Historical Narratives in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia: Destroying the Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Future PDF
Preview Historical Narratives in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia: Destroying the Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Future
istorical arratives in H N the oviet nion and S U ost- oviet ussia P S R This page intentionally left blank istorical arratives in H N the oviet nion and S U ost- oviet ussia P S R estroying the ettled ast, D S P reating an ncertain uture C U F Thomas Sherlock HISTORICALNARRATIVESINTHESOVIETUNIONANDPOST-SOVIETRUSSIA © Thomas Sherlock,2007. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2007 978-1-4039-7450-1 The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not purport to reflect the position of the United States Military Academy,the Department of the Army,or the Department of Defense. All rights reserved.No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2007 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue,New York,N.Y.10010 and Houndmills,Basingstoke,Hampshire,England RG21 6XS Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St.Martin’s Press,LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States,United Kingdom and other countries.Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-53516-3 ISBN 978-0-230-60421-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230604216 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sherlock,Thomas. Historical narratives in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia :destroying the settled past,creating an uncertain future / Thomas Sherlock. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1.Soviet Union—Politics and government.I.Title. DK268.4.S47 2007 947.084—dc22 2006050300 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd.,Chennai,India. First edition:May 2007 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ontents C Acknowledgments vii 1 Myth and Legitimacyin the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia 1 2 Authorizing Reform by Uncovering the Past 29 3 Leninist Mythology and Reform 49 4 Assessing the Genesis of Stalinism 67 5 The Legitimation of Insurgent Narratives 93 6 Myth, History, and Separatism in the Periphery 125 7 Destroying a Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Future 149 Notes 187 Bibliography 241 Index 263 This page intentionally left blank cknowledgments A T he foundation for this book is my doctoral dissertation, completed at Columbia University over ten years ago. Since that time, the original manuscript has been altered and lengthened, but the central argument has remained the same. My initial conceptualization of the problem of histori- cal memory in the Soviet Union profited from long conversations with the faculty and students of the Harriman Institute at Columbia. Particular thanks are due Mark von Hagen and Alexander Motyl, who read versions of the dissertation with remarkable patience and diligence. The project matured during fellowships at the Kennan Institute in Washington and at Radio Liberty in Munich, where I was fortunate to share an office with Vera Tolz, whose advice and insights were most appreciated. Participation in several projects devoted to memory and politics helped me develop more clearly the linkages between myth and legitimacy in the Soviet Union and in post-Soviet Russia. In this regard, the program on History and the Politics of Reconciliation, ably guided by Lili Cole of the Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs in New York City, was most useful, as was the project After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities, which was led by Beatrice Pouligny, Simon Chesterman, and Albrecht Schnabel. Both of these undertakings incorporated diverse case studies which encouraged me to think of the importance of historical narra- tives in comparative terms. I remain grateful to Joke van der Leeuw-Roord and the Netherlands-based EUROCLIO, the European Standing Conference of History Teachers’ Associations, for inviting me to present my argument at a workshop in Golytsino, Russia in February 2004. Thanks are also due to the editors of Ab Imperio for publishing a version of chapter 6 on history and myth in the Baltic republics during perestroika (no. 4, 2002). As I extended the argument of my dissertation to incorporate post-Soviet Russia, I made numerous research trips to that remarkable and often frustrat- ing country. I have been fortunate in making many lasting professional ties and personal friendships during my visits. From Igor Dolutskii I learned the real meaning of intellectual courage. From Tamara Eidelman, Sasha Shevyrev, and their colleagues I came to understand better the fragile but vital existence of Russian civil society as they worked with organizations like EUROCLIOto make learning history in the classroom an exciting and meaningful experience. viii Acknowledgments Tatiana Parkhalina demonstrates on a daily basis that liberal intellectuals could fight against, and sometimes partially stem, the contraction of pluralist dis- course in Russia. Many others in Russia contributed valuable insights to the present work, including Liudmilla Aleksashkina, Genadii Bordiugov, Maxim Brandt, Alexander Danilov, Boris Demidov, Denis Fomin-Nilov, Sergei Glebov, Galina Klokova, Andrei Kortunov, Masha Lvova, Sergei Markedonov, Andranik Migranian, Aleksei Miller, Nikolai Petrov, Alexander Golts, Andrei Piontkovskii, Andrei Riabov, Alexander Semionov, Lilia Shevtsova, and Vladimir Iadov. For the past eleven years I have taught in West Point’s Department of Social Sciences, where officers and civilians effortlessly blend dedication to national service and commitment to critical inquiry. I am particularly grateful to my colleagues Cindy Jebb, Ruth Beitler, and Jay Parker for their friendship and professional support over the past many years. My courses at West Point on Russian Politics, Democracy and Democratization, and Comparative Politics allowed me to weave together and then test the various strands of the argument of this book in the classroom. The intellectual curiosity and love of debate of the Academy’s cadets uncovered many weaknesses in my argument, happily early enough for me to correct many of them. My greatest thanks go to my family. My wife Cynthia Roberts, who has listened to my arguments about history and politics longer than either of us cares to admit, brought her extensive knowledge of political theory and Russia to the writing of this book. She also increasingly assumed many of my quotidian responsibilities, both large and small, to allow me the time to finish this project amid her own demanding schedule of teaching and research. Andrew, our eleven-year-old son, who has been a constant source of joy and fascination, helped me put a seemingly endless project into its proper perspective just by his very existence. I dedicate this book to both of them. Thomas Sherlock West Point, New York 1 yth and egitimacy in M L the oviet nion and S U ost- oviet ussia P S R History is the most political of all the sciences. History is politics of the past, without which one is unable to practice politics of the present. M.N. Pokrovskii1 I am struggling in the noose of contradictions, wholly rejecting Stalin but not knowing how not to “hurt” the people and socialism. Leon Trotskii2 I n 1991 the Soviet Union dissolved, ending over seven decades of exis- tence. Although scholars have conducted numerous postmortems on the Soviet state, most have neglected the role of symbolic discourse in explain- ing the dramatic Soviet collapse. Under perestroika, the opening of public space permitted the emergence of heterodox reconstructions of the Soviet past that challenged the legitimacy of the Soviet regime and state. These insurgent narratives nurtured a powerful if loosely aligned opposition that undermined the Soviet Union from within and without, strongly con- tributing to its demise. After the Soviet collapse, the heterodoxy of late perestroika was trans- formed into orthodoxy in many of the new states that emerged from under the Soviet rubble, providing the metanarratives that helped construct new national identities. But in post-Soviet Russia the insurgent discourse that had worked to delegitimate the Soviet system was itself gradually stripped of legitimacy in the first decade of the reborn Russian state. The resurrected bureaucracies that were disgraced by historical revelations during pere- stroika—particularly the armed forces and the security services—took revenge in post-Soviet Russia, attempting to resacralize the Soviet past to provide symbolic support for their values and interests. Paradoxically, these efforts were approved in large part by Russia society when only several years earlier it had condemned the Soviet system.
The list of books you might like
