GOOD WIVES, NASTY WENCHES, AND ANXIOUS PATRIARCHS This page intentionally left blank KATHLEEN M. BROWN Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, and Anxious Patriarchs Gender, Race, and Power in Colonial Virginia Published for the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Virginia, by the University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London The Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture is sponsored jointly by the College of William and Mary and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. © 1996 The University of North Carolina Press All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Brown, Kathleen M., 1960- Good wives, nasty wenches, and anxious patriarchs : gender, race, and power in colonial Virginia / Kathleen M. Brown. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8078-2.307-4 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 0-8078-462.3-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) i. Virginia —History —Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775. 2- Sex role—Virginia—History. 3. Women—Virginia — Social conditions. 4. Virginia — Race relations. 5. Social classes—Virginia—History. I. Institute of Early American History and Culture (Williamsburg, Va.) II. Title. F2.29.68783 1996 96-16501 975-5'oz —dczo CIP This volume received indirect support from an unrestricted book publication grant awarded to the Institute by the L. J. Skaggs and Mary C. Skaggs Foundation of Oakland, California. cloth 06 05 04 03 oz 5 4 3 2, i paper 06 05 04 03 oz 9 8 7 65 To Sheila Mahoney Brown and to the memory of Catherine Cunningham Mahoney and John Edward Mahoney This page intentionally left blank A C K N O W L E D G M E N TS Nearly ten years ago, I began incurring intellectual and financial debts in my quest to write a dissertation on the gender history of colonial Virginia. Fund- ing from the Graduate School and the Department of History at the Univer- sity of Wisconsin, the Martha L. Edwards Memorial Scholarship Trust Fund, a Charlotte W. Newcombe Dissertation Fellowship, the Lena Lake Forrest Fellowship of the Business and Professional Women's Foundation, and the National Society of Colonial Dames all made it possible for me to leave the frozen climes of Wisconsin to conduct my research in Virginia and to return again to embark on the writing. That I was in Wisconsin at all I owe to Gerda Lerner, whose scholarship inspired me to enter graduate school and whose creation of a women's history program provided me with an intellectual home and the training I needed to become a scholar myself. That I needed to leave Wisconsin for Virginia I owe to Charles L. Cohen, whose excellent seminar on early American history convinced me of the need for more research on gender in colonial America. A most generous and supportive third reader, William Van Deburg, read drafts of chapters with lightning speed and helped to make the process of dissertation writing more pleasant. In addition, I benefited from the written comments of Steve J. Stern, who also served on the committee. Since leaving Wisconsin, the debts have mounted. Three semesters of fund- ing from the Institute of Early American History and Culture, including a year funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities, and one semester of leave from Princeton University enabled me to get back into the archives and revise the dissertation. I am grateful to Daniel T. Rodgers and Jean B. Lee for helping to arrange the schedule of teaching and leave during this three-year period. The opportunity to participate in the intellectual life of these two very different institutions was a tremendous aid to thinking about the book in dif- ferent ways than I had thought about the dissertation. In addition to this financial, institutional, and intellectual assistance, I am very grateful to a host of helpful archivists and librarians at several different locations. Staffs at the Virginia Historical Society, the Alderman Library at the University of Virginia, the Library of Congress's Manuscript Division, and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library were generous and efficient. The Research Division of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, especially Linda Rowe and Kevin Kelly, gave me permission to use the transcripts of York County court records and shared their expertise. Special thanks go to the librarians at the Virginia State Library and Archives, who, under the adept leadership of Conley Edwards, made many a long day in front of the microfilm machines both productive and pleasant. I am also grateful to the State His- torical Society of Wisconsin for making possible my use of interlibrary loan viii Acknowledgments materials and to Michael Edmunds, who took a flexible rather than punitive approach to my borrowing privileges during the final semester of work on the dissertation. Many of the friends and colleagues whom I have imposed upon to read this manuscript are as relieved as I that it is finally completed. Among the most grateful, no doubt, are the people who read it in its entirety several times. Gerda Lerner and Charles Cohen gamely slogged through the revised manu- script and made excellent suggestions about how to improve it. Paul Clemens generously read portions of the manuscript more than once and was can- did with me about its strengths and its weaknesses. Outside readers for the Institute of Early American History and Culture—Suzanne Lebsock, Philip Schwarz, and, later, Drew Gilpin Faust and Allan Kulikoff—were generous with their praise and judicious with their criticisms. Rutgers University col- leagues Tom Slaughter and Philip Greven offered useful suggestions during the final stages of revision. Members of the Rutgers Gender History discussion group, especially Jan Lewis and Belinda Davis, helped me to make significant improvements to Chapter 9.1 learned a great deal from John Selby's reading of Chapter 5 and Kenneth Lockridge's detailed comments on several chapters. Several people generously shared research, helped me with the management of my data, or facilitated my archival work by giving me a place to stay. Emory Evans, Michael L. Nicholls, and Kevin Kelly shared research notes and told me about additional sources that helped me to flesh out the factual base of portions of this manuscript. David Rawson extracted information from my transcripts of the court records about the prosecutions of fathers, and Anna Jarvis and Shawn Holl double-checked the cases listed in my databases against these same transcripts. Page Parrish Wright, a Virginian who was always tre- mendously hospitable to me, even when she secretly thought I was a "poor Yankee child," took me into her home during the long months of research in Richmond. Julie Richter, whose expertise on colonial Virginia is evident in the work she has done for Colonial Williamsburg and her own careful scholar- ship on York County, deserves special recognition for her unceasing kindness and assistance. Not only did she provide me with a place to stay in Williams- burg during the early days of my research and share her own findings, but she subsequently read many chapter drafts and heard innumerable of my papers. During the final phase of revisions, she read the entire revised manuscript and saved me from several foolish errors. I am also grateful to the following people for combinations of moral sup- port, friendship, generosity of time, rigorous criticisms, and intellectually stimulating conversation, which enabled me to see this project to comple- tion: Steven Aron, Bob Buchanan, Sharon Block, Maureen Fitzgerald, Colin Gordon, Martha Hodes, Maria Hoehn, Roger Horowitz, Walter Johnson, Jennifer Jones, Susan Koerber, Marie Laberge, Liz Lunbeck, Earl Mulder- Acknowledgments ix ink, Jeanie O'Brien-Kehoe, Anne Lewis Osier, Thomas Ryan, David Schuyler, Susan Selleck, Beverly Sensbach, Jon Sensbach, Jim Sidbury, Susan Smith, Darren Staloff, Chris Stansell, Doris Stormoen, Peter Thompson, Marsha Way, Tracey Weis, Michael Wilson, and Joel Wolfe. Nancy Hartog and Dirk Hartog have, in addition to opening their New Jersey home to me, kept me cheerful and sane during two years of simultaneous commuting and revising. Nancy Isenberg and Saul Cornell, both separately and in combination, have had an enormous intellectual impact upon me. Although this is not the book that either one of them would have written about colonial Virginia, it has been significantly influenced by their critiques of social history. Leslie Reagan and Leslie Schwalm have provided the most consistent supply of all types of assistance over the last eight years. Many of the ideas in this book took root in conversations I had with each of them. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Mary Keenan, a gifted teacher and scholar, whose enthusiasm for and mas- tery of her subject ignited my interest in history. Several chapters of the manuscript have benefited from the comments of panelists and audiences at the Berkshire Conference of Women Historians, the Southern Historical Association conference, the Social Science Historians Association conference, the Philadelphia Center for Early American Studies, and the Columbia Seminar on Early American History and Culture. The com- ments of Tommy Bogger, Cornelia Hughes Dayton, Joan Gunderson, Mick Nicholls, and James Merrell were particularly helpful in making me rethink the organization and emphasis of my arguments. Portions of Chapter 2. appeared previously as "The Anglo-Indian Gender Frontier," in Nancy Shoemaker, ed., Negotiators of Change: Historical Perspec- tives on Native American Women (New York, 1994), 26-48, and appear here with the permission of the publisher. Portions of Chapter 3 were previously published in " 'Changed . . . into the Fashion of Man': The Politics of Sexual Difference in a Seventeenth-Century Anglo-American Settlement," Journal of the History of Sexuality, VI (1995), 171-193. I owe many thanks to the hardworking people at the Institute of Early American History and Culture for their efforts to make this book into a reality. Ronald Hoffman has been the soul of kindness during the five years I have known him. His words of wisdom have many times calmed my fears about the process of publishing a first book. Sally Mason enlivened the Institute with her irrepressible energy and boundless intelligence. My deepest gratitude is to my editor, Fredrika Teute, whose dogged work on several versions of the manuscript and incisive comments have made this a much better book than it would otherwise have been. I have also enjoyed working with copyeditor Virginia Montijo Chew, who pleasantly bore my incessant questions about commas and hyphens and kindly provided whatever help was needed to get the manuscript into shape. Although Gil Kelly did not get the chance to take
Description: