FOSTERING CROSS-BORDER LEARNING AND ENGAGEMENT THROUGH STUDY ABROAD SCHOLARSHIPS: LESSONS FROM BRAZIL’S SCIENCE WITHOUT BORDERS PROGRAM By Julieta A. Grieco A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Department of Leadership, Higher and Adult Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Julieta Antonela Grieco 2015 Fostering Cross-border Learning and Engagement through Study Abroad Scholarships: Lessons from Brazil’s Science without Borders Program Julieta Antonela Grieco Master of Arts Graduate Department of Leadership, Higher and Adult Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto 2015 Abstract This study examines the potential benefits of participating in the Science without Borders (Ciência sem Fronteiras - CsF) program, a study abroad scholarship program created in 2011 by the Brazilian government. Like other scholarship programs, CsF seeks to foster human capital development and the internationalization of science and technology in the country. Differently from other programs, however, CsF targets undergraduate students in the sciences. While Brazil has received positive feedback for this initiative, critics have argued that insufficient planning may hinder this program’s ability to deliver desired outcomes. Thus, through a literature review and 20 interviews with CsF scholarship recipients at the University of Toronto, this qualitative study evaluates the program’s ability to promote important benefits. Although the study identified various student benefits, the research also found structural issues that prevented all participants from benefitting equally, demonstrating the importance of collaborative planning and implementation of study abroad scholarship programs. ! II! Acknowledgements This thesis marks the end of my Master of Arts at the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education. Though I am happy of this accomplishment, it is a bittersweet feeling, as I have learned and enjoyed school more in this year and a half than ever before. Yet, none of this would have been possible without the support and encouragement of many individuals along the way. First, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor, Dr. Creso Sá, for his continuous support and mentoring. My experience working with you has changed the way I perceive research and has allowed me to gain the confidence I need to continue growing and moving towards my goals. Thank you for giving me this opportunity and for encouraging me to pursue different projects and attend conferences that I would have overlooked otherwise. Thank you also for giving me a chance to work on projects outside my comfort zone. This experience has been invaluable. I would also like to thank all my professors and instructors from the Higher Education program and from the Comparative, International and Development Education collaborative program. I took something from every class and was able to explore themes relevant to my thesis in all my courses. Special thanks go to Dr. Ruth Hayhoe and Dr. Linda Muzzin for providing a learning environment where I was able to work to the best of my potential. Your courses in comparative education and qualitative research respectively were paramount in my development as an MA student and it was your passion for these subjects that kept me motivated along the way. Aside from the academic support and guidance, OISE also provided an environment that fostered my desire to learn and exchange ideas with colleagues. I have ! III! learned so much from my peers, who are equipped with such amazing work and life experiences as well as knowledge of education. Thank you. Last but not least, I want to thank my family and friends. My biggest thanks go to my fiancé, Peter. Without you I would not have been able to endure through many of the challenges this experience brought along. You have truly been the column supporting this whole project. Together with our dearest dog Winston, you were able to help me live in the moment and enjoy the process of completing this program and writing this thesis. Huge thanks also go to my parents for trusting me with my decision to choose an alternative path and for giving me the opportunity to live in different parts of the world, while always providing me with the best education. I don't think I would have developed my interest in education if it hadn’t been for those experiences. I am truly fortunate to have you as my parents. Finally, I also want to thank my brother, the rest of my family and my friends—far and near. Thank you for listening to me and for spending time with me even when all I could talk about was school. Thank you all, Julieta ! IV! Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................. II Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... III List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... IX Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................1 The Context of the Problem .............................................................................................1 The Research Question ....................................................................................................7 Organization of the Thesis .............................................................................................10 Chapter 2: Literature Review .........................................................................................11 Internationalization of Higher Education .......................................................................11 Flows of International Students .....................................................................................13 Rationales for International Student Mobility ...............................................................14 The Implications of International Student Mobility on Sending Countries ..................18 Study Abroad Program Design ......................................................................................24 Chapter 3: Methodology, Methods and Case Study .....................................................32 Methodology ..................................................................................................................32 Document Analysis ........................................................................................................33 Interviews .......................................................................................................................34 The Science without Borders Program ..........................................................................37 Brazil and the Science without Borders Program ..................................................37 Science without Borders in Canada .......................................................................44 Science without Borders at the University of Toronto ..........................................45 Chapter 4: Findings .........................................................................................................51 1. Motivations and Rationales ........................................................................................51 1.1!Motivations to join the program ........................................................................51 1.2!Rationales for choosing the University of Toronto ...........................................54 2. The Transition into the CsF program .........................................................................57 2.1!Benefits ..............................................................................................................58 2.1.1! Intercultural learning .............................................................................58 2.1.2! Intercultural academic learning through language learning .................60 2.2!Challenges .........................................................................................................62 2.2.1! Insufficient pre-departure orientation and academic orientation ..........62 3. The Course Component .............................................................................................67 3.1!Benefits ..............................................................................................................67 3.1.1! Intercultural learning .............................................................................67 ! V! 3.1.2! Knowledge gain ...................................................................................68 3.1.3! Formation of networks ........................................................................71 3.2!Challenges .........................................................................................................74 3.2.1! Compatibility issues between systems of HE ......................................74 4. The Placement Component ........................................................................................77 4.1!Benefits ..............................................................................................................78 4.1.1! Intercultural learning ...........................................................................78 4.1.2! Knowledge gain ...................................................................................79 4.1.3! Strengthening of networks & future opportunities ..............................81 4.2!Challenges .........................................................................................................83 4.2.1! Structural issues with the process of acquiring a placement ...............83 Chapter 5: Discussion ......................................................................................................92 Analysis..........................................................................................................................92 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................106 References .......................................................................................................................116 Appendices ......................................................................................................................131 Appendix A: List of Documents ..................................................................................131 Appendix B: Ethics Approval ......................................................................................133 Appendix C: Recruitment E-mail ................................................................................134 Appendix D: Ethics Amendment Approval .................................................................135 Appendix E: Amended Recruitment E-mail ................................................................136 Appendix F: Interview Protocol ...................................................................................137 Appendix G: Informed Consent Form .........................................................................138 ! VI! Tables Table 1. Critical considerations of program structure .................................................30 Table 2. 2014 CsF student distribution and sample distribution .................................36 Table 3. Program term-structure at the University of Toronto ...................................48 ! VII! Figures Figure 1. No. of CsF students per category ...................................................................40 Figure 2. No. of undergraduate CsF scholarships per country ...................................43 Figure 3. No. of undergraduate CsF scholarships per institution ...............................46 Figure 4. Benefits of the CsF experience at the different stages of the program .......57 ! VIII! List of Abbreviations ACCC Association of Canadian Community Colleges CALDO Calgary, Alberta, Laval, Dalhousie & Ottawa Consortium CAPES Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazilian Federal Agency for the Evaluation of Graduate Education CBIE Canadian Bureau for International Education CIE Centre for International Experience CNPq Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CONACYT Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia – National Council on Science and Technology CsF Ciência sem Fronteiras - Science without Borders ELP English Language Program STEM Science, technology, engineering & math ! IX! Chapter 1: Introduction The Context of the Problem International student mobility is not a new phenomenon. Already in the 7th century students, scholars and clergymen would travel distances to reach universities in other regions and countries (Rizvi, 2011). In the 12th century, after the creation of Europe’s medieval universities, students began to flock to specialized centers such as the University of Bologna, known for its faculty of law, and the University of Salerno for medicine (Perkin, 2006). The university of Oxford was actually established by English students who had studied at universities like Bologna and Paris. In this context, then, students and scholars would travel to study in a different city or country either to specialize or to interact with scholars in their field of interest. Today this phenomenon continues to be embraced but arguably to a greater extent. In fact, international student mobility has grown exponentially in recent decades, encompassing over 4 million students who study outside of their home country (Perkin, 2006; Rebolledo-Gomez & Ranchin, 2013; UNESCO, 2014). There are various forces that have encouraged growth in international student mobility; yet, the process of internationalization, along with the discourse of globalization and the global knowledge economy, has been a major driving force (Gürüz, 2011; Banks & Bhandari, 2012; Bhandari & Blumenthal, 2011; Altbach & Knight, 2007; Rumbley, Altbach, & Reisberg, 2012). In fact, international student mobility is recognized as the most popular of all internationalization initiatives. Essentially, those who promote international student mobility suggest that it has the potential to open minds, to teach ! 1!
Description: