Table Of Content

(All POSTURE ELSEVIER Author index Volume 25 (2007) Delval, A., P. Krystkowiak, J.-L. Blatt, E. Laby Goodwin, ¢ K. Dujardin, A. Destée, P. Derambure, L. Defebvre, A biomechanical Gough, M study of gait initiation in Huntington's disease 25, 7 Graham, H.K Den Otter, A.R., A.C.H. Geurts, T. Mulder, J. Duysen ymormalities Granata, K.P the temporal patterning ower extremity muscle activity hemuparetic Granata, K.P. rait 25, 342 Gupta, R., see Derambure *¢ Delval 7 Gutierrez Destée, A.. see Delval, A. 2 Deviterne, D., see Jamet, M Dijkstra, P.U., see Hijmans, J.M. 25 6 Dobson, F., M.E. Morris, R. Baker, H.K. Graham, Gait children with cerebral palsy: A s\ Dohring, M.. see Daly Doyle, R., see Rosengrer Doyle, RJ... E.1 Generalizability 166 Draganich, L.I Dudkiewicz Dujar lin, K d Dusing, S.¢ orp normative of Zait paramet n children using the GAITRite 25 Edwards, W.B.. see Hreljac Edwards. W.T.. Effecto f joint England, S.A., K.P. Granata stabilityo f walking 25, | Epifanio Eriksson Escamill Fitzpatrick, I Forth, K.E.. EJ. Metter, W.H. Palos postural equilibrium contro! mum time to contact (TT¢ Frank, J.S.. see Gage, W.H Fredrickson, E., see Daly, J.J Fujishima, K., see Masumoto Fujiwara, K., see Maeda Fuller, J.R., A.L. Adkin change travel direction Gage, W.H., J.S. Frank, S.D tural responses following KA: Sagittal plane rota Gatts, S.K M.H. W Biomechanics of rec Gauchard, G.C., see Jam Gazendam, M.G.J., A.l ning at different sj Geertzen, J.H.B.. see Geurts, A.C.H.. see Den Otter Giakas, G., see Paschalis, \ Giannini, S., see Leardini Gibson, J.N.A.. see Stewart Gilleard. W.. see Levinger. P Glaister, B.( G.C. Bernatz, G.K. Klute, M.S. Orend analysis of turning during activities of daily livir Gobelet, C.. see Meichtry, A. 25, 25 Goldberg, E.J., R.R. Neptune, Compensatory strategic walin krespionsen tog mu scle weakness and increased aT Ines a wis ae © 25. 360 Standing position Kirby, K.A.. see Lewis, G.S. 25, 63 Kitaoka, H.B Klute, G.K., see Glaister Komi, P.V., see Ishikawa, M Kotajarvi, B.R., see Ringleb Kotzamanidis, C., see Paschalis Koutedakis, Y., see Paschalis, V Kreulen, M., M.J.C. Smeulders terns of the upper extremity and trunk assoc rotation in patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy controls 25, 485 Krystkowiak, P.. see Delval Kuemmerle-Deschner, J.B model for the determination of 4. 25 couture, P., see Begon, M afortune, M.A., see Moretto porte see Siidhoff, | Hamaoui M.G. Benedetti oot and Will The effect of seria liminary results from Romke Gobel validity of 3D trunk ¢ able-bodied gait 25 Meijer, K e Savelberg, H.H.C.M. 25 Menz, H.B., S.R. Lord, R.C. Fitzpatrick ing impaired sensorimotor function older people 25, 243 H.H.C.M GALT POSTURE ELSEVIER Subject index Volume 25 (2007) Accelerometers and gyroscopes; Outcome evaluation il score Ankle strategy Ambulatory system 25, 523 | br G Accelerometry; Gait: External work: Outcome 2 Ankle: Subt Accidental falls: Gait: Ageing: Balance Anthropometry: | 25, 615 ACL: Knee: Motor control: Electromy Anticipation: K Activities daily living, Upper extren RT ES| Sis a9e5 ‘ Anti. cipatory postural adjustment: B Test; Balance 23, $15 AFO: Motor 65? 7 Anticipatory postural control: ( ' - Ageing , Anticipatory: S Ageing Old ts 25 P Ascending stairs Ageing . ( 25.17 . . Attachment systems Ageing 25 Aging Attention. ( Aging: Ta otic lar Gait: B ' . ) Attention, P Akinesia: Hu Attentional resources 25 Algorithm: Walking: Gait nt str if ‘ Australopithecus. ‘ H Ambulation: Gait: GAITRit« Autocorrelation. ( Ambulation: Turning: Gait Backward: EMG: HR: W Ambulatory system: Outcom scores 25. 523 Balance. B 5 Anatomical reference frames Metatarsus: Metatarsal bones: Metatarso p lange om i Balance: B ysis 25, 453 Ankle power, AFO; Motor disorder; Ca uscle pares int f Balance. ( 25. 652 2S 16 10.1016/S0966-63620(00057 5-0 Balance erebral palsy: S; 25 Balance confidence: Steer Older adults 25, 393 hildren: | 25 6 Balance control bat 25 ) horea: H 5 Balance 2255 216 lassificat“inso n system Balance linical interpretation , oe Balance linical measurement Balance linical scores support luster analysis: ( p Biomechanics | o-contraction Biomechanics Biomechanics: J 275 42 ognition Biomechanics ognitive tasks Biomechanics f > omputerized dynamic posturography 5 alf muscle paresis 25 oncussion enter of mass ( 1 ontingent negative variation ' I enter of pressure: | D oordination oordination enter of pressure Q *s 6 erebral palsy; ( oordination erebral palsy 2— SR Descending stairs 5b erebral palsy: ‘ Descriptive statistics 25 4) Detrended fluctuation analysis erebral palsy: ¢ . s erebral palsy Diabetes 25. 485 25 erebral palsy Dual-task paradigm 193 Dual-task Cerebral palsy Dual-tasking iral control; Working mem Foot: P I ootsteps: G Dynamic balance Funct 25. 509 Footwear. B Dynamic balance recovery 25, 205 Gait: Balance: Pos Footwear. G Dynamic knee orthosis: Pat Forces. G Forearm rotation. ( Dynamic posturog raphy Dynamic similarity: Walk Forefoot. | 4 Fore-foot. F Dynamic stability Elastic energy: G Forward dynamics simulation Elderly: S 5 ‘ Electrical stimulation Froude number R 5 Full community ambulators lectromyography 5 Functional method lectromyography 25 lectromyography Functional neuromuscular stimulation kK MG MG Functional reach. ( < MG Functional MG Fuzzy decision tree MG ' > s quilibrium ( xoskeleton Gait analysis Cait analvsis xternal work: ( alls: ¢ Cait analysis alls (; analysis Feet: H analysis Flatfoot deformity p 5 EMG 25 analysis: K Foot: ‘ N 664 Subjec index vol 25 (2007 Gait analysis Knee osteoarthritis; Principal component analysis; Knee Gait patterns; Cerebral pa sific n system: Validity; Syste matic kinematics Knee kinetics 25, 86 review 25, 140 Gait analysis; Lower limb amputees; Descending stairs; Ascendin Gait Posterior tibial Biomechanics 25, 26 pressure EMG 25 Gait analysis Rear-foot: Mid-foot Fore Toot Metatarsus: Met Gait quality: Kohone: bones Metatarso-phalangeal point Kinematics Anatomical rror 25, 374 frames 25, 453 Gait: Sli; Gait biomechanics Locomtion Gait Rehabilitation; Electrical stimulation: Functional Gait: St lation 25 2 Gait: St Gait biomechanics: Powered ankle-foot orthosis: VO Gait Exoskeleton 25. 620 \ Gait; Cerebral palsy Gait termination: |; Gait Concussion; ( Gait transition: M Gai2t5 , de1c8r5 ement: Motor task Gait transitions: \\ Gait: 1 Gait; EMG: HR; Backwar Gait: 7 Gait events: Walking: Hee GAITRite Gait; Falls: Knee Gear ratio: P Gait Forefoo 7& S00 Gait. GAITRit« Gender, Walk G Gait, Gear 25. 590 Generalizability: ¢ 2 16 Gait; Hemipar Ground reaction force: W EMG: J Heel strike: W Gait initiation: Huntington's 25, 279 Hemiparesis Gait Inverted || pendulun Hip joint centre Equilibrium 25, 250 9K 26 Gait; Kinematics: Kinetics: Inc Hominid: Ga Hu Gait laboratory ( ebral gait assessment 25, 18 HR; EMG: Backw Gait Locomotion; Ultrasonography: Elastic Human evolution Australopitl He Gait; Locomotion; Variability; Autocorrelation: Footsteps Human locomotion Gait; Locomtion: Stroke; Coordination: Rehabilitation: Electri Huma Gait biomechanics; Functional neuromuscular stimulatior Human locomotion: 1 Gait; Minimum foot clearance: De scriptive statistics lripy Gait; Balance: Post Gait; Muscle work; Musculoskeletal model: Forward dynamics s Human movement analysis: 1 25. 360 95 152 Gait; Patellofemoral pain; Knee: Dynamic knee orthosis: Kinematic Human posture: Senso Lateral step up 25, 544 vibration 25, 99 Subject index Human running: EMG: Electromyography: Velocity 25. 604 Kinematics bones: M Huntington’s disease; Gait initiation; Chorea; Akinesia; Hypokinesia 25 Hyperpronation: Malalignment: Feet: Pelvis: Wedges 25 Kinetic 25. 6 Hypokinesia: Huntington's disease: Gait initiatio Kinetics Index of normality: Gait: Kinematics: Kinetics Information-processing; Posture: Attention Kinetics In-shoe: Normal: Foot: Pressure Knee; ACI Insole hardness: Gait termination Knee; ( H Intervention: Staircase: Gait: Elder Knee kinematics: ¢ Intra-rater reliability. CODA 25 parameters 25, 303 Knee kinematics: G Inverse dynamics: Gait analysis: Li K Inverse dynamics: Joint torque Knee kinetics: ( inalysis 25 a» k Inverted pendulum model: St Knee osteoarthritis Equilibrium: Gait 25, 250 h r K Isokinetic: Torg 3D kinematics; Opto Knee osteoarthritis Joint angles: Walkir Knee: P e 25, 40 Joint axis: Sub Kohonen neural network ., t t 25 Joint coordinate system, Gait ateral step up: P Joint motion, Walking speed K Ground reaction force 25 imb segme Joint stiffness: Bior 25 ¢ old 25, 43 ocomotion Joint torques redistribution nalysis 25, 259 ocomotion Joint work: AFO:; Motor ocomotion 3D kinematics: |sokinet ocomotion 3D kinematics: Upper extremity O analysis 25, 573 ocomotion Kinematic analysis: Reaching: Cerebral palsy ocomtion, G Kinematic coupling: Forefoot: R« Kinematics: CODA: Intra-r: ower limb amputees parameters 25, 303 Biomect ( Kinematics: Gait: Kinetics: Index « Lower limb: G 25. 44 Kinematics: Gait termination: lr M. tibialis anterior: ( Kinematics; Patellofemoral pain: Kne Lateral step up 25, 544 Malalignment: H 25 (2007 Mass: Limb segment: Torque: ( hildre Model Anthropon Muscular stiffness: Postur espiratior pi 1 25. 615 25 10900 MBT shoes; Foot: P! Musculoskeletal model. G 25. 360 Metatarsal bones: R Noise: Hir Normal Metatarso-phalangeal joint: R« Metatarsal bones: Kiner Normal fI rames 25, +4 53 Metatarsus npin avialaa ng € Observational gait assessment. ( ul patttee r s° }p i YSIC >< Mid-foot: Re: Older adults: St 95 453 nce 25 Minimum foot clearance: ( Older people. B 5 f Model: | b segment; Ma 25. 615 Optoelectronic Motion analysis: | Orthotics 5 I< f Motor control: K Osteoarthritis turbat 5 Motor disorder 2% 45 Outcome evaluation 4 Motor task: Walk 25 R« Outcome Movement disorders Pain: G 25, 493 Patella: G Movement: Hi; H 95 352 Patellofemoral pain: | Movement patterns: ( Later t 25 25, 485 Pedar”: No Multiple obstacle avoidance of mass; Gait 25, 50 Pediatric: Gait: GAITR Muscle activity: S Pelvic retraction: G 25 565 Pelvis: H Muscle: E! 25 SRO) Peripheral neuropathy 25, 31¢ Muscle strength: Gea 25. 590 Physical activity: Ge 2— S00) Muscle vibration: Hun Proprioception2 5, 99 Physical activity inalysis 25. 259 Muscle work; Gait: Musculoske 25. 360 Physical therapy: ( Observational gait Muscle-tendon unit; Ge: 25. 590 Plantar pressure: Foot