HISTORY AS LITERATURE IN BYZANTIUM Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies Publications 15 HISTORY AS LITERATURE IN BYZANTIUM Papers from the Fortieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham, April 2007 edited by Ruth Macrides SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF BYZANTINE STUDIES – PUBLICATION 15 First published 2010 by Ashgate Publishing Published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright© Ruth Macrides and the contributors 2010 Ruth Macrides has asserted her moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the editor of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies (40th : 2007: University of Birmingham) History as Literature in Byzantium: Papers from the Fortieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham, March 2007. – (Publications of the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies) 1. Historiography – Byzantine Empire – Congresses. I. Title II. Series III. Macrides, R. J. 907.2’049502–dc22 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies (40th : 2007: University of Birmingham) History as Literature in Byzantium :Papers from the Fortieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham, March 2007 / [edited by] Ruth Macrides. p. cm. -- (Publications of the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. 1. Byzantine Empire – Historiography – Congresses. 2. Historiography – Byzantine Empire – Congresses. 3. Byzantine Empire – History – Sources – Congresses. 4. Byzantine literature – History and criticism – Congresses. I. Macrides, R. J. II. Title. DF505.S67 2007 949.5’02072–dc22 2010021507 ISBN 9781409412069 (hbk) Contents Foreword vii Editor’s Preface ix List of Contributors xiii List of Abbreviations xvii List of Illustrations xxiii Note on Spelling of Names xxv Section I: Aesthetics 1. Stratis Papaioannou The aesthetics of history: from Theophanes to Eustathios 3 Section II: Audience 2. Brian Croke Uncovering Byzantium’s historiographical audience 25 3. John Davis Anna Komnene and Niketas Choniates ‘translated’: the fourteenth-century Byzantine metaphrases 55 Section III: Narrator 4. Michael Jeffreys Psellos and ‘his emperors’: fact, fiction and genre 73 5. Teresa Shawcross ‘Listen, all of you, both Franks and Romans’: the narrator in the Chronicle of Morea 93 Section IV: Story-telling 6. Roger Sco(cid:308) From propaganda to history to literature: the Byzantine stories of Theodosius’ apple and Marcian’s eagles 115 From History as Literature in Byzantium, ed. Ruth Macrides. Copyright © 2010 by the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies. Published by Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Wey Court East, Union Road, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 7PT, Great Britain. v vi HISTORY AS LITERATURE IN BYZANTIUM 7. George T. Calofonos Dream narratives in historical writing. Making sense of history in Theophanes’ Chronographia 133 8. Nicole(cid:308)e S. Trahoulia The Venice Alexander Romance: pictorial narrative and the art of telling stories 145 Section V: The Classical Tradition Reinterpreted 9. Stephanos E(cid:286)hymiadis A historian and his tragic hero: a literary reading of Theophylact Simoka(cid:308)a’s Ecumenical History 169 10. Martin Hinterberger Envy and Nemesis in the Vita Basilii and Leo the Deacon: literary mimesis or something more? 187 Section VI: Sources Reconfigured 11. Dmitry Afinogenov The story of the patriarch Constantine II of Constantinople in Theophanes and George the Monk: transformations of a narrative 207 12. Elena N. Boeck Engaging the Byzantine past: strategies of visualizing history in Sicily and Bulgaria 215 13. Konstantinos Zafeiris The Synopsis Chronike and hagiography: the presentation of Constantine the Great 237 Section VII: Structure and Themes 14. Anthony Kaldellis Procopius’ Persian War: a thematic and literary analysis 253 15. Paolo Odorico La chronique de Malalas entre li(cid:308)érature et philosophie 275 16. Athanasios Angelou Rhetoric and history: the case of Niketas Choniates 289 Index of Proper Names, Places, Terms 307 Index of Modern Authors 309 Foreword The contributions to this book derive from papers presented to the Fortieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies on ‘Byzantine History as Literature’, held in Birmingham, 13–16 April 2007. Participants from three continents converged on the original home of symposia where, for once, truly spring-like weather conditions held, so that the daffodils blossomed in record time. The symposium coincided with the annual Classical Association meeting, as it had done 28 years earlier when Margaret Mullett and Roger Scott organized the Thirteenth Spring Symposium, from which Byzantium and the Classical Tradition emerged. That was still a time when every symposium met in Birmingham but not every symposium resulted in an edited book. To commemorate that earlier convergence of classicists and Byzantinists, Margaret Mullett addressed the 2007 joint meeting with ‘History and truth, lies and fiction: Byzantium and the classical tradition, twenty- five years on’. The symposium theme was divided into four sessions, each named after a prominent man or woman who has made pronouncements on literature and/or historical writing: David Lodge, Anna Komnene, Henry Ford and Steven Runciman. Fourteen speakers examined classicizing histories and chronicles from the sixth to the fourteenth centuries, asking questions about audience and aesthetics, narrative and narrator, stories and their reinterpretations and reconfigurations. Eighteen communications were given on topics related to the symposium theme. Some of these speakers were also Birmingham student assistants who took care of all manner of needs, with smooth efficiency. The symposium certainly could not have taken place without the kind and generous support of a host of institutions and individuals. It is a pleasure to acknowledge their sponsorship here and thank the AHRC (doctoral training funds), Ashgate Publishing and Variorum, the British Academy, the J. F. Costopoulos Foundation, the Cyprus Ministry of Education and Culture, Nicholas and Matrona Egon, the Greek Ministry of Culture, the Hellenic Foundation, the Hellenic Society, the A. G. Leventis Foundation, Oxford University Press, the St Hilary Trust. From History as Literature in Byzantium, ed. Ruth Macrides. Copyright © 2010 by the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies. Published by Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Wey Court East, Union Road, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 7PT, Great Britain. vii viii HISTORY AS LITERATURE IN BYZANTIUM Warm thanks are due to John Smedley and Kirsten Weissenberg of Ashgate Publishing, for their exemplary support throughout the editorial process, and Rowena Loverance, series editor and head of the Publications Commi(cid:308)ee of the SPBS. Ruth Macrides Birmingham, September 2009 Editor’s Preface The words ‘history’ and ‘literature’ have been appearing in close association with each other with greater frequency in Byzantine studies over the last decade.1 Although it has been the case that Byzantinists have always treated ‘the literature of the empire as a body of historical source material’, they have not always treated their historical source material as literature.2 In 1990 Margaret Mulle(cid:308) wrote that it was rare for ‘literature’ to be given a section of its own at symposia and congresses, although she thought that historiography was an exception – ‘it should now be the best understood area of Byzantine literature’.3 The emphasis here is on ‘should’. ‘Still’ is another word that must be emphasized. The literary analysis of historical works, chronographies and historiographies, is still in its early days for Byzantine studies. The literary dimension of historical writing is still considered the domain of others. The historian’s work, it is thought, lies elsewhere, in the accumulation and corroboration of information about the past. Even though ‘historiography was cut away from the branches of literature’4 relatively recently, in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and made a discipline only then, we like to impute to medieval authors and medieval historiography characteristics of our own times – history as a discrete discipline of learning, and the historian’s goal as that of uncovering, recording and explaining the past. Likewise we understand ‘literature’ to be separate and separable from history. Literature does not make for good history; it lacks ‘the seriousness of 1 See the papers of the Third International Literary Colloquium at Nicosia in 2004: L’écriture de la mémoire. La li(cid:308)érarité de l’historiographie, eds. P. Odorico, P. A. Agapitos and M. Hinterberger (Paris, 2006); the Fourteenth Conference of the Australian Association for Byzantine Studies, Melbourne, 2004: Byzantine Narrative: Papers in Honour of Roger Sco(cid:308), eds. J. Burke, U. Betka and R. Sco(cid:308) (Melbourne, 2006). 2 M. Mulle(cid:308), ‘Dancing with deconstructionists in the gardens of the muses: new literary history vs ?’, BMGS 14 (1990), 258–75, here at 268. 3 Mulle(cid:308), ‘Dancing’, 261–2, 263. 4 C.F. Robinson, Islamic Historiography (Cambridge, 2004), 84. From History as Literature in Byzantium, ed. Ruth Macrides. Copyright © 2010 by the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies. Published by Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Wey Court East, Union Road, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 7PT, Great Britain. ix
Description: