feathers in the glaze ice feathers zone are inclined into the flow1°. They have a tooth shape, The presence of scallop formations on swept wings and therefore a preferred direction of growth (the has been documented in past studies of ice direction along which a feather is growing faster accretions on swept wings 234. Reehorst and laterally, that is, the direction of the larger axis for BidwelP did an experiment in the NASA Glenn Icing the tooth shape of the top of the feather). The Research Tunnel (IRT) to study the effect of tunnel preferred direction of growth is oriented perpendicular parameters on the presence or absence of to the external streamlines. The angle that the scallops. Hedde and Guffond6proposed a ballistic model of scallop growth. preferred direction of growth makes with respect to the attachment linedirection is 90°forfeathers located on the attachment line(streamlines are parallel to the A study of the fundamental physical mechanisms attachment line direction at this location). The angle that lead to the formation of scallops on swept decreases as the distance from the attachment line wings was conducted by Vargas and Reshotko 78 increases (the streamlines are turning as they move They also conducted a parametric experimentai away from the locationof the attachment line). study on the effect of velocity and sweep angle on the critical distance do,9and astudy on the effect of Three types of ice accretions were identified onswept LWC and temperature _oon the critical distance. wings at glaze ice conditions: complete scallops, incomplete scallops, and no-scallops. The present work continues the investigations into the formation of ice accretions on swept wings by When complete scallops form_0(figure 2a), the ice studying the formation of these ice accretions in-flight. accretion is covered with glaze ice feathers with a preferred direction of growth that is perpendicular to the external streamlines. The feathers have Background developed from roughness elements that reached a certain height. The value of the critical distance is Previous studies on formation of ice accretions on zero, and only the glaze ice feathers zone is present. swept wings at glaze ice conditions7,8found that The feathers join along the preferred direction of scallop and incomplete scallop formation isgoverned growth to form ridges, with incipient scallop tips by local effects on roughness elements. Roughness formed by the feathers at the end of each ridge. As elements formed at the beginning of the ice accretion the ridges grow they form scallop tips. The scallop process develop into glaze ice feathers when they tips have different inclinations with respect to the reach a given height, and are located beyond agiven surface of the airfoil. Because of their different distance from the attachment line. This distance is inclinations, as the scallop tips grow in height and called the critical distance dcr (see figure 1), and it along the preferred direction, they merge with depends on sweep angle and tunnel conditions_o adjacent scallop tips by joining at the top of the When the critical distance is not zero it defines two feathers that form each scallop tip.This mechanism is zones on the ice accretion. A zone called the responsible for the growth of the scallop tips, their attachment linezone, where the roughness elements increase in size, and the enhancing of the spacing do not become feathers, and another zone called the between scallops. Along the attachment lineareathe glaze ice feathers zone where the roughness feathers tend to join other feathers around them by elements develop into feathers (figures la, lb). The touching, bridging and filling, in this way they form attachment line zone begins at the attachment line areas of solid ice that are also covered with proper (the line inthe spanwise direction, alongwhich roughness elements. As the scallop tips grow by the flow splits over and under awing) and extends on joining at their tops, the top surface tends to fill with each side to the location where roughness elements water and areas of solid ice can be observed with develop into feathers (beginning of the glaze ice roughness elements present. feathers zone). The glaze icefeathers zone begins at the endofthe attachment linezone and extends some When the critical distance is not zero and only distance chordwise. Only feathers that are an active roughness elements located beyond a given distance part of the main ice accretion are included in the from the attachment line grow to become feathers, NASA/TM--2002-211357 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the ice accretion looks almost like complete incomplete scallops or no-scallops may develop. The scallops. In a no-scallop, in some cases the feathers formation of incomplete scallops or no-scallops may grow faster than the attachment line ice in the depends on the angle that the preferred direction of beginning of the ice accretion, but the ice of the growth of the feathers makes with respect to the attachment line eventually will cover them and the attachment line direction. feathers will cease to play a role in the formation of the ice shape. Because of the fast growth of the feathers When incomplete scallops form1° (figure 2b), the inthe initial stage of the formation of the ice accretion, feathers in the glaze ice feathers zone will form the ice shape will show horns, and resemble some of scallop tips. The mechanisms of formation of these the ice shapes that are observed in 2D ice accretions. scallop tips were found to be identical to the mechanisms observed for the formation of the scallop In all cases of formation of glaze ice accretions on a tips in the complete scallop case. The formation of swept wing, the distance from the attachment line the scallop tips depends on the angle that the beyond which the roughness elements become glaze preferred direction of growth of the feathers makes ice feathers (the critical distance dcr)is a critical factor with respect to the attachment line, which in turn inthe kind of ice accretion that will form. depends on the distance from the attachment line at which those feathers are located. The angle must be A Parametric experimental study on the effect of large enough to allow the mechanisms of formation of velocity and sweep angle on the critical distance 9 scallop tips to operate and form scallop tips, and also conducted on a swept NACA 0012 wing tip showed must be large enough to prevent the ice of the that at a given velocity and tunnel condition, as the attachment line zone from covering all the glaze ice sweep angle is increased from 0° to 25°, the critical feathers zone and burying the incipient scallop tips. distance slowly decreases. As the sweep angle is increased past 25°, the critical distance starts When no-scallops form '° (figure 2c), scallop tips are decreasing more rapidly. For 75 and 100 mph it not present in the ice accretion. Three situations may reaches a value of 0 millimeters at 35 °. For 150 lead to the formation of no-scallops. In one case the and 200 mph it reaches a value of 0 millimeters at critical distance may be so large that only the 40°. On the ice accretion, as the sweep angle is attachment line zone is present. In the second case increased from 0° to 25°, the extent of the the attachment line zone and the glaze ice feathers attachment line zone slowly decreases but overall, zone are both present, but the angle of the feathers the ice accretions remain similar to the 0° sweep with respect to the attachment line direction is not angle case. As the sweep angle is increased above large enough for the mechanisms of formation of 25°, the extent of the attachment line zone scallop tips to operate. In the last case, the decreases rapidly and complete scallops form at attachment line zone and the glaze ice feathers zone 350 sweep angle for 75 and 100 mph, and at 40° for are both present, and the angle of the feathers with 150 and 200 mph. respect to the attachment line direction is large enough for the mechanisms of scallop tip formation to A study on the effect of LWC and temperature on operate, but not large enough to prevent the ice of the the critical distance 1° conducted on a swept NACA attachment line from totally covering the scallop tips. 0012 wing tip airfoil found that decreasing the LWC When the feathers are totally covered they cease to to 0.5 g/m3 decreases the value of the critical play a role inthe formation of the ice accretion. distance at a given sweep angle compared to the baseline case, and starts the formation of complete When the attachment line zone and the glaze ice scallops at 30°sweep angle. Increasing the LWC to feathers zone are both present, in general one will 1.0 g/m 3increases the value of the critical distance tend to prevail over the other in the first stages of the compared to the baseline case, the critical distance formation of the ice accretion, and this will influence remains always above 0 millimeters and complete the final ice shape. This interaction between the ice of scallops are not formed. Decreasing the total the attachment line zone and the feathers in the glaze temperature to 20 °F decreases the critical ice feathers zone depends on how fast each kind of distance with respect to the baseline case and ice grows. In an incomplete scallop when the critical formation of complete scallops begins at 25° sweep distance is small and the feathers in the glaze ice angle. When the total temperature was increased feathers zone grow faster than the ice of the to 30 °F, bumps covered with roughness elements attachment line, they will form large scallop tips. As appear on the ice accretion at 25° and 30° sweep ice accretion time increases the large scallop tips angles, large ice structures appear at 35o and 40° wash out the presence of the attachment line zone NASA/TM--2002-211357 3 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics sweep angles, and complete scallops are formed at hatch in the cabin of the aircraft and into the 45 °sweep angle. airstream. Experimental Procedure A heater was installed on the area where the Icing Research Aircraft measurements and collection of ice shapes were going to be performed. The heater was powered by a 28 DC, 1 amp, power supply. A grid was The icing research aircraft is a modified painted on the surface of the heater to allow DeHavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter Icing Research identification of the flow direction on the Aircraft (figure 3). It is a twin engine commuter photographic data and to serve as a distance scale type aircraft powered by two 550 shaft horsepower in some pictures. turboprop engines. It has been modified for flight in icing environments and to permit the acquisition of icing data. A small laboratory type freezer (figure 5) was used to store the ice samples during flight operations. The freezer weighs 60 Ibs and has 1.5 cu-ft of InstrumentaUon and Data Reduction storage. It draws a peak current of 11 amps at startup, but rapidly drops to 1 amp during The Twin Otter Icing Research Aircraft is equipped continuous operation. The freezer uses a small with standard flight instrumentation and with amount of R-134A refrigerant as the working fluid instrumentation specific to icing research. The and can maintain the ice samples between -4 ° measured flight data consisted of airspeed, outside and 20° F. Ice samples were laid on bubble-wrap air temperature, angle of attack, angle of sideslip, material to prevent damage to them during storage. droplet size (MVD), liquid water content (LWC), The freezer door was modified with a safety latch and altitude. The LWC was measured using a King to keep it securely closed while in flight and during probe. Droplet size (MVD) measured by a Forward take-offs/landings. Ice packs were also installed in Scattering Spectrometry Probe (FSSP). The the freezer to help keep ice samples frozen in the outside temperature was measured with a event the power to the freezer was interrupted for Rosemount probe mounted on the fuselage. any extended period of time. Airspeed, altitude, angle of attack and sideslip were measured with a Rosemount 858 probe. Test Procedure All data was acquired using Science Engineering Each day of testing started with identification of and Associates (SEA) M200 data acquisition icing conditions. The pilots and the test engineer software and was stored in a binary format. SEA held a telecon with National Center for Atmospheric Playback software read the binary formatted data Research personnel to determine the best altitude and produced ASCII files which were analyzed and location to intercept icing conditions. The using a spreadsheet software. The time series for aircraft was launched. When the location for icing each parameter was plotted and time averages and conditions was reached a determination was made standard deviations were calculated. Table 1 if the conditions were sufficient or if better icing shows the summary of the flight data. conditions were needed. If better icing conditions Model and Related Hardware were needed, communication was established by Satcom with NCAR personnel, and a better location for icing conditions was located (if it The model chosen for this study was a NACA 0012 existed). If the conditions were found to be swept wing tip (figure 4). The airfoil is made of sufficient, a holding pattern was established and wood, with a 0.381meter (15-inch) chord measured the experiment was started. The hatch on the normal to the leading edge, and a 0.609-meter (24- ceiling of the aircraft was opened, and the airfoil inch) span. It was fitted with a rounded end cap. It was elevated through the hatch into the airstream. was mounted on a base that allowed pivoting of the airfoil to sweep angles from 0° to 45° in 50 Because of the size of the hatch opening, the airfoil increments. The base of the airfoil was attached to was elevated at 0° sweep angle through the hatch a specially designed stand (figure 5). The stand and once in the airstream it was set at the selected consisted of a system of pulleys connected to a sweep angle. The starting time for the icing crank that allowed the airfoil to be raised through a encounter was recorded. During the icing NASA/TM--2002-211357 4 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Table 1 presents the complete summary of the conditions the meteorological data was recorded by flight data. Tables 2 through 5 present the flight the data acquisition system and constantly data in each one of the groups A through D. monitored by the test engineer. About midpoint into the ice encounter, the researcher requested Group A: glaze ice conditions from the test engineer a reading of the meteorological conditions and wrote them in a data The data in this group (Table 2) have average icing sheet, these conditions were used as a rough conditions close to V = 150 mph, T_ota_= 25 °F, LWC indication of the icing conditions. = 0.4 g/m 3,MVD = 13 _m. Once the ice accretion was formed, the airfoil was For the in-flight test the sweep angles tested were moved to 0° sweep angle and lowered into the 0°, 15°, 25°, 30°, and 45°. cabin. The ending time of the ice encounter was recorded. Photographic data of the ice accretion For a sweep angle of 45°two ice accretions belong was taken. Three cuts were made in the ice to group A (figures 6,7). The average conditions accretion using an aluminum template. The cuts for both cases are about the same with slight were made perpendicular to the leading edge. A difference in the LWCs (0.48 g/m3 versus 0.37 cardboard tracing was made in the middle cut. g/m3). Once the tracing was done, the heater was activated and two samples of the ice accretion For the higher LWC (figure 6) the scallop tips are were removed from the airfoil and placed in a well defined and starting at the attachment line. freezer. The freezer was kept at a temperature The ice shape is a complete scallop. The scallop near 10 °F. The airfoil was cleaned and prepared tips are very close and the spaces between are for the next data point. At the end of the flight, the filled with ice. This ice shape is different from the ice accretions were placed in a Styrofoam ice shape in figure 7. The ice shape is almost container and moved to the location in the hangar identical to ice shapes obtained at a lower total where a wax bath was maintained. A wax mold of temperature (figure 23) and also to an ice shape each ice accretion was made and labeled. Later a obtained at lower LWC (figure 20). casting of the ice accretion was obtained from the wax mold. The ice shape in figure 7 is a complete scallop. A side view of the ice accretion (figure 8) shows the Castings feather formation of the scallop tips. It compares well with an ice accretion obtained in the IRT For each of the wax molds a urethane casting was (figure 9) at A = 45°, V = 150 mph, Ttota_= 25 °F, made of the ice shape. The castings allowed LWC = 0.5 g/m3, MVD = 20 _m, 1; = 5 minutes. measurement of the critical distance and Close up photographic data of the in-flight observation of the ice accretion. accretion (figure 10) and the IRT accretion (figure The castings were made by dipping the ice shape 11) show that they share the same icing characteristics. The scallop tips are similar in several times in a bath of bees-wax at 150 °F to formation and not well defined. They are made of form a wax mold, draining the water from inside the wax mold, and filling the mold with liquid urethane. feathers joining along their preferred direction of The urethane was allowed to solidify, and then a growth, in both ice accretions large feathers with a solvent was used to remove the wax. preferred direction growth can be seen along the attachment line. These large ice feathers along the Results and Discussion attachment line have been observed in past studies of ice accretions on swept wings 1°. They typically start appearing at large sweep angles when the For the purpose of data analysis, the flight data LWC is lowered from 0.75 g/m _ to 0.5 g/m 3, or was divided into four groups labeled A through D. when the total temperature is lowered from 25 °F to The data in a given group have average icing conditions within a close range of values. This 20 °F starting at a baseline condition of 150 mph, division of the data allowed observation of the 25 °F, 0.75 g/m 3,20 _m MVD. effect of the sweep angle and in some cases comparison to Icing Research Tunnel data. NASA/TM--2002-211357 5 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics At a sweep angle of 30°the ice shape (figure 12) is increase in the local sweep angles on the end cap a complete scallop. Comparison with an accretion affect the iceshape. obtained in the tunnel (figure 13) at A = 30°, V = 150 mph, Ttota=p 25 °F, LWC =0.5 g/m3,MVD = 20 At the bottom of Table 2 there are three data points pm, "_ = 10 minutes, shows that the two ice below the heading "Data points with lower LWCs". accretions have the same overall characteristics. These data points have similar icing conditions to the For both ice accretions large feathers appear along other ones but the LWCs are closer to0.3 g/m3than the attachment finearea. Only thetop of the feathers to 0.4 g/m3. The three pointsare for sweep angles of can beobserved and the space between them is filled 45°,30°,and 25°. by ice with roughness elements. The scallop tips are present in both cases but they are small and not well Inthe case for asweep angleof 45° (figure 20)the ice defined. accretion issimilar tothe iceaccretion infigure 6. Itis acomplete scallop. Scallop tips are well defined. Ice At a sweep angle of 15°the ice shape is ano-scallop isfillingthe space between the scallop tips. (figure 14). Comparison with an ice accretion (figure 15) obtained in the tunnel at A = 15d,V = 150 mph, Inthe case for asweep angle of30°(figure 21) the ice T_ola=p25 OF,LWC = 0.5 g/m3,and MVD =20 _m, "c accretion is a complete scallop. The overall ice = 10 minutes, shows that the two ice accretions accretion is similar to the case with the higher LWC share similar characteristics. In both cases the discussed above (figure 12), but the ice forming the attachment line and the glaze ice feathers zone are ice shape islesstransparent, more towards rime ice. present. In both cases the attachment linezones are covered withroughness elements. Thefeathers inthe In the case for a sweep angle of 25° (figure 22), the glaze ice feathers zones have apreferred direction of ice accretion is an incomplete scallop. The scallop growth oriented inthe direction ofthe attachment line. tips are present although not well defined. The In both cases the critical distance (dcr)is present. For attachment line zone and the glaze ice feathers zone the tunnel ice accretion dcr= 7 mm, for the in-flight ice can be observed. The attachment line zone is accretion d_r=8mm. covered with large roughness elements. The tops of large icefeathers seen at largersweep angles are not At asweep angleof 00the ice accretion isanoscallop present. (figure 16). Comparison with an ice accretion (figure 17)obtained inthe tunnel at at A = 0°, V= 150 mph, Group B Ttota_=25 °F, LWC =0.5 g/m3,and MVD =20 _tm,"¢ = 5 minutes, shows that the same icing The data inthis group (Table 3) have average icing characteristics are present. Both ice shapes have an conditions close to V = 150 mph, Ttota_= 20°F, LWC attachment line zone covered with roughness = 0.5 g/m3, MVD = 12 _tm. The main difference elements and a reduced glaze ice feathers zone. For with the data from group A is the lower total the in-flight ice shape de,= 9 mm, and for the tunnel temperature of 20 °F versus 25 °F. The effect of ice shape dc,=11.5 mm. lower temperature can be observed when comparing the ice accretions in both groups. Observations on the end cap of the airfoil allow studying the effect of changing the local sweep angle Icing test points were obtained for sweep angles of 45d,30°, 15°and 00. for the same icing conditions. This is especially important in the in-flight data because the conditions are unsteady. Figures 18 and 19 present the For 45° sweep angle (figure 23) the ice accretion is photographic data onthe end cap when the airfoil was a complete scallop. The ice accretion is similar to set a sweep angle of 15°. On the span of the airfoil the ice shape in figure 6. Well-defined scallop tips the ice accretion is a no-scallop (figure 14). As the can be observed. The space between the scallop local sweep angle changes along the end cap of the tips and the area around the attachment line are covered with ice. airfoil, the critical distance collapses and scallops made of feathers with a preferred direction of growth can be observed (figure 18). A side view of the For 30° sweep angle (figure 24) the ice accretion scallops onthe endcap (figure 19)shows their feather looks similar to the ice accretion from group A for formation. These observations are consistent with the same sweep angle but in this case the area observations made in IRT experiments of how the around the attachment line is covered with ice (figure 25) and there is no indication of large NASA/TM--2002-211357 6 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics