ebook img

HUD-0005845 The HUD Lead-Based Paint Abatement Demonstration PDF

142 Pages·2010·5.9 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview HUD-0005845 The HUD Lead-Based Paint Abatement Demonstration

HUD-0005845 The HUD Lead-Based Paint Abatement Demonstration (FHA) August 1991 The HUD Lead-Based Paint Abatement Demonstration (FHA) August 1991 Prepared for the U.S. Department ofHousing and Urban Development Office ofPolicy Development and Research Washington, D.C. By Dewberry & Davis HC-5831 THE HUD LEAD·BASED PAINT ABATEMENT DEMONSTRATION (FHA) KEY PARTICIPANTS DEWBERRY & DAVIS· Dewberry & Davis served as the project manager, responsible for coordinating and conducting supervision of each task, management of all abatement, and preparation of final reports. Dewberry & Davis personnel performed several operational functions, including field inspections of candidate units. development of abatement specifications, monitoring of abatement. solicitation of abatement contractors, contracting with abatement contractors, and data collection. William G. Fry, P.E., Project Manager Dennis (Chip) A. Harris, Assistant Project Manager Mark S. Montgomery. Assistant Project Manager R. Frederick Eberle, Field Coordinator Richard A. Baker, Field Coordinator Kenneth M. Shaffer, Field Coordinator Douglas S. Williams, Field Coordinator Rosemary H. O'Neill, Senior Technical Writer SPEEDWELL, INC.. Speedwell developed the research design, including preliminary unit selection plan, all field data collection instruments (forms), and the final unit selection plan. Speedwell also compiled, analyzed, and reported the results of all data received during this project. Anthony 1. Blackburn, Senior Statistician James T. Quinn. Analyst KTA • T ATOR, INC. - KT A was responsible for all XRF testing, development of LBP detection protocols. testing of units of housing, and conducting AAS and EP toxicity sampling where necessary. Kenneth Trimber. Project Manager Charles McCartney. Field Operations Manager Dwight Weldon. Laboratory Director TRACOR TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, INC. - TRACOR developed worker protection and safety protocols, developed and conducted worker protection and safety training sessions for abatement contractors, and carried out environmental and personnel monitoring. They performed AAS laboratory analysis of samples and monitored data collection, and were responsible for final testing of all abated units. Daniel Chute, CIH, Project Manager Bonnie A. Barrows. Laboratory Director Stephen R. Schanamann, CIH THE HUD LEAD-BASED PAINT ABATEMENT DEMONSTRATION (FHA) KEY PARTICIPANTS (Cont'd.) THE MARCOR GROUP - MARCOR provided lead-based paint abatement for unit prototype abatements in Baltimore, Maryland. Marcor also assisted in the development of the abatement methods, substrate identification, abatement monitoring, and data collection. Jeffrey T. Paulding, Project Manager U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Office of Policy Development and Research Ronald J. Morony, Director, Division of Innovative Technology Ellis G. Goldman, Government Technical Representative Nelson A. Carbonell, Government Technical Monitor Dorothy R. Allen, Program Information Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Executive Surrunary .......................................... . Research Design ....................................... ii Testing for Lead-Based Paint .............................. iv Worker Protection and Personal Exposure Monitoring ............. v The Cost of Lead-Based Paint Abatement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii The Efficacy of Lead-Based Paint Abatement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix Waste Disposal ........................................ xi Abatement Contracting: Process and Performance ............... xi Synthesis of Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xii 1. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 A. The Lead-Based Paint Problem ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-I B. Legislative Background to the Demonstration ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5 C. Management and Work Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-6 D. Organization of this Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-8 II. Research Design ....................................... II-I A. Objectives of the Demonstration! Research Design Objectives ........................... II-I 1. Estimating the Costs of Altemative Lead-Based Paint Abatement Methods II-I 2. Assessing the Efficacy of Alternative Lead-Based Paint Abatement Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-2 3. Confirming the Adequacy of Worker Protection Safeguards Used in Lead-Based Paint Abatement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-3 B. Limitations of the Demonstration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-3 C. Design of the Demonstration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-4 1. Selection of Dwelling Units to be Abated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-5 2. Selection of Abatement Methods ................... 11-7 3. Assignment of Abatement Methods to Substrates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-9 D. Data Collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-II 1. Cost Data Collection ............................ 11-11 2. Abatement Efficacy Data Collection ................. 11-12 3. Worker Protection Assessment Data Collection . . . . . . . . . . 11-13 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter III. Testing for Lead-Based Paint III-I A. The Testing Program ................................ III-I B. X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-2 C. Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-3 D. Test Volume and Results ............................. JII-S E. Lead-in-Soil Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-6 IV. Worker Protection and Personal Exposure Monitoring ............. JV-I A. Worker Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IV-l 1. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) Guidelines ............................. . IV-l 2. NIOSH Evaluation ............................. . IV-2 3. Development of Training Program .................. . IV-S 4. Medical Examination, Blood Tests, and Respiratory Requirements ..................... . IV-7 B. Personal Exposure Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-8 1. Exposure Monitoring Findings .................... . IV-8 2. Negative Air Control ........................... . IV-13 3. Blood Lead Monitoring ......................... . IV-14 V. The Cost of Lead-Based Paint Abatement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-I A. Cost Data and Methods of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-I B. Cost Estimates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-3 1. Direct Labor Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V -4 2. Indirect Labor Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. V-4 3. Direct Materials Costs ........................... V-6 4. Indirect Materials Costs .......................... V-6 S. Abatement Contractors' Overhead and Profit ........... V-7 6. Total Costs of Abatement by Substrate and by Abatement Method ........................ V-8 C. The Cost of Disposing of Hazardous Materials .............. V-II VI. The Efficacy of Lead-Based Paint Abatement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VI-I A. Visual Clearance Testing and Final Cleaning ............... VI-I B. Wipe Test Results and the Efficacy of Final Cleaning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter VI. C. Field Analysis of Different Abatement Methods .......... . VI-6 1. Encapsulation............................. VI-7 2. Encapsulation with Flexible Wall Covering Systems ......................... . VI-7 3. Abrasive Removal ......................... . VI-8 4. Vacuum Blasting .......................... . VI-S 5 Hand-Scraping with Heat Gun .................. . VI-9 6. Chemical Removal ......................... . VI-9 7. Enclosure with Paneling ..................... . VI-lO S. Enclosure with Gypsum Board ................. . VI-tO 9. Exterior Enclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-ll 10. Off-Site Chemical Removal ................... . VI-ll 11. Removal and Replacement .................... . VI-ll D. Other Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Abatement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-12 1. Contractor Background ....................... VI-12 2. Condition of the Dwelling Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-13 3. Climate................................. VI-14 4. Product Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-14 vn. Waste Disposal .................................. . VII-l A. Hazardous Waste Determination ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1 B. Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Waste Disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . VII-4 C. The Cost of Waste Disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-5 D. Waste Processing Observations for Lead-Based Paint Abatement ....................... VII-7 vrn. Abatement Contracting: Process and Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-! A. Contract Document Development ................... . VUH 1. Abatement Specifications ..................... . VIII-2 2. Bid Quantities ............................ . VIII-2 3. Product Utilization ......................... . VIII-3 B. Abatement Contractor Selection .................... . VIII-4 1. Initial Investigation During Advance City Team (ACT) ......................... . VIII-4 2. Solicitation Process ........................ . VIII-5 3. Contractor Meetings (Site Visits) ................ . VIII-5 4. Final Abatement Contractor Selection ............. . VIII-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter VIII. C. Abatement Contracting Performance ..................... VIII-7 1. Scheduling/Mobilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-8 2. Set-up ..................................... . VIII-9 3. Field Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-tO 4. Industrial Hygiene Monitoring ..................... . VIII-ll IX. Synthesis of Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IX-! A. Cost-Effectiveness of Encapsulation and Enclosure Abatement Methods ......................... IX-! 1. Encapsulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-2 2. Enclosure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-2 B. Cost-Effectiveness of Removal Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IX-3 1. Chemical Removal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-3 2. Hand-Scraping with Heat Gun. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-4 3. Replacement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-5 C. Summary.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX-6

Description:
The most severe cases of childhood lead poisoning are typically associated with eating chips of lead-based paint or chewing on in the final sample and
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.