ebook img

Hiding in Plain Sight—The US Navy and Dispersed Operations under EMCON, 1956–1972 PDF

18 Pages·2017·0.2 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Hiding in Plain Sight—The US Navy and Dispersed Operations under EMCON, 1956–1972

Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 6 Number 2Spring 2011 Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations under EMCON, 1956–1972 Robert G. Angevine Follow this and additional works at:https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Angevine, Robert G. (2011) "Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations under EMCON, 1956–1972,"Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 2 , Article 6. Available at:https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Angevine: Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations unde HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations under EMCON, 1956–1972 Robert G.Angevine T heabilitytooperatefreely,unthreatenedbyadversariesseekingtotrackand targetthemorinterferewiththeircommunications,thattheU.S.Navy’sair- craftcarriershaveenjoyedforthelasttwodecadesisunlikelytocontinue.China has been developing an antiaccess/area-denial capability,centered on antiship ballisticmissiles,thatmaysoonbeabletolocateandattackU.S.carriersatcon- 1 siderabledistances. TheChinesePeople’sLiberationArmyhasalsodeveloped conceptsforinformationwarfarethatintegratecomputernetworkoperations, electronicwarfare,andkineticstrikestodegradeanopponent’sabilitytocollect, 2 process,anddisseminateinformation. Ifcombinedeffectively,antishipballistic missiles and attacks on information networks could endanger the U.S.Navy’s 3 commandofthesea. Although the specific problems presented by antiship ballistic missiles and informationwarfarearenew,thebroaderoperationalchallengesarenot.During the Cold War, the threat posed by Soviet naval aviation and submarines promptedtheU.S.Navytostageanumberof experimentsexaminingthecon- Dr.AngevineistheauthorofTheRailroadandthe duct of dispersed operations at sea. Spreading out State:War,Politics,andTechnologyin19th-Century across a wide area, it was believed, would make U.S. America(2004)andarticlesonmilitaryapproachesto naval forces harder to detect, identify, and target. In technology,navalexperimentation,andAmericanmil- itary and naval intelligence. He received his PhD in order to lessen the chance of detection further, the militaryhistoryfromDukeUniversityin1999andcur- U.S. forces in the experiments strictly limited their rently works as a defense analyst in the Washington communications. Dispersed operations under emis- area.HehastaughtatDuke,American,andGeorge MasonUniversitiesandnowservesasadjunctassistant sion control (EMCON) represented a significant de- professor of history at George Washington University. parture from more active and overt methods of operation and posed new operational challenges. Naval War College Review, Spring 2011, Vol. 64, No. 2 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2011 1 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 80 NAVALWARNCOavLaLlE WGEarR CEVolIlEegWe Review, Vol. 64 [2011], No. 2, Art. 6 NavyexperimentsliketheHAYSTACKandUPTIDEseriesthereforeoffercollec- tivelyanexcellentopportunitytostudyorganizationaladaptationandchangein responsetonewtechnologiesandthreatsandtoconsidertheconductofdistrib- utedoperationsintheabsenceofanetwork. THE U.S. NAVY IN THE 1950S OneoftheprimarychallengesfacingtheU.S.NavyintheearlyyearsoftheCold Warwashowtoemployitscommandoftheseatoinfluenceeventsashore.The SovietUnionwasessentiallyalandpower;itdidnotpossessafleetcapableof challengingAmericanmaritimesupremacy.Instead,AmericanandWesternEu- ropean policy makers expected a land attack against Western Europe and the Middle East to constitute the Soviets’principal offensive thrust in any future 4 conflict. As early as 1948, the U.S. Navy began envisaging an offensive strike 5 forcethatwouldseektoslowtheSovietgroundadvanceacrossWesternEurope. By1956,thecarriersoftheNavy’sMediterranean-basedSixthFleetweretasked withnotonlyslowinganySovietattackheadedwestandsouthbutalsostriking 6 keytargetsinthesouthernEuropeanpartoftheSovietUnion. Inorderfortheiraircrafttoreachtheirtargets,however,theSixthFleet’scar- riershadtomoveintotheeasternMediterranean,closetotheSovietUnion,and survivetherelongenoughtoconductlaunchoperations.Inthemid-1950s,the carriers’chancesofdoingsoappearedslim.Aseriesofair-defenseexercisesover theprecedingyearshaddemonstratedthefleet’sinabilitytodefenditselfagainst 7 evenrelativelysmallSovietairraids. In1956,AdmiralJohnH.Cassady,Com- mander in Chief,U.S.Naval Forces,Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean,con- ceded in his annual report, “It is widely recognized that a carrier task force cannotprovideforitsairdefenseunderconditionslikelytoexistincombatin 8 theMediterranean.” TheHaystackConcept When Vice Admiral Harry Felt assumed command of Sixth Fleet in 1956,the fleet’s ability to perform its primary mission was therefore questionable. Per- haps as a consequence,Sixth Fleet had the reputation of being a social rather thananoperationalfleet.Feltsoughttochangethatreputationandimprovethe 9 effectivenessofhisnewcommandbyinfusingthefleet’sstaffwithnewblood. 10 OneoftheyoungofficersFeltbroughtinwasLieutenantJeremiahDenton. Denton’s background was in lighter-than-air aviation and electronic warfare. Hehadtestedlargeairborneradarsinblimpsandservedastheprojectofficerfor theWV-2,oneoftheNavy’sfirstairborne-early-warningradaraircraft.Denton thuspossessedasolidunderstandingofairdefenseoperations,Sovietaerialat- 11 tackcapabilities,andairborneradarsystems. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/6 2 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Angevine: Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations unde ANGEVINE 81 Drawingonhisextensiveexperiencelookingatradarscopes,Dentonhadde- velopedanideaof howtoextendthesurvivaltimeof theSixthFleet’scarriers 12 duringageneralwar. HejoinedforceswithRalphBeatty,theOperationsEval- uationGroupanalystattachedtoSixthFleet,whohadbeenworkingonmathe- maticaltechniquesforcalculatinghowafleetofaircraftcouldfindacarrierina 13 backgroundofsimilartargets.Together,theybegandevelopingthenewconcept. Denton and Beatty argued that the Soviet bombers’greatest challenge was findingandidentifyingtheSixthFleet’scarriers.Thefleetshouldthereforedo everything in its power to “thwart and delay” recognition of the carriers. It should disperse widely and intermingle with commercial shipping in order to eliminatetheunmistakableappearanceonairborneradarscopesofthestandard close,circular(“bull’s-eye”)formation.Allnearbysupportingunits,including thedestroyersservingasplaneguardsandscreeningthecarriersagainstsubma- rines, should disperse, and the carriers should operate independently. Strict controlof allelectronicemissionsandthewidespreaduseof deceptionwould increasetheeffectivenessoftheconcept,whichDentondubbed“Haystack,”be- 14 causeofitsemphasisonmakingthecarriersdifficulttofind. WhenFeltleftSixthFleetafterjustsixmonthstobecomeViceChiefofNaval Operations,hemadeapointofpraisingDenton,Beatty,andtheHaystackcon- ceptinfrontofhissuccessor,ViceAdmiralCharles“Cat”Brown,andtheentire 15 SixthFleetstaff. UnderBrown’scommand,SixthFleetbeganconductingex- perimentstotesttheHaystackconcept.Small-scaletestsbeganinOctober1956. TheHAYSTACKExercises The first major exercise testing the Haystack concept,HAYSTACK CHARLIE,was conducted in January 1957 in the Mediterranean Sea about a hundred miles westofSardinia.Theprimaryobjectiveofthetwo-dayexercisewas“totestthe effectivenessoftacticaldeceptionasamethodofstrikingforceairdefense.”The exercisepittedtwoaircraftcarriers,USSCoralSea(CVA43)andUSSRandolph (CVA15),theirescorts,andtheirlogisticalsupportshipsagainstaconventional submarineandland-basedsnooperandattackaircraftflyingoutofNaplesand Malta.Thecarriers,whichoperatedupto250milesapart,conductedsimulated nuclear strikes against wartime targets and then retired, while the aggressor 16 forcetriedtofindandattackthemassoonaspossible. Theexerciseresultssuggestedthattacticaldeceptionwaseffective.Thecarri- erswereabletoavoiddetectionlongenoughtolaunchthirtytothirty-fivesimu- lated atomic strikes each day before being “attacked” by “aggressor” aircraft. Smallgroupsofshipswereemployedeffectivelyasdecoys;theyattractedattacks fromseveralaircraftsearchingforthecarriers.Inparticular,theguided-missile cruiser USS Boston (CAG 1) and two destroyers acted as an effective “missile Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2011 3 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 82 NAVALWARNCOavLaLlE WGEarR CEVolIlEegWe Review, Vol. 64 [2011], No. 2, Art. 6 trap”earlyintheexercise,shootingdownseveralsnooperaircrafttryingtoin- 17 vestigatethethreecloselypackedradarblips. Theresultsindicated,however,thattheHaystackconceptwasstillimperfect. Destroyerswerefrequentlytooclosetothecarriers.Thethreedestroyersescort- ingCoralSeawerewithintenmilesof thecarrierwhentheexercisebegan,en- abling a snooper aircraft to detect the carrier in the first five minutes. The destroyersaccompanying Randolphremainedmore distant,buttheywere still close enough to attract attention from snooper aircraft soon after the exercise started.Aircraftalsotendedtooperate tooclose tothe carriers.Aggressorair- craftattackedRandolphafterinterceptingtheradarofanantisubmarinepatrol planecirclingthecarrier.Asnooperaircraftalsodetectedtheradarsignalofan 18 airborne-early-warningplaneoperatingnearacarrier. HAYSTACKDELTA,aseventeen-hourexercise,washeldon2March1957inthe MediterraneanSeasoutheastofMaltaandSicily.Theexerciseemphasizedpas- sive air defense using traps and decoy groups. It matched two carriers, USS Forrestal(CVA59)andUSSLakeChamplain(CVA39),againsttwoconventional submarines and land-based attack, snooper, and electronic countermeasure 19 (ECM)aircraftoperatingoutofNaplesandMalta. The exercise results again suggested that tactical deception was successful. The strike aircraft experienced significant problems identifying targets due to heavy cloud cover and squalls,careful emission control,and deceptive forma- tions.Learningfrompastexercises,thedestroyersinHAYSTACKDELTAremained fartherawayfromthecarriersandoftenpairedwithothershipstosimulatecar- riers.Theeightaggressorstrikesdetectedthirteenpossiblemilitarytargets,but only one correctly identified a carrier (Forrestal) and its plane guard. Three strikesdetectedBostonandtwoaccompanyingdestroyers,whichwerestationed intheexpecteddirectionofattackinordertodrawstrikesawayfromthecarri- ers,andclosedtoinvestigateorattack.Twootherstrikesattackedoilers,which 20 werepairedwithdestroyersandbeingusedasdecoysforthefirsttime. Emissioncontrolalsoprovedeffective.Onlyradarpicketdestroyersandsec- torair-defenseships,notcarriers,usednavigationaids.TheaggressorECMair- craft located the task force’s operating area but could not locate or identify individual units, due to the suppression of electronic signals characteristic of 21 particularships. Inordertoexperimentwiththeuseofislandstohindertheidentificationof surfaceunitsbyaggressoraircraft,thevenueforHAYSTACKECHOwasmovedto the Aegean Sea. The exercise, which was held from 9 to 11 April 1957, pitted Forrestal, Lake Champlain, and their escorts against two submarines and land-based snooper, ECM, and attack aircraft operating from Athens. The https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/6 4 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Angevine: Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations unde ANGEVINE 83 primaryobjective,again,wastopracticetacticalcontrolandairdefenseinadis- 22 perseddisposition. Postexercise analysis was to indicate that it had not realistically tested the Haystackconcept,becauseoftherequirementfornighttimeairoperationsand theconsequentneedforthecarrierstoemployplaneguardsandtacticalairnav- igation systems (TACANs). An aggressor ECM aircraft had intercepted Lake Champlain’sTACANemissionsshortlyaftertheexercisebeganandvectoredin snooperaircrafttotrackthecarrierandstrikeaircrafttoattackit.Theinitialtwo attacks had been successful, as were two later strikes; snooper aircraft had tracked Lake Champlain almost continuously for the rest of the exercise. Forrestalhadbeendetectedvisuallyat7:14AMon10Aprilandhadbeentracked continuously thereafter, although it had not been attacked successfully until 3:01PM.ECMaircrafthadalsodetectedandsuccessfullyattackedthecarrierson severalotheroccasionsduringtheexercise.Theanalysisconcluded,“Aircontrol 23 withouttheuseofTACANbycarriersisessential.” OtherattemptsatdeceptioninHAYSTACKECHOwereonlymoderatelysuc- cessful.TheheavycruiserSalem(CA139)andtwodestroyersdecoyedsnooper aircraftintoshadowingthemforseveralhours,untildaybreakrevealedthatthe groupwasnotacarrieranditsescorts.Themanyislandsintheoperatingarea, however,didnotappeartohindertheaggressorforce’sabilitytofindthecarri- ers. Instead, they complicated the task force’s efforts to defend itself. Land- locking of radars (the tendency of radar return from landmasses to mask contactsaroundthem)severelyhandicappedtheabilityofthetaskforcetode- tectaggressoraircraftandcontrolitsownaircraft.Moreover,oncethecarriers anddecoygroupswerelocated,theywereunabletorelocatequickly.Theaggres- 24 sorscouldthusignorethedecoysandconcentratetheireffortsonthecarriers. The purpose of the Haystack concept was to develop tactics that would ex- tendthesurvivaltimeofU.S.carriersintheMediterraneanduringtheinitialpe- riod of a nuclear exchange. After the conclusion of HAYSTACK ECHO, Brown declared the exercises a success. In a letter to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO)thatalsowenttoallthemajorcommandsintheNavy,Brownclaimed, “Haystack tactics have been proved effective in increasing the critical survival time available for launching counter strikes against aggressor bases under to- 25 day’swarconditionsinthisarea.” Whentheexerciseseriesbegan,theexpected survival time for carriers in the Mediterranean had been less than two hours. DuringHAYSTACKCHARLIE,DELTA,andECHO,thecarriers,withoneexception, survivedforatleasteighthours;half of the participating carrierssurvivedfor 26 over fifteen hours. Extending the survival time of the carriers by even a few hoursgavethemenoughtimetohitSovietairfieldsandports,therebyreducing Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2011 5 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 84 NAVALWARNCOavLaLlE WGEarR CEVolIlEegWe Review, Vol. 64 [2011], No. 2, Art. 6 thethreattheyfacedthereafter.“Aseachhourwithoutattackpasses,”Brownex- 27 plained,“thechancesofcontinuedsurvivalincreasesmanyfold.” THE U.S. NAVY IN THE 1960S The Sixth Fleet focused most of its attention on the threat posed by Soviet long-rangeaviationinpartbecausetherewasnosignificantSovietnavalpres- enceoutsidehomewatersatthetime.Inthemid-1950sSovietsurfacecombat- ants started to visit foreign ports occasionally, and they began conducting annual exercises in the North and Norwegian Seas in the late 1950s,but there werestillrelativelyfewSovietsubmarinesoperatingintheMediterranean.The commander of the Sixth Fleet from 1958 to 1959, Vice Admiral Clarence E. 28 Ekstrom,feltthesubmarinethreatfacingSixthFleetwas“quitemanageable.” ThedevelopersoftheHaystackconceptexpectedthatdispersingthedestroy- ersscreeningthecarrierwouldincreasethecarrier’svulnerabilitytosubmarine attackbutconsideredtheriskacceptableinareaswherethesubmarineconcen- 29 trationwasloworwhentheairthreatexceededthesubmarinethreat. By1961 they were confident that the combination of dispersion,deception,and emis- sioncontrolwouldenableU.S.carrierstosurviveagainstenemysubmarineat- tack long enough to conduct their retaliatory nuclear strikes,even in areas of relativelyhighconcentrationsofsubmarines,solongasthosesubmarineswere conventionallypowered.Beattyestimatedthatacarriercouldsurviveforanav- erage of five days in a ten-thousand-square-mile area containing two conven- 30 tionalsubmarines. Theintroductionofthenuclear-poweredsubmarineinthemid-1950s,how- 31 ever,revolutionizedunderseawarfare. ThefirstSovietnuclearsubmarinesbe- ganenteringservicein1958andsoonthreatenedtorendertheHaystacktactics obsolete.Bytheearly1960sleadingNavyofficialswereincreasinglyfocusedon howtocounterthepotentialthreatofnuclearsubmarines.Apaper,“TheStrate- gic Concept for Antisubmarine Warfare,” circulated by the CNO, Admiral Arleigh Burke,identified hostile submarine activities as “foremost among the 32 threatstoouruseoftheseas.” Compoundingthechallengewastheequippingof nuclearsubmarineswith antishipcruisemissiles.Asearlyas1960,RearAdmiralJimmyThach,oneofthe Navy’sleadingantisubmarinewarfare(ASW)experts,predictedthatsubmarine forceswouldincreasinglyrelyonmissilesastheirprimaryweapons,evenagainst 33 shipping. The Soviet Echo II class, a nuclear-powered submarine equipped witheightSS-N-3A(Shaddock)missiles,enteredservicein1962.TheSS-N-3A missile was,withthe exception of certain aircraft,the longest-rangedantiship weaponintheworld;itwascapableofstrikingtargetsatseafromadistanceof 250nauticalmiles.SincethetypicaldefensiveperimeterofanAmericancarrier https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/6 6 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Angevine: Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations unde ANGEVINE 85 battlegroupextendedonlyahundrednauticalmilesfromthecenter,anEchoII could remain outside the perimeter and potentially launch an attack unde- tected.AfteranexercisetotestperformanceagainstSovietnuclearsubmarines firing“standoff”missiles,oneU.S.Navycommanderconcluded,“Itisevident 34 thattheforcewouldhavehadessentiallynocapabilityagainstsuchanattack.” Althoughthecruisemissile–firingsubmarinepresenteddangers,italsohad weaknesses.Itschiefproblemwasdetectingandidentifyingitstargetswhilepre- servingitsownstealth.AsBeattyobserved,“Theabilityofasubmarinetoiden- tify carriers by sonar alone in large dispersed dispositions is poor. Visual 35 identificationisusuallynecessary.” Herecommendedtestingtheeffectiveness of dispersed formations against nuclear submarines and placing an increased emphasisonthedevelopmentofacousticdeceptiontacticsandequipment,par- 36 ticularlyexpendableacousticdecoys. TheUPTIDEConcept Bythelate1960s,theNavyincreasinglyemphasizedimprovingitsabilitytode- fendagainstmissile-firingnuclearsubmarines.InJune1968,thecommanderin chief of the Pacific Fleet, Admiral John J. Hyland, initiated Project UPTIDE (Unified Pacific Fleet Project for Tactical Improvement and Data Extraction). OneoftheprimaryobjectivesofUPTIDEwastodeviseandevaluatetacticsPa- cificFleetantisubmarinewarfaregroups(typicallyanASWcarrier,itsairwing, andadestroyersquadron)couldusetofrustrateanddefendagainstmissileand torpedoattacksbyenemysubmarineswithinmovingorstaticareasofhightac- 37 ticalinterest. The driving force behind the UPTIDE series was Vice Admiral E.P.“Pete” Aurand.Aninnovatorandiconoclast,Aurandsuggestedshiftingthefocusofthe ASWeffortfromkillingsubmarinestoreducingtheireffectivenessbyprevent- 38 ingencounters. EchoingBeatty,Aurandarguedthatalthoughthenuclearsub- marine was very fast and could remain submerged indefinitely, it was still essentially blind. An unassisted submarine relied heavily on passive acoustic sensorstodetect,classify,track,andlocalizecarriersandotherhigh-valuetar- gets.Degradingtheinformationthesubmarinereceivedcouldsignificantlyre- duceitseffectiveness. TheUPTIDEexperimentsfocusedonreducingtheprobabilitiesthatthesub- marine would detect, identify, and localize its target. The probability that the submarinewoulddetectitstargetcouldbereducedbystrictacousticandelec- tromagnetic emission control. Aurand may have drawn inspiration from his previousobservationofSovietnavaloperationsintheSeaofJapan.Aurandhad noticed that Soviet radar antennas neither rotated nor emitted.He speculated thattheSovietnavy’spolicywastoleaveitsradarsturnedoffunlesstherewasno Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2011 7 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 86 NAVALWARNCOavLaLlE WGEarR CEVolIlEegWe Review, Vol. 64 [2011], No. 2, Art. 6 other way to obtain desired information.Although it denied the Soviets early warning,Aurandbelieved,“suchapolicyhasmerit,especiallywhencompared to the predominant practice of most U.S. ships to emit constantly.” He con- cluded, “Finesse in the handling of emitters, electronic, visual, and acoustic 39 shouldbedevelopedbyourships,especiallyinthevicinityofSovietships.” Theprobabilitythatthesubmarinewouldsuccessfullyidentifyadetectedtar- getcouldbedecreasedthroughacousticdeception.Theprobabilitythatthesub- marine would localize it (i.e., close to within range of its weapons) could be diminished by forcing the submarine to move slowly,by deploying good pas- siveacousticsystemsinallantisubmarinevehicles,especiallyhelicoptersand 40 destroyers. TheUPTIDEExperiments Project UPTIDE developed in three phases from January 1969 to November 1972.Ineachphase,anASWgroupexaminedvariousdimensionsof thechal- 41 lengepresentedbynuclearsubmarinesfiringcruisemissiles. Thepurposeof Phase I was to lay the foundation for Phases II and III by exploring the broad outlinesoftheproblem,refiningtheexperimentaldesignandmethodology,and developingproceduresforprocessingandanalyzingdata.Itexaminedthesitua- tionfromtheperspectiveoftheenemysubmarineandderiveddataonthesub- marine’scapabilitiestodetect,identify,andfireitsmissilesathigh-valuetargets. PhaseIalsoestablishedabaselineforcomparisonof conventionalantisubma- 42 rinewarfaretacticswithUPTIDEtactics. Phase I consisted of three continuous free-play experiments (each a Hunter-Killer Antisubmarine Warfare Exercise, or HUKASWEX), which took placefromJanuarytoMarch1969.Ineachexercise,USSKearsarge(CVS33),its aircraft, and Destroyer Squadron 23, constituting Antisubmarine Warfare Group1,triedtodefendKearsargeagainsttwoopposingsubmarineswithsimu- lated cruise-missile capabilities.The submarines participating in Phase I were USSPomodon(SS486)andMedregal(SS480)forHUKASWEX1-69andUSS Snook(SSN592)andScamp(SSN588)forHUKASWEX2-69and3-69.There- sults of Phase I underscored the magnitude of the threat posed by the cruise-missilesubmarineandestablishedthekeymetricthatwouldbeusedin PhaseII—thesurvivaltimeofthecarrier.In144exercisehours,thesubmarines conductedthreetorpedoattacksandnineteenlauncheventssimulatingthefir- ingofseventy-eightmissilesatthecarrier.Eighty-sevenpercentofthemissiles werejudgedtohavemetthebearingparametersforacquisitionoftheirtargets. 43 Theaveragesurvivaltimeofthecarrierwasninehours. PhaseIIwasthemajordata-collectionandtactical-evaluationphaseofProj- ect UPTIDE.It consisted of four major experiments from September 1969 to https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/6 8 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Angevine: Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and Dispersed Operations unde ANGEVINE 87 January1971.Theexperimentsweredevotedtoexaminingtheeffectivenessof dispersion, acoustic and electromagnetic emission control, simulation of the high-valuetargetbysurfaceescorts,andactiveacousticdeceptionagainstcruise missile–firing submarines in a scenario involving a carrier operating within a 44 fixedareaandsimulatingthelaunchingofstrikeaircraft. The initial Phase II experiment,UPTIDE 2-B,took place in late September andearlyOctober1969andpittedAntisubmarineWarfareGroup3—consisting ofUSSHornet(CVS12),itsaircraft,andDestroyerSquadron31—againstUSS Sculpin(SSN590)andRazorback(SS394).Byemployingadispersedformation, steamingbelowpropellercavitationspeed(i.e.,thespeedatwhichthecollapse of bubblesbehindthebladesbecomesdetectablyloud),controllingemissions, andusingescortsas“wolf trap”unitstolurethesubmarinesaway,Hornetwas able to avoid identification for the entire seven-day exercise. The submarines were deceived, lured, or confused for the majority of the exercise and spent nearlyalltherestofthetimeinunproductivesearches.Towardtheendoftheex- ercise,infrustration,Sculpinusedstrategicinformationtofireaspreadofeight missilesatarangeoftwohundredmiles.Significantly,twoofthemcouldhave metthebearingparameterstoacquireHornet.Nevertheless,thecommanderof Antisubmarine Warfare Group 3 described the exercise as “an unprecedented success against the undersea adversary by an ASW group using a totally new concept in communications, formations, tactics, deception, and electronic/ 45 acousticemissioncontrol.” UPTIDE2-C,heldinJanuaryandFebruary1970,markedtheintroductionof a new tactical element—the acoustic deception device.The minesweeper USS Leader(MSO490)wasequippedwithanactiveacousticsimulatorcalled“Ter- giversator,”developedbytheNavalUnderwaterSoundCenterinNewLondon, Connecticut.Tergiversatortransmittedintothewatercarrierandescortpropul- sion noises and active sonar transmissions. Working together, Leader and the guided-missilecruiserUSSChicago(CG11)wereabletodeceivethesubmarines USSPlunger(SSN595)andSnook.Afterlisteningtothedeceptiondevice’sout- putforthreehours,Plungerconcludedthatitwasaheavywarshipandfiredtwo missilesatit.Meanwhile,Hornetwasabletosurviveundetectedforeighty-seven hours. Only when the carrier operated independently at high speed were the 46 submarinessuccessfulinmakingacoordinatedmissileattack. Thenumberandrangeofacousticdeceptiondevicesexpandedsignificantly inUPTIDE2-D,whichwasheldinOctober1970.Sevendeviceswereemployed, including an updated version of Tergiversator; two SADSAC (Small Acoustic Device Simulating a Carrier) buoys, developed by the Naval Underwater Re- searchandDevelopmentCenter;andfourNYVOs(Nymph’sVoices),developed Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2011 9 NWC_Review_Spring2011.ps \\data1\john.lanzieri.ctr$\msdata\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\NWC_Review_Spring2011\NWC_Review_Spring2011.vp Monday, February 14, 2011 4:09:10 PM

Description:
Hiding in Plain Sight—The U.S. Navy and. Dispersed Operations under EMCON,. 1956–1972. Robert G. Angevine. Follow this and additional works
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.