University of Tampere School of Management MGE-Master' Degree Programme in Public Economics and Public Finance HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND FINLAND Dostupnost bydlení v České republice a Finsku Master´s thesis Thesis supervisor: Author: Prof. Hannu Laurila Ing. Dominika Čižnárová doc. Mgr. Jiří Špalek, Ph.D. Brno, 2016 Jméno a příjmení autora: Ing. Dominika Čižnárová Název diplomové práce: Dostupnost bydlení v České republice a Finsku Název práce v angličtině: Housing Affordability in the Czech Republic and Finland Katedra: veřejné ekonomie Vedoucí diplomové práce: doc. Mgr. Jiří Špalek, Ph.D. Rok obhajoby: 2016 Anotace Diplomová práca sa venuje problematike dostupnosti bývania v Českej republike a Fínsku s cieľom identifikovať koľko domácností je nadmerne zaťažených nákladmi na bývanie. V úvahu boli vzaté prostredie politiky bývania a rozdielne prístupy k problematike dostupnosti bývania v závislosti na právnom dôvode užívania bývania domácnosťou. Na základe výsledkov bolo zistené, že nájomné bývanie je pre fínske domácnosti oveľa dostupnejšie v porovnaní s Českou republikou, kde významná časť domácností čelí zhoršujúcej sa dostupnosti bývania. Annotation This thesis deals with the housing affordability measurements in the Czech Republic and Finland in order to identify how many households are burdened with high housing costs. The environment of housing policy is taken into account and there are different housing affordability approaches depending on the tenure status of the households. This thesis presents long-term results in order to see the development of housing affordability. According to the findings, Finnish rental housing is far more affordable than in the Czech Republic where a significant percentage of rental households are facing worsening housing affordability. Klíčová slova Dostupnosť bývania, náklady na bývanie, disponibilný príjem, príspevok na bývanie, politika bývania, regulácia nájomného, EU-SILC, probit model, finančné faktory Keywords Housing affordability, housing costs, disposable income, housing allowances, housing policy, rent regulation, EU-SILC, probit model, financial factors Declaration I hereby declare that I have developed and written this thesis independently, using only the sources listed, in accordance with Czech legal regulations and the internal regulations of the Masaryk University and the Faculty of Economics and Administration. In Brno, May 2016 Author’s signature Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to doc. Mgr. Jiří Špalek, Ph.D. and Professor Hannu Laurila, my thesis supervisors, for professional guidance and useful critiques of my thesis and to Ing. Robert Jahoda, PhD. and Ms. Terhi Nieminen for providing me with the opportunity to study a double degree master program at the University of Tampere and their support during my studies. Furthermore, I would like to thank my family for emotional support. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 13 1 HOUSING IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND FINLAND ........................... 17 1.1 HOUSING IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC ............................................................................... 17 1.1.1 Housing policy and competency ........................................................................... 17 1.1.2 Tenure structure .................................................................................................... 24 1.1.3 Social Housing ...................................................................................................... 28 1.2 HOUSING IN FINLAND ................................................................................................... 32 1.2.1 Housing policy and competency ........................................................................... 32 1.2.2 Tenure structure .................................................................................................... 32 1.2.3 Social housing ....................................................................................................... 34 2 IMPACT OF FINANCIAL FACTORS ON TENURE CHOICE .................. 41 2.1 PROBIT MODEL ............................................................................................................. 41 2.1.1 Variables ............................................................................................................... 42 2.2 RESULTS FOR CZECH REPUBLIC ................................................................................... 44 2.3 RESULTS FOR FINLAND ................................................................................................. 47 2.4 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................. 49 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND FINLAND………………………………………………………………………51 3.1 THE CONCEPT OF HOUSING AFFORDABILITY ................................................................ 52 3.1.1 Applying Economic Concept of Affordability ....................................................... 53 3.1.2 Affordability measures .......................................................................................... 55 3.1.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Selected Measures ......................................... 60
Description: