ebook img

House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, “Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America’s Research and Development.” April 11, 2018. Unclassified. PDF

4.9 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, “Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America’s Research and Development.” April 11, 2018. Unclassified.

SCHOLARS OR SPIES: FOREIGN PLOTS TARGETING AMERICA’S RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JOINT HEARING BEFORETHE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT & SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 11, 2018 Serial No. 115–54 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 29–781PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California MO BROOKS, Alabama DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon BILL POSEY, Florida AMI BERA, California THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma MARC A. VEASEY, Texas RANDY K. WEBER, Texas DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia STEPHEN KNIGHT, California JACKY ROSEN, Nevada BRIAN BABIN, Texas JERRY MCNERNEY, California BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia PAUL TONKO, New York RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana BILL FOSTER, Illinois DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida MARK TAKANO, California JIM BANKS, Indiana COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii ANDY BIGGS, Arizona CHARLIE CRIST, Florida ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas NEAL P. DUNN, Florida CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, LOUISIANA, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DONALD S. BEYER, Jr., Virginia BILL POSEY, Florida JERRY MCNERNEY, California THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut STEPHEN KNIGHT, California JACKY ROSEN, Nevada RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida AMI BERA, California JIM BANKS, Indiana DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas (II) C O N T E N T S April 11, 2018 Page Witness List ............................................................................................................. 2 Hearing Charter ...................................................................................................... 3 Opening Statements Statement by Representative Ralph Lee Abraham, Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ................................................................................................ 5 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 7 Statement by Representative Donald S. Beyer, Jr., Ranking Member, Sub- committee on Oversight, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ............................................................................ 9 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 11 Statement by Representative Lamar S. Smith, Chairman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ..................... 13 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 15 Statement by Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Member, Com- mittee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives .... 17 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 18 Statement by Representative Barbara Comstock, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on Research and Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ............................................................................ 20 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 22 Witnesses: The Honorable Michael Wessel, Commissioner, U.S.-China Economic and Se- curity Review Commission Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 24 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 27 The Honorable Michelle Van Cleave, former National Counterintelligence Ex- ecutive Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 39 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 42 Mr. Daniel Golden, Author, Spy Schools Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 50 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 53 Mr. Crane Hassold, Director of Threat Intelligence, PhishLabs Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 68 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 70 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 104 Appendix I: Answers to Post-Hearing Questions The Honorable Michael Wessel, Commissioner, U.S.-China Economic and Se- curity Review Commission .................................................................................. 128 The Honorable Michelle Van Cleave, former National Counterintelligence Ex- ecutive ................................................................................................................... 130 Mr. Daniel Golden, Author, Spy Schools ............................................................... 131 (III) IV Page Mr. Crane Hassold, Director of Threat Intelligence, PhishLabs ......................... 132 Appendix II: Additional Material for the Record Documents submitted by Representative Donald S. Beyer, Jr., Ranking Mem- ber, Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on Science, Space, and Tech- nology, U.S. House of Representatives ............................................................... 134 SCHOLARS OR SPIES: FOREIGN PLOTS TARGETING AMERICA’S RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11, 2018 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY, Washington, D.C. The Subcommittees met, pursuant to call, at 10:01 a.m., in Room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Ralph Abraham [Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight] presiding. (1) 2 lAi\1ARS SM<TH l!''•''' EDOlF BERNICE -.>OHNSON CH•\IRM•\N RANKi\:GME\18!:R [:ongress of the 'llnited eStates House of Rcprcscntatiocs COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY 2321 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDiNG WASHINGTON, DC 20515-6301 (702) 225-6371 Subcommittee on Oversight and Subcommittee on Research & Technology Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America's Research ami Development Wednesday,April11,2018 10:00 a.m. 2318 Rayburn House Office Building Hon. Michael Wessel, Commissioner. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hon. Michelle Van Cleave, former National Counterintelligence Executive Mr. Daniel Golden, Author. Spy Schools Mr. Crane Hassold. Director of Threat Intelligence. PhishLabs 3 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HEARING CHARTER April!!, 2018 TO: Members, Subcommittees on Oversight and Research and Technology FROM: Majority Staff, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology SUBJECT: Oversight Subcommittee and Research and Technology Subcommittee joint hearing: Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America's Research and Development The Subcommittees on Oversight and Research and Technology will hold a joint hearing entitled Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America's Research and Development on Wednesday, April 11, 2018, at l 0:00 a.m. in Room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building. Hearing Purpose: The purpose of this hearing is to explore foreign nations' exploitation of U.S. academic institutions for the purpose of accessing and engaging in the exfiltration of valuable science and technology (S&T) research and development (R&D). The FBI has warned the academic community about foreign exfiltration ofS&T R&D, including that funded by the National Science Foundation, NASA, and other federal grant-making agencies, for many years, and has urged measures be taken to protect against this threat. 1 Witnesses will discuss the extent of the threat and what can be done to prevent or mitigate the foreign exfiltration of S&T R&D from U.S. academic institutions, without stifling collaborative research activities within the academic sector. Witness List: • Hon. Michael Wessel, Commissioner, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission • Hon. Michelle Van Cleave, former National Counterintelligence Executive • Mr. Daniel Golden, Author, Spy Schools • Mr. Crane Hassold, Director of Threat Intelligence, PhishLabs 1 See e.g., Higher Education and National Security: The Targeting ofS ensitive, Proprietmy and Classified Information on Campuses ofH igher Education, FBI (Apr. 2011 ), https:l/www.fbi.gov/file-repositorylhigher education-national-security.pdti'view; Counterintelligence Strategic Partnership Note: Preventing Loss ofA cademic Research, FBI (June 20 15), https://research.umbc.edu/files/2015/07/SPIN -15-006-Preventing-Loss-of-Academic Research.pdf; Counterintelligence Strategic Partnership Note: Chinese Talent Programs, FBI (Sept. 2015), https://compliance.fiu.edu/documents/SPIN%20-%20Chinese%20Talent%20Program.pdf; Press Release, FBI, FBI Director Appoints National Security Higher Education Advisory Board (Sept. 15, 2005), https://archives.fbi.govl archives/news/pressrel!press-releases/fbi-appoints-national-security-higher-education-advisory-board. 4 Staff Contact: For questions related to the hearing, please contact Tom Connally or Travis Voyles of the Majority Staff at 202-225-6371. 5 Chairman ABRAHAM. Good morning. The Subcommittee on Over- sight and Research and Technology will come to order. Without objection, the Chair is authorized to declare recess of the Subcommittee at any time. This hearing will be entitled ‘‘Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America’s Research and Development.’’ I’m going to rec- ognize myself for five minutes for an opening statement. Again, good morning. Welcome to the joint Oversight and Re- search and Technology hearing ‘‘Scholars or Spies: Foreign Plots Targeting America’s Research and Development.’’ This hearing is an opportunity to address the vulnerability of U.S. academic insti- tutions to the threat of foreign exfiltration of valuable science and technology research and development. Exfiltration is a new word being used to describe the surrep- titious removal of data, as well as R&D, both of which we’ll discuss today. We look forward to hearing from former government and private sector experts about the magnitude and consequences of this threat. We are also interested in learning what actions must be taken to prevent or mitigate this threat in the future without stifling the collaborative research activities that are critical to the United States academic sector. Over the past few years, case after case has been reported at our universities and colleges, all with similar themes. After obtaining access to data and other valuable information, individuals, includ- ing professors, students, researchers and visitors—some with strong ties to a foreign nation—attempt to take that knowledge to foreign governments, universities, or companies. As a medical doctor myself, I found one case particularly con- cerning. A former associate professor at New York University, spe- cializing in MRI technology, had been working on research spon- sored by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. According to prosecutors in the initial charges, this individual colluded with representatives from a Chinese-sponsored research institute and concealed the fact that he patented technology developed with NIH funds for the purpose of licensing it to a Chinese medical imaging company for literally millions of dollars. This case and others demonstrate the targeting of the innovation and intellectual property from our country’s greatest minds and in- stitutions and, in some cases, the ability for foreign nations to gain easy access by exploiting the lax security posture of our academic institutions. The Science Committee has continuously engaged in vigorous oversight of federally funded basic research and technology, par- ticularly research with a clear path to commercialization and a di- rect benefit for U.S. businesses and government. A significant amount of academic research and development is funded by the American taxpayers. Just last year, the Federal Government spent approximately $1.5 billion on research and development, in addi- tion to the even larger amount of funding provided by private sec- tor U.S. companies and universities. If this nefarious activity is aimed at recipients of federal grant programs, then it is the American taxpayers that are unwittingly funding the technological advancements and innovative break- 6 throughs that allow foreign nations to improperly gain a competi- tive economic advantage. China has publicly proven itself to be the most aggressive in the targeting of U.S. research over the past decade. China has heavily invested increasing amounts of financial and physical resources to support a science and technology industry that is based on the transfer of basic science, which allows that country to prioritize ad- vanced development and commercialization over basic and funda- mental research. Essentially, China steals our fundamental re- search and quickly capitalizes by commercializing the technology. While much of the discussion and examples used in today’s hear- ing may focus on China, I want to be clear that this committee is very concerned about all foreign nations and agents that are inap- propriately attempting to take advantage of America’s research and development. China’s efforts in particular have provided useful ex- amples to analyze, mainly because of their open and aggressive tac- tics. However, the recent DOJ charges based on Iran’s actions are further confirmation that this problem is not confined just to China, and we should assume a number of other bad actors are also making similar attempts. Taking that into account, bolstering the cybersecurity of federal information systems has been among the Committee’s top prior- ities. I am hopeful that the discussion here today will highlight ef- forts to accomplish this objective and make prevention a priority of all recipients of taxpayer dollars. Whether physical or cybersecurity threats, it is clear that our academic institutions are not taking all the necessary steps to adequately protect this vital research. I look forward to the insight of our witnesses today, which will help us assess these important issues and determine whether addi- tional questions need to be asked of our partners in the executive branch, as well as in academia. We hope to better understand the next steps that must be taken to safeguard the competitiveness and security of federally funded research and development, espe- cially the role of U.S. academic institutes. [The prepared statement of Chairman Abraham follows:]

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.