Basic Theory and Conceptual Framework of Multiphase Flows Guan Heng Yeoh and Jiyuan Tu Abstract The fundamentals of computational multiphase fluid dynamics are presented usingdiscreteandcontinuumframeworks. Dependingonthenumber,type, and size of phases and their interaction between phases within the flow system, a multiscaleconsiderationofthemultiphaseflowphysicsallowstheadoptionofa number of possible approaches. The Lagrangian formulation can be utilized to track the motion of discrete constituents of identifiable portion of particular phases occupying the flow system. This represents the most comprehensive investigation that can be performed to analyze the multiphase flow physics. Becauseofthecomplexityofthemicroscopicmotionsandthermalcharacteristics ofeachdiscreteconstituentwhichcanbeprohibitiveatthe(macro)devicescale, theEulerianformulationwhichcharacterizestheflowofdiscreteconstituentsasa fluidcanbeadoptedforpracticalanalysisoftheflowsystem.Thisresultsinthe development of a multifluid approach which solves for the conservation equa- tions of continuous and dispersed phases. In order to better resolve the micro- physics of the discrete constituents at the mesoscale, population balance allows thesynthesizationofthebehavioranddynamicevolutionofthepopulationofthe discrete constituents occupying the flow system. Such an approach allows the considerationofthespatialandtemporalevolutionofthegeometricalstructures as a result of formation and destruction of agglomerates or clusters through G.H.Yeoh(*) SchoolofMechanicalandManufacturingEngineering,UniversityofNewSouthWales,Sydney, NSW,Australia AustralianNuclearScienceandTechnologyOrganisation(ANSTO),KirraweeDC,NSW,Australia e-mail:[email protected] J.Tu SchoolofAerospace,MechanicalandManufacturingEngineering,PlatformTechnologies ResearchInstitute(PTRI),RMITUniversity,Melbourne,VIC,Australia e-mail:[email protected] #SpringerNatureSingaporePteLtd.2016 1 G.H.Yeoh(ed.),HandbookofMultiphaseFlowScienceandTechnology, DOI10.1007/978-981-4585-86-6_1-1 2 G.H.YeohandJ.Tu interactions between the discrete constituents and, more importantly, the colli- sionswithturbulenteddies. Keywords Multiphase flows (cid:129) Lagrangian framework (cid:129) Eulerian framework (cid:129) Population balance Contents Introduction....................................................................................... 2 Gas-SolidFlows............................................................................... 2 Liquid-SolidFlows............................................................................ 3 Gas-LiquidFlows............................................................................. 3 Three-PhaseFlows............................................................................ 4 DefinitionsofBasicTerms....................................................................... 4 Multi-ScaleConsiderationofMultiphaseFlows................................................. 6 LagrangianFormulation.......................................................................... 6 ModelsforParticulate-ParticulateInteraction................................................ 8 ClassificationofParticulate-ParticulateForces............................................... 13 ClassificationofFluid-ParticulateForces.................................................... 18 EulerianFormulation............................................................................. 21 InterpenetratingMediaFramework........................................................... 22 DerivationofGoverningEquations.......................................................... 23 PopulationBalanceApproach................................................................ 35 Summary.......................................................................................... 42 References........................................................................................ 43 Introduction Multiphaseflowsinthecontextoffluidmechanicscanbeperceivedasaflowsystem thatconsistsoftwoormoredistinctphasesflowinginafluidmixturewherethelevel of separation between the phases is at a scale well above the molecular level. Principally, multiphase flows can be categorized by the number, type, and size of phases and their respective interaction between each phase in the fluid mixture. A multiphaseflow system can thus be classified according to different types offlows depending on the combination of different phases within the fluid mixture. The physicalunderstandingofmultiphaseflowsespeciallywhendealingwithmorethan onephaseinthefluidmixtureoffersproblemsofcomplexitythatareimmeasurably fargreaterthaninsingle-phaseflows.Thesephasesgenerallydonotuniformlymix, andtheprevalenceofsmall-scaleinteractionsoccurringbetweenthephasescanhave profound effects on the macroscopic properties of the flow system. This clearly reflectstheubiquitouschallengesthatpersistwhenmodelingtheinherentlycomplex natureofthemultiphaseflowphysics. BasicTheoryandConceptualFrameworkofMultiphaseFlows 3 Gas-Solid Flows Gas-solidorgas-particleflowsconcernthemotionofsuspendedsolidparticlesinthe gas phase. When the particle number density is relatively small, the gas flow influences the flow of solid particles. Such flows are governed predominantly by the surface and body forces acting on the solid particles. These types of flows are generally known as dilute gas-particle flows. When the particle number density is very small, these solid particles are mere tracers in the gas phase. These types of flows are commonly known as very dilute gas-particle flows. When the particle number density is sufficiently large, particle-particle interactions now govern the motion of solid particles. Collisions that exist between solid particles will signifi- cantlyalterthemigrationoftheseparticleswithinthegasphase.Thesetypesofflow are referred to as dense gas-particle or granular flows. For gas-particle flows in conduits, the motion of solid particles following impact on the boundary walls is affected by the surface characteristics and material properties, which is different when compared to the free flight of solid particles in the gas phase. In gas-particle flows,thesolidparticlesconstitutethedispersedordiscretephaseandthegasisthe continuousphase. Liquid-Solid Flows Liquid-solidflowscomprisethetransportofsolidparticlesintheliquidphase.Such flowsaredrivenlargelybythepresenceofpressuregradientssincethedensityratio betweenthetwophasesisgenerallylowandthedragbetweenthephasesconstitutes the dominant effect in such flows. These types of flows are generally known as liquid-particle flows or slurry flows. In liquid-particle flows, the solid particles constitute the dispersed phase and the liquid represents the continuous phase. The majorconcerninsuchflowsisthecharacterizationofthesedimentationbehaviorin theliquid-particlemixturewhichisgovernedbytherangeofsizeofsolidparticles travelingintheliquidphase. Gas-Liquid Flows Gas-liquidflowscanexistinanumberofdifferentforms–themotionofgasbubbles intheliquidphaseorthemotionofliquiddropletsinthegasphase.Fortheformer, the liquid is taken as the continuous phase and the gas bubbles are considered as discreteconstituentsofthegasphaseorthedispersedphase.Forthelatter,thegasis regarded as the continuous phase and the droplets are taken as the finite fluid particles of the liquid phase or the dispersed phase. Since gas bubbles or liquid droplets are allowed to deform within the continuous phase, several different geometrical shapes are possible which include spherical, elliptical, distorted, toroi- dal,cap,andothercomplexconfigurations.Gas-liquidflowsundergoaspectrumof flowtransitionregimes.Changeofinterfacialstructuresbetweenthephasesaredue 4 G.H.YeohandJ.Tu tobubble-bubbleinteractionsviacoalescenceandbreakupofbubblesandanyphase changeprocessfromgas-to-liquidorliquid-to-gas.Forthespecialcaseofseparated flowssuchasliquidfilmingasphaseorgasfilminliquidphaseandliquidcoreand gas film or gas core and liquid film in conduits, such flows possess well-defined interfaces, and they belong to the specific consideration of immiscible flows. Each phaseistreatedasacontinuousfluidco-flowingsimultaneouslywitheachother. Three-Phase Flows Three-phase gas-liquid-solid flows are encountered in a number of engineering applications of technical relevance. Principally, this particular class of multiphase flowsconsidersthesolidparticlesandgasbubblesasbeingthediscreteconstituents ofthedispersedphaseco-flowingwiththecontinuousliquidphase.Thecoexistence ofthethreephasesconsiderablycomplicatesthecomputationalmodelingduetothe requirementofunderstandingthephenomenaassociatedwithparticle-particle,bub- ble-bubble, particle-bubble, particle-fluid, and bubble-fluid interactions modifying themultiphaseflowphysics. Definitions of Basic Terms Some basic definitions that are fundamental to the description of multiphase flows are introduced herein. For convenience, the notation that will be adopted corre- spondstotheCartesiantensorformat.Thelowercasesubscripts(ijk)areemployedin theconventional mannertodenote vector ortensorcomponents. Thesingleupper- case subscript (n) refers to the property of a specific phase. In general, the generic subscripts n = c (continuous liquid), n = d (dispersed or discrete phase), n = l (liquid), n = g (gas), and n = s (solid) are employed for clarity in depicting the differentclassesofmultiphaseflows. Specificpropertiesfrequentlyencounteredareasfollows.Thevolumefractionof thecontinuousphasecanbedefinedas δV α ¼ lim c (1) c δV!δVo δV whereδV isthevolumeofthecontinuous phase inthevolumeofδV.Thevolume c δVo represents the limiting volume whereby a stationary averaging is performed. Equivalently,thevolumefractionofthedispersedordiscretephasecanbewrittenas δV α ¼ lim d (2) d δV!δVo δV whereδV isthevolumeofthedispersedordiscretephaseinthevolumeofδV.This d volumefractionisalsoreferredtoasthevoidfractionwhichdescribestheportionof BasicTheoryandConceptualFrameworkofMultiphaseFlows 5 thechannelorpipeoccupiedbythedispersedgasphaseatanyinstantinspaceand time.Inthechemicalengineeringterminology,itisknownasholdup.Forthecaseof two-phaseflow,itfollowsthatα = 1 (cid:2) α .Hence,thesumofthevolumefractions d c of different constituents in a multiphase mixture must be equal to unity, i.e., P α n n ¼1. Themixturedensitycanbeevaluatedinaccordancewith X ρ¼ α ρ (3) n n n Thebulkdensityofthedispersedphaseisrelatedtothematerialdensityby ρ ¼α ρ (4) d d d ofwhichthematerialdensity,intermsofalimit,isdefinedas δM ρd ¼limδV!δVo δVd (5) withδM beingthemassofthedispersedphase.Thebulkandmaterialdensitiesof d thecontinuousphaseareanalogouslydefinedinaccordancewiththedefinitionofthe bulkandmaterialdensitiesofthedispersedphase.Conversely,thespecificenthalpy, h, and specific entropy, s, in terms of per unit mass are weighted similar to the mixturedensitytothefollowing: X ρh¼ α ρ h (6) n n n n X ρs¼ α ρ s (7) n n n n It should be noted that properties such as mixture viscosity or thermal conduc- tivitymaynotbeobtainedthroughsuchsimpleweightedaveraging.Othermeansof evaluatingthesepropertiesarerequired. The true velocities (or actual local velocities) of the different phases are the velocities the phases actually travel, which is the local instantaneous velocities of the fluids. Defining u and u to be the local instantaneous or phase velocities of c d continuousand dispersed phases, thesuperficial velocities and thephasevelocities arerelatedbythevolumefractionaccordingto U ¼α u (8) c c c U ¼α u (9) d d d For the case of two-phase flow, the total superficial velocity is U = U + U . c d Hence, the total superficial velocity for a multiphase mixture can be analogously writtenasU ¼P α u . n n n 6 G.H.YeohandJ.Tu Ofmorespecificdefinitions,thequalityofamixturecomprisingliquidandvapor isdefinedby ρ X ¼ d (10) ρ whilethedispersedphasemassconcentration,whichistheratioofthemassofthe dispersedphasetothatofthecontinuousphaseinamixture,isgivenas ρ C¼ d (11) ρ c Multi-Scale Consideration of Multiphase Flows Within the conceptual framework of computational multiphase fluid dynamics, the Eulerian or Lagrangian formulation of multiphase flows requires the multiscale consideration of themultiphase flow physics. Thedifferent physical characteristics at different length scales are illustrated in Fig. 1. For the microscale physics, it is paramountthatinteractionofthegasbubbles,liquiddrops,andsolidparticleswith the continuum phase is properly understood through tracking the motion of the individual discrete constituents in space and time. For the mesoscale physics, significantinteractionbetweenthediscreteconstituentsmayresultinlocalstructural changes due to agglomeration/coalescence and breakage/breakup processes of gas bubbles,liquiddrops,andsolidparticles.Forthemacroscalephysics,thehydrody- namicbehaviorofthebackgroundfluidontheclustersofgasbubbles,liquiddrops, and solid particles may yield large scale flow structures influencing the different individualphasesco-flowingwiththecontinuousphasewithintheflowsystem. Computational approaches can be utilized to reveal details of particular multi- phase flow physics that otherwise could not be visualized through experiments or clarify specific accentuating mechanisms that are consistently being manifested. Techniques that are being adopted based on the utilization of advanced numerical methodsandmodelsusuallycontainverydetailedinformation,producinganaccu- raterealizationofthefluidflow. Lagrangian Formulation The concept of Lagrangian tracking entails following the motion of individual identitiesoftheidentifiableportionofaparticularphaseoccupyingtheflowsystem. Suchconsiderationthereforeincludesmoleculardynamics,Browniandynamics,and discreteelementmethod,whichisrepresentedbyanillustrationofaplotdepicting thecharacteristictimescaleversuslengthscaleinFig.2.Ingeneral,theseidentities being considered represent a wide range of discrete elements including atoms, molecules,nuclei,cells,aerosolorcolloidalparticles,andgranules. BasicTheoryandConceptualFrameworkofMultiphaseFlows 7 Micro-Scale Meso-Scale Macro-Scale Interactionsof Formation of Hydrodynamic Discrete Elements Clusters of Bubbles, Behaviour of Phases with Continuum Fluid Drops and Particles at Device Scale Motion of Local Structural Large Scale Discrete Changes Flow Structures Elements Length Scale Fig.1 Multiscaleconsiderationofmultiphaseflows(Yeohetal.2014) Fig. 2 Illustration of time and length scales for Lagrangian simulations: molecular dynamics, Browniandynamics,anddiscreteelementmethod(Yeohetal.2014) Moleculardynamics,Browniandynamics,anddiscreteelementmethodsharethe commoncharacteristics wherebythe discrete elements are allowed tointeract for a periodoftimeunderprescribedinteractionlaws,andthemotionofeachindividual element is resolved by solving the linear momentum and angular momentum equations, subject to forces and torques arising both from particle interaction with each other and those imposed on the particles by the surrounding fluid (Li et al. 2011). Consideration of which Lagrangian tracking approach should be adopted 8 G.H.YeohandJ.Tu stems primarily through the formulation of appropriate particle interaction laws as wellasbytheimpositionofrandomforcingtomimiccollisionsorinteractionwith moleculesofthesurroundingfluid.Bycarefullyidentifyingtheseparticleinteraction laws, the physical behavior of the discrete element at a certain range of time and lengthscalescanbeefficientlycaptured. Consideringthediscreteelementswhichcouldbesolidparticles,liquiddroplets, or gas bubbles, the instantaneous velocity Ud and rotation rate Ωd for the discrete particulate (particle, droplet, or bubble) through the time-driven discrete element method can be obtained through solution of the linear and angular momentum equations(Newton’ssecondlaw): m DUd ¼XF (12) d d Dt I DΩd ¼XM (13) d d Dt wherem isthemassofparticulate,andI isthemomentofinertiaofparticulate.On d d therighthandside,thetimederivativesareessentiallythematerialderivativesofthe particulate velocity and particulate rotation rate. On the left hand side, the source terms represent the sum or cumulative of forces and moments acting on the particulate. For multiphase flow associated with heat exchange and phase change between particulateandsurroundingfluid,theseheatandmasstransferprocessesareconcur- rentlytrackedalongthediscreteparticulatetrajectoriesandsolvedbytheparticulate conservationequationsofmassandenergy: Dm d ¼S (14) Dt md DT d ¼S (15) Dt Td where T is the temperature of the particulate. The source term S represents the d md interphase mass transfer between the particulate and surrounding fluid, while the source term S is governed primarily by the interphase convection heat transfer, Td latentheattransferassociatedwithmasstransfer,netradiativepowerabsorbedbythe particulate, and particulate-particulate interaction due to conduction heat transfer. Notethattheproductoftheparticulatemass,specificheatofconstantpressure,and materialderivativeoftheparticulatetemperaturedenotethesensibleheatingtermof theparticulateenergyequation. BasicTheoryandConceptualFrameworkofMultiphaseFlows 9 Models for Particulate-Particulate Interaction Throughspecificconsiderationofusingdiscreteelementmethodforlargeparticulate assemblies, the hard-sphere or soft-sphere model can be effectively applied. Soft contact forces are subsequently derived from a point on the bodies for the hard- spheremodelortheoverlapofbodiesforsoft-spheremodel. Hard-SphereModel Mainassumptionsthatareconcernedwiththeparticulateshape,deformationhistory duringcollision,andnatureofcollisionsare: (cid:129) Particulatesaregenerallytakentobesphericalandquasirigid (cid:129) Shapeofparticulatesisretainedafterimpact (cid:129) Dynamicsofidealizedbinarycollision (cid:129) Collisionsbetweenparticulatesareinstantaneous (cid:129) Contactofparticulatesduringcollisionoccursatapoint (cid:129) Interaction forces are taken to be impulsive and all other finite forces are negli- gibleduringcollisions These assumptions are believed to be sufficiently realistic for collisions of relatively coarse particulates (>100 μm). One characteristic feature of this model is the ability to process a sequence of collisions one at a time. Also, Lagrangian trackingofparticulatescanbereadilyperformedwithrealisticvaluesoftherestitu- tionandfrictioncoefficients.Duringtheimpactoftwoparticlessuchasdescribedin Fig.3,themotionisgovernedbythelinearandangularimpulsemomentumlawsfor abinarycollisionoftwospheres: (cid:2) (cid:3) md,k Ud,k(cid:2)U0d,k ¼J (16) (cid:2) (cid:3) md,l Ud,l(cid:2)U0d,l ¼(cid:2)J (17) Ird,k(cid:2)Ωd,k(cid:2)Ω0d,k(cid:3)¼J(cid:3)n (18) k Ird,l(cid:2)Ωd,l(cid:2)Ω0d,l(cid:3)¼J(cid:3)n (19) l where superscript 0 denotes conditions just before collision, m and m are the d,k d,l mass,r andr aretheradii,Ω andΩ aretheangularvelocities,I andI are k l d,k d,l d,k d,l themomentofinertiaofparticulatekandparticulatel.Velocitiespriortocollisions arethevelocitiesdeterminedatthelasttimestepjustbeforecollision.Notethatthe correspondingtimedifferenceshouldnotbelargerthan10(cid:2)4s. InFig.3,thenormalandtangentialunitvectorsthatdefinethecollisioncoordi- natesystemare: 10 G.H.YeohandJ.Tu y r l U r d,l k n U l d,k Wd,l k R Gd,kl R l W k l d,k x k t J z Fig.3 Contactbetweentwoparticlesforhard-spheremodel x (cid:2)x n¼ k l (20) jx (cid:2)xj k l (cid:2) (cid:3) t¼(cid:4)Ud,kl(cid:2)(cid:2)G0d,kl∙n(cid:3)n(cid:4) (21) (cid:4)(cid:4)Ud,kl(cid:2) G0d,kl∙n n(cid:4)(cid:4) By definition, I ¼mr2 where r is the radius of gyration of the gyration gyration particulateandJistheimpulsevector.Adopting(J (cid:3) n) (cid:3) n = J (cid:2) (J ∙ n)n,the relative velocity at the contact point between two particulates with velocities U d,k andU isderivedas d,l Ud,kl(cid:2)U0d,kl ¼Bd,kJ(cid:2)(cid:5)Bd,k(cid:2)Bd,l(cid:6)ðJ∙nÞn (22) where Ud,kl ¼Gd,kl(cid:2)(cid:5)rkΩd,k(cid:2)rlΩd,l(cid:6)(cid:3)n (23) TherelativevelocityofparticulatecentroidsG isgivenby d,kl Gd,kl ¼Ud,k(cid:2)Ud,l (24) Some parameters are established to relate the velocities before and after colli- sions.Thefirstcollisionparameteristhecoefficientofnormalrestitution,e : n (cid:2) (cid:3) Ud,kl∙n¼(cid:2)en U0d,kl∙n (25) Thenormalcomponentoftheimpulsevectorcanthusbewrittenas: