Chapter 3 Protecting Individual Rights to Affordable Housing “Equality may be America's last frontier, just as it was its first, a more difficult frontier to reach than the outer planets and a rougher terrain than the Rocky Mountains. But the achievement or near achievement of equality would raise the entire level, the entire nature of democracy... " Roger Rosenblatt "Coming to America" LIFE, February, 1990 ______________________________________________________________________________________ GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3/1 Contents 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................. 3/3 2.0 Legal Right to Housing .......................... ........................................................... 3/4 3.0 Challenging Discrimination ............................................................................... 3/5 3.1 Overview 3.2 Race, National Origin, Ethnicity 3.3 Gender/Sexual Harassment 3.4 Disability 3.5 Familial Status/Seniors 3.6 Sexual Orientation 3.7 Other Protected Categories 3.8 Duty to "Affirmatively Further Fair Housing" 4.0 Farmworker Housing ............................. ......................................................... 3/89 5.0 Relocation Assistance Laws ................... ......................................................... 3/95 6.0 Predatory Lending & Other Scams ........ ....................................................... 3/105 7.0 Foreclosure ............................................. ....................................................... 3/117 ________________________________________________________________________ 3/2 GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS Protecting Individual Rights to Affordable Housing 1.0 Introduction Strategies P eople who live in affordable housing or 1. Represent clients in eviction and foreclosure who want to live in affordable housing are actions and help unrepresented clients defend often treated unfairly or trapped in themselves effectively. bureaucratic nightmares. They — 2. Insure that admission processes for affordable • have fewer resources to fight back even though housing are fair and nondiscriminatory and that the housing problems may create unbearable people can have hearings to challenge unfair conditions. decisions. • may be evicted without good reasons. 3. Protect clients facing displacement by government action by fighting the displacement • may have their homes foreclosed upon because and by getting the clients adequate relocation of events they can't control. benefits and replacement housing. • may have trouble getting into housing. 4. Protect tenants’ rights to work together on common issues, and to seek a role in • may face discrimination in housing because of management and eventual ownership of their their race, sex, family status, immigration status, housing. sexual preference, age, disability or economic status. 5. Insure that subsidized housing owners, public housing authorities, and shelter and transitional • may not have a way to change bad or unsafe housing providers have reasonable nondiscrim- conditions. inatory rules, grievance procedures, and oppor- tunities for tenant involvement in management • may be homeless or face arbitrary rules in a and rule making. shelter. 6. Help tenants challenge health hazards in • may want to be involved in managing their own housing such as asbestos or lead paint. housing. 7. Assist clients with special needs in fighting As their advocates we must to work alongside discrimination and in obtaining accommodation our clients to insure that they have rights, are of those needs as required by law. treated fairly, and are given a voice in decisions that affect them. 8. Challenge discriminatory actions and conditions, both for individual people and families and for groups of people. 9. Work for “just cause” eviction and other protections for tenants in private housing ______________________________________________________________________________________ GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3/3 2.0 A Legal Right to Housing This report gives the U.S. letter grades on each of Establishing the right to live in decent, safe them. It also offers common sense solutions the homes is an important goal for advocates to U.S. can adopt to better meet the housing needs pursue with low-income people. of homeless and poor people. Housing Rights for All: Promoting and Opening the Door to the Human Right to Defending Housing Rights in the United States Housing - The Universal Periodic Review and (Fifth Edition, 2011) argues that U.S. laws are Strategic Advocacy for a Rights-Based Approach to inadequate to address the profound and diverse Housing3 array of housing problems faced by so many “In 2010 HUD affirmed for the first time the Americans. The Manual describes an relevance of an international human rights international human rights approach that mechanism to its role in setting domestic housing recognizes the legal duties of the government to policy. Five months later, again for the first time, respect, protect, and fulfill the right to adequate the U.S. Department of State, in consultation housing for every member of society without with HUD, supported recommendations on discrimination.1 affordable housing and protecting the rights of homeless persons, among others, in response to Resource Alert: This is useful, cutting edge the Universal Periodic Review. The following material and a must read for all serious housing week the State Department announced a advocates. re-embrace of economic and social rights, including the right to housing, after seventy years “Simply Unacceptable”: Homelessness and of treating them as second-class rights.” the Human Right to Housing In the United States (2016)2 Resource Alert: National Law Center on National Law Center on Homelessness & Homelessness & Poverty collects it reports and Poverty has released a report card grading the resources on enforcing the human rights of United States on its response to homelessness individuals experiencing homelessness.4 and its compliance with the human right to housing. The Report issues failing grades in Cross-Reference: Chapter 10, Cutting Edge for more than one category. more on the Human Right to Housing. According to international standards, the human right to housing consists of seven elements: • security of tenure; • availability of services, materials, and infra- structure; • affordability; • accessibility; • habitability; • location; and • cultural adequacy. 1 https://www.nlchp.org/documents/Human_Right_to_ Housing_Manual 2 https://nlchp.org//wp- 3 content/uploads/2018/10/Right_to_Housing_Report_ https://www.nlchp.org/documents/Clearinghouse_Ope Card_2016-1.pdf ning_the_Door_2011.09 4 https://nlchp.org/human-rights/ ________________________________________________________________________ 3/4 GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3.0 Challenging Discrimination Challenging Discrimination - Contents 3.1 Overview 3.2 Race, National Origin, Ethnicity 3.3 Gender/Sexual Harassment 3.4 Disability 3.5 Familial Status/Seniors 3.6 Sexual Orientation 3.7 Other Protected Categories 3.8 Duty to "Affirmatively Further Fair Housing" Charly Palmer www.aviscafineart.com H ousing problems for low-income people are caused, perpetuated and exacerbated by discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, disability, sexual orientation, and national origin. As their advocates we must vindicate poor people's civil rights to choose to live in decent, safe, affordable housing in well-served neighborhoods. Vindication involves helping people to improve the housing and neighborhoods in which they live and enabling people who wish to move into different neighborhoods ─ usually, white, "mainstream," middle-income neighborhoods to do so. ______________________________________________________________________________________ GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3/5 3.1 Challenging Discrimination Overview .1 Federal Housing Laws a list .2 Federal and State Fair Housing Laws and Procedures ─An Overview lays out the fundamentals of the Federal Housing Act, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, and Unruh Civil Rights Act. .3 DFEH comparison of Federal and State Housing Laws charts the key provisions of these fair housing laws detailing coverage, senior exemptions, litigation forums, and available remedies. .4 Laws Prohibiting Discrimination Against Affordable Housing & Its Residents focuses on discrimination against group homes, shelters and other low-income housing through government policies or laws such as zoning or planning ordinances. .5 Low income Housing Tax Credit MOU re Fair Housing among The Departments of the Treasury, Housing and Urban Development and Justice about the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program’s compliance with the Fair Housing Act. .6 Required Procedure for Requesting Reasonable Accommodation in Land Use Laws is a letter from California Attorney General Bill Lockyer re local government’s affirmative duty to modify zoning laws for people with disabilities. .7 DFEH Housing Complaint Process and Flow Chart describes the steps in dealing with a housing discrimination complaint. .8 Fair Housing Resources lists information on how to contact HUD Fair Housing Enforcement Centers, DFEH offices and Fair Housing Councils throughout California. ________________________________________________________________________ 3/6 GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3.3.1 Federal Fair Housing Laws Section 504 Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701, 794 Fair Housing Act Fair Housing Act, P.L. 90-284, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et 24 CFR Part 8 (6/2/88), 53 Fed Reg. 20216: seq., as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Nondiscrimination Based on Handicap in Federally Act of 1988 Assisted Programs and Activities 24 CFR Chapter I (3/16/91), Fair Housing 24 CFR Part 9, 59 Fed. Reg. 31036 et seq., Accessibility Guidelines, 56 Federal Register 9472 et (6/16/94): Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the seq., as revised in the 6/24/19 Federal Register Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities conducted by the Department of Housing and Urban 24 CFR Part 14 et seq., Implementation of the Fair Development Housing Amendments Act of 1988; Final Rule, 54 Federal Register 3532 (1/23/89) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Americans With Disabilities Act, P.L. 101-336 Title VI (7/26/90), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, 12131 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P.L. 88-352, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., Nondiscrimination in 28 CFR Part 35, 56 Fed. Reg. 35694 et seq., Federally Assisted Programs Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, P.L. 100-259 (3/22/88) amending various statutes including § 504 Architectural Barriers Act and Title VI The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, P.L. 90-480 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 4151 et seq. Civil Rights Act of 1991 42 U.S.C. § 1981, amending various statutes including § 504 24 CFR Part 40: Accessibility Standards for Design, Construction and Alternation of Publicly Owned 24 CFR Part 1: Nondiscrimination in Federally Residential Structures Assisted Programs of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development – Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil 24 CFR Part 41: Policies and Procedures for the Rights Act of 1964 – 24 CFR §§1.1 et seq. Enforcement of Standards and Requirements for Accessibility by the Physically Handicapped Section 109 Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Age Discrimination Development Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 5309, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs §§ 6101-07 24 CFR Parts 6, 8, 570 (Drafts – 2/27/95) 24 CFR Part 146: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in HUD Programs or Activities Receiving 24 CFR §§ 570.601 and 570.602 Federal Financial Assistance Executive Orders Section 3 (Employment Opportunities) Executive Order 11063, 27 Fed. Reg. 11527 (Eff. 11- Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, P.L. 20-62), as amended by Executive Order 12259, Equal 90-448; as amended by the Housing and Community Opportunity in Housing Development Act of 1992, § 915, 42 U.S.C. 1701u: Employment Opportunities for Lower Income 24 CFR Part 107: Nondiscrimination and Equal Persons in Connection with Assisted Projects Opportunity in Housing Under Executive Order 11063 24 CFR Part 135 and Subtitle A, et al., 24 CFR Part 108: Compliance Procedures for Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Economic Opportunities for Low & Very Low Income Persons, 59 Fed. Reg. § 3866 (6/30/96) 24 CFR Part 109: Fair Housing Advertising Executive Order 12259, 46 Fed. Reg. 1255, and Executive Order 12892, 59 Fed. Reg. 2939 (1/20/94): Leadership and Coordination of Fair Housing in Federal Programs: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing ______________________________________________________________________________________ GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3/7 Federal Contracts pruning back the law’s coverage so late in the Executive Order 11246, Nondiscrimination Under day. Federal Contracts (9/24/65, as amended by Executive Orders 12086 (10/8/78) and 11375 (10/13/67) Justice Kennedy’s opinion appropriately begins by locating the Fair Housing Act against the Environmental Justice background of this country’s long history of Executive Order 12898, February 11, 1994, 59 Fed. discrimination and segregation. The Congress Reg. 7629 (2/16/94), Federal Actions to Address that enacted the FHA, in the midst of the civil Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations unrest of 1968, was well aware that the problems it was attacking were (as they remain) Discriminatory Effects Standard5 deeply rooted in American Society. 24 CFR Part 100, 78 Fed. Reg. 11460 (2/15/13) Accordingly, when enacting the FHA, Congress Implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s used language focusing on the results of Discriminatory Effects Standard decision makers’ policies rather than the motivation behind them. This rule formalizes the national standard for determining whether a housing practice violates Excerpted from Morgan Williams, Symposium: the Fair Housing Act as the result of An endorsement of forty years of effective fair discriminatory effect. housing enforcement, SCOTUSBLOG (Jun. 25, 2015, 8:38 PM).7 HUD is statutorily charged with the authority and responsibility for interpreting and enforcing the Update 2019: HUD is attempting to Fair Housing Act and has long interpreted the eliminate disparate impact as a means of Act to prohibit housing practices with an combatting discrimination. Victims of unjustified discriminatory effect, if those acts housing discrimination would be hard- actually or predictably result in a disparate pressed to overcome the exceedingly high impact on a group of persons, or create, increase, bar HUD is proposing when it comes to reinforce, or perpetuate segregated housing bringing fair housing cases using disparate patterns because of race, color, religion, sex, impact. handicap, familial status, or national origin. In effect, HUD’s proposal would effectively Update 2015: Texas Department of Housing eliminate disparate impact as a usable legal and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities tool. Project, 576 U.S. ___ (2015)6 US Supreme Court holds 5-4 that disparate- Discriminatory housing policies often do impact claims are cognizable under the Fair not appear to target any particular group of Housing Act. people and may even seem to apply to everyone equally. However, in practice, The Court reaffirms the consistent finding of the these policies unjustifiably harm some federal courts over the past four decades that the groups (e.g., people with disabilities, people Fair Housing Act bars not only intentional of color) more than others. discrimination, but also policies that have an unwarranted disparate impact. In doing so, the Disparate impact has made it possible for courts Court’s majority correctly recognized that it was to stop a long list of bad practices: funding not construing a new law, but rather one with a formulas that concentrate government- long and proud history that did not warrant subsidized housing in predominantly non-white neighborhoods, apartment occupancy limits that exclude families with children, practices that 5 deny insurance to landlords who rent to people http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id =discriminatoryeffectrule.pdf 7 http://goo.gl/65cIMR 6 Scotus Blog - http://goo.gl/rFjUMQ ________________________________________________________________________ 3/8 GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS receiving federal housing assistance vouchers, so-called nuisance ordinances that force landlords to evict tenants who call for emergency help and incentive programs that encourage loan officers to sell subprime loans to black and Latino borrowers. The new regulation also goes further: The HUD rule carves out an unprecedented guidance for the automated decision-making systems that power the housing market. These are the algorithms used by lenders and landlords that deliver judgments on credit risk, home insurance, mortgage interest rates, and more. Under the new dispensation, lenders would not be responsible for the effects of an algorithm provided by a third party—a standard that critics say would build an industry backdoor to bias. The U.S. Supreme Court confirmed in 2015 that disparate impact was a valid legal tool to combat housing discrimination. The Court made no mention in its opinion of the need for changes to HUD’s current disparate impact rule. Comment period on the Disparate Impact Rule ended in September 2019. Find the latest news on the proposed HUD rules at https://www.fightforhousingjustice.org/ Supported by National Housing Law Project, Western Center on Law and Poverty, and Shriver Center. ______________________________________________________________________________________ GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS 3/9 3.1.2 Federal and State Fair Housing A. Section 1982 of the Civil Rights Act of Laws and Procedures ─ An Overview8 1866 The first statute enacted to give African- Americans, and subsequently all Americans, Outline equal rights to property was Section 1982 of the I. Evolution of Fair Housing Rights Civil Rights Act of 1866. It held that “All A. § 1982 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 citizens of the United States shall have the same B. Executive Order 11,063 (1962) rights... as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof C. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and D. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 – convey real and personal property.”9 Fair Housing Act E. Executive Order No. 12,259 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing B. Executive Order 11,063 (1962) F. California Unruh Civil Rights Act The first federal anti-discrimination initiative of G. California Fair Employment and Housing Act this century in the field of housing was Executive Order 11,063. The November 20, II. Protected Classes: Who Is Protected 1962 order, signed by President Kennedy, prohibits discrimination in housing that is III. Unlawful Practices: What Conduct Is Unlawful owned, operated, or assisted by the federal A. General Prohibited Conduct government. This prohibition extends to race, B. Land Use Practices religion, and national origin. C. Senior Housing Exemption D. Properties and Practices Not Covered Under Federal or State Fair Housing Laws C. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 E. Other Prohibited Practices The 1962 Executive Order was followed by the F. How to Prove Discrimination Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI of the Act prohibits the denial of benefits and IV. Procedures and Enforcement discrimination by any program or activity A. Private Civil Litigation receiving federal financial assistance.10 It B. Action by U.S. or California Justice covered discrimination in the location and Department occupancy of subsidized housing and in the C. Administrative Complaint administration of federal urban revitalization V. Other Laws Prohibiting Housing programs. Discrimination A. Ralph Act D. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 – B. The Bane Civil Rights Act Fair Housing Act C. Guide Dog Statute The next major fair housing law was Title VIII D. Other Statutes of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the “Fair Housing Act.” Congress passed the Civil Cross-Reference: § 3.1.3 DFEH Comparison of Rights Act of 1968 almost immediately after the Federal and State Housing Laws below. assassination of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.11 Earlier that same year, the United I. Evolution of Fair Housing Rights F air housing laws have provided States Supreme Court had held that increasingly stronger protection since the discrimination in real estate violated Section Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth 1982.12 The Court, however, held that Section Amendment of the United States Constitution. 1982 only applied to racial discrimination and 9 42 U.S.C. § 1982, originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. 8 Chancela Al-Mansour is the Executive Director of 10 42 U.S.C. §2000(d). Housing Rights Center in Los Angeles. This article first appeared in the Legal Services Section News, 11 42 U.S.C. §§3601-3619, 3631. State Bar of California Vol 19, No. 1 Summer 1994. It has been modified and updated by Benchmark 12 Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer, Co., 392 U.S. 409 Institute. (1968). ________________________________________________________________________ 3/10 GUIDE TO HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOW INCOME CLIENTS
Description: