Gender, Identities and Education Edited by Vassiliki Deliyanni Artūras Tereškinas Khalid Bekkaoui Sadik Reddad Hayat Naciri Sultan Moulay Slimane University Erasmus+ project “Gender Studies Curriculum: A Step for Democracy and Peace in EU-Neighboring Countries with Different Traditions” (GeSt), No. 561785-EPP-1-2015-1-LT-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP The book ‘Gender, Identities and Education’ has been prepared in the framework of the Erasmus+ project ‘Gender Studies Curriculum: A Step for Democracy and Peace in EU- Neighbouring Countries with Different Traditions’ (GeSt), No. 561785-EPP-1-2015-1-LT- EPPKA2-CBHE-JP. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. The publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Title Gender, Identities and Education Publisher Sultan Moulay Slimane University Copyright © 2018 Vassiliki Deliyanni, Artūras Tereškinas, Khalid Bekkaoui, Sadik Reddad, Hayat Naciri and contributors (authors) © 2018 Research Laboratory on Interdisciplinary Diversity & Development and the Faculty of Arts and Humanities Dépôt legal n° ISBN Gender, Identities and Education Editorial Board Vassiliki Deliyanni Artūras Tereškinas Khalid Bekkaoui Sadik Reddad Hayat Naciri International Advisory Board Natalija Mažeikienė Erzsebet Barat Souad Slaoui Gender, Identities and Education Edited by Vassiliki Deliyanni, Artūras Tereškinas, Khalid Bekkaoui, Sadik Reddad, Hayat Naciri This volume published 2018 Copyright © 2018 by: Vassiliki Deliyanni, Artūras Tereškinas, Khalid Bekkaoui, Sadik Reddad, Hayat Naciri and contributors (authors) ISBN CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 9 GENDER IDENTITY IN AMAZIGH TEXTBOOKS: TEACHING INEQUALITY ........................ 13 ILHAM BETTACH, MOHAMMED V UNIVERSITY ...................................................................................... 13 HASSAN ZAID, SULTAN MOULAY SLIMANE UNIVERSITY ...................................................................... 13 INTERSECTIONAL SUBJECTIVITY CONSTITUTION AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY REPRODUCTION THROUGH GENDERED DISCOURSES IN SCHOOLING ........................... 194 DOROTTYA REDAI, CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST ...................................................... 23 THE DISCURSIVE DEFENSE OF HETERONORMATIVITY IN AN ITALIAN DEBATE OVER GENDER EDUCATION .......................................................................................................................... 32 MONICA PORZIONATO, CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST ................................................ 32 MOROCCAN WOMEN AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC WELL-BEING: THE CASE OF HOME- BASED BUSINESSES IN FEZ REGION ............................................................................................... 41 LAMIAE AZZOUZI, MOULAY ISMAIL UNIVERSITY, MEKNÈS .................................................................. 41 GENDER REPRESENTATION IN THE MOROCCAN EFL TEXTBOOK DISCOURSE ............ 54 MOHAMED JAAFARI, CADI AYYAD UNIVERSITY, MARRAKECH ............................................................ 54 CONSTRAINTS TO GIRLS’ EDUCATION IN MOROCCO AND A GENDER APPROACH TO LITERACY ............................................................................................................................................... 71 HAYAT NACIRI, SULTAN MOULAY SLIMANE UNIVERSITY, BENI MELLAL............................................ 71 GENDER DIFFERENCES OF UKRAINIAN EIGHTH GRADERS IN MATTERS RELATED TO EDUCATION OBTAINED FROM TIMSS-2011 RESULTS ............................................................... 84 YURIY KOVALCHUK, AND TETIAN ALISOVA, NIZHYN MYKOLA GOGOL STATE UNIVERSITY, NIZHYN 84 “GIRL POWER” IN EDUCATION: THE CASE OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN EL JADIDA ..................................................................................................................................................... 90 BOUCHAIB BENZEHAF, CHOUAIB DOUKKALI UNIVERSITY, EL JADIDA................................................. 90 ARAB-AMERICAN WOMEN WRITE BACK: POETRY AS RESISTANCE IN MOHJAKAHF’S E-MAILS FROM SCHEHERAZADE .................................................................................................. 106 HIND YOUSSOUFI, SULTAN MOULAY SLIMANE UNIVERSITY, BENI MELLAL ...................................... 106 THE IMPORTANCE OF EXCHANGE PROGRAMS IN THE RE-CONSTRUCTION OF FEMALE STUDENTS’ IDENTITIES .................................................................................................. 116 SOUAD BELHORMA AND HAJAR BERGHABI, UNIVERSITY SIDI MOHAMMED BEN ABDELLAH, FEZ ... 116 PERFORMING A VICTIM: TOXIC POSTSOCIALIST MASCULINITIES ................................. 139 ARTŪRAS TEREŠKINAS, VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY, KAUNAS ................................................. 139 DECONSTRUCTING THE FOUNDATIONAL MYTHS OF PATRIARCHY IN GILMAN’S HERLAND............................................................................................................................................... 149 HAMID MASFOUR, SULTAN MOULAY SLIMANE UNIVERSITY, BENI MELLAL. .................................... 149 THE EFFECT OF GENDER DIFFERENCES ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF CREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY CONSTRUCT................................................................................... 163 TETIANA LISOVA, NIZHYN MYKOLA GOGOL STATE UNIVERSITY, UKRAINE ...................................... 163 PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO FEMALE MASTER-STUDENTS’ IDENTITY WITH THE LEADING “MANAGEMENT” ORIENTATION...................................................................... 170 OKSANA SHCHOTKA, MYKOLA GOGOL NIZHYN STATE UNIVERSITY, UKRAINE ................................ 170 DEBATE ABOUT MODERN EDUCATION OF MUSLIM GIRLS IN TUNISIA BEFORE AND DURING THE COLONIAL PERIOD (1856-1956): BETWEEN OPPONENTS AND SUPPORTERS ........................................................................................................................................ 179 ADEL BEN YOUSSEF, UNIVERSITY OF SOUSSE, TUNISIA ...................................................................... 179 Foreword All papers selected in this volume were subject to a rigorous peer-review process. They are reviewed and conceptualized into GIE volume. The papers selected are based on innovation, organization, and quality of presentation. We would like to take this opportunity to express our appreciation to all authors and thank them all in considering and trusting GIE as the platform for publishing their invaluable work. All reviewers should be also thanked for their careful comments and advice. They have worked hard reviewing papers and making valuable suggestions for the authors to improve their work. We would like to thank the members of the program committees. Also, we would like to express our deepest and sincere gratitude to all the partners of the ERASMUS+ project who helped in the success of this work. A special word of gratitude is due to the President of Sultan Moulay Slimane University for his support. We are also grateful to the vice-president for his help. Finally, we sincerely appreciate the tireless efforts of Dr. Natalija Mazekiené (the Coordinator of the project) for her excellent contributions to make the volume a grand success. Hayat Naciri Introduction This volume “Gender, Identities and Education” raises the issue of gender inequality in education and its impact on individuals and society. A prime motivation for editing this volume was to discuss different approaches to improving the quality of education. Thus, the major conclusion/recommendation of the volume is that the various societies the contributors represent must change attitudes towards gender in a very fundamental way if social, economic and political development and gender equality are to be achieved in education. Dr. Hassan Zaid, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, and Dr. Ilham Bettach, Mohamed V University, reported that textbooks are important in the formation of children’s gender identity, and showed that the Amazigh textbooks serve to perpetuate the stereotypical gender roles which exist in Moroccan society. In an inspiring contribution, Dr. Dorottya Redai, Central European University, addressed the issue of intersectional subjectivity constitution and social inequality reproduction in Hungarian secondary education and discussed how class and ethnicity are reproduced through gendered discourses and practices in a school. Dr. Monica Porzionato, Central European University, analyzed how the introduction of a series of pedagogical programs aimed at sensitizing children to gender and sexuality in Italy has resulted in a rapidly growing body of discourses which, both explicitly and implicitly, aim at maintaining heteronormativity. Dr. Lamia Azzouzi, Moulay Ismail University, reported on the socioeconomic situation of Moroccan women in her case study and their awareness of the necessity to change their social situation for their own well being. Through this survey, it has been demonstrated that housewives, today, can enjoy more and more independence, respect and success, thanks to running small businesses. Dr. Mohamed Jaafari, Cadi Ayyad University, examined a significant feature of gender representation in the discourse underlying the current Moroccan EFL textbooks. He pointed out that multiple gender inequalities seem to persist in the textbooks. The results from the study imply that textbook designers should treat gender representation quantitatively and qualitatively. Dr. Hayat Naciri, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, shed light on some of the most significant constraints to girls’ schooling in Morocco. She intended to make people in charge aware of the effects of education and human development; and particularly NGOs regarding the role they can play to fight some negative traditional values to improve girls’ and women’s situation in Morocco. Dr. Tetiana Lisova and Dr. Yuriy Kovalchuk, Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University, presented an analysis of the answers of Ukrainian TIMSS-2011 participants to a student questionnaire in order to find the differences between boys and girls in matters related to Math and Science education. Overall, their results show that these differences are not significant. Dr. Bouchaib Benzehaf, Chouaib Doukkali University, presented an analysis of the results of a comparative study that set out to explore gender differences in the area of writing among Moroccan high school students. It has been found out that girls steadily out-perform boys in academic areas, and the differences are highly noticeable, thus suggesting a reversal of the traditional gender gap. However, it has also been found out that a peer perception gap persists, with boys refusing to recognize girls’ skills in spite of their higher grades. Dr. Hind youssoufi, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, examined how the contemporary Arab- American poet Mohja Kahf challenges the western and patriarchal interpretations of some Islamic cultural symbols like the “hijab” (the veil). In poems like “Descent in JFK”, “Hijab Scene # 7”, and “Thawrah Des Odalisques at the Matisse Retrospective”, Mohja Kahf offers an interesting counterpoint to challenge hegemonic narratives about Arab-American women rooted in the nineteenth century. Dr. Souad Belhorma and Hajar Berghabi, University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, aimed to examine how NGOs exchange programs to help female university students reconstruct their social, economic, cultural, and gender identities in different Moroccan cities. They asserted that AIESEC exchange programs served both as tourism opportunities and a learning means. Dr. Artūras Tereškinas, Vytautas Magnus University, analyzed postsocialist toxic masculinities as an ensemble of discourses, rules, and practices characterized by excess and banality. The author emphasizes that fraught with fear and anxiety, Lithuanian politicians attempt to resolve their masculine ambiguities by resorting to dramatic performances of resentment, impetuousness, hatred, and denigration of others. Dr. Hamid Masfour, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, maintains a practical deconstructionist analysis of the different relevant levels of patriarchal myths questioned in Gilman’s Herland, the work revises the claimed patriarchal prerogatives for perpetuating social order and providence, along with deconstructing traditions and religion as legitimating factors of male dominance.
Description: