Gait & Posture 2006: Vol 23 Index

2006·2.7 MB·English

(Al?
POSTURE
Gait and Posture 23 (2006 SHS 45
Author index
Volume 23 (2006)
Aalto, H., see Arokoski J.PA. 23,45 armines, D.V., see Damiano, D.I
Abel, M.F see Damiano, D.1 23. | arpinella, L.. P. Mazzoleni, M
Achard de Leluardiére, F L.N. Hajri, P. Lacouture, J. Duboy, M.1 Frelut Experimental protocol for the kis
G. Peres Validation and influence of anthropometric and kinematic and repeatability 23. 445
models of obese teenagers in vertical jump performance and mechanical arvalho, R.L., see Almeida, G.I 23
internal energy expenditure 23, 149 hen, G Induced acceleration contributions to locomotion dynan
Aerts, P.. see Hallemans, A 23, 142 not physically well defined 23
Almeida, G.L., R.L. Carvalho, V.1 Talis, Postural Strategy to keep balance hen, H.-L., see Lu, T.-W. 23, 4
on the seesaw 23, 17 hen. H.-L., T.-W. Lu, Comparisons t moments Detwee!
Armand, S., E. Watelain, M. Mercier, G. Lensel, F.-X I epoul ind trailing limb in young adults whe tep » over obstacl
Identification and classification of toe-walkers based on ankle kinematic hen, H.-Y... A.M. Wing, D. Pratt ie synchronisation of lower
using a data-mining method 23, 240 responses with a variable metronome: The effect of bion
Arnold, A.S., M.Q. Liu, M.H. Schwartz, S. Ounpuu, S.1 Delp, The role ot constraints on timing 23. 307
estimating muscle-tendon lengths and velocitieso f the hamstrings in the hen, S.-C., see Lu, T.-W 23. 471
evaluation and treatment of crouch gait 23 77 hockalingam, N.. see Longworth, R
Arokoski, J.P.A.. \ Leinonen M.H. Arokoski, H Aalto, H. Valtonen hristou, E., see Peterson, M.1 23
Postural control in male patients with hip osteoarthritis 23, 45 lark, R.C., see Smith, B. 23, 263
Arokoski, M.H.. see Arokoski, J.P.A 23, 45 yoney K.M.. see Buczek, Fl 23
Ashton, K.M., see Smith, B. 23, 263 urthoys, L.S.. see Vibert, N. 23, 35
Auner, C., see Saraph, V. 23, 83
Daffertshofer. A.. see Lamoth, C.J.( 23. 230
Baker, R., J. Robb, Foot models for clinical gait analysis 23. 399 Damiano, D.1I Laws. D.V. Carmines, M.f Abel
Baker, R., see Huxham, F. 23, 159 spasticity to angular
Bang, T.J., see Hollman, J.H. 23, 441 palsy 23, |
Baumert, T., see Vasarhelyi, A. 23, 99 Danion, F.. M. Duarte. M
Beek, P.J., see Lamoth, C.J.¢ 23, 230 movements during standing
Benda, E., see Hurkmans, H.L.P. 23, 118
!
Bennett, D.. L. Ogonda, D. Elliott, | Humphreys, D.E Beverland Dascalos. S see Liu, W. 23
Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive Davidson, B.S see Wilson, E.1
and traditional hip replacement surgery \ prospective blinded stud De Clereg, D see De Cock, A
23, 374 Clercq, D see Hallemans
Berge, J.S., see Orendurff, M.S. 23, 106 De Clercq, D., see Willems, T.M
Beverland, D.E., see Bennett, D De Cock, A.. see Willems, T.M
Black, F.O., see Paloski, W.H De Cock, A.. T. Willems, E. Witvrouw
Bock, H.G., see Simon, J. 23, 411 functional foot type classification
Bohl, D., see Smith, B. 23, 263 pressure distribution during jogging
Bétzel, K., O.1. Kolev, T Brandt, Comparison of tap-evoked and tone Dekker, R., see Huitema, R.B. 23, 200
evoked postural reflexes in humans 23, 324 Delbaere. K.. see Willems. T.M. 23, 91
Brandt, T., see Bétzel, K. 23, 324 Delp. S.L.. see Arnold, A.S. 23, 27
Bretthauer, G., see Wolf, S. 23, 33 Delp, S.L., see Higginson, J.S. 23, 32
Brey, R.H., see Hollman, J.H. 23, 441 Dembowska-Baginska, B., see Syczewska, M. 23, 206
Brouwer, W.H., see Huitema, R.B. 23, 200 Desloovere, K., see Jonkers, 1. 23, 222
Buczek, F.L.. M.R. Walker, M.J. Rainbow, K.M. Cooney, J.O. Sanders Dickens, W.E., M.I Smith. Validation of a viissuua l gait asse
Impact of mediolateral segmentation on a multi-segment foot model children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy 23. 78
23, 519 Diéderlein, | . see Wolf, S. 23
Burgar, C.G., see Higginson, J.S. 233,, 32 Doederlein, L.. see Simon, J
Burgess, A.M., see Vibert, N. 23, 355 Dongen, S.V., see Hallemans, A. 23
Bussmann, J.B.J., see Hurkmans, H.L.P. 23. 118 Duarte, M.. see Danion, f 23.17
Duboy, J., see Achardd e Leluardiére. I
doi: 10. 1016/S0966-6362)O(0000684 - |
(Al?
POSTURE
Gait and Posture 23 (2006 SHS 45
Author index
Volume 23 (2006)
Aalto, H., see Arokoski J.PA. 23,45 armines, D.V., see Damiano, D.I
Abel, M.F see Damiano, D.1 23. | arpinella, L.. P. Mazzoleni, M
Achard de Leluardiére, F L.N. Hajri, P. Lacouture, J. Duboy, M.1 Frelut Experimental protocol for the kis
G. Peres Validation and influence of anthropometric and kinematic and repeatability 23. 445
models of obese teenagers in vertical jump performance and mechanical arvalho, R.L., see Almeida, G.I 23
internal energy expenditure 23, 149 hen, G Induced acceleration contributions to locomotion dynan
Aerts, P.. see Hallemans, A 23, 142 not physically well defined 23
Almeida, G.L., R.L. Carvalho, V.1 Talis, Postural Strategy to keep balance hen, H.-L., see Lu, T.-W. 23, 4
on the seesaw 23, 17 hen. H.-L., T.-W. Lu, Comparisons t moments Detwee!
Armand, S., E. Watelain, M. Mercier, G. Lensel, F.-X I epoul ind trailing limb in young adults whe tep » over obstacl
Identification and classification of toe-walkers based on ankle kinematic hen, H.-Y... A.M. Wing, D. Pratt ie synchronisation of lower
using a data-mining method 23, 240 responses with a variable metronome: The effect of bion
Arnold, A.S., M.Q. Liu, M.H. Schwartz, S. Ounpuu, S.1 Delp, The role ot constraints on timing 23. 307
estimating muscle-tendon lengths and velocitieso f the hamstrings in the hen, S.-C., see Lu, T.-W 23. 471
evaluation and treatment of crouch gait 23 77 hockalingam, N.. see Longworth, R
Arokoski, J.P.A.. \ Leinonen M.H. Arokoski, H Aalto, H. Valtonen hristou, E., see Peterson, M.1 23
Postural control in male patients with hip osteoarthritis 23, 45 lark, R.C., see Smith, B. 23, 263
Arokoski, M.H.. see Arokoski, J.P.A 23, 45 yoney K.M.. see Buczek, Fl 23
Ashton, K.M., see Smith, B. 23, 263 urthoys, L.S.. see Vibert, N. 23, 35
Auner, C., see Saraph, V. 23, 83
Daffertshofer. A.. see Lamoth, C.J.( 23. 230
Baker, R., J. Robb, Foot models for clinical gait analysis 23. 399 Damiano, D.1I Laws. D.V. Carmines, M.f Abel
Baker, R., see Huxham, F. 23, 159 spasticity to angular
Bang, T.J., see Hollman, J.H. 23, 441 palsy 23, |
Baumert, T., see Vasarhelyi, A. 23, 99 Danion, F.. M. Duarte. M
Beek, P.J., see Lamoth, C.J.¢ 23, 230 movements during standing
Benda, E., see Hurkmans, H.L.P. 23, 118
!
Bennett, D.. L. Ogonda, D. Elliott, | Humphreys, D.E Beverland Dascalos. S see Liu, W. 23
Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive Davidson, B.S see Wilson, E.1
and traditional hip replacement surgery \ prospective blinded stud De Clereg, D see De Cock, A
23, 374 Clercq, D see Hallemans
Berge, J.S., see Orendurff, M.S. 23, 106 De Clercq, D., see Willems, T.M
Beverland, D.E., see Bennett, D De Cock, A.. see Willems, T.M
Black, F.O., see Paloski, W.H De Cock, A.. T. Willems, E. Witvrouw
Bock, H.G., see Simon, J. 23, 411 functional foot type classification
Bohl, D., see Smith, B. 23, 263 pressure distribution during jogging
Bétzel, K., O.1. Kolev, T Brandt, Comparison of tap-evoked and tone Dekker, R., see Huitema, R.B. 23, 200
evoked postural reflexes in humans 23, 324 Delbaere. K.. see Willems. T.M. 23, 91
Brandt, T., see Bétzel, K. 23, 324 Delp. S.L.. see Arnold, A.S. 23, 27
Bretthauer, G., see Wolf, S. 23, 33 Delp, S.L., see Higginson, J.S. 23, 32
Brey, R.H., see Hollman, J.H. 23, 441 Dembowska-Baginska, B., see Syczewska, M. 23, 206
Brouwer, W.H., see Huitema, R.B. 23, 200 Desloovere, K., see Jonkers, 1. 23, 222
Buczek, F.L.. M.R. Walker, M.J. Rainbow, K.M. Cooney, J.O. Sanders Dickens, W.E., M.I Smith. Validation of a viissuua l gait asse
Impact of mediolateral segmentation on a multi-segment foot model children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy 23. 78
23, 519 Diéderlein, | . see Wolf, S. 23
Burgar, C.G., see Higginson, J.S. 233,, 32 Doederlein, L.. see Simon, J
Burgess, A.M., see Vibert, N. 23, 355 Dongen, S.V., see Hallemans, A. 23
Bussmann, J.B.J., see Hurkmans, H.L.P. 23. 118 Duarte, M.. see Danion, f 23.17
Duboy, J., see Achardd e Leluardiére. I
doi: 10. 1016/S0966-6362)O(0000684 - |
23 (2006
Elliott, D.. see Bennett. D. 23, 374 ynkers. | Stewart. K. Desloor
Eng, J.J.. see Marigold, D.S. 23, 249 Musculo
Eves. F.F.. see Orrell. AJ. 23,9 suill Knec
Feiveson, A.H., see Paloski, W.H 23, 315 Kapreli, E., see Strimpakos, N 23
Ferrarin. M.. see Carpinella, | 23, 445 Kaufman, K.R.. see Hollmar 23 +4
Ferris. D.P.. K.E. Gordon, G.S. Sawicki. A. Peethambaran, Ar 1 improved Kautz, S.A., see Higginson, J.S 2! 3
powered ankle—foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric controi Keppl sec | 2: 3
Kim, S.H., see Liu
see Orendurff, M.S. 23. 106 Kimmel, S.A., M.H
orner-Cordero, A.. H.J.F.M. Koopman, F.C.T. van der Helm Inverse during gait 23
dynamics calculations during gait with restricted ground reaction force Klassen, S.. see Smith
information from pressure insoles 23, 189 Klute. G.K.. see Oren
Fowler, N.E., A.L.F. Rodacki, C.D. Rodacki, Changes in stature and spine Kolev, O.1., see Bétzel
kinematics during a loaded walking task 23, 133 Koopman, H.J.F.M.. see
relut, M.L.. see Achard de Leluardiére, F. 23, 149 Kubo, M., B. Ulrich, Ce
ritsch, C., see Vasarhelyi, A. 23, 99 in anterior—posterior ar
preadolescents with/without Do wi
yaniey, K.J.. C.M. Powers, Intersegmental dynamics during the swing Kuczynski. M.. B. Ostrowska. Ur der
phase of gait: A comparison of knee kinetics between 7 year-old children VIiSCs coelaj sti c model’ ing fj
and adults 23, 499 Kwat M.M.S.. see Menz. H.B 23
Gerner, H.J.. see Wolf, S. 23, 331
Giacomozzi, C., F. Martelli, Peak pressure curve: An effective parametet Lacouture, P.. see Achard de |
for early detection of foot functional impairments in diabetic patients Lamoth, ( Daffertshot
23. 464 with chronic low back f
Gilchrist. D.P.D., see Vibert, N. 23, 355 coordination and lumbar erect
Gioftsos, G., see Strimpakos, N. 23 itt, M.D.. see Menz, H.B. 23. 5
Gong. J.. see Huxham, F. 23, 159 sce Damiano
Gordon, K.E., see Ferris. D.P. 23, 425
Gradl, G.. see Vasarhelyi, A. 23, 99
Grasso, M., see Nardone, A. 23, 364 epoulr
Grosjean. M.. see Danion. f 23. 173 wek, M.D
Gross, M.T., see Queen. R.M. 23, 282 wiabilit
inhart, W
Haddad, J.M.. R.E.A. van Emmerik, S.N. Whittlesey, J. Hamill H.-Y
Adaptations in interlimb and intralimb coordination to asymmetrical J
loading in human walking 23, 429 lobal
Hajri, L.N.. see Achard de Leluardiére, F. 23, 149 23. 480
Hallemans, A.. D. De Clercq, S.V. Dongen, P. Aerts, Changes in foot-function iu, M.Q., see Arno
parameters during the first 5 months after the onset of independent walking iu, W., K. MeIntir
a longitudinal follow-up study 23, 142 Bilateral subthalan
Hamill, J.. see Haddad, J.M. 23, 429 Parkinsor lise
Harper, W.M., see Parmar, V. 23, 523 ockhart, T.E
Harrington, M.. see Stebbins. J. 23, 401
Hazlewood, M.E.. see Stansfield, B.W. 23, 288
Higginson, J.S.. FE. Zajac, R.R. Neptune, S.A. Kautz, C.G. Burgas
S.L. Delp, Effect of equinus foot placement and intrinsic musck
response on knee extension during stance 23, 32 Menz. H.B
Hillman, S.J.. see Stansfield, B.W. 23, 288 Musolir
Hoang. T.. see Vibert. N. 23, 355
Hof, At.L.. see Huitema., R.B. 23, 200
Hollman, J.H.. R.H. Brey. R.A. Robb, TJ. Bang, K.R. Kaufmar
Spatiotemporal gait deviations in a virtual reality environment 23, 441
Hopfenmiiller, W., see Vasarhelyi, A 23, 99
Huitema, R.B., W.H. Brouwer, At.L. Hof, R.D ekker, T. Mulder, K. Postema K.I
Walking trajectory in neglect patients 23, 200
Humble, R.N., see Miindermann, A. 23, 295 MacDougall, H.G., see Vibert
Humphreys. L., see Bennett, D. 23, 374 Mackey. D.C S.N. Robinovit
Hurkmans, H.L.P.. J.B.J. Bussmann, E. Benda, J.A.N. Verhaar, HJ. Stam differences in abilit CCK
Accuracy and repeatability of the Pedar Mobile system in long-term Madigan, M.L., see Wilson, f
vertical force measurements 23, 118 Marigold, D.S
Huxham, F., J. Gong. R. Baker. M. Morris, R. lansek, Defining spatial
parameters for non-linear walking 23, 159 Martelli, F.. see Giacomozzi., ¢
Hwang. E.Y.. see Paloski, W.H. 23, 315 Masani, K., A.H. Vette, M.R
standing: Proportional and deriy
lansek, R.. see Huxham, F. 23, 159 command to body sway position onpse
Author index vol. 23 (2006)
Masters, R.S.W.. see Orrell, A.J Rabuffetti, M., see Carpinella, I
Mazzoleni, P., see Carpinella, I 3.4 Rainbow, M.J.. see Buczek. F.1
McIntire. K., see Liu, W. 23. Redfern. M.S., see Musolino, M.¢ 23
McIntosh, A.S.. see Simon, J 3.4 Redmond, A.C... see Longworth 23
Meijer, O.G., see Lamoth J. 3, 231 Reed, R.J.. C.R. Lowrey, L.A. Vallis. Middle
Menz. H.B., M.D. Latt, A. Tiedemann, M.M.S. Kwan, S.R. Lord dwelling adults respond diffe
Responsteo Letter to the Editor: Reliability of the GAITRite” walkway environments 23, 486
system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in Reschke, M.F., see Paloski, W.H
young and older people 23, 524 Rietdyk. S.. Anticipatory locomot
Mercier, M., see Armand, S 24 ace accommodation 23
Metaxiotis, D.. see Simon, J i Robb, J.. see Baker, R. 23, 399
Metheny, J.B.. see Smith, B 3, 263 Robb, J.E.. see Stansfield, B.W
Mikut, R., see Wolf, S 23, 3 Robb, R.A.. see Hollman, J.H
MittImeier see Vasarhelyi, A Roberts. R.D.. see Vibert. N
Molenaers, G., see Jonkers, | 3, 2 Robinovitch, S.N.. see Macke
Morris, M., see Huxham, F. 23, 15° Rodacki. A.L.F., see
Mulder, T., see Huitema. R.B. 23, 200 Rodacki, C.D
Mindermann \ J.M. Wakeling. B.M. Nigg. R.N. Humble Rosengren, K.S., see Peterson
D.J. Stefanyshyn, Foot orthoses affect frequency components of muscle Royer, T.D.. C.A. Wasilewski
activity in the lower extremity 23, 295 persons with unilateral. trans-tibial
Musolino, M.C., P.J. Loughlin, P.J. Sparto. M.S. Redfern. Spectrally similar Rudolph, K.S.. see Lewek. M.D. 23. 505
periodic and non-periodic optic flows evoke different postural sway Rupp. R.. see Wolf. S. 23
responses 23, 180
Sakellari, V.. see Strimpakos, N
Nardone, A.. M. Grasso, M. Schieppati. Balance control in periph; eral Sanderlosr, J.O.. see 2 BRuucczzeekl, F.l
neuropathy: Are patients equally unstable unde atic and dynamic Saraph, V.. E.B. Zwick
conditions? 23, 364 W. Linhart, Leg
NNeeppttuunnee,, RR..RR..,, sseeee SHaivgagkiin, son,K . J.2S3. , 38233, 32 Sasakeir,e braKl. , paRlsRy.: aNn epteuvnael,u atioM usct
Nigg, B.M.. see Miindermann, A. 23, 295 utilization during walking and t
Nussbaum, M.A., see Wilson, E.L. 23, 348 speed =2 5, 385
Sawicki, G.S.. see Ferris, D.P
Schablowski. M.. see Wolf. S
Ogonda. L., see Bennett. D. 23, 374
Oldham, J.. see Strimpakos, N. 23, 22 Schieppati, M., see Nardone, A
Schneider, F.. see Saraph, V. 23
Orendurff, M.S., A.D. Segal, J.S. Berge, K.C. Flick, D. Spanier. G.K. Klute
Scholz, J.. see Lewek, M.D. 23
The kinematics and kinetics of turning: limb asymmetries associate
Schwartz, M.H.. see Arnold, A.S
walking a circular path 23, 10¢
M.H.. see Kimmel. S
Orendurtf, M.S., see Yuen, T.J. 23, 112
4.D.. see Orendurtf, M.S
Orrell, A.J.. F.F. Eves, R.S.W. Masters. Implicit motor learnit
Shyam Kumar, A.J.. see Parmar
balancing task 23,9 egel, K.L., T.M. Kepple. S.J
Ostrowska, B.. see Kuczyriski. M 23. 51 wis
Ounpuu, S., see Arnold, A.S. 23
Doederleir
P)a hwa, R.. see2 Li'u , W. 293 , 41992) S.1. Wolf. The Heidelberg
Paloski, W.H.. S.J. Wood, A.H. Fei yn. F.O. Black, E.Y. Hwan description and ass¢
M.F. Reschke, Destabilization of human balance control by static and
Smith, B.. K.M. Ashton
dynamic head tilts 23. 315 a
Influence «
Parmar, V., A.J. Shyam Kumar, W.M. Harper, Reliability of the GAITRite
female coll
Walkway System for the Quantification of Temporo-spatial Parameters Smith, M.F.. see Dickens
of Gait in Young and Older People. Gait & Posture 2004;20(1 ):20-—25 Snyder-Mackler, L.. see Lewel 23. 505
23, 523
Spaepen, A.. see Jonkers, |
Peethambaran, A., see Ferris. D.P. 23 Spanier. D., see Orendurff. M.S. 23. 10¢
Perek, D., see Syczewska. M 23. 206 Sparto, P.J.. see Musolino. M.( 23. IR
Perek-Polnik, M.. see Syczewska, M. 23, 206 Stam, H.J.. see Hurkmans, H.L.P. 23
Peres, G., see Achard de Leluardiére, I 23. 149 Stanhope, S.J.. see Siegel. K.L. 23. 435
Peterson, M.L., E. Christou. K.S. Rosengren, Children achieve adult-like Stansfield, B.W., S.J. Hillman, M.E. Hazlewood, J.t
sensory integration during stance at |2-years-old 23, 455
analysis of gait parameters with speed in normal
Popovic, M.R., see Masani, K. 23, 164 self-selected speeds 23, 288
Postema, K., see Huitema, R.B. 23, 200
Stebbins, J.. M. Harrington. N. Thor
Powers, C.M., see Ganley, K.J. 23, 499
Pratt, D., see Chen, H.-Y. 23, 307 Repeatability ot re| model tor measur!
children 23, 40]
Prescott, R.J., A step in the right direction 23, 131 Stefanyshyn, D.J.. see Miindermant
Steinwender, G.. see Saraph. V. 23, 83
Queen, R.M., M.T. Gross, H.-Y. Liu, Repeatability of lower extremity Stewart, C., see Jonkers, 1. 23, 222
kinetics and kinematics for standardized and self-selected running Strimpakos, N., V. Sakellari, G. Gioftsos. E. Kapreli. J. Oldhan
77 92 929 ? : ,
speeds 23, 282 jOINt position sense: an intra- and inter-examuiner reliability stud
Author inde 23 (2006
Syczewska, M.. B. Dembowska-Baginska, M. Perek-Polnik. D. Perek Wakeling, J.M., see Miindermann, A
Functional status of children after treatment for a malignant tumour of Walker, M.R.. see Buczek, Fl 23
the CNS: a preliminary report 23, 206 Wasilewski, C.A.. see Royer, T.D
Watelain, E.. see Armand, S$. 23
Talis, V.L., see AlmeidaG,. I 23. 17 Whittlesey. S.N.. see Haddad, J.M
Theologis. T.. see Stebbins. J 23. 401 Willems, T.. see De Cock, A 23
Thompson, N., see Stebbins. J. 23, 401 Willems, T.M., D. De Clereg, K. Delbac
Thorsen, R.. see Carpinella. | 23. 445 E. Witvrouw ospecti
liedemani 4.. see Menz. H.B 23 524 related lower leg pain 23. ‘
Wilson, E.l M.L. Madigar
lrich, B.. see Kubo, M. 23, 512 strategy changes with fatigue
Wing. A.M.. see Chen, H.-Y
Vallis, L.A., see Reed, R.J. 23, 486 Witvrouw, E., see De Cock, A
Valtonen, H., see Arokoski, J.P.A. 23, 45 Witvrouw, E.. see Willems, T.M
van der Helm, F.C.T., see Forner-Cordero, A. 23, 189
Wolf, S.. T. Loose, M. Schablowsk
Vanderstraeten, G., see Willems, T.M. 23, 91
G. Bretthauer, R. Mikut, Automated
van Emmerik, R.E.A., see Haddad, J.M. 23, 429
gait analysis 23
Vanrenterghem. J.. see De Cock. A. 23, 339 Wolf, S.L.. see Simon, J. 23
Vasarhelyi, A., T. Baumert, C. Fritsch, W. Hopfenmiiller, G. Grad
Wood, S.J. see Paloski, W.H
T. Mitthmeier, Partial weight bearing after surgery for fractures of the
lower extremity — is it achievable? 23, 99 Yuen, T.J.. M.S. Orendurff
Verhaar. J.A.N., see Hurkmans, H.L.P. 23, 118 tendon unit length durin
Vette. A.H.. see Masani, K. 23, 164 model 23. 112
Vibert. N.. T. Hoang, D.P.D. Gilchrist, H\G. MacDougall, A.M. Burgess
R.D. Roberts, P.P. Vidal, 1.S. Curthoys. Psychophysiological correlates Zajac, F.E., see Higginson, J.S
of the inter-individual variability of head movement control in seated Zavatsky, A e¢ Stebbins, J
humans 23. 355 Zhang. J.. see Liu. W 23. 49?
Vidal. P.P.. see Vibert, N 23, 355 Zwick, E.B., see Saraph, \
(All
PUNTURE
ELSEVIER
Gait and Posture 534-540
Subject index
Volume 23 (2006)
Accidental fall; Musculoskeletal equilibrium: Reaction time: Strengt! Balance: Postural control
Biomechanics 23, 59
Balance
Accuracy; Pedar Mobile system: Repeatability; Long-term measurements
23. 118 Balance
Adaptation: Power: Locomotion; Elevated Surface; Kinetics23 , 268 Balance
Age. Coordinate system: 3D: Inverse dynamic 23, 480 Balancing task: Motor le
Age effect; Obstructed gait: Joint kinematics: Lower limb: Locomotion 23 Bi-articular muscle function: Ind
+1/ 7] i function 23, > 21
Alignment; Shin splints: Stress fractures: Plantar pressure: Kinemati: Biomechanics: Accidenta
9] me; Strength 23, 59
Ambulation: Pediatrics: Intersegmental dynamics: Moments 23 Biomechanics: Gait ar
23. 240
Amplitude; Human movement; Posture: Center of pressure: Variab
Frequency 23, 173 Biomechanics: Gait
metries 23, 106
Angular velocity; Stiffness; Kinematics: Stretch responses; Diplegia 23
Biomechanics: Induced
Ankle function; Diabetes; Peripheral neuropathy; Plantar pressure 23, 464 Modeling: Coordination: Gait 23
Biomedical model; Gait: Mult
Ankle plantarflexors; Equinus; Gait; Stroke; Forward dynamic simulatior
23, 32 Inverse dynamics: Mediolatet
Botulinum Toxin: Gait an:
Asynchrony; Metronome: Synchronisation: Phase shift: Compen
function 23, 307 tion: Classification: Feat
ing: Cerebral palsy 23
Automated methods; Gait analysis: Mutual information: Classific
‘adaveric: Muscle lengt astrocnemius: MRI: Human 23
Feature extraction; Pattern recognition; Data mining: Cerebral
Botulinum Toxin 23, 3> 31
enter of pressure: Huma
Frequency 23, 17
Back pain: Load carriage: Ergonomics: Spinal motion; Locon
Stature change 23, 133 erebral palsy: Gait analysis
Classification: Feature extract
Balance; COP COM: Fall prevention: Osteoporosis; Postural Sway Botulinum Toxin 23, 331
Stabilography: Stiffness 23, 51
‘erebral palsy: Gait: Hamstrings
Balance; Malignant CNS tumours; Functional status: Gait analysis 23, 206
‘erebral palsy: Visua! gai
Balance: Neuropathy : Quiet stance: Postural perturbation Spindle group Il
afferent fibres 23, 364 ‘erebrovascular accident, Postura
Balance: Optic flow: Posture: Postural control; Prediction 23, 180 Children: Foot; Kinematics: Repeatability 23
doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(06)00085-3
Children; Walking: Regression: Kinematics: Kinetics2 3, 288 Dynamic muscle function
function2 3, 21!
Classification; Gait analysis: Automated methods; Mutual information
Feature extraction: Pattern recognition; Data mining: Cerebral palsy Dynamic plantar pressure distribution: Part
Botulinum Toxin 23, 331 of the lower leg
Cluttered environments: Older adults: Obstacle Electromagnetic motion tracking. |
Locomotion 23, 486 metatarsopnalangeal oint 23, 39
Compensation function: Metronome: Synchronisation: Phase shift Elevated Surface: Power: Locon
Asynchrony 23, 307
Energy expenditure. M
Compensation: Weakness: Gait: Quadriceps femoris; Motor control 23 Obesity 23. 149
Equilibrium control
Computer simulation: Induced acceleration analysis: Modelir Simulation: Feedback
Biomechanics: Coordination: Gait 23, 37
Equinus: Gait: Strok
Coordinate system: Age: 3D: Inverse dynamic 23, 480 23
Coordination: Induced acceleration analysis: Computer simulatior Ergonomics
Modeling: Biomechanics; Gait 23, 37 Stature cha
Coordination: Locomotion: Low back Exoskeleton: Li
23. 236
Fall prevention: Ba
Coordination; Locomotion: Relative phase: Limb loading and sy1 Stabilogr
23. 429
Fatigue: Postur
COP COM: Balance: Fall prevention; Osteoporosis: Postural sway
Stabilography: Stiffness 23. 51s Feature extraction
CP: Muscle ke Musculoskeleta Botulin
Ely 23, 222
Feedback control
Cross-correlation analysis: Equilibrium control; Posturograpl nalv Six
Simulation: Feedback control: PD control 23. 164
Foot function: P.
Custom-molded foot orthoses: Muscle activity: Lower
lime-frequency analysis 23, 295
system: Inverse dynamic 23, 480
Data mining: Gait analysis: Automated methods: Mutual informatior Foot
Classifica tion ature extraction: Pattern recognition; Cerebral palsy
Botulinum Toxin 23, 331
Projection
Data-mining: Gait analysis: Biomechanics: Toe-walking: Fuzzy
23. 240
Foot model. Gait
Projyectio
Deep brain stimulation: Parkinson's disease: Gait initiation: Subthalamic
nucleus 23, 492 Foot-function: Todd
Development Postural control: Balance: Sensory organization 23, 455 Forward dynamic simulation: Equi
ws 23. 32
Diabetes: Peripheral neuropathy: Plantar pressure: Ankle function 23, 464
Forward dynamic simulation. M
Diplegia: Stiffness: Kinematics: Angular velocity: Stretch responses 23 Preferred gait mode 23, 383
Direction of progression: Gait: Spatiotemporal: Locomotion: Turning 23 Fractures of the lower leg
1aY analysis: Dynamic plantas
Down syndrome: Trunk coordination: Treadmill walking: Preadolescents Frequency: Human move
23 §1? Amplitude 23
Duncan Ely; Muscle length: CP; Musculoskeletal modeling; Rectus Functional status: Malignant CNS tur
femoris 23, 22? 206
Subject ] 23 (2006
Fuzzy c-means: Gait analysis: Biomechanics: Data-mining: Toe-walking Gait instability: Virtual reality
23, 240
Gastrocnemius: Muscle |
3D gait analysis: Inverse dynamics: Pressure insoles: Human gait 23, 189
Hamstrings: Cerebral pals
Gait analysis: Automated methods; Mutual information; Classific
Feature extraction; Pattern recognition: Data mining: Cerebral \ Hand segments: Optoele:
Botulinum Toxin 23, 331 23, 44! 5
Gait analysis; Biomechanics; Data-mining: Toe-walking: Fuzzy c-means Head tilt: Posture: Otolith: Spatia
23. 240
Hemiparesis: Un
Gait analysis: Foot: Electromagnetic motion tracking: Validity
metatarsophalangeal joint 23, 39] Hemiplegia Gait
4
Gait analysis: Foot kinematics: Foot model; Joint axes: Marker placemer
Pr*orjoejcetciotni o anglegsle s 223,3 411 | Hemipl. egia:: Visua
Gait analysis: Gait improvement zery g lengthening: Hen
Hip: Postural control; Oste
23. 83
: ; Hip replacement: Minim:
Gait analysis: Malignant CNS tumours: Fun nal status; Balance 23, 206 Dacossnpieicett ive \ bling led t I
Gait analysis: Minimally invasive surgery: Hip replacement: Kinen Haman gait
Prospective blinded trial 23, 374
Human movement: Post:
Gait analysis: Partial weight bearing: Fractures of the | owel Frequency 2~ 3 e 3
Rehabilitation; Dynamic plantar pressure distribution 23, 99
Gait analysis; Running: Kinematics: Kinetics: Repeatability 23. 287 Human: Muscle lengt! trocne 1s daveric: MRI 23
_ : , Human posture: Post
Gait; Biomechanics: Walking: Turning: Kinematics: Kinetics: Limb asyn
metries 23, 106 '
Induced acceleration analysis
‘ot Biomechanics: Coordination: Gait
Gait: Biomedical model: Multi-segment foot: Kinematics: Kinetic
Inverse dynamics: Mediolateral segmentation 23, 519
Induced acceleration
Ga=it : Cerebral palsy: Hamstrings: Musculoske: letal model 23, 2—7 3 funct- ion 23, 211
Gait; Direction of progression: Spatiotemporal: Locomotion Instability; Motor control; Gait; Mu
23, 159
Intersegmental dynamics: Ambulat
Gait; Equinus: Stroke: Ankle plantarflexors; Forward dynamic simulatior
93.32 Inverse dynamic; Age: Coordinat
Gait: Locomotion; Exoskeleton: Rehabilitation2 3, 425 Inverse dynamics: Biom«
Kinematics: Kinetics: Me
Gait; Motor control; Muscle function: Instability; Varus 23, 505
Inverse dynamics: Mechanics
= , , 1 AK
Gait; Obstacles: Joint moments: Lower limb 23, 69 diture 23, 149
Gait: Prosthesis: Kinetics: Joint moments: Walking 23, 303 Inverse dynamics: Pri
Gait; Toddler; Foot-function: Pedobarography 23, 142 Joint axes: Gait analysis: Foot kinemati
Projection angleICSs &2 3. 41]
Gait: Virtual reality: Gait instability: Treadmill 23, 441
Joint kinematics; Obstructed ocomouo
Gait; Induced acceleration analysis Computer simulation: Modeling 23. 471
Biomechanics; Coordination 23, 3
Joint moments; Gait: Obstacles: Lov
Gait; Weakness: Quadriceps femoris: Compensation; Motor control 23, 435
Jvini moments, Gail; Prosthesis: Kineti
Gait improvement surgery: Gait analysis; Leg lengthening: Hemiplegia
23. 83 Joint position sense: Proprioception: Neck: Re
Gait initiation; Parkinson's disease; Deep brain stimulation: Subthalamic Kinematic model: Mechanics: Inverse dynamics: Obesity: Ener
nucleus 23, 492 diture 23, 149
2006
Kinematics: Biomechanics; Gait: Walking: Turning: Kinetics: Limb asyn Locomotion, Older adults: Obstac!
metries 23. 106 ents 23. 486
Kinematics: Biomedical model; Gait: Multi-segmer Locomotion: Power: I
Inverse dynamics: Mediolateral segmentatior 23
Long-term measurements
Kinematics: Foot: Children: Repeatability 23, 40 Repeatability \ ~2~3 , 118
Kinematics: Gait analysis: Running: Kinetics Repeatability 23, 282 Low back pain: Locomotior
vent analysis2 3 4)
Kinematics: Minimally invasive Hip replacement: Gait analy
Prospective blinded trial 23, 374 Lower extremity
Locomotion: 7
Kinematics: Shin splints: Stress fractures: Plantar pressure, Alignmet
Ol Lower limb: Gait: Obstacles
Lower limb: Obstructed
Kinematics: Stiffness: Angular velocity: Stretch responses: Dip
23. 47
Kinematics: Walking: Children: Regression: Kinetics 23, ?
Malignant CNS tumours: |
206
Kinetics: Biomechanics: Gait: Walking: Turning: Kinematics: Limb asym
netries 23. 106
Marker placement: G:
Kinetics: Biomedical model: Gait: Multi-segment foot: Kinematics
Inverse dynamics: Mediolateral segmentation 23, 519
Mechanics: Kinematic
diture 23, 149
Kinetics: Gait analysis; Running; Kinematics; Repeatability 23, 282
Mediolateral segmentation. Bior
Kinetics: Gait: Prosthesis: Joint moments: Walking 23, 303 Kinematics: Kinetics: |
Kinetics: Power: Locomotion: Elevated Surface: Adaptation 23, 268 Ist metatarsophalangeal joint
motion tracking: Validity 23
Kinetics; Walking: Children; Regression: Kinematics 23, 288
Metronome: Synchronis
Leg lengthening: Gait improvement surgery: Gait analysis; Hemiplegia function 23. 30
23. 83
Minimally invasive surgery: Hi;
Limb asymmetries: Biomechanics: Gait: Walking: Turning: Kinematics Prospect t [ d trial 23, 374
Kinetics2 3, 106
Modeling: Induced
Limb loading and symmetry: Coordination; Locomotion: Relative phase Biomechar ics; (
23, 429
Moments: Ambulatic
Load carriage: Ergonomics: Back pain: Spinal motion: Locomotior
Motion sickness: Posture
Stature change 23, 133
Whiplash injurv 23
Locomotion, Coordination; Relative phase: Limb loading and symmetry
Motor control; Gait: Muscle
3 479
Motor control; Weakness: Gait: Quadric
Locomotion; Custom-molded foot orthoses; Muscle
435
extremity; Time-frequency analysis 23, 295
Motor learning: Balancing
Locomotion; Direction of progression: Gait: Spatiotemporal; Turning 23
159
MRI: Muscle length: Gastrocr
Locomotion; Exoskeleton: Gait: Rehabilitation 23, 425 Multi-segment foot: Biomedical mode!
Inverse dynamics: Mediolateral segmentati«
Locomotion; Load carriage: Ergonomics: Back pain: Spinal motion
Stature change 23, 133 Muscle activity; Custom-molded foot
Locomotion: Time-frequency
Locomotion; Low back pain: Coordination: Variability; Principal compo
nent analysis 23, ~ 230 Muscle function: Motor control: Gait: Instability; Varus 23, 505
Locomotion; Obstructed gait; Joint kinematics: Lower limb; Age effect 23 Muscle length; CP; Musculoskeletal modeling: Rectus femoris; Duncat
471 Ely 23, 222
23 (2006
Muscle length; Gastrocnemius: Cadaveric: MRI: Human 23, | Pedar Mobile system: Accuracy
23. 118
Muscle work: Musculoskeletal model: Forward dynamic simulatior
Preferred gait mode 23, 383 Pediatrics: Ambulation; Inters«
Musculoskeletal equilibrium: Accidental fall; Reaction time; Strength Pedobarography: Toddler: Gait
Biomechanics 23, 59
Pelvic motion: Postural chi
Musculoskeletal model: Cerebral palsy: Gait: Hamstrings 23, 273
Peripheral neuropathy: Di:
Musculoskeletal model: Muscle work: Forward dynamic simulation 464
Preterred gait mode 23 383
Perturbation: Postural strate
Musculoskeletal modeling: Muscle length: CP: Rectus femoris: Duncar
Ely 23, 222 Phase shift; Metronome: Synch
function 23. 307
Mutual information: Gait analysis; Automated methods: Classification
Plantar pressure: Diabetes: Per
Feature extraction; Pattern recognition; Data mining: Cerebral palsy
Botulinum Toxin 23, 33 464
Neck; Proprioception; Joint position sense; Reliability 23, 22 Plantar pressure: Shin splints: Stre
23. 91
Neuropathy: Balance; Quiet stance; Postural perturbation; Spindle g
ll afferent fibres 23, 364 Postural changes: Pelvic moti VICON
Postural control: Balance: Developn
Obesity; Mechanics: Kinematic model: Inverse dynamics: Energy expp er
diture 23, 149
Postural control, Cerebrovasc
Obstacle course navigation; Older adults: Locomotion: Cluttered envi
Postural control: Hip: Osteoarthritis
ronments 23, 486
Postural control: Optic flow: Posture
Obstacles: Gait: Joint moments: Lower limb 23, 69
Postural perturbation: Neuropathy: Balance
Obstructed gait; Joint kinematics; Lower limb: Locomotion;
Il afferent fibres 23, 364
23. 471
Postural reflexes: Human posture
Older adults; Obstacle course navigation; Locomotion; Cluttered envi
ments 23, 486
Postural strategy: Fatigue: Perturbation: Balance 23
Optic flow; Posture; Balance; Postural control; Prediction 23, 180
Postural sway: Balance: COP COM: Fall
Stabilography: Stiffness 23, 51
Optoelectronic kinematic analysis: Hand segments; Range of movement
23, 445
Posture: Balance: Seesaw: Strategy 2
Osteoarthritis; Postural control; Hip 23, 45
Posture: Human movement: Cente: essure: Variability
Frequency 23, 173
Osteoporosis: Balance: COP COM; Fall prevention: Postural sway
Stabilography; Stiffness 23. 5] Posture: Optic flow: Balance: Postural control: Prediction 23, 180
Otolith; Posture: Spatial orientation; Vestibulo-spinal; Head tilt 23, 315 Posture: Otolith: Spatial orientation: Vestibulo-spinal: Head tilt 23
Parkinson’s disease: Gait initiation: Deep brain stimulation: Subthalamic Posture, Visual field-dependenc isual imagery: Motior sickness
nucleus 23, 492 Whiplash injury 23, 355
Partial weight bearing; Fractures of the lower leg: Rehabilitation: Gait Posturography: Equilibrium control: Cross-correlatior
analysis: Dynamic plantar pressure distribution 23, 99 Simulation; Feedback control: PD control 23, 164
Pattern recognition; Gait analysis; Automated methods; Mutual informa
Power: Locomotion: Elevated Surface: Kinetics Adaptation 23. 268
tion; Classification; Feature extraction; Data mining: Cerebral palsy
Botulinum Toxin 23, 331 Preadolescents: Trunk coordination: Treadmill walking: Down syndrome
23. 512
PD control; Equilibrium control; Posturography:; Cross-correlation analy
sis; Simulation; Feedback control 23, 164 Prediction: Optic flow: Posture; Balance: Postural control 23, 180
Peak pressure: Pressure load: Running; Reference data; Foot function 23. Preferred gait mode: Muscle work: Musculoskeletal model: Forward
339 dynamic simulation 23, 383