Government, Governance and Welfare Reform 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 1 30/11/2012 15:26 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 2 30/11/2012 15:26 Government, Governance and Welfare Reform Structural Changes and Subsidiarity in Italy and Britain Edited by Alberto Brugnoli Professor of Applied Economics, Università degli Studi di Bergamo and Director General at Éupolis Lombardia Alessandro Colombo Director of the ‘Governance and Institutions’ Strategic Unit at Éupolis Lombardia Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 3 30/11/2012 15:26 © Alberto Brugnoli and Alessandro Colombo 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Limited The Lypiatts 15 Lansdown Road Cheltenham Glos GL50 2JA UK Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. William Pratt House 9 Dewey Court Northampton Massachusetts 01060 USA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Control Number: 2012944442 ISBN 978 1 84844 477 5 Printed and bound by MPG Books Group, UK 3 0 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 4 30/11/2012 15:26 Contents List of contributors vii Introduction Alberto Brugnoli and Alessandro Colombo ix PART I GovERNANCE AND GovERNMENT: BEyoND ThE STATE-CENTRIC APPRoACh 1 Key principles of governance 3 Alberto Martinelli 2 Subsidiarity: a new partnership between state, market and civil society 17 Giorgio Vittadini 3 Governance and subsidiarity 28 Lorenzo Ornaghi PART II BUILDING CoMPETITIvENESS: TERRIToRIES, INSTITUTIoNS AND SoCIAL CAPITAL 4 The new regionalism 41 Michael Keating 5 Regional competitiveness and regional policy in the UK 54 Michael Kitson 6 The pursuit of regional competitiveness in Lombardy: productivity, resilience and aggregate welfare 67 Massimo M. Beber and Alberto Brugnoli PART III WELfARE REfoRMS: fREEDoM AND RESPoNSIBILITy foR AN EMPoWERED SoCIETy 7 The Lombardy model of governance 81 Alessandro Colombo and Tim O’Sullivan 8 Innovation in governance: the involvement of social enterprises in health service delivery 95 Helen Haugh v 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 5 30/11/2012 15:26 vi Government, governance and welfare reform 9 horizontal subsidiarity in Lombardy and the UK: decentralization, partnership and governance of welfare 108 Martin Powell 10 New frontiers of welfare state and new challenges for the third sector 122 Stefano Zamagni PART Iv ThE fUTURE of INvESTING IN PEoPLE: fRoM STATE MoNoPoLy To RESPoNSIBLE CHoICe 11 The importance of investing in very young people 133 Luigi Campiglio 12 Subsidiarity and individual responsibility: quasi-markets and asset-based welfare 147 Julian Le Grand 13 freedom of choice in the Italian educational system: the idea of a dote 155 Lorenza Violini and Daniele Capone Conclusions Alberto Brugnoli and Alessandro Colombo 167 Index 177 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 6 30/11/2012 15:26 Contributors Massimo M. Beber is fellow in Economics, Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge (UK). Alberto Brugnoli is Professor of Applied Economics at the Università degli Studi di Bergamo and Director General of Éupolis Lombardia - Institute for Research, Statistics and Training, Lombardy (Italy). Luigi Campiglio is Professor of Economics, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Milan (Italy). Daniele Capone is Research fellow in Public Policy Analysis at the Università degli Studi di Milano (Italy). Alessandro Colombo is Director of the ‘Governance and Institutions’ Strategic Unit at Éupolis Lombardia - Institute for Research, Statistics and Training, Lombardy (Italy). Helen Haugh is Senior Lecturer at Judge Business School and Deputy Director of the MBA Programme, University of Cambridge (UK). Michael Keating is Professor of Politics at the University of Aberdeen (UK). Michael Kitson is Senior Lecturer in Global Macroeconomics at the Judge Business School, University of Cambridge. he is also Knowledge hub Director of the UK Innovation Research Centre. Julian Le Grand is the Richard Titmuss Professor of Social Policy at the London School of Economics (UK). Alberto Martinelli is Professor emeritus of Political Science and Sociology at the Università degli Studi di Milano (Italy). Tim O’Sullivan is Senior Specialist in Public Policy at IPA (Ireland). vii 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 7 30/11/2012 15:26 viii Government, governance and welfare reform Lorenzo Ornaghi is Professor of Political Science and History of Political Thought at the Catholic University of Milan (Italy), of which he was Chancellor from 2002 to 2012. He is currently the Culture Secretary in the Italian Government. Martin Powell is Professor of Health and Social Policy at the Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham (UK). Lorenza Violini is Professor of Constitutional Law at the Università degli Studi di Milano (Italy). Giorgio Vittadini is Professor of Methodological Statistics at the University of Milan Bicocca. he is also President of the Italian foundation for Subsidiarity (Italy). Stefano Zamagni is Professor of Political Economy at the faculty of Economics of the University of Bologna. he is also President of Agenzia per le onlus (Italy). 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 8 30/11/2012 15:26 Introduction Alberto Brugnoli and Alessandro Colombo over the last three decades, a large body of literature has analysed the crisis of traditional concepts of ‘government’ and gradually outlined the main features of an alternative system of ‘governance’. That debate, while far from exhausted in purely scholarly terms, has by now reached a broad consensus: against a background of structural shifts which have increasingly challenged both the praxis and our models of the nation state, few voices now dispute the need for a move from ‘government’ (hierarchical, top-down politics) to ‘governance’ (cooperative, bottom-up politics), the latter characterized by greater involve- ment and participation of civil society. over the same period – and in many ways, running ahead of analytical developments – policy makers have adopted a bottom-up approach to governance, acknowledging in their praxis that soci- ety needs to be much more involved in a wide spectrum of activities which, for much of the twentieth century, had progressively become dominated by state action. As one of the contributors to this volume notes, the history of political governance has forged ahead, leaving scholarship trailing in its wake. In common with much of the relevant literature, the present volume deals with the institutional changes and welfare reforms brought about by the trends just described. Its originality lies in the exploration of an original philosophical interpretation of governance, centred upon the principle of (horizontal) subsid- iarity. Stemming from a long tradition and recently revived by the catholic social doctrine and in the debate on European integration, subsidiarity affirms that social action should be organized at the closest, most involving possible level to the people affected by that action. Specifically, subsidiarity is consid- ered here not primarily as a guiding principle of decentralization of powers from the European Union (EU) to member states, and to their regions and local authorities. Rather, the volume focuses on the horizontal dimension of subsidiarity, asserting that the public sphere should be restrained from organiz- ing social action when individuals, families and associations can accomplish shared objectives better; conversely, horizontal subsidiarity (the Latin root of the term, subsidium afferre, being especially relevant here) government has a duty to afford assistance to those social entities in pursuing their own aims, when that assistance is needed. ix 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 9 30/11/2012 15:26 x Government, governance and welfare reform Subsidiarity then, provides an original perspective on the relationship between politics and society; from this perspective, the volume’s contribu- tors review the experiments and experiences of governance in two European countries characterized by very different traditions of public administration, very different constitutional settlements for the allocation of policy compe- tence across different welfare areas and very different political positions on the future of the welfare state. In each case, horizontal subsidiarity is still an evolv- ing process, in which institutional and policy experiments at times run ahead of the underlying philosophy, and at other times lag behind it. Italy – above all its key northern region of Lombardy – is characterized by a strong historical heritage of subsidiarity in the relationship between its political and adminis- trative structures, and society; at the same time, the scope for applying the principle of subsidiarity in practice has been heavily constrained, until recent constitutional reforms, by a fundamentally dysfunctional national political system. In Great Britain, in contrast, successive governments have displayed an increasing eagerness to reform the welfare state in the direction of greater social involvement – from the early experiments in John Major’s administra- tion, to the second-term reform frenzy of ‘Blair unbound’, to the exhortations of a ‘Big Society’ by the current coalition government. And while that coun- try’s political pragmatism may have reduced the scope for an explicit analysis of the political philosophy of such reforms, its remarkably centralized political system has enabled each government in turn to innovate and to experiment at remarkable pace, and in considerable depth (to the point that ‘reform fatigue’ has become a significant consideration in the British debate on governance). The contributions collected in Part I of this volume flesh out a philosophical analysis of (subsidiarity-inspired) principled governance, and set this agenda in its current historical context, characterized by the economic and cultural imperatives of globalization. After reviewing the structures of governance at different levels (Martinelli), the reader is introduced explicitly to the anthro- pological roots of the concept of horizontal subsidiarity (vittadini). ornaghi’s contribution clarifies the strong linkage between the two concepts, and focuses especially on the key consequence of taking subsidiarity seriously: in this perspective, it is not enough that society should be ‘involved’ in governance, rather its primacy over government must be acknowledged. The recession which hit the advanced countries in 2008/09, and still casts a long shadow several years later, has also refocused the attention of both policy makers and the protagonists of public debate on the theme of competitiveness. Together, the four contributions collected in Part II challenge any notion that ‘governance’ may be a luxury of the ‘Great Moderation’, no longer affordable in a harsher economic climate, and that a retrenchment into government – a ‘back to economic basics’, as it were – may constitute a valid strategy for public policy. To the contrary, there is a strong natural connection between 00-Brugnoli-Prelims_i-xii.indd 10 30/11/2012 15:26