ebook img

Fort Wayne Ordinance S-92-01-14 PDF

8 Pages·0.59 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Fort Wayne Ordinance S-92-01-14

y” BILL NO. S-92-01-/ Y SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO. s- /3-%2/ AN ORDINANCE approving Change Order No. 1 FOR RES. 6221-91, TURTLE CREEK/STARDALE PAVEMENT RESTORATION with MERGY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in connection with the Board of Public Works of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA; SECTION 1. That Change Order No. 1, RES. #6221-91, DNHWO01NdOBM ) R TURTLE CREEK/STARDALE PAVEMENT RESTORATION with MERGY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in connection with the Board of Public Works and Safety, for: was necesary due to an unrelated (storm sewer) pavement failure occurred within the scope of project limits. An emergency situation was at hand and was considered "hazardous" to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Repair resulted in an increase which is reflected accordingly; involving a net increase of Sixteen Thousand One Hundred Sixteen and 91/100 Dollars ($16,116.91), all as more particularly set forth in the specifications, and which is on file with the Office of the Board of Public Works and is by reference incorporated herein, made a part hereof, and is hereby in all things ratified, confirmed and approved. SECTION 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and any and all APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY SH ae Timothy | ulay o0ùNNNNDNNNNNpOAABpppYYYSYYlRSa 0=0O(O+eO“ © NoOOON a=tOlO) )2 p OO . S .pIRl D0 :0 .S — 7 , ' _ , a CCHHAANNGGEE OORRDDEERR - : Change Order No. l PT roj.e ct No. HO S Resolution No. 6221-91 Name of Project mTURTLE CREEK/eSTARDALE PAVE MENT DaBtoear d Order No. b92a-p91a. x To: MERGY CONSTRUCTION CO. (Contractor) Gentlemen; You are hereby re specifications: [Nio.t er Quantity |! T URTLE CDReEsEcKr/iSpMTtaAitRoeDnrA iLaEol f CPhAaVnEgMeE NT RESTOR_:A UTnIiOtN Price: i¡ C5hD,ae3nc5gr7ee. a4s2ei n Co|nt r1I1an,cc6tr0 e1a.Ps3re3i c e j| ADDITIVE ALTERNATE : | i SEE ATTACHMENTS | | Total Decrease ` 5,907.42 ii ! Total Increase i |! 22,024.33 ipo Tphrei ce,su m ando f th§e - fina1l6 ,1cN1eo6tn. t9r1(a Pcete nsparsiiecs)e hes(rhIeanlbclyr eab(seae d)da eddjC uosntttoe)rd a c(ta sS Parfiocdlel oewsr: )— 16,t1h1e6 _.9t1o tal |— contrac t OSL i Original Contract Price R“oi(ethm ece ZonamaltmRml. ie emnnexwdt oe r dpk rtN Cooeu wvbrbs yiryth:d eah Cenleodlt (n __ |t-c A robfC aenoo cDtrAnttI rtr araccanAotPcim rt ipi 8clAac/teeda3P tdl B1ri e/ iion9canndre1lc a l lr ui eAdZnPd i rjdneoautgyvsh siet setidhdco uion+ esnsb t yrF tCauoohPc frart ~ tnet hghvteeihif resoo mPur Oo sCcrr hdoetean,hCrnti hL grsaAne an t cg.hpteirO s ro djsOeehdrrcaod.tlce lru mieTsan hp$t$$e_p A (lu4y2dns 73ach,tah,h7-elae680 lnr=4 g8e .fte2]2obod1r0ef. ) T c ocmoe(m ipnlcaenr teiaosne d) Y Chiefíi ¿LEngineer) aa, pcpireorvteedd bbyy;: É —v ae av 7 ya P U T 4 ae Fa D A `4 gf PLGrAy C+o Cnotnrtraac` cttoorr) DDaattee A 121>421/1 7/2>9/1 5 / Agprevod by ~N SMAS } AY - > ~ —C L O pe ct =ngineer) Date oPsE ÑTAA AG Owner) Data lo £- Zz- LYA muaki -AN y rn Y» abPaire es toyv u `b y: Z Change Order No. Van Resolution No. 6221-91 Board Order No. 92-91 REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE Necessity for change: An unrelated (storm sewer) pavement failure occurred within the "hazardous" to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Repair resulted in an increase which is reflected accordingly. eee „ # . á A A»ODDA«<«-«-> Will proposed change alter size of the project? Yes XX No If yes, explain: Additional pavement replacement was substantial. Failed areas are now properly restored and pose no hazard to the general public. re pa 0 CO DO O OOO DO DO E OO Affect on operation and maintenance cost of this project: - A OO OO DO OO DOD O DO O DO O \ Kevin Okleshen, Project Engineer. :.. PROJECT: TURTLE CREEK / STARDALE RES. NO: 6221-91 CONTRACTOR: MERGY CONST.’ CD. PAVEMENT RESTORATION CONTRACT COST ANALYSIS B.0: 92-91 DATE: 12-16-91 ITEM i MATERIAL PLAN + ACTUAL 1 UNIT 1 CHANGE 5 CHANGE 5 TOTAL i TOTAL NO. + COST INCREASE + ACTUAL em_ . nna 3 e £n o m ena eae ~r ep =>]e ew o~m —ea s O Gasa m me en vam Da ae we eee i t1i ‘ § 3 e 1 ie is t ‘ 1 i i 1D t me =- t 4 4 t t ‘ i ‘ {un I> 1 t i H 1 1 in iW IS | to > 1 4 t ! I t t ! i= loa i= > H ' 1] t 1 ' ¡e be to ic 1] I i i | im wo 1S los ta i> ‘ eSmos .a mamaenawr=a seaS R OpERe CcOb eie aO aN Eo lnmae ”l B Oa laC oaRlnoE D c >rOr Eea— t eR e Ceeuer ebne 00T0 yeep e a Ioe- Ba et t 1 3I1+11y t t [i t I 1 o. 1 lo tr r on Ia 1 ' t t 1 1 t t AN H i] i 1 10 t y e m en am ee t t t 1 [i 1 I 1 L] 4 1 I pe iog 1 tom o US] (> ius t t ' t I H i i] ll i — | lr Im in t— O la lo» losa l— ic is '> ‘ i t I i] 1 1 i I t 1 1 y i) [] t ‘> to loa ln tD o (‘> Io 1 1 t I I i ' i ‘ t | t ir tN ¡> ios de lo o tS is 1] I i I a a | Li iw io to Im im iow IN dun dle los INN is Io > t ' Oem-ma . owsna omO1ee3 c ewe tQ e Et 4PsIk quOr dO ese a.Or uS oua u.e ea we* an en amt eHtty t 3 [] lw pr 100 1 I t 1 1] IN 4 et $ [ i] y t de Im > ic t t 1 L] 1] i] i H O loe is O 1 I i] t [i io tr ies 1-0 t to isa t t I il tes IS IS los lo. o is 1 i Ia i] | dos ~ les lo is 1 $ I I ' t Seœom ~ qe etis a a i wst 4 . e ma an mea wœ me =r ix a — im a=te eg ke li mn<C tes 2 5 ing e =18 225 t 1 ica a oa —A 5e ea .i O“tam oe N BE Mt a jas aeim aa t a vu om YN 3103 —w= @ — iO e« {q {asso a en1 > (a2 eH mm em U i n—5 o — s f " >$ ome pe|t ta t Dtan ho [] nois iw >>a p~[| as 1 a 0 [j come ll... waf 1 Iae lica a— De a t r+0 t O ilr. 1 e bra mI fu m[] m asl t ei] el ‘ i] a 1 e) a 1 e1 ] 1 L] 1 ,t31I1 I t i y | 1 t t _ t 4 11mm ia nes un o © te L] 1 1 1 ' ' t I I ‘ l I 4 ombe t ie i] i] i( w L] Yara> | ‘ io iv 15m ic ine bao 1 I 1] I we ' t t t t t t I t t [i ' I 1 i t l $ t t ta fd ia I 1 i i ire tra 1 t 1 w3 ua to (Ss o 1 IO Io IS i> , 1 1 [| L] i] I 1 1 t t I 4 t ‘ $ t ' ' i] Y ' 1 i im 4 ii m itN tw t {wa ts lœoat ds los bos be iis s ic lr ic le le ™ t I t t I ' t H ‘ 4 t 1 1 t ‘ 4 ( t 1 —E. L] 4 to 1] | 4© ta I (> tus ta Ww | a le l te a i> ia to Io is io IS if 1 ' I [|] 1 1 1 t r]i 1 t $ 1] 1] I ' IN I I $ iW tl. 1™~ to tas tes [|] iitwwo s lun w — los» to Io 10m Io icf ta ica (‘> i] t 1 I y i I i | 1 i I i 7 ie is le 1 ‘ tome t 4 lA ln i™ S io e Io iw is (Ss i loe> ft los ic O O tS IS Io o Io 4 t t i] 1 t o lo t Se oe 1 << la 15 (aa rod is gs 1 is ' sle |a le 4 4 t t 4 ' 4 i ‘ 1 1 4 t I [i t t i 1 i 1 IN lo. lun I i to ica les ble ie ico 3 4 y t ' t fs ' ie IS is $ t ‘ i ! + to tm 100 da IS lo I t i ‘ t t i) > losa is 1S 4 t i t iw =pi tes ln yt lr ía , I I IS la two ~~ pu oO . H a to o ‘ PSNR a mo e a ae Wee A 0 4 o = m a ena m m ae RO TE 49533 |7 590.33. ~ $7,095.00| 10. ¡HAC Surface Type A-2 215 i 230.01 i 11. ¡Joint & Crack Sealer i i i= le tos ‘ ' pI l io i] I I t eml yen ic ! > io , F I i I t ' to if IS 1 t t t t is Ud O ic $ ma "m 1 ‘ 1-a IS to los IS to 1 1 I t pa tre i> ic i= > i we12, Caeset eie nege s eeA djaue sete edie eteo Gradeee-E] oo aao pm ea mo Et 1t t1 I 1' t | i t 1 ' iiwe t t t t t t 5 ‘1 1 ‘ ' o' I 1N t yt 4 i t 1 ‘ 4 I 1 t 1 [i it—_ i> t o> t Q [H a ] t t i) ‘ i i] i] tt t i] ' ii t 4 I t t t te ic t t ol os =) if (> t , i t t l t i 4 it 1 lima a 1 ' t Io i bo. lo. i> > if. ia 1 iee ae 'I tt 1 i t ' 4 10% t IS t 1> i a t Io > O O I t I 4 I 1 1 1 Had 4 iN [] io im t i> o .. Hid isd © © t ' -n oe is oH . ©H a la Seer ee == A A See ee aaa a eee 0 a aa a o a we A eee BOMBEREE R Teese meen | Hee em ween te <x -t on + $5,357.42 1 $11,601.33 [$29,943.11 i $23,699.20 y ies | a mt [EUN mu tis uu ta (uu tz a) Lafs |o e, 1 1 1 I 1 ie t igs loI. S O I t ts t io ves ytr otmo Hian iry “$0,283.91! $$00..0000 | PROJECT: TURTLE CREEK / STARDALE RES. NOs 6221-91 CONTRACTOR: MERGY CONST, CO, (ADDITIVE ALTERNATE) CONTRACT COST ANALYSIS B.0: 92-91 DATE: 12-16-91 Oe a ae a oo PLAN a E ACTnoU AL 3e n UNIT e| e CHANeGEe e | CHANGE |T OTALTOT}AL QUANT. i QUANT, | PRICE of| to FO COST + COST i i t$) + DECREASE à INCREASE ' ACTUAL ' PLAN meamea aeea mn 0 CU ate0 mea amee tm ee m esa mt ow T E a S0 TASTE E E NIT NTE NE NTE OS3. ¡Bitunse ian Ooe uees A MiOxSt u4r ae SfD oa rO DC RAa apo perma ona atew ce haDe te — ry IE ry Sarr reer ts i (A-2 Surface) 4, ¡Anchor Bolts (J-Type) i —_ a CIC ATEO OITEE a ENTE poe 5, #53 Stone (ospacint pleacde 1 a” TA TR for Base Sterilization of Itea $! oo |O er maar TN CES [maem n A ee ana ae a a oea eo ww e eo ee ee ee 2000 a eee TOTALS: ' $550.00 | $10,423.00 $13,938.60 $4,065, 00 DIFFERENCE; $ $0000.) 80,873.00 iA aaa i a Read the fixst,time in full and on motion by seconded by BU Geo , and duly af title and referred to the Committee on due legal notice, at the Common Counci Onference Room , City-County Building, Fort Wayne, Indiana, on , the , day o'clock M., E.S.T. of , 19 DATED: Ves Read the third time in full and on motion by seconded by Let , and duly adopted, placed y its passage. PASSED OSH lowing vote: AYES NAYS ABSTAINED ABSENT TOTAL VOTES / | 2) BRADBURY bt EDMONDS L- GiaQUINTA __ HENRY LO LONG an LUNSEY RAVINE £— SCHMIDT EZ TALARICO DATED: Y -2X. Litio É 7 | SANDRA E. KENNEDY, CITY CLERK Passed and adopted by the Common Council of the City of Fort Wayne, 3 ) Indiana, as X (SPECIAL) ZONING) ORDINANCE -RESOŁƏTTON NO. Y-/S -F on the 2 fel day of , 19 S A ATTEST: AL) Lats É henley m SANDRA E. KENNEDY, CITY CLERK PRESIDING Presented by me to the Mayor of the ity of Fort Wayne, Indiana, on , 19 2L) o GH day of the at the hour of Z 92 o'clock SANDRA E. KENNEDY, CITY CLERK Approved and signed by me this zA day of Valor ' 19 4t, at the hour of boo o'clock N M., E.S.T. PAUL HELMKE, MAYOR BILL NO. S5-92-01=14 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS DAVID C. LONG, CHAIRMAN MARK E. GiaQUINTA, VICE CHAIRMAN SCHMIDT, BRADBURY, TALARICO WE, YOUR COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS TO WHOM WAS REFERRED AN (ORDINANCE) (RESQRURIAN) approving Change Order —_No. 1 FOR RES, 46221-=9 1 TURTLE CREEK/STARDALE PAVEMENT RESTORA TION Board of Public Works of the City of Fort Wa HAVE HAD SAID (ORDINANCE) i #+#£=(RES@ZMFXQN) UNDER CONSIDERATION AND on LEAVE TO REPORT BACK TO THE COMMON COUNCIL THAT SAID ABSTAIN NO REC DATED: ise as Sandra E. Kennedy City Clerk Admn. Appr. TITLE OF ORDINANCE: _ Change Order #1, Res. #6221-91, Turtle Creek/Stardale Pavement Restoration DEPARTMENT REQUESTING ORDINANCE: Board of Public Works SYNOPSIS OF ORDINANCE: Change Order #1, Res. 6221-91, Turtle Creek/Stardale Pavement Restoration was necessary due to an unrelated (storm Sewer) pavement failure occurred within the scope of project limits. An emergency situation was at hand and was considered "hazardous" to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Repair resulted in an increase which is reflected accordingly. Mergy Construction is the contractor. EFFECT OF PASSAGE: Additional pavement replacement was substantial. Failed areas are now properly restored and pose no hazard to the general public. EFFECT OF NON PASSAGE: AD O 1-1 MONEY INVOLVED (DIRECT COSTS, EXPENDITURE, SAVINGS) $16,116.91 Increase ASSIGNED TO COMMITTEE:

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.