The Headless State ARISTOCRATIC ORDERS, KINSHIP SOCIETY, MISREPRESENTATIONS OF NOMAD IC INNER David Sneath COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS New York COLUMBIA ['NIVI2RSITY PRESS Publishers Since i5<y New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 2007 David Sneath All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataluging-in-PubLtcation Data Sneath, David . The Headless state . aristocratic orders, kinship society, and misrepresentations of nomadic inner Asia / David Sneath. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-2.31-14054-6 (cloth . alk, paper)—ISBN 978-0-231-5H67-4 (e-book) 1. Asia, Central—Politic sand government—1991 - 2. Tribal government—Asia, Central, 3. Clans—Asia ,Central. 4. Power (Social sciences)—Asia ,Central. 5, Aristocracy (Political science)—Asia .Central. I. Title. DS329.4.S64 2007 958 .042—DC22 2007020899 (gj) Columbia University Press books are printed 011 permanent and durable acid-free paper. This book is printed on paper with recycled content. Printed in the United States of America c io 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 11 References to Internet Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared. This book is dedicated to Lisa. Adam, and Emily— as representatives of long-suffering families everywhere. MAP r. The Eurasian Sieppe and neighboring regions in ihe late sixth century. (Qipchaks) Naiiaan Khanale ^eiiyicl- Mongol LnkellMmllJ Khanale Q^N^Kltan Kh^arzipian Sultanate1,' of Delhi;:-' '>! Oman .jirmain MAP 2. The Eurasian Sreppe and neighboring regions in the late twelfth century. Tsarist Russian Empire ' il fliikr Ly Hul,in Kazakh Kbahate wf-ct- Lab Balkhash Igar Oirat K\ aitate KbaJkha Moijgol Turkmen buck SUA "Bukhflhic— -Kfrieshad-Girai (]>eed Mongol ... Tibet SSfavid Persia [1/ Oman AltAH/A.V SEA TTie Eurasian Steppe and neighboring regions in the mid-sevenleenth century. THE HEADLESS STATE Introduction This book has two aims: the first: is to expose a misconception that became firmly rooted in twentieth-century social science, journalism, policymak- ing. and popular culture. Since the colonial era, representations of Inner Asia and its traditions and histories have been dominated by images of fierce and free nomads organized by the principles of prestate kinship so- ciety into clans and tribes. Anthropological fieldwork in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia in the 1980s and 1990s convinced me that nothing like the popular image of kinship society had existed recently in Mongolia, and the more I studied the history of Inner Asia, the more apparent it became that colonial-era notions of tribalism had powerfully distorted representations of steppe societies and their past. On closer inspection, it was not "kinship society" but aristocratic power and statelike processes of administration that emerged as the more significant features of the wider organization of life on the steppe. This brings me to my second aim: to rethink the traditional dichotomy between state and nonstate society and to approach the state in a differ- ent way—in terms of the decentralized and distributed power found in aristocratic orders. Viewing the state as a form of social relation rather