B I B L I CA ET O R I E N T A L IA (SACRA SCRIPTURA ANTIQUITATIBUS ORIENTALIBUS ILLUSTRATA) 35 R O M AE E PONTIFICIO INSTITUTO BIBLICO 1979 THOMAS W. FRANXMAN GENESIS A ND THE "JEWISH ANTIQUITIES" OF FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS R O ME BIBLICAL INSTITUTE PRESS 1979 © Iura editionis et versionis reservantur PRINTED IN ITALY TYPIS PONTIFICIAE UNIVERSITATIS GREGORIANAE — ROMAE Preface At Oxford University, in early March of 1975, the present investiga tion was submitted to the Board of the Faculty of Oriental Studies and, having been duly examined and approved, became the basis upon which its author was subsequently awarded the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. To my "Doktorvater", Dr. Geza Vermes, Fellow of Wolfson College, Oxford, I owe the suggestion of the theme of this work as well as the abundant counsel necessary to ground, define and initiate an investigation of this kind. The fruits of his knowledge of, and enthusiasm for, the entire field to which this investigation belongs have proven a continuing inspiration, while his confidence in the viability of the project once undertaken did much to encourage my seeing it through to the comple tion which, but for his generous assistance on one occasion in particular, might not otherwise have been achieved. Thanks are also unquestionably due to my examiners (Doctors Sebastian P. Brock, of Oxford, and Nicholas R. M. De Lange, of Cambridge) for their patient reading of the submitted thesis, and to my colleagues at the Pontifical Biblical Institute for unremitting encouragement to publish it. THOMAS W. FRANXMAN, S.J. Rome, February 2, 1979 Contents PREFACE • v TABLE OF CONTENTS vn INTRODUCTION 1 1. Flavius Josephus and His Works 1 2. The " Jewish Antiquities " 5 3. The Genesis Narrative of the " Jewish Antiquities" Compared with Genesis 9 a. Onomastics 9 b. Localization 12 c. Chronology 14 d. Genealogy 17 e. The Deity 19 4. The Genesis Narrative of the ' ' Jewish Antiquities " Contrasted with Genesis 20 a. Citation of Sources 21 b. Retelling and Reshaping 24 5. The Purposes of This Investigation 27 PART I — PROTO-HISTORY: GENESIS 1/1 - 12/9 33 INTRODUCTION 35 CHAPTER 1 : Origins 37 a. J A 1/27-33 37 b. 34-40 46 c. 41-51 56 CHAPTER 2 : Degenerations 65 a. J A 1/52-66 65 b. 67-88 77 c. 89-108 86 CHAPTER 3 : Migrations . 93 a. J A 1/109-121 94 b. 122-147 100 c. 148-160 116 PART II — ABRAHAM: GENESIS 12/10-25/10 123 INTRODUCTION 125 CHAPTER 4 : Father of Nations 127 a. JA 1/161-168 127 vin CONTENTS b. 169-185 132 c. 186-193 138 d. 194-206 141 e. 207-212 147 CHAMBER 5 : Son of Promise 152 a. J A 1/213-221 152 b. 222-236 156 c. 237-256 162 PART HI — JACOB: GENESIS 25/11-35/29 171 INTRODUCTION 173 CHAPTER 6 : Strangers in Residence 175 a. J A 1/257-266 175 b. 267-284 181 c. 285-308 187 CHAPTER 7 : Wanderers Abroad 196 a. J A 1/309-324 196 b. 325-336 202 c. 337-346 206 PART IV — JOSEPH: GENESIS 36/1-50/26 213 INTRODUCTION 215 CHAPTER 8 : Early Tribulations 217 a. J A II/1-8 218 b. 9-38 221 c. 39-59 231 d. 60-74 238 e. 75-94 240 CHAPTER 9 : Climactic Trials 248 a. J A 11/95-113 : 249 b. 114-123 255 c. 124-159 259 CHAPTER 10 : Final Events 268 a. J A 11/160-167 268 b. 168-188 271 c. 189-200 279 CONCLUSION 285 BIBLIOGRAPHY 291 INDEX OF TEXTS IN GENESIS UNDERLYING J A 1/27-11/200 301 Introduction 1. Flavius Josephus and His Works The author, a portion of whose literary productivity this present investigation undertakes to scrutinize, is scarcely either anonymous or uncelebrated. Flavius Josephus not only left behind him an autobiography but also speaks of himself in the course of his three other extant works. Extending from the reference made to him by his younger contemporary, Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus (c. A.D. 75-150), notices of Jos. and his writings parade down the centuries and into the era of printing.1 Then, in the last half of the fifteenth century, there begins to appear, and gradually to swell, that tide of translations, editions and monographs among which it is altogether possible to find expert accounts of our author's life and works in general as well as of many significant aspects thereof.2 Modern scholarship has succeeded in producing a clear and definitive bibliographic picture of the results of these more recent centuries of attention.3 Thus, it might justifiably be said that neither Flavius Josephus nor his works are in want of a detailed identification. 1 The chatty SUETONIUS mentions Jos. in his life of Vespasian (V/6), the context in question being Jos.' celebrated prognosis of Vespasian's future greatness. A collection of passages referring to Jos. and drawn from sources extending into the fifteenth century is to be found in a series of nineteen unnumbered pages at the beginning of the first volume of the HUDSON-HAVERCAMP edition of Jos.' works published in Holland in 1726. 2 Four editions of the Greek text of the works of Jos. deserve immediate attention. The first edition was published by FROBENIUS and EPISCOPIUS at Basel in 1544, under the direction of ARNOLDUS PERAXYLUS ARLENIUS, and has ever remained important. In 1726 there appeared, in two volumes, the edition of J. HUDSON (Oxford: 1720), improved and expanded by S. HAVERCAMP, and published at Amsterdam-Ley den-Utrecht. The HUDSON-HAVERCAMP edition introduced a system of text division which is still frequently used for reference. Finally, there are the two great editions: B. NBSSE'S in seven volumes (Berlin: 1885-1895) and S.A. NABER'S in six (Leipzig: 1888-1896). NIESE'S edition has been adopted as authoritative for this investigation and his system of numbering the various sections of Jos.' text (an improvement over the older HUDSON-HAVERCAMP notation) has been followed throughout. Among the valuable aids to understanding Jos.' text, the Latin translation thereof is of ancient provenance (end of the 6th century A.D.) and not to be discounted. This present investigation has made use of the Latin version as it appears in the edition of Franz BLATT, The Latin Josephus I. Introduction and Text. The Antiquities: Books I-V (Aarhus: 1958). 3 Most, if not all, articles, books or portions of books which treat of Jos. also append some sort of bibliography. The two most useful bibliographical tools for working with Jos., however, are now L. H. FELDMAN'S Studies in Judaica, Scholarship on Philo and Josephus (1937-1962) (New York: 1963), and Heinz SCHRBCKENBERG'S 1 2 INTRODUCTION The literature produced by any author, however, is so closely linked with his own personality and to the times in which he lives and writes that to begin our investigation with some chosen generalities respecting Flavius Josephus and the phases of his life is not only a fitting and logical point of departure but also one which is truly necessary for our purposes.4 Jos/ floruit places him squarely within the second half of the first century of our era. His life may, for convenience, be divided, according to the facts at our disposal, into three sections: (1) his early and (pre sumably) formative period, extending from the year of his birth (A.D. 37-38) to his mid-twenties (64); (2) the spate of years during which public affairs and national responsibilities would seem to have commanded most of his time and attention (64 to 71); (3) his later life when, in residence at the capital of the Roman world, he produced the four works, a part of one of which is the subject of this present study. If or for how long he may have survived Domitian (who was removed from the scene in A.D. 96) are questions to which there are no definite answers.5 The first and third of these periods must now be examined in order to project the background against which it is intended that a useful picture of our author take shape. Jos. was born at Jerusalem and into a world by then dominated for already a century by the Roman imperial government. His growth to maturity took place under the distant aegis of the curious, colorful and last three members of the Julio-Claudian house, and beneath the more proximate influence of the Judaean Procurators and, between A.D. 41 and 44, Herod Agrippa I. In Jos/ case especially, it is necessary to take note of this socio-political influence at once and not merely because it was his eventual and willingly accepted fortune to enter (and at the very highest level) into a relationship with the world's rulers which was much closer than that which, as a relatively anonymous subject, he had experienced as a formative element throughout the entirety of his early life. What Jos. thought, or at least accepted, Roman power to be, influenced directly his attitude regarding the identity and destiny of his own nation and people. This attitude, in turn, might logically be expected to color his Bibliographie zu Flavius Josephus (Leiden: 1968). The annotations given in both these excellent works are extremely helpful. 4 Summaries of Jos/ life are of course abundant. Under the article entitled "Jose phus" the following authorities have written for the following works of reference: A. EDERSHEIM, A Dictionary of Christian Bibliography, III, 441-460; Samuel KRAUSS, The Jewish Encyclopedia, VII, 274-281; B. NIESE, Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, VII, 569-579; G. HOELSCHER, Pauly-Wissowa RE, IX, 1934-2000. More recently Jos. has received excellent general treatment in the first volume (pp. 43-63) of the new English edition of Emil SCHUERER'S The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, ed. G. VERMES, F. MILLAR, P. VERMES and M. BLACK (Edinburgh: 1973). 5 One of Jos/ writings was published after the death of Agrippa II (cf. the Life, 359-360). According to PHOTIUS (Bibliotheca, 33), Agrippa II died in A. a 100. PHOTIUS' testimony has, however, been called into question. Nothing is known of any association of our author with an emperor later than Domitian.