CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY VOLUME III An inquiry into the carnage in Gujarat List of Annexures CONCERNED CITIZENS TRIBUNAL - GUJARAT 2002 1 Recommended contribution: Rs. 200 (Towards expenses incurred on the Tribunal’s work) Published by Anil Dharkar for Citizens for Justice and Peace P.O. Box 28253, Juhu Post Office, Mumbai 400 049. India. E-mail : [email protected] 2 CONTENTS Foreword 5 Introduction 9 Annexures Form Circulated by Different Groups to Collect Data on Victims/Survivors 13 Relief Camp Statistics 17 Status of Refugees Survey 22 Affidavits filed by Camp Managers in Gujarat HC 30 NHRC Recommendations 34 Recommendations from the Editors’ Guild Report 44 Official Document, Management of Violence- Godhra Collector 47 History of Communal Violence -- Godhra 51 Statements Condemning Godhra 53 Reservation Chart of S-6 of the Sabarmati Express, Coach S-6 55 Report of Forensic Science Laboratory, Ahmedabad 57 Note by Vadodara Police 59 List of Dead --- Gulberg Society, Chamanpura, Ahmedabad 62 List of Dead--Naroda Gaon and Patiya, Ahmedabad 63 List of the Dead-- Kheda District 66 Statistics -- BEST Bakery Incident, Vadodara 67 Summaries of Deaths -- Dahod & Panchmahal 69 List of Dead -- Dahod District 70 Detailed List of Mosques and Shrines Destroyed/Desecrated 100 Economic Losses -- Panchmahal District 107 Economic Losses -- Banaskantha District 112 Economic Losses -- Dahod District 116 Economic Losses -- Varodara 117 Damages to Sulemani Jama’at 122 Statistics of Losses -- Anand District 123 List of Dead / Missing Panchmahal and other Districts 128 Summary of Deaths -- Dahod & Panchmahal Districts 150 Damages to Alavi Bohra Jamaat 167 Damages of Dawodi Bohra Jamaat 171 Tables of Economic Losses -- Sabarkantha district 173 Economic Losses -- Other Districts 180 Economic Losses -- Mehsana District 191 Gujarat Government Form, March 2002 193 Media and Stereotyping 195 3 Media Channels 197 Media Reports 199 RSS prepares the ground in Rajasthan, press clipping 211 Alerts by Citizens for Justice and Peace 212 Details of Relief Camps 216 Memorandum by Memoon Ajwa residents 230 Memorandum by Residents of Panchmahal District 234 Memorandum to the Prime Minister by the Kadi Muslim Samaj, Mehsana 235 Memorandum to the Gujarat Governor --CPI(M)/AIDWA 239 Memorandum by Janata Dal (Secular) 240 Citizens’ Memorandum to Election Commission 246 Memorandum to the Election Commission 248 Second Memorandum to the Election Commission 255 Indictment of the Indian Police in Communal Violence 257 Involvement of Organisations in Communal Violence 262 How to Mend and Break the Law -Document 266 RSS-VHP Close Connections 272 Background of the RSS 273 Background of the Bajrang Dal 274 Training Camps -- Bajrang Dal 276 4 FOREWORD What a shock and shame that Indiaís fair secular name should suffer dastardly disgrace through the recent government-abetted Gujarat communal rage, compounded by grisly genocidal carnage and savage arsonous pillage, victimising people of Muslim vintageó and ëunkindest cut of allíó allegedly executed with the monstrous abetment of chief minister Modi, his colleagues and party goons. The gravamen of this pogrom-like opera- tion was that the administration reversed its constitutional role and, by omission and commission, engineered the loot, ravishment and murder which was methodically perpe- trated through planned process by chauvinist VHP elements, goaded by terrorist appetite. What ensued was a ghastly sight the like of which, since bleeding partition days, no Indian eye had seen, no Indian heart had conceived and of which no Indian tongue could ad- equately tell. Hindutva barbarians came out on the streets in different parts of Gujarat and, in all flaming fury, targeted innocent and helpless Muslims who had nothing to do with the antecedent Godhra event. They were brutalised by miscreants uninhibited by the police; their women were unblushingly molested; and Muslim men, women and chil- dren, in a travesty of justice, were burnt alive. The chief minister, oath-bound to defend law and order, vicariously connived at the inhuman violence and some of his ministers even commanded the macabre acts of horror. There was none to question the malevolent managers of communal massacre. The criminal outrage, there was none in uniform to resist, not even to record information of the felonies. Nor was there any impartial official to render succour or assure civilised peace. When government failed and the local media distorted the truth, the fascist trend flourished and the barbaric, fanatic, rapist human animals remained unchecked. Awakened by this sinister scenario, people of conscience, all over the country, felt the gory, catastrophe merited investigation. Thus was set up a committee of enquiry formally headed by me, but actively and functionally managed by a great young ladyóTeesta Setalvad. She organised the services of eminent judges whose retirement would not in- hibit them from throwing all their energy to the enquiry processóa signal public service. A great team, valiant paradigm, joined them. They collected evidence of the gruesome events, lethal incidents, vicious environs and the complicity of people in authority who were vicariously guilty of the indescribable offenses. Those who sat on the committeeó they were superannuated judges, a militant marvel of an advocate and four other noble public figuresómade great sacrifice and rendered free service. They were experienced as 5 judges and seasoned social activists, and knew what a judicial enquiry called foróan objective, yet sensitive examination of the overall holocaust. They pooled testimonies sought from official and non-official sources, and pooled all probative material. People came and gave evidence, some officials showed up to unfold what they knew had hap- pened. The Tribunal toured, restlessly strove to get at the traumatic truth and were guided by the necessity of hearing both parties. Grievances poured in. Tears and fears were placed before the Tribunal. I was there only for a day and, therefore, cannot claim to have participated substantially in the enquiry. But my colleagues have done an anguished job, looking into tons of material, sifting and sorting and producing a brave, massive report. I commend their task to the Indian People. I cannot but condemn the culpable delinquency of those in power in Gandhinagar nor, indeed, is it possible to absolve the Central rulers in Delhi who failed to act and, perhaps, connived by omission, the harrying operation in Gandhi Country; I mean Gujarat, where the greatest man of our time was born, with the noblest example of secular symphony of religions. Yet, action has to be taken against heinous culprits since justice shall be done under the Indian Constitution. Be you ever so high, the law is above you. My message and my mission is the presentation of an exhaustive report, which does credit to those (other than me) who prepared, sedulously and feelingly, findings which they were commissioned to do by their conscience and the nation. There are tragic, traumatic conclusions and creative, corrective recommendations. There are measures, punitive and rehabilitative, for victimological constitutional action. My task is to place the report before the people. Know ye the Truth and the Truth shall make you Freeóprovided We, the people of India, act promptly and fearlessly. The melody of communal unity, the beauty of religious amity and the secularity of Indian humanityóthese glorious values are the mission and message to the nation. Let us struggle to sustain this supreme value, lest we, as a people, perish by divisive ideology. The Gujarat episode is an evil event and disastrous portent. Let us battle for the success of our pluralist culture, secular heritage and social-justice-illumined democracy. India must win! The integrity of our fraternity shall never surrender to berserk, blood-thirsty political bestiality. October 24, 2002 Justice VR Krishna Iyer 6 Concerned Citizens Tribunal - Gujarat 2002 An Inquiry into the Carnage in Gujarat Report of the Tribunal Justice VR Krishna Iyer Justice PB Sawant Retd Judge, Supreme Court Retd Judge, Supreme Court Justice Hosbet Suresh Adv KG Kannabiran Retd Judge, Mumbai High Court President, PUCL Ms. Aruna Roy Dr. KS Subramanian Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghatan Retd IPS, Former DGP, Tripura Prof. Ghanshyam Shah Prof. Tanika Sarkar Professor of Social Sciences in Professor of History, JNU Community Health, JNU Dated this 21st day of November 2002 7 8 Introduction The Concerned Citizens Tribunal ñ Gujarat 2002, was conceived as a response to the carnage that rocked the state of Gujarat following the Godhra tragedy on February 27, 2002. The eight-member Tribunal was constituted in consultation with a large number of groups from within Gujarat and the rest of the country. A copy of its terms of reference and a list of the groups urging that such a Peopleís Inquiry be launched is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure 1. The Tribunal collected 2,094 oral and written testimonies, both individual and collective, from victim-survivors and also independent human rights groups, womenís groups, NGOs and academics. The documentation work done by relief camp managers and community leaders, from lists of persons killed or ëmissingí, to the meticulous tabulation of economic loss and religious desecration, is unprecedented and immense. The Tribunal has benefited greatly from these and they are being published in a separate volume of annexures to our report. In addition, over one dozen detailed fact-finding reports and inquiries were placed before the Tribunal and we have benefited greatly from a close scrutiny of these. We have also collected photographs, copies of FIRs, audio- and video-tapes, as evidence. The sheer volume of the evidence on record took an enormous amount of time and human resources to sift through and evaluate. Yet, as in all human endeavours, there may be deficiencies in the report. For these, we plead extenuation and understanding as unlike in case of official inquiries, it has been voluntary commitment from a whole team that has enabled the comple- tion of this report. The Tribunal pays tribute to the victim-survivors, individually and collectively, who deposed before us at great risk to their person in the simple hope that one day justice will be done and the guilty be punished. Even as the Tribunal sat in Ahmedabad, there were threats and premises like the circuit house at Shahibaug were denied us due to the omni- presence of prowling mobs. We acknowledge our great debt to the activists on the ground who worked day and night to bring the victims and reliable eyewitnesses to us. After recording evidence, visiting sites, placing on record statements and collecting other relevant material, the Tribunal arrived at some prima facie conclusions. These were forwarded along with our recommendations to both the central and state governments and their views were awaited. However, the Tribunal regrets that neither the state government nor the central government, or individual ministers to whom request letters were sent, 9 responded. Though we are entitled to draw adverse conclusions from this lack of re- sponse, because that they did not respond to the interim findings, we do not propose to do so. However, many senior government officials and police officers did agree to meet the Tribunal, responded to our queries, shared insightful observations and presented some valuable evidence to us. One minister also appeared and deposed before us. The Tribunal had assured this witness (minister) and other officials that their anonymity would be pro- tected. Hence, while their valuable evidence is reflected in the Findings of the report, they have not been identified. Anonymity was urged especially because of the fear of reprisal from political bosses if names became known. The Tribunal has independently accessed volumes of material that helped us arrive at our final Findings and Recommendations. The Interim findings and Recommendations are annexed as Annexure 6, Volume 1. In a democracy, the peopleís right to information should be paramount. Any govern- ment wedded to this basic right should have eagerly cooperated in the effort of a citizenís tribunal to inquire and let the people know what happened in Gujarat, who engineered the carnage, and who the guilty are. The Tribunal undertook this huge task as part of the exercise of this fundamental hu- man freedom. The health of any society lies not in denials and half-truths when grave injustices have occurred, but in courageously admitting to them, righting those wrongs with justice and then reconciliation. That both the government of Gujarat and the govern- ment of India did not participate in the inquiry reveals their utter disregard for the peopleís basic democratic right to know. Having completed its task, it is with humility that the Tribunal presents this report to the country and the world. Even as we complete our task, we know and recognise that our countryís record in the matter of punishment of the guilty in cases of mass crimes, against the minorities, against Dalits, and against the poor has been pathetic. Yet, with hope that is eternal to the human condition, we do present this report in the belief that, this time, knowing the truth will help us chalk a future that is radically different. The sorry state of the rule of law in the country is closely connected to the functioning and accountability of our courts, and the criminal justice system is crying out for radical reform. We hope that with justice to the victim-survivors, these reforms will become a matter of urgent political debate. The Tribunal would like to express its gratitude to justice GG Loney (retd) who partici- pated in some sittings of the Tribunal. The panel also benefited from the insights provided by justice PD Desai (former CJ Mumbai, Kolkata and Himachal Pradesh High Court) who met us in Ahmedabad, and over lengthy discussions, enhanced our understanding and grasp of the situation. The setting up and the functioning of the Tribunal was made possible due to the Citi- zens for Justice and Peace, an association of committed citizens from all walks of life, from Mumbai and Ahmedabad, who came together to garner support for the fight for justice, post-carnage. The Tribunal acknowledges its huge debt to this group that felt duty and conscience bound to support and make possible such a Citizenís Inquiry. The committed team from Sabrang Communications and Publishing, Mumbai, ably 10
Description: