Francis Bacon From Magic to Science by Paolo Rossi translated from the Italian by Sacha Rabinovitch London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Translated from the Italian FRANCESCO BACONE*. DALLA MAGIA ALLA SCIENZA (Editori Laterza, Bari 1957) First published in Great Britain ig68 by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane London, E.C.4 Printed in Great Britain by Butler & Tanner Ltd Frome and London English translation © Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd ig68 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except for the quotation of brief passages in criticism SBN 7100 6016 5 ! SIS DfV73$E to the memory of my father :> ‘ Contents Introduction page ix Introduction to the English edition xvi I The Mechanical Arts, Magic, and Science i II The Refutation of Philosophies 36 III The Classical Fable 73 IV Logic, Rhetoric, and Method 135 V Language and Communication 152 VI Rhetorical Tradition and the Method of Science 186 List of Abbreviations used in the Notes 224 Notes 227 Index 273 4 I !,i t \ \\ \ v Introduction Among the asserters of free reason’s claim Our nation’s not the least in worth or fame The world to Bacon does not only owe Its present knowledge, but its future too. JOHN DRYDEN On y voit que Locke est successeur de Bacon, ce qui est incon testable; ony voit que Locke, k son tour, engendre Helvetius; etque tous ces ennemis du genre humain r6unis . . . descendent de Bacon. J. DE MAISTRE Francis Bacon lived between 1561 and 1626 in an age of con flicting political and cultural ideas. In those years the seeds of England’s political and industrial power were sown, the founda tions of the Empire were laid; England was drawn into inter national politics by her support of the Dutch rebels and the French Protestants; Raleigh’s establishment in Virginia opened the doors to colonisation; England defeated the Spanish Armada and sacked Cadiz; Scotland, Ireland, and England were united to form a political whole; the struggle of Parlia ment against monopolies foreshadowed the increasing inter vention of both Houses in financial and commercial legislation and religious matters. This was the age of Elizabeth, Marlowe, and Shakespeare; an age of vitality and exuberance where new urges rubbed shoulders with century-old traditions; a decisive age both for English and European history. Many aspects of this civilisation were not new but derived ix INTRODUCTION from medieval English and European culture. For instance, /the typical seventeenth-century intellectual probings are a direct legacy ofj^ccamist empiricism, the Occamist concept j of knowledge as experienceTancl of nominalism—of all those doctrines, in fact, which questioned the Thomist compromise and the translation of Christianity into Aristotelian terms on which Scholastic learning was based. A new science of nature and a new form of religious belief were inspired by Occam’s notion of experience. Further, a revival of the classics, the anti-clerical revolt, and the birth of a new philosophy of nature widened the gap that separated English culture from syste matic theology and Aristotelianism. The English humanists’ distaste for ‘barbarous’ forms of theological erudition and their partiality to a religious revival that would reveal the practical aspects of the Gospels and oppose theological definitions, im plied a radical change of attitude towards the corpus of meta physical doctrines. Thus the urge to reinstate the Gospels in their integrity that we find in John Golet and Thomas More was merged with an Erasmian rebellion against Scholasticism. Yet scholars have discovered links between this period of history and earlier traditions, even where these had previously been denied. S ’ However the fact remains that around 1600 the English w intellectual was more than half medieval and around 1660 I he was more than half modem.1 Such a transformation, in volving the whole economic and social structure of a country, besides its intellectual manifestations, is too far-reaching to be dealt with here in detail. But it is only against the background of this upheaval that the peculiar mentality of an age which opened with Bacon’s programme and closed with Newton’s laws can be fully appreciated. After the great reforms of King Henry VIII a new class of landed gentry came to occupy the political foreground, replac ing the clergy and that feudal aristocracy which had perished in the Wars of the Roses. Macaulay, in his famous essay on Bacon, paints a brilliant portrait of this first generation of ‘new men’ to which Bacon’s father belonged. They were the first professional statesman England had ever produced; though they had grown up in the midst of theological controversies and were in the vanguard of intellectual life because they were INTRODUCTION jPro test ant s.jjieyshqwed little religious zeal or fanaticism, and their reform of the Church of England'Was accomplished by appealing to the anti-Catholicism of public opinion and bank ing on the success of the European Protestants. These men had none of the pomp and majesty of the next generation of courtiers and politicians, nor their daring adventurousness, but the future greatness of England was built on their skilful, cautious diplomacy. Queen Elizabeth’s England, governed by this new class of men of law and country squires, knew a period of ex traordinary prosperity; and from France and Holland, where religious dissensions were raging, came workmen and merchants bringing with them capital, technical ability, and initiative. As more and more new industries sprang up England was changed from an agricultural into an industrial nation. Her first industrial revolution took place in the hundred years L .k' following Cromwell’s abolition of the monasteries. Between ■V , V* 1575 and 1642 England became the leading European country in mining and heavy industries; the average annual production of pit coal rose from 210 tons in the decade 1551-60 to nearly ( two million in the decade 1681-90. Wool had always been sent to Flanders for the manufacture of cloth, but now there were cloth-weavers in every town and village; companies were chartering fleets for trade, voyages of discovery, and piracy, thus adding to England’s wealth and power. The number of ships weighing over 100 tons rose from 35 in 1545, to 183 in 1558, to 350 in 1620. The port of London saw ships from Asia berthed beside ships from the New World, and expeditions launched against the galleons of Spain. In 155^, while the 7 sixteen-year-old Bacon was rebelling against Aristotelianism, Drake, who had repeated Magellan’s venture, was returning home laden with Spanish spoil. In 1584 Walter Raleigh founded the first English colony in America and the same year the Levant Company—later to become the East India Company— was established in London. Technology, commerce, and banking are the principal ^ activities of such a society, and Puntamsm responded admirably ^ \ to“its "needs; the idea of a God who could be reached by a y diligent conquest of reality was, indeed, far more amenable to these prac tical men and women than the idea of contemplation. Tt is for action that God maintained! us and our activities, xi INTRODUCTION work is the moral as well as the natural end of power.* This is a passage from a contemporary religious text and not, as one might suppose, from Bacon. Literature too reflects this attitude. The one desire of Marlowe’s Faustus is to satisfy his thirst for knowledge and power. He wants to know and to possess all: he is willing to sell his soul to Mephistopheles in order to acquire all the gold of the Indies and the Oceans, to know every plant that grows on the earth and every star that shines in the heavens. Hell and the after-life are ‘trifles and mere old-wives* tales’ but ‘oh might I see Hell and return again, how happy were I then!* But the merry pagan aspect of Elizabethan England had its counterpart in the pessimistic, morbid vein that runs through English literature from Sackville to Spenser, from Shakespeare to Donne and Browne, reaching its climax in the reign of James I. In the same way Bacon’s attitude was balanced by the survival of medieval Scholastic traditions in men such as Everard Digby, Richard Hooker, and John Case. Though we tend to forget it, the great Elizabethans, Shakespeare, Spenser, Marlowe, and Sidney drew their cosmology neither from Ramus nor from atomist physics, but from these medieval Scholastic and magico-Hatonist traditions. Besides showing the dangers of indiscriminate generalisa tions these reflections may throw some light on the complexity | of the English intellectual scene in its transition from Renais sance to modem times. Many early seventeenth-century writers reveal an assortment of conflicting influences: classical culture and the demands of a new logic; scientific experimentalism and magico-alchemical enquiries; astrology and Copernican astronomy; atomistic theories of matter and the quest for the philosophers* stone; classical mythology and the evocation of demons; pagan and evangelical moralities; political agitation and contemplative ideals,2 while others lived passionately through a tumultuous succession of contradictory experien ces whose diversity—in true Renaissance style—they did not attempt to reconcile or justify. Complexity and contradiction are certainly not absent from f Bacon’s own writings. Thus he has quite naturally been seen i as the first modern philosopher, a typical product of Renais- \ sance culture, the theorist and fatheTof empinasm^ a ration- ~ xii
Description: