How To Trump SJWs: Using Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ Against Liberals

79 Pages·2016·0.6 MB·English

by  Manon Welles

How To Trump SJWs:
Using Alinsky’s ‘Rules for
Radicals’ Against Liberals

By
Manon Welles
Copyright © 2016 by Manon Welles
Cover copyright © 2016

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,
recording, uploading, scanning or any information storage and retrieval system
now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher
obtained by writing to [email protected] , except by a reviewer
who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for
inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, website or broadcast.

Published in the United States by
Aristocrats of the Soul
2220 Meridian Blvd., Suite AU361
Minden, NV 89423
www.AristocratsOfTheSoul.com

First ebook edition: August 2016
Thank you for your purchase!

Thanks for purchasing How to Trump SJWs ! You’re about to learn the history of
radical Leftists who have morphed into today’s social justice warriors. You’ll
also learn Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals, how SJWs use them, and how
conservatives can start using these tactics against the Left.

If you enjoy this book, especially if you got it through a promotion, please take a
moment to leave a review on Amazon. Every positive review will improve my
ranking on Amazon, allowing more readers to learn the tactics of the Left and
how to fight back—and it’s now more important than ever for us to start taking
our country back. Positive reviews will also lead to more book sales, which is
important to me because I hope to eventually be able to write full-time.
Table of Contents

Introduction
2015: The Year of the SJW
SJW Logic: It Doesn’t Exist
Microaggressions: SJW Thought Police Seek out Thought-Criminals
Alinsky’s Handbook for Leftist Agitation
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals
Rule No. 1: Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you
have.
Rule No. 2: Never go outside the expertise of your people.
Rule No. 3: Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.
Rule No. 4: Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.
Rule No. 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
Rule No. 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy.
Rule No. 7: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
Rule No. 8: Keep the pressure on. Never let up.
Rule No. 9: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
Rule No. 10: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that
will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
Rule No. 11: If you push a negative hard and enough, it will push through and
become a positive.
Rule No. 12: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
Rule No. 13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
Conclusion: The Left Is Losing — Keep Fighting
Epilogue: Why Do You Hate SJWs?
Further Reading
Endnotes
Introduction
During the past few years a new breed of radical Leftist has developed, one
that’s just as intolerant and violent as rioters in the late 1960s or the Bolsheviks
who created Communist Russia. Steeped in the “progressive” ideologies taught
at liberal universities, social justice warriors believe in feminism, gay rights,
political correctness, transgender rights, women’s rights, the Black Lives Matter
movement, gun restrictions, and whatever else their liberal professors and the
media can make them think is an “injustice.” Yet they are not content with
equality. They seek special treatment and special privileges for those groups they
consider to be marginalized.
The name social justice warrior (SJW) is a pejorative that refers to someone
who talks a lot about “social justice,” but who in real life seems to care more
about their own reputation and virtue signaling than effecting any real change.
Since SJWs believe straight white males have “white privilege,” they think
white men have never suffered any injustice. They claim white men created a
racist “patriarchy” in America and Europe that they use to suppress everyone
else. SJWs don’t compare Western societies to other cultures — such as Islamic
countries where women can’t vote, child marriage is legal, slavery is still
practiced, and gays are put to death. If they did, they might feel fortunate to live
in the freest countries in the world. Instead, they just complain.
This is because SJWs only examine history from the point of view of the
oppressed. One of their favorite books is Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of
the United States , which is filled with stories of white men killing Indians and
the rise of the KKK. Because of this limited perspective, SJWs feel no gratitude
for the European-Americans who gave their lives to end slavery, gave women
and minorities the vote, put non-discrimination laws into place, built a social
welfare net, and granted freedoms to all citizens years before the majority of the
world. Their hatred doesn’t stop at just white men, even though it’s concentrated
there. Anyone of any sex or race is worthy of SJW wrath if they’re a
conservative.
Perhaps the worldview of SJWs wouldn’t be dangerous — only pathetic —
if they were tolerant of those who disagreed. But today’s radical Leftists have
turned social justice into a totalitarian ideology that all must follow lest they be
bullied into submission. SJWs censor free speech, get people fired who dare to
disagree with them, engage in violence, and even use social media to call for
their enemies to be killed. If there was a kill switch on Twitter that could
actually murder people, they’d hit the button. In fact, the scariest aspect of SJWs
is their self-delusion: They honestly believe they’re tolerant and open-minded.
As Urban Dictionary puts it: “Social Justice Warriors or SJWs are: People
with paper thin skin who always find something to be offended about. They
generally have no concept of humour.” Words they commonly use include:
intolerant, offensive, triggering, sexist and racist. [1]
If you’re out of college and working, you’re most likely to encounter SJWs
on the Internet. They spend a lot of time online, since it’s easier to post
comments and memes on social media than it is to do something good for the
world in real life. SJWs also flock to sympathetic message boards and online
groups because they’re easily “triggered” — meaning they freak out over
everyday occurrences that they view as traumatic. When SJWs are triggered,
they retreat to a “safe space” like those offered on college campuses. There
might be blankets, teddy bears and coloring books, or signs saying “women
only” [2] or “no whites allowed.” [3] Because although SJWs preach diversity,
they only want to congregate only with others who think exactly like they do.
Their lives are echo chambers, where the only voices they hear are those of their
friends and news media who agree with them. If a distant relative has ever
deleted you on Facebook for making a positive post about Donald Trump,
chances are they’re an SJW. They literally have “no tolerance” for differing
opinions.
SJWS are typically millennials, but Gen X Bernie Sanders and middle-aged
feminist Hillary Clinton supporters now veer into SJW territory. Most have this
free time to spend online because they’re either in college or underemployed.
It’s rare to encounter a family with two working parents and a couple kids that
adheres to the SJW mantra — they’re too busy with other pressing issues to care
about how many “gender options” Facebook allows its users to choose from
(currently it’s somewhere around 70).
And of course, working families understand that it’s their money that will
be taken to implement the thousands of social justice programs demanded by
SJWs. The one exception is the very rich — especially Hollywood celebrities —
who must endorse liberal policies to stay working. And those celebrities that are
serious about liberal policies have enough money to not care how SJW policies
like bringing in Muslim refugees will affect their bottom line or safety. They’re
not going to live next door to them. [4]
2015: The Year of the SJW
The year 2015 was dubbed the “year of the social justice warrior.” [5] But
what created the SJW? Why now?
Like so much on the Left, it starts with Karl Marx. (Ironically, Marx was
chronically unemployed, lived off others’ money most of his life and kept his
children living in such fifth and poverty that four of his seven children died. [6] )
Marx’s plan was for a classless society, an ideal world that would exist after the
workers seized control of the means of production from the capitalists. But
everywhere they tried to implement it, the Marxists’ platform was met with
resistance.
So an Italian communist, Antonio Gramsci, tried to figure out why the
communist revolution was never successful in Europe. He determined that the
failure was because most people’s dominant ideology was still capitalism (“rule
by the bourgeoisie” in Marxist terms). If Marxism was ever to succeed, he said,
first they’d have to change the culture. After that, placing a vote in the ballot box
for Marxist policies would come naturally to the brainwashed masses.
Thus the Left started its “long march through the institutions” — what
Marxist Herbert Marcuse said was the only effective way to take power. The
plan involved taking over every institution they could — colleges, government
agencies, media outlets, advertising, and later Hollywood. Any institution that
influences public opinion was a target for Marxist takeover.
During and after World War II, numerous Marxists fled to the U.S. (they
weren’t welcome in Nazi Germany). They took up residence at American
universities, most notably at New York’s Columbia University. The Left’s
takeover of the universities, media and other cultural institutions (like art
museums) was not by chance. The cultural destruction of the West so
communism could take power was a deliberate, multi-generational plan. Sadly,
many of those involved were merely indoctrinated pawns.
Today’s SJWs stem from those Marxists, though most deny the association,
claiming instead to be on the side of “truth,” “reason,” or “progress.” Like the
Communists before them, SJWs are totalitarian; they even like the idea of
reeducation camps. Also like the Communists, they are mostly secular. When
SJWs are religious, they tend to be secular adherents of a religion. For example,
they only like the teachings of Jesus or the Buddha that fit into the progressive
agenda and they discount all other aspects of the religious tradition as outdated
or somehow less pure. Most SJWs are atheists or agnostic. But like religious
fanatics, their blind adherence to Left-wing ideology puts them clearly in the
category of being a secular cult.
One of the main traits of SJWs is that they tend to engage in issues not to
cause any real change, but simply to raise their personal reputation. This is
“virtue signaling” — signaling to their friends and community that they’re a
virtuous person without having to actually do anything. This is why so much
SJW activism takes place online — it doesn’t even require getting out of bed,
but their friends on Facebook and Twitter can congratulate them for “speaking
out” or “being brave.”
Real-life activism by SJWs is often just virtue signaling as well. They hold
protests to try to make other people do something. Why don’t they use their own
money to build a homeless shelter, hold diversity classes or house refugees?
Because all those things require more effort than holding a sign or burning a
flag. It’s pure hypocrisy, motivated by improving their image. If SJWs wanted
more events that talked about racism in America, they could form a club, raise
money and bring speakers to campus themselves. But they want universities to
bear the burden of both organizing and paying for it.
Another trait of SJWs is their verbal abuse and bullying. And while they’re
abusing others and calling them names, SJWs play the victim — leading to the
nickname “crybullies.” They are adept at using crocodile tears to feign
victimhood so people give into them. The goal, after the temper tantrums pave
the way, is a totalitarian state in which their rules are enforced by jail time or
huge fines. Already in New York City, employees, landlords and businesses who
refuse to use someone’s preferred pronoun can be fined for violating their human
rights. This could be accidentally calling a transgender woman “him” when the
person prefers “her,” or refusing to use a plethora of new pronouns like “ze” and
“hir.” [7] This is how SJWs fight oppression: by becoming the oppressors
themselves.
SJWs are also the most selfish element in today’s society. Like so many
other traits, they’re oblivious to this as well. SJWs claim to be unselfish because
they agitate for groups they consider to be oppressed — the LGBT community,
minorities, women — but they have no consideration for groups like men,
whites, Christians and heterosexuals. Ironically, most SJWs are young, white
people. SJWs will say it’s racist to mimic an Asian accent, then turn around and
make fun of rural conservatives in a redneck voice — obviously not caring at all
about stereotyping or hurting the feelings of those on the Right. In fact, SJWs
will go out of their way to insult, oppress and make fun of anyone not on board
with the Leftist agenda.
SJWs do this because all they really care about is their own feelings and
whether people are accommodating them. They’ll even be offended on behalf of
other groups, like white liberals who try to get the name of the Washington
Redskins changed even though nine out of 10 Native Americans polled aren’t
offended by it. [8]
The classic example is liberal politicians who pander to minority voters.
Many minority voters — like the gays and lesbians who jumped on the Trump
train after the 2016 Orlando massacre — are starting to see through the rhetoric
of the Left.
Notice how SJWs care about the feelings of transgender people and which
bathroom they can use, but completely discount the feelings of parents
concerned about pedophiles and peeping Toms taking advantage of such
policies. SJWs care about the feelings of illegal immigrants and Muslim
refugees. They don’t care one iota about the feelings of legal Americans who are
struggling to pay for their own children because so much of their money gets
stolen through taxes to pay for other people’s kids.
This lack of caring for others — except for themselves and the supposedly
oppressed — ties into SJW’s greed. They have a long list of demands, all which
must be “free” — free college tuition, student loan forgiveness, free healthcare,
free universal basic income and free reeducation classes for professors who
aren’t “progressive” enough.
SJWs don’t bother with the facts. For example, confiscating 100 percent of
the earnings of Americans who make $10 million a year or more would fund
current federal spending for 24 days. Taxing those who make $1 million a year
or more at 100 percent would fund current federal spending for just 72 days. In
fact, the more than $700 billion taken every year wouldn’t even cover Medicare
and Medicaid, which cost $1 trillion a year. And those numbers are before the
additional costs of “free healthcare” and “free college” for everyone. [9]
Yet SJWs insist the upper middle classes and the rich aren’t paying their
“fair share” of taxes. According to the Pew Research Center, Americans who
make $250,000 a year pay 51.6 percent of total income taxes collected by the
U.S. government. Individuals who make $50,000 a year or more pay 94.3
percent of income taxes. In contrast, those who make under $30,000 a year pay
just 1.5 percent of income taxes. [10] So who’s not paying their fair share again?
SJWs also love to complain. They feel justified in whining because in their
minds, their problems are always someone else’s fault. They have no concept of
working hard and making sacrifices to get ahead in life. They believe what
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren said in 2011: “There is nobody in this
country who got rich on his own.” [11]
The Occupy Wall Street movement that started in the fall of 2011 is another
example of SJW whining. They had some fair complaints about the banking
system. But their rallying cry, “We are the 99%,” tried to paint rich people out as
the bad guys. I doubt if any of them realized that it only takes an income of
$32,400 to make it into the global top 1%. [12] Despite being the most