From Martyrs to Murderers CONSTRUCTING KNOWLEDGE: CURRICULUM STUDIES IN ACTION Volume 14 Series Editors Brad Porfilio, California State University at East Bay, USA Julie Gorlewski, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA David Gorlewski, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA Editorial Board Sue Books, State University of New York at New Paltz, USA Ken Lindblom, Stony Brook University, New York, USA Peter McLaren, University of California, Los Angeles, USA Wayne Ross, University of British Columbia, Canada Christine Sleeter, California State University, Monterey, USA Eve Tuck, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada Scope “Curriculum” is an expansive term; it encompasses vast aspects of teaching and learning. Curriculum can be defined as broadly as, “The content of schooling in all its forms” (English, p. 4), and as narrowly as a lesson plan. Complicating matters is the fact that curricula are often organized to fit particular time frames. The incompatible and overlapping notions that curriculum involves everything that is taught and learned in a particular setting and that this learning occurs in a limited time frame reveal the nuanced complexities of curriculum studies. “Constructing Knowledge” provides a forum for systematic reflection on the substance (subject matter, courses, programs of study), purposes, and practices used for bringing about learning in educational settings. Of concern are such fundamental issues as: What should be studied? Why? By whom? In what ways? And in what settings? Reflection upon such issues involves an inter-play among the major components of education: subject matter, learning, teaching, and the larger social, political, and economic contexts, as well as the immediate instructional situation. Historical and autobiographical analyses are central in understanding the contemporary realties of schooling and envisioning how to (re)shape schools to meet the intellectual and social needs of all societal members. Curriculum is a social construction that results from a set of decisions; it is written and enacted and both facets undergo constant change as contexts evolve. This series aims to extend the professional conversation about curriculum in contemporary educational settings. Curriculum is a designed experience intended to promote learning. Because it is socially constructed, curriculum is subject to all the pressures and complications of the diverse communities that comprise schools and other social contexts in which citizens gain self-understanding. From Martyrs to Murderers Images of Teachers and Teaching in Hollywood Films Robert L. Dahlgren State University of New York at Fredonia, USA A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: 978-94-6300-963-8 (paperback) ISBN: 978-94-6300-964-5 (hardback) ISBN: 978-94-6300-965-2 (e-book) Published by: Sense Publishers, P.O. Box 21858, 3001 AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands https://www.sensepublishers.com/ All chapters in this book have undergone peer review. Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 2017 Sense Publishers No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface vii Acknowledgements ix Chapter 1: Introduction: Teachers as the Enemy within 1 Neo-Liberalism and the Art of Blaming Teachers 2 ‘Bad Teachers’ and Public Antipathy toward Public Schools 5 Chapter 2: Education and Popular Culture Narratives 13 Fear of a Media Planet 14 Media Exposure V. Protection 16 Toward a New Media Literacy 19 Education and Popular Culture Narratives 22 Conclusions 27 Chapter 3: The Shift: Teacher Film Narratives in the Post-War Period 31 From Martyrs to Murderers 32 Juvenile Delinquency and the “Blackboard Jungle” 34 Urban Education and Up the Down Staircase 40 Conclusions 44 Chapter 4: The “Crisis” in America’s Public Schools 47 A Nation at Risk – A Blueprint for Standards Reform 49 Hollywood and the “Crisis” in America’s Schools 53 Conclusions 61 Chapter 5: Classroom Management in Hollywood Schools 65 “Ditto” and the Barely Conscious Teacher 67 Behaviorism in the Celluloid Classroom 68 “Mr. Hand” and Authoritarianism in the Classroom 70 Conclusions 75 Chapter 6: Instructional Practices in Hollywood’s Imagination 77 The Revolution in Instructional Techniques 78 Hollywood and Direct Instruction Fantasies 82 Anyone…Anyone…Anyone? Ferris Bueller and the Escape from High School 84 Conclusions 88 v TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 7: Teacher/Student Interactions on the Silver Screen 91 Teachers and the Philosophy of Caring 92 The Toxic Public School Teacher in 1970s and 1980s Movies 94 Sex and the Single Teacher 99 Mr. Ryan and Teacher Expectations of Students 100 Conclusions 104 Chapter 8: The Mavericks: Inner City Schools and White Saviors 109 Urban Education and the “At Risk” Student 112 Of Dangerous Minds and Freedom Writers 116 Revolting Parents on Film 122 Conclusions 125 Chapter 9: Myth, Reality and America’s Public Schools 129 America’s Schools through the Hollywood Looking Glass 133 “America’s Report Card” 135 Education Reform Falls on Its Face 138 Conclusions 141 Chapter 10: Conclusions: Toward a New Media Paradigm on Education 145 Where We Are 147 Where We Could Be 151 Appendix 1: Filmography 159 vi PREFACE I was born into a family of teachers. My maternal grandmother Helen Hobart worked at the University of Michigan in the late 1940s. My fraternal grandmother Leta Dahlgren also taught, albeit briefly, in a small, rural elementary school in Mount Vernon, Washington. My great aunt Florence taught various elementary grades during a lengthy career in Long Beach, California. An uncle, Royal Gunn, was a Physical Education teacher in Washington State. My maternal aunt Ran Hobart taught 4th and 5th grades during a 30-year career in the Alexandria, Virginia school district. My father Wayne taught 6th and 7th grades for 6 years in the Bay Area of California before joining the United States Department of Defense Dependent Schools (DODDS) system, for which he worked as a principal for the rest of his career. He met my mother Em, who taught 1st grade for 9 years in Virginia and then in the DODDS system, in a small school in Orleans, France in 1957. Many of our closest family friends during my childhood, most notably Leonard Blostein – a 5th and 6th grade teacher – were also DODDS educators. Most of my childhood friends were sons and daughters of fellow teachers and administrators. Wherever I went growing up, therefore, I was surrounded by people who had devoted their lives to working with children. Ironically, for just this reason, I resisted teaching for many years. My older brother Steve and I both remember well dinner-table conversations during our childhood that were drenched with the frustrations of the day-to-day lives of public educators – belligerent students, unsupportive parents, dictatorial upper administrators, irritating paperwork. Whatever it was that they spent their days and weeks and school years doing, it didn’t seem like much fun to us. My father even brought his planning charts for the following year with him on our summer beach vacations on the Adriatic coast of Italy. Teaching, thus, seemed more like drudgery than did the exciting career options I had planned for myself. I consequently cast my mind toward more seemingly glamorous pursuits. Like a lot of bookish kids in the 1970s, I imagined myself as a young Bob Woodward or Carl Bernstein, diligently working to expose the next political scandal to rock the nation to its foundations; or perhaps as a young Greil Marcus or Cameron Crowe, habituating smoky clubs in order to unearth the next voice of a generation for rock fans across the country. These dreams were soon dashed in my college career when I butted up against the reality of the mind numbing, and yet necessary, daily routine of obituaries and police blotter reports. When I then doubled back to teaching in my late 20s, the work had an instant impact on my level of confidence and general sense of happiness; I had finally found something that I enjoyed doing and that I seemed to be good at as well. While my father wondered out loud whether I could ever make a decent living in teaching (an odd thought, given that he had raised a family of four vii PREFACE doing precisely that), my parents were nonetheless thrilled to see me land on my feet – and in a field to which they’d devoted much of their lives, no less. When I received my Master’s degree in Social Studies Education from Simmons College in Boston in May 1997, my mother reached out to hug me and whispered in my ear, “I always knew you were a born teacher.” While none of us ever went into the teaching profession expecting to become millionaires, teachers, until recently, were all reasonably well compensated for our hard work in the classrooms and led comfortable, middle class professional lives. Moreover, we were psychically rewarded with the knowledge that we were all important figures in the lives of the children with whom we taught and within the communities in which we worked. In that sense, we were all rich. Teaching was once an honored profession in this country, viewed in the same vein as police work or fire fighting. The people around us may not have always wanted to trade places with us; those who knew us well, knew that we didn’t get the proverbial summers off. However, they valued our service and were quick to tell us so. When I started teaching, I encountered a peculiar reaction when I told people that I met for the first time that I was a teacher. They always asked whether I taught in a public or a private school. When I told them I was a public school teacher, they would typically pat me on the shoulder and say things such as, “Thank you. That must be very difficult but rewarding work.” I have always assumed that this is a similar reaction to that which a young man encounters when entering the priesthood – “thank you, my son.” In many ways, this makes sense, as the modern public education movement sprung largely from a monastic model developed in medieval Europe. Teaching is, thus, a vocation, a calling, for many who take it up to continually go down into the cave of Plato’s imagination and to help to enlighten the next generation – and those outside education once valued it as such. Something has changed dramatically in the public image of teachers since the time that I began teaching in the early 1990s. In the media and the popular culture, teachers are no longer considered martyrs to the cause. More often than not, teachers are portrayed as depressives, as bullies, as sexual predators, even as murderers. This book is a humble effort to push back against this unfair and dangerous mischaracterization of a group of professionals who dedicate their careers to improving the lives of children. January 2017 Fredonia, NY viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project has been a labor of love for me from its inception to its culmination. I began 1st grade in 1970 – the turning point of this survey of films – and was graduated from high school in 1982 – the height of the popularity of the teen comedies created by John Hughes and other masters of the craft. Thus, I grew up entranced by many of these movies, laughing along even at the barbs aimed at public schools and teachers. At the time, their humor seemed harmless at worst and anti-authoritarian and empowering at best. Enjoying the popular cultural artifacts of the 1970s and 1980s therefore doesn’t automatically mean that one hates the public sector and sneers at public servants and revels in Tea Party pronouncements about the death of big government. On the other hand, it need not blunt the ability to unpack the critical meanings embedded in these seemingly innocuous entertainments. It is my hope that this book is but one humble effort in this direction. I would like to first acknowledge the colleagues at the University of Florida who initially encouraged me down this line of inquiry, including my mentors Drs. Elizabeth Washington and Sevan Terzian. I have presented pieces of this work on panel discussions with several colleagues, including Dr. Christopher Brkich, Dr. Andrew Grunzke, Dr. Amy Martinelli, Dr. Stephen Masyada, and Dr. Patrick Ryan. From small kernels of ideas spring larger projects, my friends! Several of my colleagues here at Fredonia, including Dr. Bond Benton, Dr. Alexander Caviedes, Dr. Douglas McCord, and Dr. Shazad Mohammed read early drafts of this material and gave me important feedback on its content and structure. I have also received much-needed support from the Dean of the College of Education Dr. Christine Givner. This book is very much inspired by the dedicated example of all the teachers in my life, most notably the teachers in my family – including my mother and father. This also includes the many teachers alongside which I’ve worked in Massachusetts, Japan, Florida and here in Western New York. When I first embarked on this path, one of my social studies teacher friends in Florida, jaded by one too many in-service workshop days, was initially skeptical about the value of research to K-12 public school teachers, and said to me – “just don’t forget us here in the trenches.” I hope that I’ve done him proud with this modest effort. I’d also like to note the influence on this work of my brother Stephen Dahlgren and nephew Eric Dahlgren, both avid and critical consumers of movies. Watching films and television shows with them and, more importantly, discussing them long after the fact, has forced me to challenge my most deeply-held beliefs about mass culture products. This book couldn’t have been written without them. Finally, this volume would not have seen the light of day without all of the love and support that I receive daily from my favorite teacher, my colleague and wife Dr. Kate Douglass, to whom I am pleased to dedicate this work. I love you, my darling Kate! ix