ebook img

From nuclear transmutation to nuclear fission, 1932-1939 PDF

317 Pages·2002·2.116 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview From nuclear transmutation to nuclear fission, 1932-1939

From Nuclear Transmutation to Nuclear Fission, 1932–1939 Also by Per F Dahl Ludvig Colding and The Conservation ofEnergy Principle: Experimental andPhilosophical Contributions (1972) Superconductivity: its Historical Rootsand Developmentfrom Mercury to the CeramicOxides(1992) American Instituteof Physics Flash of the Cathode Rays: A History of JJThomson’s Electron (1997) Institute of Physics Publishing Heavy Water andthe Wartime Race for Nuclear Energy (1999) Institute of Physics Publishing Related Titles published by Institute of Physics Publishing Cockcroftand the Atom GHartcup andT E Allibone The Origin of theConcept of NuclearForces L M Brown and HRechenberg The Defining Years in NuclearPhysics, 1932–1960s M Mladjenovic´ Operation Epsilon:The Farm Hall Transcripts Edited by Sir Charles Frank RadarDays E GBowen Echoes ofWar: The Story of H S Radar 2 Sir Bernard Lovell Boffin:A Personal Story of the Early Days ofRadar and Radio Astronomy andQuantum Optics R Hanbury Brown Technical and MilitaryImperatives: A Radar History of World War II L Brown From Nuclear Transmutation to Nuclear Fission, 1932–1939 Per F Dahl Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol and Philadelphia #IOPPublishingLtd2002 Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem ortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recordingor otherwise, without theprior permission of the publisher.Multiple copying is permittedin accordancewiththetermsoflicencesissuedbytheCopyrightLicensingAgencyunderthe termsofitsagreementwithUniversitiesUK(UUK). Theauthorhasattemptedtotracethecopyrightholdersofallthefiguresreproducedinthis publication and apologizes to them if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. BritishLibraryCataloguing-in-PublicationData AcataloguerecordofthisbookisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary. ISBN0750308656 LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationDataareavailable CommissioningEditor:JamesRevill ProductionEditor:SimonLaurenson ProductionControl:SarahPlenty CoverDesign:Fre´de´riqueSwist Marketing:NicolaNeweyandVerityCooke Published by Institute of Physics Publishing, wholly owned by The Institute of Physics, London InstituteofPhysicsPublishing,DiracHouse,TempleBack,BristolBS16BE,UK USOffice:InstituteofPhysicsPublishing,Suite1035,ThePublicLedgerBuilding,150South IndependenceMallWest,Philadelphia,PA19106,USA TypesetbyAcademicþTechnical,Bristol PrintedintheUKbyMPGBooksLtd,Bodmin,Cornwall Contents Preface vii Acknowledgments x List ofIllustrations xii 1 PROLOGUE 1 1.1 1932:Wings over Europe,and other upheavals 1 2 THE ENGLISH STAGE IS SET 5 2.1 Manchester,1919 5 2.2 From Manchester to Cambridge: off to apoor start 9 2.3 Provocations inVienna 14 2.4 Amillionvolts or more? 17 3 AMERICAN BEGINNINGS 25 3.1 South Dakotapals 25 3.2 Geophysics, or smash the atom? 27 3.3 Research aboveallelse 31 4 HOW MANY VOLTS? 36 4.1 New physics, with consequences for smashing atoms 36 4.2 The Three Musketeers of DTM 43 4.3 Berkeley, and anevening inthe library 49 4.4 Widero¨eandVan de Graaff: accelerator virtuosos 52 5 PROTONS, ELECTRONS, AND GAMMA-RAYS 58 5.1 Protons in Cambridge, and (cid:1)-rays? 58 5.2 Protons in Berkeley 61 5.3 Electrons in Washington, DC 69 v From Nuclear Transmutation toNuclear Fission, 1932–1939 6 PROTONS EAST AND WEST 75 6.1 One million volt protons 75 6.2 Protons atDTM 79 7 GIANTS OF ELECTRICITY 86 7.1 X-rays in Pasadena 86 7.2 Megavolts on Round Hill 90 8 DIFFICULT YEARS 96 8.1 Depression and other scientificailments 96 9 1932 100 9.1 Moreparticles, expected and unexpected 100 9.2 Cockcroft andWaltonstrike 108 10 RUNNERS UP 119 10.1 Disintegrations at Berkeley, if with difficulty 119 10.2 Disintegrations in Washington as well 125 11 DEUTERIUM 138 11.1 Deutons ontarget 138 11.2 A controversy erupts 144 11.3 The controversy is resolved 150 11.4 Mopping up theheavy water 156 12 THE AMERICANS FORGE AHEAD 160 12.1 Slowdown at theCavendish; Rutherford’s death 160 12.2 Another dispute gives wayto American success 168 12.3 The Rad Lab in action 178 13 FISSION: RETURN OF LIGHTFOOT 186 13.1 Slowneutrons in Rome;nuclear fission in Berlin 186 13.2. News of fission reaches America 194 13.3. Fissionin Berkeley, andCockcroft again in action 204 14 EPILOGUE 215 14.1. Lateryears 215 14.2. Mostly Cockcroft 223 Abbreviations 229 Notes 232 Selectbibliography 266 Name index 275 Subject index 293 vi Preface The present volume deals with a particular phase of the early history of experimental nuclear physics: what in effect became a race, circa 1930, betweenfourlaboratoryteamstobethefirsttoachievethetransmutation ofatomicnucleiwith artificiallyaccelerated nuclear projectiles(protons) in high-voltage discharge tubes or vacuum chambers. (Experiments 15 years earlier under Ernest Rutherford had relied on alpha-particles fromradiumsourcesinthedisintegrationofnitrogennuclei.)Thelabora- tories and their team leaders were John D Cockcroft at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, England; Merle A Tuve at the Department of TerrestrialMagnetism (DTM)of theCarnegieInstitution ofWashington; Ernest OLawrenceatthe Radiation Laboratory andDepartmentofPhy- sicsoftheUniversityofCaliforniainBerkeley;andCharlesCLauritsenat the Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, CA. As is generally known, the ‘race’ was won by the English team in 1932—the ‘annus mirabilis’ of nuclear physics with a number of impor- tant breakthroughs in nuclear and particle physics that year. Less well known are the details of the competing accelerators, the personalities of theteammembers,theirvariegatedexperiments,andcertainexternalfac- torsthat played a role in theBritish victory. Istart,aftersomepreliminaries,withtheearlydaysoftheCavendish under Rutherford and James Chadwick, with certain provocations from the Radium Institute in Vienna, and the arrival of John Cockcroft and hispartnerErnestWaltoninCambridge.Next,wemeetErnestLawrence andMerleTuve,boyhoodfriendsinSouthDakota.WealsomeetGeorge Gamow and Gregory Breit, theorists who would profoundly affect the upcomingcompetition.Earlygeophysicsandhigh-speedelectronexperi- mentsattheDTMled,oddlyenough,toasuccessfulprotonacceleratorin Tuve’s laboratory, taking advantage of Robert Van de Graaff and his clevergenerator.AsayoungprofessoratBerkeley,meanwhile,Lawrence vii From Nuclear Transmutation toNuclear Fission, 1932–1939 came across an accelerator scheme by the young Norwegian physicist RolfWidero¨e,andmagicallytransformeditintohiscyclotron.AtCaltech, Charlie Lauritsen had his own ideas for the design of a high-voltage installation for various purposes. With prototype accelerators running afterafashioninCambridge,inWashington,andinBerkeleyandinPasa- dena,theracewasoninthemidstofpooreconomictimes.Welearnofthe success at Cambridge in more ways than one, and how the competition metthe challenge. By way of rounding out the volume, we follow subsequent develop- ments in nuclear science, culminating in the discovery of fission and its aftermath, and learn how the accelerator laboratories responded to the discovery, each in their own way. While focusing on a particular theme in early nuclear physics, the book thus also provides an overview of the history of modern physics, from Rutherford’s experiment at the end of WorldWarItoprospectsfornuclearenergyontheeveofWorldWarII. A ‘sub-plot’ running through much of the narrative, and not so well known, is connected with the divergent ambitions of the two friendly rivals, Merle Tuve and Ernest Lawrence. Once ensconced in Berkeley, Lawrence emphasized ever-more-powerful accelerators, at the expense of the underlying physics made possible with the new atomic artillery. Tuve, on the other hand, had his eye on the basic physics from the start. At the same time he found himself in the awkward position of chasing down a serious blunder in physics interpretation by his friend in Berkeley,whilehoninghis own high-precision accelerator technology in Washington to the point of allowing him to perform the world’s first fundamental experiments bearing directly on the internal constitution of the atomic nucleus. In a sense Tuve, less well known than Cockcroft or Lawrence to most, isthe unsung hero of our story. My primary sources include the wealth of archival material in Cambridge,England,inBerkeley,andinWashington,DC.InCambridge, IhadaccesstothepapersandnotebooksofCockcroft(andErnestWalton) at Churchill College, as well as the Rutherford archives at Cambridge University Library. Not to be overlooked is the museum collection of originalapparatus,aswellasthephotographicarchives,attheCavendish LaboratorynowadayslocatedintherollingfieldsofwestCambridge.At Berkeley I availed myself of the E O Lawrence papers, in the Bancroft Library, University of California, including the Berkeley notebooks of M Stanley Livingston. In Washington, DC, I had access to the Merle Tuve papers, all held in the Madison Building, Library of Congress, as well as archives in the DTM Library of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. As always important were the extensive holdings of the NielsBohrLibrary,AmericanInstituteofPhysics,aidedbytheirexcellent GuidetotheArchivalCollections.TheNielsBohrLibraryholdingsincludea copy of the Archives for the History of Quantum Physics, which I also viii Preface accessed at the Office for History of Science and Technology of the University ofCalifornia in Berkeley. Amongthesecondarysourcespertinenttothesubjectathand,Ihave profited particularly from Guy Hartcup and T E Allibone’s Cockcroft and the Atom, Herbert Child’s An American Genius: The Life and Times of Ernest Orlando Lawrence, and John L Heilbron and Robert W Seidel’s Lawrence and His Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. As for Tuve’s program, I had the benefit of three unpublished manu- scripts. The first, ‘Respectfully Submitted, Merle A. Tuve,’ Reports from a Golden Age of Physics, edited, with notes and comments by Louis Brown, containsMerleTuve’smonthlyreportstoJohnAFleming,DTMdirector, from June 1928 to September 1940. The second manuscript, written by Louis Brown, is a draft for DTM’s Centennial History, prepared by Brown as part of a larger history of the Carnegie Institution, which will celebrate its centennial in 2002. The third manuscript was the PhD dis- sertation by Thomas D Cornell, entitled Merle A Tuve and His Program of Nuclear Studies at the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism: The Early Career ofa ModernAmerican Physicist. Iamindebtedtothefollowingindividualsandinstitutionsforarchival assistance: Louise King (Churchill Archives Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge), Godfrey Waller (Cambridge University Library), Keith Papworth (Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge), Fred Bauman (Manu- script Reading Room, Library of Congress), Joseph Andersen and his staff (Niels Bohr Library, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD), Shaun Hardy (DTM Library, Carnegie Institution of Washington), Rita Labrie (Research Library, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), andthe staff of theBancroft Library (Universityof California,Berkeley). Along the way, I have been helped directly and indirectly by many individuals, including Laurie Brown, Louis Brown, Cathy Carson, John Heilbron,Roger Stuewer, Diana Wear,and Spencer Weart. I thank my publisher, Jim Revill, and his editorial staff at Institute of Physics Publishing, including Simon Laurenson, my editor, for their splendid supportandcooperationinallstagesofmanuscriptprocessing andproduction of thevolume. Finally,thebookdepended,asalways,onEleanor,mypersonaleditor, companion, and wife. Much of the work on the name index was done by her; she has a keen sense in copy-editing, and her word processing expertise was essential. All in all, she is truly a partner in my literary andhistorical endeavors. PerF Dahl January 2002 ix

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.