Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles Fourth Edition Laurie J. Vitt and Janalee P. Caldwell Sam Noble Museum and Biology Department University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic Press is an Imprint of Elsevier Acquiring Editor: Kristi Gomez Development Editor: Pat Gonzalez Project Managers: Karen East and Kirsty Halterman Design: Russell Purdy Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA Fourth edition 2014 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively, visit the Science and Technology Books website at www.elsevierdirect.com/rights for further information Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN: 978-0-12-386919-7 For information on all Academic Press publications visit our website at elsevierdirect.com Typeset by TNQ Books and Journals www.tnq.co.in Printed and bound in China 13 14 15 16 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Dedication We dedicate this book to the many young scientists that have joined the global herpetological community during the past 20 years, bringing new perspectives, new techniques, and new data to a taxonomically delimited field that impacts all conceptual areas of the biological sciences. L.J.V. and J.P.C. Foreword The diversity of living creatures on our planet is extraordi- creatures being studied, not just on methods or concepts. nary—and thus, trying to understand how those organisms So “herpetology” is a useful category: If we really want to function, and how and why they do the things they do, is understand what animals do, we can’t ignore the history an awesome challenge. To make the challenge a bit more behind each type of organism. Many of its features will be manageable, we traditionally divide the study of biology determined by that history, not by current forces. Because into many categories, some based on methodology (e.g., of that historical underpinning, the most effective way to “microscopy” or “molecular biology”), some on function answer general questions in biology may be to work within (e.g., “ecology” or “physiology”), and some on relatedness one or more of those major branches in the tree of life. Start- among the things that are to be studied (e.g., “ornithology” ing from common ancestors, we can see with much greater or “herpetology”). At first sight, this last way of slicing the clarity how evolutionary forces have created rapid change cake seems a bit old-fashioned—surely we can simply ask in some cases (why are chameleons so incredibly weird the same questions and use the same methods, regardless compared with other lizards?), have produced remarkably of what kind of organism we might be studying? If so, are little change over vast timescales in others (can it really be traditional taxonomy-based divisions just historical relics of true that crocodiles are more closely related to birds than to the early naturalists, doomed to eventual extinction by the lizards?), and have even generated convergent solutions in rise of powerful conceptual and methodological advances? distantly related species exposed to similar adaptive chal- Nothing could be further from the truth. Entrancing as lenges (like horned lizards in the deserts of North America the new approaches and conceptual divisions are, the reality compared with thorny devils in the deserts of Australia). of life on Earth is that organisms do fall into instantly recog- Allied to the greater clarity that comes from compar- nizable types. Few people would mistake a tree for a lizard, ing like with like, and including genealogy in our thinking, or a whale for an insect. The reason is simple: evolution is are other great advantages to taxon-based categories like a historical process that creates biodiversity by the accu- “herpetology.” Organisms are composites of many traits, mulation of small changes along genealogies, with the vast and these need to work together for the creature to function majority of species becoming extinct during that process. effectively. So we can’t really look at metabolic rate sepa- So the end result at any time in Earth’s history is a series rately from foraging behavior, or social systems separately of terminal branches from the great tree of life—terminal from rates of water loss. Biology forges functional links branches that form larger branches, that in turn coalesce between systems that our conceptual and methodological to form even larger branches, and so forth. All the species classification systems would treat in isolation from each within each of those larger branches share common ances- other, ignoring their need for integration within a function- tors not shared by any species on the other branches, and, ing individual. And there are many other advantages also. as a result, the species within each branch resemble each In a purely pragmatic sense, the methods that we use to other in many ways. For example, no amphibian embryo study animals—such as the ways we observe them, catch grows up with an amniotic membrane around it in the egg, them, handle them, mark them, and follow them around— whereas every reptile embryo has one. depend enormously on many of the traits that differ so con- The evolutionary conservatism of major characteristics spicuously between major vertebrate lineages. A textbook such as metabolic rates, reproductive modes, feeding struc- of herpetology can thus teach us more about how to study tures, and the like, in turn have imposed evolutionary pres- these animals than can a textbook focused on any single sures on myriad other features—and the end result is that functional topic. And lastly, the conservation challenges the diversity of life is packaged into a meaningful set of facing reptiles and amphibians also are massively affected categories. That is the reason why most of us can easily dis- by their small body sizes, low rates of energy use, primarily tinguish a frog from any other kind of animal and can even tropical distributions, and the like—so that if we are to pre- tell the difference between a crocodile and a lizard. And it serve these magnificent animals for future generations, we is a major reason why there is immense value in defining need a new generation of biologists who can comprehend a scientific field based on evolutionary relatedness of the the sophisticated functioning of these threatened creatures. ix x Foreword This marvelous book captures the excitement of herpetol- from developed countries glean fragments of data during ogy and will do much to instill that appreciation. brief trips to places far from home. Instead, locally born and Much has happened in the world of herpetological locally based researchers are taking their studies to a whole research since I wrote the Foreword to the Third Edition of new level, based upon a deep familiarity with the systems, this book. The authors have updated their work to include and a perspective based upon living in an area rather than those new insights, and the extent of the work required tells just visiting it. Herpetology is evolving as a discipline, and us just how dramatically our understanding of reptile and the book you hold in your hands shows the rapid growth of amphibian biology has advanced. One of the most striking our insights into the extraordinary world of amphibians and features of this new generation of herpetological researchers reptiles. is that so many of them come from developing countries— especially in the tropics, which hold so much of the planet’s Rick Shine herpetological diversity. Tropical fieldwork is no longer School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, the province of “pith-helmet biology,” where researchers Sydney, Australia Acknowledgments We first acknowledge all herpetologists who have published R. Pianka, Michael Polcyn, Louis W. Porras, D. M. Portik, results of their research, thus providing the basis for our Alan Pounds, Jennifer Pramuk, F. Rauschenbach, Chris textbook. Several students and colleagues in our laboratory Raxworthy, Todd Reeder, Doug Ruby, Rudy Ruibal, Steve have provided continual help and insight, often serving as M. Reilly, R. P. Reynolds, Stephen J. Richards, S tephen crucial critics. In particular, Gabriel C. Costa, Donald B. Richter, Gordon H. Rodda, Santiago Ron, James Rorabaugh, Shepard, Adrian A. Garda, Tim Colston, and Jessa Watters Herbert I. Rosenberg, C. A. Ross, Rodolfo Ruibal, Anthony provided continual input. Many dedicated volunteers at the P. Russell, Marcello Ruta, Paddy Ryan, Diego San Mauro, Sam Noble Museum at the University of Oklahoma have Ivan Sazima, Rainer R. Schloch, D. Schmidt, Cecil Schwalbe, helped us put together information. Terry Schwaner, Kurt Schwenk, Bradley Shaffer, Wade The following friends and colleagues provided photo- Sherbrooke, Antonio Sebben, Stephen C. Secor, Bradley graphs, graphics, information, or read portions of the text: Shaffer, Donald B. Shepard, Rick Shine, Cameron Siler, Andrés Acosta, G. Alexander, Ronald Altig, J. Pedro do Barry Sinervo, Jack Sites, U. Srinivasan, Koen Stein, James Amaral, Stevan J. Arnold, Chris Austin, Teresa Cristina S. R. Stewart, R. Chris Tracy, Richard C. Tracy, Stanley E. Ávila-Pires, R. W. Barbour, Richard D. Bartlett, Aaron M. Trauth, Linda Trueb, R. G. Tuck, Jr., H. I. Uible, R. Wayne Bauer, Dirk Bauwens, S. D. Biju, Daniel Blackburn, David Van Devender, Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Miguel Vences, C. Blackburn, James Bogart, Franky Bossuyt, William R. Nicolas Vidal, Harold Voris, J. Visser, David Wake, Marvalee Branch, A. Britton, Chris Brochu, Edmond D. Brodie, III, Wake, Dan Warner, Richard Wassersug, Graham Webb, Peter Edmond D. Brodie, Jr., Rafe M. Brown, Samuel (Buddy) Weish, R. Whitaker, Martin Whiting, John J. Wiens, Steve Brown, Frank Burbrink, Andrew C ampbell, Jonathan Wilson, Chris A. Wolfe, Yuchi Zheng, and George R. Zug. A. Campbell, David Cannatella, Karen Carr, L. Chirio, Organizations permitting us to use their illustrative R. S. Clarke, Guarino R. Colli, James P. Collins, Suzanne materials include: Academic Press, American Associa- L. C ollins, Tim Colston, Justin D. Congdon, William E. tion for the Advancement of Science, American Museum Cooper, Jr., Gabriel C. Costa, E. G. Crespo, Orlando Cuellar, of Natural History, American Society of Ichthyologists Indraneil Das, K. P. Dinesh, C. Ken Dodd, Jr., R obert and Herpetologists, American Society of Integrative Biol- C. Drewes, William E. Duellman, Carl H. Ernst, Robert ogy, Blackwell Science, Inc., Cambridge University Press, Espinoza, Richard Etheridge, Danté B. Fenolio, April Fink Charles University Press, Chelonian Research Founda- Dalto, Darrel Frost, Chris Funk, Tony Gamble, Adrian A. tion, Cornell University Press, CRC Press, Inc., Ecologi- Garda, Luis G asparini, Varad Giri, J. Whitfield Gibbons, B. cal Society of America, Elsevier Science, Ltd. (TREE), Göçmen, David J. Gower, Harry W. Greene, L. Lee Grismer, Ethology Ecology & Evolution, Herpetological Natural W. Grossman, Celio Haddad, S. Harikrishnan, Blair Hedges, History, Harvard University Press, The Herpetologist’s Robert H enderson, W. Ronald Heyer, David Hillis, Walter League, Kluwer Academic Publisher, The McGraw-Hill Hödl, Marinus Hoogmoed, J effrey M. Howland, Raymond Companies, Muséum National d’Historie Naturelle, Paris, B. Huey, Victor H. Hutchison, Kate Jackson, Karl-Heinz Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Divi- Jungfer, Ken Kardong, J. Karney, Daryl R. Karns, Michael sion of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Kearney, A. Kwet, Jeffrey W. Lang, Christopher Leary, Twan Natural History, Princeton University Press, Smithsonian Leenders, William Leonard, Randy Lewis, Albertina Lima, Institution, National Research Council of Canada, Savan- Jonathan B. Losos, William Magnusson, John H. Malone, nah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Michael A. Mares, Otavio A. V. Marques, Iñigo Martínez- Museum of Comparative Zoology (Harvard University), Solano, Brad Maryan, Chris M attison, Roy W. McDiarmid, Selva, Smithsonian Institution Press, Society for the Study James McGuire, D. Bruce Means, G. J. Measey, Phil A. of Amphibians and Reptiles, Society for the Study of Evo- Medica, Peter Meylan, Ken Miyata, Edward O. Moll, Donald lution, Society of Systematic Biologists, Springer Verlag, Moll, Robert W. Murphy, D. Nelson, K. Nemuras, Cristiano University of Chicago Press, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Nogueira, Brice P. Noonan, Ronald A. Nussbaum, N ikolai Cambridge University Press, National Academy of Sci- Orlov, Mark T. O’Shea, David Pearson, David Pfennig, Eric ences (USA), and others. xi Introduction It is an admirable feature of herpetologists that they are able to population increase is reflected in the exponential increase cross the boundaries between different aspects of their subject, in environmental effects. We consider it imperative that which remains, perhaps more than other branches of zoology, a students understand the basis for life around them and the single coherent discipline. connections between our survival and the survival of other A. d’A. Bellairs and C. B. Cox, 1976. species. The biology of amphibians and reptiles provides a unique opportunity to achieve that goal, for several rather We are now in the Fourth Edition of Herpetology, and obvious reasons. Amphibians and reptiles live in water, on advances in the field have been remarkable. The global and under the surface of the land, or in vegetation cover- interest in herpetology has increased dramatically, with new ing the Earth. As a result, they are exposed to all chemicals professional societies emerging in nearly every country and that are released into the environment, either directly or literally thousands of bright, enthusiastic herpetologists indirectly. Because many, if not most, have special habi- entering the field. Perusal of nearly every scientific jour- tat requirements, modifications of their habitats usually nal reveals author lines with new names, many of which result in loss of populations or species. Some species are will make significant contributions to the field throughout harvested commercially for food or cultural medicines, and their entire careers. Technological and analytical advances those with considerable monetary value are rapidly being in phylogenetics have not only resulted in new phylogenetic overexploited. Amphibians (frogs in particular) have gained hypotheses for clades of amphibians and reptiles, but have enormous popularity in the arts and crafts trade, partly resulted in reinterpretations of ecological and behavioral because they are colorful and diverse, and partly because phenomena. Most striking is the impact of phylogenetics they are non-threatening. The pet trade has brought amphib- on historical biogeography and related fields. Not only can ians and reptiles into the homes of millions of people and we trace the history of clades on a global level, we can also sparked their interest in these remarkable animals. Harvest- add a time component to the divergence histories of clades ing of these animals for the pet trade has had local effects based on evolutionary rates of genes. These independently on populations, but captive breeding has offset some of that derived divergence histories can then be used to integrate impact. The pet trade has directly or indirectly resulted in the evolution of clades with the geological history of the the introduction of exotic species, many of which cause planet. major problems for endemic faunas. It is our hope that we Herpetology is a rapidly evolving field, and, although it can use the interest in these fascinating animals to draw stu- is a taxonomically delimited field, research on amphibians dents into understanding general biological concepts, all of and reptiles has set new directions, defined new fields, and which apply to the biodiversity surrounding us that helps led to major discoveries in all conceptual areas of biology— sustain life on Earth. discoveries that have changed the way we think about life Our primary goals in revising Herpetology—An Intro- on Earth. We know more now than we ever did, and we ductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles are to (1) update will continue to know and understand more as innovative the text to reflect some of the truly exciting discoveries that technologies allow us to explore new ideas in ways never have been made since about 2008 when we completed the before thought possible. At the same time, we are losing third edition (published in 2009), (2) update the taxonomy, species and habitats at a rate unparalleled in the history of which in some cases has changed radically as the result of life, and much of it can be tied directly to human activity much more sophisticated evolutionary analyses (e.g., squa- and indirectly to human population growth. When Coleman mates and anurans), and (3) introduce the reader to some and Olive Goin published Introduction to Herpetology in of the leading herpetological researchers by featuring them 1962, the population of the Earth was nearly 3 billion; when throughout the book. In doing the latter, we emphasize that George Zug published the first edition of Herpetology—An many truly phenomenal researchers make major discover- Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles in 1993, ies every day—we have selected a few from the many, and the population was 5.4 billion; today, the world population with future editions, our selections will vary. Our intent is has reached more than 7 billion! The exponential rate of not to slight any researcher by non-inclusion, but rather to xiii xiv Introduction highlight a few of the many in an attempt to make research physiological, and ecological data (total evidence) demon- discovery a little more personal. After all, successful her- strates the complexity of the evolutionary history of amphib- petologists are really just normal people driven by their ians and reptiles. At the same time, it brings us much closer interest in herpetology just as rock stars are normal people to constructing phylogenetic hypotheses that accurately driven by their interest in music and the performing arts. reflect evolutionary relationships. At times, molecular data We have explicitly tried to keep the text at a level that are at odds with morphological data (fossil or otherwise), will be of use to undergraduates with a basic background in and when new and different phylogenetic hypotheses emerge biology as well as those with a much broader background. based on solid molecular data and analyses, we have to ask Because color is so important in the lives of amphibians whether morphological traits that we have so long believed and reptiles, we use it throughout the text, which we believe reflect homology may have misled us. Most striking is the aids significantly in showcasing how special these animals observation that classical Linnean taxonomy presents a false are. Color is also useful in chapters in which we discuss impression about relationships of taxa. For example, Lin- crypsis, aposomatic coloration, and social behaviors medi- nean taxonomy implies that all Families are equal age, that ated by visual displays. We remind the reader that not only all Orders are equal age, and so on. Although some elements are amphibians and reptiles part of our own evolutionary of Linnean taxonomy are useful in allowing us to talk about history, but also they are an integral part of our natural heri- amphibians and reptiles, the basic notion that organisms tage. They, along with all other animal and plant species, can be placed in arbitrary groups and given names is highly comprise life on Earth. misleading. Our classification contains a mix of lower Readers will note that the taxonomies that we present taxonomic-level Linnean taxonomy (to facilitate discussion) in Chapters 15–22 differ from those in past editions. This and phylogenetic taxonomy (to reflect relationships). We use in itself is a testament to the rapid advances being made in species, genus, subfamily, and family as labels, emphasiz- phylogenetics. In addition, many new species, genera, and ing that each does not correspond to a given phylogenetic families have been described since the last edition, and this distance or evolutionary time period (e.g., not only are dif- will continue. Indeed, between the time that we completed ferent “families” different ages, they are nested within each this revision and the release date (approximately 8 months), other). We have attempted to be as current as possible and additional taxa will be described and new phylogenies will our classification sections reflect published interpretations appear rendering some of our taxonomies dated. A num- through August 2012. Numerous phylogenetic hypotheses ber of websites can be used to track changes as they occur, exist for most groups of amphibians and reptiles, resulting in and we recommend that users of this text refer to these different classifications, sometimes strikingly different. We periodically for updates. For amphibians, two websites, have selected a single cladistic interpretation for each group AmphibiaWeb (http://amphibiaweb.org/) and the American or combined the results of two interpretations when a single Museum’s Amphibian Species of the World (http://research. cladistic analysis for all members of the group (clade) was amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/) are particularly use- not available. We discuss other interpretations and analy- ful. For reptiles, The Reptile Database (http://www.reptile- ses, but not necessarily all available studies, to ensure that database.org/) maintained by Peter Uetz and supported by readers are aware that other interpretations exist. We use the Systematics working group of the German Herpetologi- Latinized familial and subfamilial group names for mono- cal Society and the European Union through the Catalogue phyletic groups and Anglicized or Latinized names in quotes of Life Project is continually updated. for groups that are of uncertain monophyly. Some authors Classification and nomenclature continue to change, and, have not assigned family names to some species and groups if anything, the rate of change is greater than it ever has been. of species that represent a sister taxon to another family; New fossils, new techniques for obtaining and interpreting where Latinized familial names are available, we have used phylogenetic data, and the beginnings of a truly phylogenetic the available name or elevated a subfamilial name if that lat- taxonomy and its associated nomenclature are changing ter taxon includes the same set of species. Distributions are amphibian and reptilian classification monthly. The ability an important component of an organism’s biology; our maps to recover relationships among taxa at all levels based on show the natural (nonhuman dispersed) distribution as best combinations of morphological, gene sequence, behavioral, as we were able to determine it. Part I Evolutionary History Although amphibians and reptiles are not closely related evolutionarily, they are usually studied together, largely because they often occur side by side and share many physiological, behavioral, and ecological similarities. More- over, both are very ancient groups with fascinating histories. What we see today are the successful remnants of a few groups that avoided extinction for various historical reasons. Major extinction events reduced global diversity of amphibians and reptiles several times, only to be followed by relatively rapid diversification events within some of the surviving groups. Chapter 1 Tetrapod Relationships and Evolutionary Systematics Chapter Outline Amphibians and Reptiles—Evolutionary History 5 Early Amniotes 18 Relationships Among Vertebrates 7 Radiation of Diapsids 19 Origin of Tetrapods 7 Linnean Versus Evolutionary Taxonomy 21 Key Fossils 8 Rules and Practice 22 Major Features of Early Tetrapod Evolution 9 Evolution-Based Taxonomy 25 Respiration 9 Systematics—Theory and Practice 26 Movement 13 Systematic Analysis 26 Feeding 13 Types of Characters 26 Skin 14 Morphology 27 Sense Organs 14 Molecular Structure 28 Evolution of Early Anamniotes 14 Methods of Analysis 29 Ancient Amphibians 14 Numeric Analyses 30 Modern Amphibians—The Lissamphibia 15 Phylogenetic Analyses 31 Evolution of Early Amniotes 15 Early Tetrapods and Terrestriality 15 Herpetology is the study of amphibians and reptiles. We Amphibians have successfully exploited most terrestrial focus on the biology of extant amphibians and reptiles environments while remaining closely tied to water or throughout much of the text. Nevertheless, we provide an moist microhabitats for reproduction. Most amphibians introduction to what is currently known about the fascinat- experience rapid desiccation in dry environments, but ing history of these animals. Reconstructing this history some species have evolved spectacular adaptations that has been a challenge, largely because the fossil record is so permit existence in extreme habitats. incomplete, but also because methods used to reconstruct During the Carboniferous, about 320 Ma, the ances- relationships (phylogenies) continue to change. Living tors of modern reptiles (including birds) and mammals amphibians and reptiles are representatives of a small num- appeared. They not only were able to reproduce on land ber of the many historical tetrapod radiations (Fig. 1.1). in the absence of water but also had an effective skin bar- Living amphibians are descendants of the first terres- rier that presumably reduced rapid and excessive water trial vertebrates. Their ancestors were lobe-finned fishes loss. Higher taxonomy of early tetrapods remains unsta- (Sarcopterygii), a group of bony fishes (Osteichtyes). ble. Anthracosaura and Reptiliomorpha have been used to These fishes appeared in the Lower Devonian Period include reptile ancestors, but definitions of each, in terms (more than 400 million years ago [=400 Ma, where 1 mega- of fossil taxa included, varies from author to author. We annum = 1 million years ago]) and radiated in fresh and use anthracosaur to include modern amniotes and extinct salt water. The earliest fossils assigned to Tetrapoda (from tetrapods that cannot be considered amphibians. The study Greek, tetra = four, poda = foot) included Elginerpeton, of birds and mammals, formally called Ornithology and Ventastega, Acanthostega, and Ichthyostega, all of which Mammalogy, respectively, are beyond the scope of this were completely aquatic but had four distinct limbs. They book. appeared as fossils in the late Devonian (about 360 Ma) Amphibians and reptiles (collectively, herps) are not but may have been present much earlier (see below). They each other’s closest relatives evolutionarily, yet they are in a group of tetrapods referred to as ichthyostegalians. have traditionally been treated as though they are related 3 Herpetology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386919-7.00001-0 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Description: