ebook img

Human Experimentation and Research PDF

653 Pages·2001·41.197 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Human Experimentation and Research

Human Experimentation and Research The International Library of Medicine, Ethics and Law Series Editor: Michael D. Freeman Titles in the Series Death, Dying and the Ending of Life Rights and Resources Margaret P. Battin, Leslie Francis and Frances H. Miller Bruce Landesman AIDS: Society, Ethics and Law Abortion Udo Schüklenk Belinda Bennett Women, Medicine, Ethics and the Law Ethics and Medical Decision-Making Susan Sherwin and Barbara Parish Michael D. Freeman Legal and Ethical Issues in Human Children, Medicine and the Law Reproduction Michael D. Freeman Bonnie Steinbock Mental Illness, Medicine and Law Medical Practice and Malpractice Martin Lyon Levine Harvey Teff The Elderly Human Experimentation and Research Martin Lyon Levine George F. Tomossy and David N. Weisstub The Genome Project and Gene Therapy Medicine and Industry Sheila A.M. McLean George F. Tomossy Human Experimentation and Research Edited by George F.Tomossy and David N. Weisstub University of Sydney, Australia and Université de Montréal, Canada Firstpublished2001 byAshgatePublishing Reissued2018byRoutledge 2ParkSquare,MiltonPark,Abingdon,OxonOX144RN 711 ThirdAvenue,NewYork,NY10017,USA Routledge is an imprint oft he Taylor &Francis Group, an informa business Copyright ©DavidJ.Hickson,RichardJ.Butler,DavidC.Wilson2001.Forcopyrightofindividual articlespleaserefertotheAcknowledgements. Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthisbookmaybereprintedorreproducedorutilisedinanyformorby anyelectronic,mechanical,orothermeans,nowknownorhereafterinvented,includingphotocopying andrecording, orinanyinformationstorageorretrievalsystem,withoutpermissioninwritingfrom thepublishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identificationandexplanationwithoutintenttoinfringe. Publisher'sNote Thepublisherhas gonetogreatlengthsto ensurethe qualityofthis reprintbutpointsoutthatsome imperfectionsintheoriginalcopiesmaybeapparent. Disclaimer Thepublisherhas made everyefforttotrace copyrightholders andwelcomes correspondence from thosetheyhavebeenunabletocontact. ALibraryofCongressrecordexistsunderLCcontrolnumber: 00029953 ISBN 13: 978-1-138-72409-9(hbk) ISBN 13: 978-1-315-19265-9(ebk) Contents Acknowledgements ix Series Preface xiii Introduction: Human Research Ethics XV PART I THE HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS 1 Hans Jonas (1969), ‘Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects’, Dœdalus, 98, pp. 219-47. 3 2 Ruth Macklin and Susan Sherwin (1975), ‘Experimenting on Human Subjects: Philosophical Perspectives’, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 25, pp. 434-71. 33 3 Eric M. Meslin, Heather J. Sutherland, James V. Lavery and James E. Till (1995),. ‘Principlism and the Ethical Appraisal of Clinical Trials’, Bioethics, 9, pp. 399^18. 71 4 David J. Rothman (1998), ‘The Nuremberg Code in Light of Previous Principles and Practices in Human Experimentation’, in Ulrich Tröhler and Stella Reiter- Theil in cooperation with Eckhard Herych (eds), Ethics Codes in Medicine: Foundations and Achievements of Codification Since 1947, Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 50-59. 91 5 James F. Childress (2000), ‘Nuremberg’s Legacy: Some Ethical Reflections’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 43, pp. 347-61. 101 6 Allen Buchanan (1996), ‘The Controversy over Retrospective Moral Judgment’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 6, pp. 245-50. 117 7 Tom L. Beauchamp (1996), ‘Looking Back and Judging Our Predecessors’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 6, pp. 251-70. 123 8 Arthur L. Caplan (1992), ‘When Evil Intrudes’, Hastings Center Report, 22, pp. 29-32. 143 9 Sissela Bok (1995), ‘Shading the Truth in Seeking Informed Consent for Research Purposes’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5, pp. 1-17. 147 10 Nancy E. Kass, Jeremy Sugarman, Ruth Faden and Monica Schoch-Spana (1996), ‘Trust: The Fragile Foundation of Contemporary Biomedical Research’, Hastings Center Report, 26, pp. 25-29. 165 11 George J. Annas (1996), ‘Questing for Grails: Duplicity, Betrayal and Self- Deception in Postmodern Medical Research’, Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 12, pp. 297-324. 171 12 David N. Weisstub (1996), ‘Roles and Fictions in Clinical and Research Ethics’, Health Law Journal, 4, pp. 259-82. 199 vi Human Experimentation and Research PART II PROTECTING HUMAN SUBJECTS 13 Jay Katz (1993), ‘Human Experimentation and Human Rights’, Saint Louis University Law Journal, 38, pp. 7-54. 225 14 Paul R. Benson (1989), ‘The Social Control of Human Biomedical Research: An Overview and Review of the Literature’, Social Science and Medicine, 29, pp. 1-12. 273 15 Jonathan D. Moreno (2001), ‘Goodbye to All That: The End of Moderate Protectionism in Human Subjects Research’, Hastings Center Report, 31, pp. 9-17. 285 16 Alexander Morgan Capron (1999), ‘Is National, Independent Oversight Needed for the Protection of Human Subjects?’, Accountability in Research, 7, pp. 283-92. 295 17 Anna C. Mastroianni (1999), ‘National, Independent Oversight: Reinforcing the Safety Net for Human Subjects Research’, Accountability in Research, 7, pp. 303-309. 305 18 Marshall B. Kapp (2002), ‘Regulating Research for the Decisionally Impaired: Implications for Mental Health Professionals’, Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 8, pp. 35-51. 313 19 Robert Michels (1999), ‘Are Research Ethics Bad for Our Mental Health?’, New England Journal of Medicine, 340, pp. 1427-30. 331 20 George F. Tomossy and David N. Weisstub (1997), ‘The Reform of Adult Guardianship Laws: The Case of Non-Therapeutic Experimentation’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20, pp. 113-39. 335 PART III RISK AND RESPONSIBILITY 21 Charles Weijer (2000), ‘The Ethical Analysis of Risk’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 28, pp. 344-61. 365 22 Nancy M.P. King (2000), ‘Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 28, pp. 332-43. 383 23 David Wendler (2002), ‘What Research with Stored Samples Teaches us about Research with Human Subjects’, Bioethics, 16, pp. 33-54. 395 24 Robert J. Levine (1988), ‘Uncertainty in Clinical Research’, Law, Medicine and Health Care, 16, pp. 174-82. 417 25 Benjamin Freedman (1987), ‘Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical Research’, New England Journal of Medicine, 317, pp. 141-45. 427 26 Richard Ashcroft (1999), ‘Equipoise, Knowledge and Ethics in Clinical Research and Practice’, Bioethics, 13, pp. 314-26. 433 27 S. Senn (2002), ‘Ethical Considerations Concerning Treatment Allocation in Drug Development Trials’, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, pp. 403-11. 447 28 Baruch A. Brody (1997), ‘When are Placebo-Controlled Trials No Longer Appropriate?’, Control Clinical Trials, 18, pp. 602-12. 457 Human Experimentation and Research vii PART IV GLOBALIZATION AND CORPORATION - TRUST AND PARTICIPATION 29 Ruth Macklin (1999), ‘International Research: Ethical Imperialism or Ethical Pluralism?’, Accountability in Research, 7, pp. 59-83. 471 30 Marcia Angell (2000), ‘Is Academic Medicine for Sale?’, New England Journal of Medicine, 342, pp. 1516-18. 497 31 James T. Rule and Adil E. Shamoo (1997), ‘Ethical Issues in Research Relationships between Universities and Industry’, Accountability in Research, 5, pp. 239-49. 501 32 Thomas Bodenheimer (2000), ‘Uneasy Alliance: Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry’, New England Journal of Medicine, 342, pp. 1539-44. 513 33 Trudo Lemmens and Benjamin Freedman (2000), ‘Ethics Review for Sale? Conflict of Interest and Commercial Research Review Boards’, Milbank Quarterly Review, 78, pp. 547-84. 519 34 Jesse A. Goldner (2000), ‘Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: IRB Oversight as the Next Best Solution to the Abolitionist Approach’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 28, pp. 379-404. 557 35 Mark Yarborough and Richard R. Sharp (2002), ‘Restoring and Preserving Trust in Biomedical Research’, Academic Medicine, 77, pp. 8-14. 583 36 David B. Resnik (1999), ‘Privatized Biomedical Research, Public Fears, and the Hazards of Government Regulation: Lessons from Stem Cell Research’, Health Care Analysis, 7, pp. 273-87. 591 Name Index 607 Acknowledgements The editors and publishers wish to thank the following for permission to use copyright material. George J. Annas (1996), ‘Questing for Grails: Duplicity, Betrayal and Self-Deception in Postmodern Medical Research’, Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 12, pp. 297- 324. Copyright © George J. Annas. Ashgate Publishing Limited for the essay: David J. Rothman (1998), ‘The Nuremberg Code in Light of Previous Principles and Practices in Human Experimentation’, in Ulrich Tröhler and Stella Reiter-Theil in cooperation with Eckhard Herych (eds), Ethics Codes in Medicine: Foundations and Achievements of Codification Since 1947, Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 50-59. Association of American Medical Colleges for the essay: Mark Yarborough and Richard R. Sharp (2002), ‘Restoring and Preserving Trust in Biomedical Research’, Academic Medicine, 77, pp. 8-14. Copyright © 2002 Association of American Medical Colleges. American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics for the essays: Jesse A. Goldner (2000), ‘Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: IRB Oversight as the Next Best Solution to the Abolitionist Approach’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 28, pp. 379-404. Copyright © 2000 American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics; Charles Weijer (2000), ‘The Ethical Analysis of Risk’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 28, pp. 344-61. Copyright © 2000 Charles Weijer; Nancy M.P. King (2000), ‘Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 28, pp. 332-43. Copyright © 2000 American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics; Robert J. Levine (1988), ‘Uncertainty in Clinical Research’, Law, Medicine and Health Care, 16, pp. 174-82. Copyright © 1998 American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics. Reprinted with the permission of the American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics. All rights reserved. Arnold Journals & Reference for the essay: S. Senn (2002), ‘Ethical Considerations Concerning Treatment Allocation in Drug Development Trials’, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, pp. 403-11. Copyright © 2002 Arnold. Blackwell Publishing Ltd for the essays: Eric M. Meslin, Heather J. Sutherland, James V. Lavery and James E. Till (1995), ‘Principlism and the Ethical Appraisal of Clinical Trials’, Bioethics, 9, pp. 399-418. Copyright © 1995 Blackwell Publishers Ltd; Richard Ashcroft (1999), ‘Equipoise, Knowledge and Ethics in Clinical Research and Practice’, Bioethics, 13, pp. 314- 26.Copyright © 1999 Blackwell Publishers Ltd; David Wendler (2002), ‘What Research with Stored Samples Teaches us about Research with Human Subjects’, Bioethics, 16, pp. 33-54. Copyright © 2002 Blackwell Publishers Ltd; Trudo Lemmens and Benjamin Freedman (2000), ‘Ethics Review for Sale? Conflict of Interest and Commercial Research Review Boards’, Milbank Quarterly Review, 78, pp. 547-84.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.