Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE for Tax Purposes OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES PEER REVIEWS, PHASE 1: GEORGIA The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 120 jurisdictions which participate in the work of the Global Peer Review Report Forum on an equal footing. Phase 1 The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily refl ected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Legal and Regulatory Framework Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004, which has been incorporated in the UN Model Tax Convention. The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant GEORGIA information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. “Fishing expeditions” are not authorised, but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fi duciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard. P e All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identifi ed by the Global Forum as e relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases. Phase 1 r R e reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange vie w of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. R Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 plus Phase 2 – reviews. ep o The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards r of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. t Ph a s All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent e 1 agreed Global Forum reports. L e g For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of a l a Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please visit n d www.oecd.org/tax/transparency and www.eoi-tax.org. R e g u la to r y F ra m e w o rk Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264217430-en. G E This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and O R statistical databases. G IA Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org for more information. ISBN 978-92-64-21742-3 9HSTCQE*cbhecd+ 23 2014 14 1 P Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Georgia 2014 PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK August 2014 (reflecting the legal and regulatory framework as at May 2014) ThisworkispublishedontheresponsibilityoftheSecretary-GeneraloftheOECD. Theopinionsexpressedandargumentsemployedhereindonotnecessarilyreflect theofficialviewsoftheOECDorofthegovernmentsofitsmembercountriesor thoseoftheGlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTax Purposes. Thisdocumentandanymapincludedhereinarewithoutprejudicetothestatusof orsovereigntyoveranyterritory,tothedelimitationofinternationalfrontiersand boundariesandtothenameofanyterritory,cityorarea. Pleasecitethispublicationas: OECD(2014),GlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTaxPurposesPeer Reviews:Georgia2014:Phase1:LegalandRegulatoryFramework,OECDPublishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264217430-en ISBN978-92-64-21742-3(print) ISBN978-92-64-21743-0(PDF) Series:GlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTaxPurposesPeerReviews ISSN2219-4681(print) ISSN2219-469X(online) CorrigendatoOECDpublicationsmaybefoundonlineat:www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. ©OECD2014 Youcancopy,downloadorprintOECDcontentforyourownuse,andyoucanincludeexcerptsfromOECD publications,databasesandmultimediaproductsinyourowndocuments,presentations,blogs,websitesand teachingmaterials,providedthatsuitableacknowledgmentofOECDassourceandcopyrightownerisgiven. Allrequestsforpublicorcommercialuseandtranslationrightsshouldbesubmittedtorights@oecd.org. Requestsforpermissiontophotocopyportionsofthismaterialforpublicorcommercialuseshallbeaddressed directlytotheCopyrightClearanceCenter(CCC)[email protected]çaisd’exploitationdu droitdecopie(CFC)[email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS – 3 Table of Contents About the Global Forum 5 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 11 Information and methodology used for the peer review of Georgia 11 Overview of Georgia 12 Compliance with the Standards 19 A. Availability of Information 19 Overview 19 A1 Ownership and identity information 21 A2 Accounting records 39 A3 Banking information 44 B. Access to Information 47 Overview 47 B1 Competent Authority’s ability to obtain and provide information 48 B2 Notification requirements and rights and safeguards 57 C. Exchanging Information 59 Overview 59 C1 Exchange of information mechanisms 60 C2 Exchange of information mechanisms with all relevant partners 66 C3 Confidentiality 67 C4 Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties 68 C5 Timeliness of responses to requests for information 70 Summary of Determinations and Factors Underlying Recommendations 71 PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – GEORGIA © OECD 2014 4 – TABLE OF CONTENTS Annex 1: Jurisdiction’s response to the review report 75 Annex 2: List of exchange of information mechanisms 76 Annex 3: List of all laws, regulations and other relevant material 81 PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – GEORGIA © OECD 2014 ABOUT THE GLOBAL FORUM – 5 About the Global Forum The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 120 jurisdictions, which participate in the Global Forum on an equal footing The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the international standards of transpar- ency and exchange of information for tax purposes These standards are primarily reflected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commen- tary as updated in 2004 The standards have also been incorporated into the UN Model Tax Convention The standards provide for international exchange on request of fore- seeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed This process is undertaken in two phases Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdic- tion’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 and Phase 2 – reviews The Global Forum has also put in place a process for supplementary reports to follow-up on recommendations, as well as for the ongoing monitor- ing of jurisdictions following the conclusion of a review The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent agreed Global Forum reports For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the pub- lished review reports, please refer to wwwoecdorg/tax/transparency and wwweoi-taxorg PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – GEORGIA © OECD 2014 ExECUTIVE SUMMARY – 7 Executive Summary 1 This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for trans- parency and exchange of information in Georgia The international standard which is set out in the Global Forum’s Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency and Exchange of Information, is concerned with the availability of relevant information within a jurisdiction, the competent authority’s ability to gain access to that information, and in turn, whether that information can be effectively exchanged on a timely basis with its exchange of information partners 2 Georgia is an independent country with a territory of approximately 69 000 square kilometres and a population of around 45 million located in the Caucasus, at the crossroad between Europe and Asia Georgia’s economy has grown steadily in the past three years (65% growth on average) with its gross domestic product reaching USD 1583 billion in 2012 Georgia joined the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes in 2011 3 Relevant entities that can be formed in Georgia include: limited-lia- bility companies, joint-stock companies, co-operatives, general partnerships, limited partnerships, and civil law partnerships Georgian legislation does not provide for the establishment of foundations The availability of ownership information in respect of relevant entities is ensured either with the public authorities or with the entity itself The tax authorities have full ownership information of any type of partnership carrying on business in Georgia through registration and/or reporting requirements Full ownership informa- tion on limited-liability companies, co-operatives, and limited partnerships is available with both the tax authorities and the commercial registry Ownership information of joint-stock companies is ensured at the level of the entity Companies incorporated in a foreign jurisdiction with sufficient nexus to Georgia have to register with the NAPR and the tax authorities when establishing a branch in Georgia, however, they are not required to maintain or provide to these authorities information on the owners in all cases, and a recommendation is made in this respect Nominees must be obligated institutions under anti-money laundering legislation and would maintain information on the person for whom they hold shares PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – GEORGIA © OECD 2014 8 – ExECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Even though the concept of a trust is not recognised in Georgia, residents may act as a trustee or trust administrator of a foreign trust, and Georgian legislation does not require the keeping or furnishing of identity information in respect of the trust Georgia should ensure the availability of information identifying the settlors and beneficiaries of foreign trusts which are administered or in respect of which a trustee is resident in Georgia A trust-like arrangement exists under the laws of Georgia, namely “entrusted property” Identity information in respect of this trust-like arrangement is available in the contract required to be signed by the parties and with the tax administration where tax liabilities arise 5 A general obligation to keep accounting records for six years is in place for all relevant entities and arrangements pursuant to tax obligations and specific accounting legislation 6 Full banking information is available through a combination of com- mercial legislation and AML legislation Anonymous accounts are explicitly prohibited 7 The authority competent to collect information and reply to an exchange of information (EOI) request is the Department for Administration of the Revenue Service, within the Ministry of Finance The Revenue Service in many circumstances already possesses information relevant to EOI pur- poses In that case, it is readily accessible to the competent authority 8 When the information is sought from persons, the competent author- ity is vested with the powers to obtain information directly from taxpayers and/or to perform audit in respect of any person These access powers are enforced through penalties The access powers under Georgia’s tax law can be used for the purposes of giving effect to an international agreement 9 Secrecy provisions in the law do not generally hinder the exchange of information in respect of information held by the authorities and accountants With regard to banking secrecy, however, the lack of an explicit exception in the banking law for disclosure to the tax authorities leaves some uncertainty in the application of the laws that may prevent effective exchange of infor- mation The scope of professional secrecy attaching to advocates is broader than that established in the international standard of exchange of informa- tion Georgia should ensure that secrecy provisions are consistent with the standard and do not hinder effective exchange of information The rights and safeguards that apply to persons in Georgia are compatible with effective exchange of information 10 Georgia’s network of EOI mechanisms covers 90 jurisdictions through 49 bilateral DTCs and the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, which entered into force in respect of Georgia since 1 June 2011 Each of Georgia’s EOI relationships contains sufficient PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – GEORGIA © OECD 2014 ExECUTIVE SUMMARY – 9 provisions to enable Georgia to exchange all relevant information Georgia’s network of exchange agreements covers all its main trading partners Each of Georgia’s EOI agreements contains confidentiality provisions that meet the international standard and its domestic legislation also contains appropriate confidentiality provisions and enforcement measures Where domestic law provisions on general confidentiality rules are less restrictive than those provided under the EOI agreements concluded by Georgia, the provisions of the international agreements will prevail ensuring that the standard is met Georgia’s EOI agreements protect rights and safeguards in accordance with the standard, although the scope of attorney-client privilege found in domes- tic legislation is wider than the international standard 11 Georgia’s response to the recommendations in this report, as well as the application of the legal framework to the practices of its competent authority will be considered in detail in the Phase 2 Peer Review of Georgia which is scheduled for the second half of 2014 PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – GEORGIA © OECD 2014