This month’s cover is provided by Dr. Giorgos Mountrakis, Director of the PE&RS Intelligent Geocomputing Lab at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (www.esf.edu). The imagery complements this Special Is- sue on “Artifi cial Intelligence in Remote Sensing”. Artifi cial intelligence methods often borrow elements from art and October 2008 Volume 74, Number 10 science. The background image contains a 2003 natural color digital orthoimagery of Syracuse, New York with a PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING pixel size of 1.0 ft. GSD. The orthoimagery is processed The offi cial journal for imaging and geospatial information science and technology using various artistic spatial fi lters. JOURNAL STAFF The center image is produced using an expert-based system on an April, 2000 Landsat scene from Las Vegas, Publisher NV. The system intelligently balances its complexity to James R. Plasker adjust to the intricacies of the underlying classifi cation. [email protected] It selectively and progressively moves from simple clas- Editor sifi ers to mathematically complex ones such as neural Russell G. Congalton networks and decision trees. The image shows the spatial [email protected] footprint of each algorithmic approach. The integration of Executive Editor numerous competing classifi ers offers advanced classifi ca- Kimberly A. Tilley tion capabilities; the resulting binary classifi cation of urban [email protected] areas is depicted on the top right image. For more infor- mation contact Giorgos Mountrakis at gmountrakis@esf. Technical Editor Michael S. Renslow edu or visit www.aboutgis.com. [email protected] Foreword Assistant Director — Publications Rae Kelley 1199 Special Issue: Artifi cial [email protected] Intelligence in Remote Sensing Publications Production Assistant Giorgos Mountrakis and Anthony Matthew Austin Stefanidis [email protected] Manuscript Coordinator Highlight Article Jeanie Congalton [email protected] 1178 Next Generation Classifi ers: 11117788 Focusing on Integration Circulation Manager Frameworks Sokhan Hing, [email protected] Giorgos Mountrakis Advertising Sales Representative The Townsend Group, Inc. Columns & Updates [email protected] 1183 Grids and Datums — Republic of CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Djibouti Grids & Datums Column 1186 Headquarters News Clifford J. Mugnier 1189 In Memoriam — Andrew [email protected] Piscitello Book Reviews 1191 Industry News Bradley C. Rundquist [email protected] Announcements Mapping Matters Column 1190 Call for Papers — 22nd Biennial Qassim Abdullah [email protected] Workshop on Aerial Photog- raphy, Videography, and High Web Site Resolution Digital Imagery for 11118833 Martin Wills Resource Assessment [email protected] 1194 New Sustaining Member — Environmental Research Incorporated 1258 Call for Papers — MultiTemp 2009 — Fifth International 1193 Who’s Who in ASPRS Workshop on the Analysis of 1194 Classifi eds Multitemporal Remote Sensing 1195 Sustaining Members Images 1197 Instructions for Authors Immediate electronic access to all peer- Departments 1200 ASPRS Member Champions reviewed articles in this issue is available to 1212 Forthcoming Articles ASPRS members at www.asprs.org. Just log in 1185 Certifi cation List 1248 Calendar 1186 Region of the Month to the ASPRS web site with your membership 1278 Professional Directory 1187 Refl ection of the Past 1279 Advertiser Index ID and password and download the articles you need. 1188 New Member List 1280 Membership Application PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING October 2008 1175 OOccttoobbeerr LLaayyoouutt..iinndddd 11117755 99//1177//22000088 88::2299::5544 AAMM ifi ers: Focusing on Integration Frameworks by Giorgos Mountrakis Looking beyond issues related to framework ar- chitecture, a challenging task remains: establishing a methodology for optimal selection among several competing classifi ers, while preserving the desired characteristics mentioned above. Work being per- formed in our Intelligent Geocomputing Lab at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry has begun to show the necessity and advantages of such a task. We have successfully established an expert-based system that segments a binary multispectral classifi cation (e.g. urban vs. non-urban areas) into context-specifi c sub-problems (e.g. urban areas of high brightness vs. soil of high brightness). In a classifi cation of a Landsat scene (Figure 2) algorithmic complexity adjusts to problem specifi cs (Figure 3). We have also automated a pro- cess using eight different neural networks for urban sprawl modeling. Both works are currently under review (for updates and paper availability please visit www.aboutgis.com). The two aforementioned efforts are small steps towards unifi ed frameworks, with substantial work still remaining. Integration Benefi ts Figure 2. Landsat scene from Las Vegas, NV (April, 2000 - natural color). The underlying objective behind integration is not to present yet another single-thread classifi er; instead we strive to establish a framework for collaborative algorithms. The appropriate merging of multiple algorithms offers the following advantages: Support for algorithmic evaluation by non-experts. Remote sensing products often act as an additional input layer for numerous environmental studies (e.g. hydrology, biology, urban planning). It is often the case that non-experts have high expecta- tions from remote sensing products without real- izing potential sensor, acquisition and classifi cation limitations. Therefore, there is a clear need to incor- porate advanced accuracy metrics associated with remote sensing products that express usefulness and limitations of incorporated methodologies. Various works already have realized the benefi ts of spatially-explicit accuracy metrics (Foody et al., 1992; Canters, 1997; Steele et al., 1998; Carpen- ter et al., 1999; Pontius, 2000; Alimohammadi et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2004; Aires et al., 2004). Integrated frameworks naturally support variable Figure 3. Spatial footprint of each selected algorithm within the framework. continued on page 1180 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING October 2008 1179 OOccttoobbeerr LLaayyoouutt..iinndddd 11117799 99//1177//22000088 88::3300::4411 AAMM continued from page 1179 accuracy metrics, each associated with a specifi c algorithm within new approach for modeling uncertainty in remote sensing the framework. For example, in Figure 3 there is an accuracy metric change detection process, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Geoinfor- linked to each of the eight algorithms. matics – Geospatial Information Research: Bridging the Pacif- ic and Atlantic, 7-9 June, 2004, University of Gavle, Sweden, Error correction capabilities. Assuming a successful integration pp. 503-508. framework where each implemented algorithm is independent of Breiman, L., 1996. Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, another (i.e. independent plug-ins), future algorithmic revisions 24(2):123–140. should target algorithms with lower accuracy. Ancillary datasets Canters, F., 1997. Evaluating the uncertainty of area estimates may be acquired in targeted areas (e.g. high-resolution imagery, derived from fuzzy land-cover classifi cation, Photogrammet- lidar or census data) and as new scientifi c methods arise incremen- ric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(4):403-414. tal algorithmic improvements can be achieved without sacrifi cing Carpenter, G. A., S. Gopal, S. Macomber, S. Martens, C.E. Woodcock, and J. Franklin, 1999. A neural network method existing accurate works. For example, as shown in Figure 3, the for effi cient vegetation mapping, Remote Sensing of Environ- decision tree (in yellow) is ~82% accurate while the whole scene is ment, 70:326-338. ~92% accurate, making the decision tree a prime candidate for re- Coe., Stefan E., M. Alberti, J.A. Hepinstall, and R. Coburn, vision. We should emphasize that this is due to both the relatively 2005. A Hybrid approach to detecting impervious surface at low accuracy and the large spatial footprint. multiple-scale. Proceedings of the ISPRS WG VII/1 ‘Human Support for scientifi c collaboration. Frameworks may separate a clas- Settlements and Impact Analysis’ 3rd International Sympo- sium Remote Sensing and Data Fusion Over Urban Areas sifi cation task in multiple sub-tasks as discussed earlier. There are (URBAN 2005), 14-16 March 2005, Tempe, AZ. no restrictions forcing each sub-task to be tackled by the same Foody, G.M., N.A. Campbell, N.M. Trodd, and T.F. Wood, 1992. algorithm or scientist. Collaborative environments can be cre- Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class ated where scientist specialization is at the foreground leading membership from maximum-likelihood classifi cation, Photo- to shared instead of competitive efforts. For example, a scientist grammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(9):1335-1341. in one university could establish vegetation extraction algorithms Hansen, L.K., and P. Salamon, 1990. Neural network ensem- while another focuses on urban build up identifi cation, with their bles, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine In- individual efforts later joined together. telligence, 12:993–1001. Krogh, A., and J. Vedelsby, 1995. Neural network ensembles, Computational speed. By design, integration frameworks shine in cross validation, and active learning, within Tesauro, G., large-scale applications, because the benefi ts (as mentioned above) Touretzky, D., Leen, T., Advances in Neural Information Pro- outperform the initial cost of establishing the framework. In such cessing Systems, 7, Cambridge, MA, pp. 238, MIT Press. environments training, error-correction and simulation speeds are Liu,W.G., S. Gopal, and C.E. Woodcock, 2004. Uncertainty and important - think of a yearly update of the National Land Cover Da- confi dence in land cover classifi cation using a hybrid classi- taset. The ability to train and simulate algorithms in a parallel fash- fi er approach, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sens- ion will utilize the latest hardware developments and in the future ing, 70(8):963-971. will allow us to analyze much higher data volumes – the majority Perrone, M., 1992. A soft-competitive splitting rule for adaptive of which is already waiting to be converted into useful products. treestructured neural networks, Proceedings of the Interna- tional Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Baltimore, MD, Summary pp. 689–693. Pontius, R.G., 2000. Quantifi cation error versus location error in As algorithmic improvements in remote sensing classifi ers reach comparison of categorical maps, Photogrammetric Engineer- their limits, the next natural frontier is the integration of multiple ing and Remote Sensing, 66(8):1011-1016. approaches into a unifi ed framework. In this highlight article, char- Steele, B.M., 2000. Combining multiple classifi ers: An ap- acteristics for integrated frameworks are discussed, along with a plication using spatial and remotely sensed information for demonstration of a classifi cation process and associated benefi ts. land cover type mapping, Remote Sensing of Environment, Considering that image availability is expected to rapidly increase with 74:545–556. the recent announcement from the USGS to allow free access to the Steele, B.M., J.C. Winne, and R.L. Redmond, 1998. Estima- tion and mapping of misclassifi cation probabilities for the- Landsat archive, integrated approaches offer a unique opportunity matic land cover maps, Remote Sensing of Environment, for collaborative systems and science within our fi eld. 66(2):192-202. Wolpert, D.H., 1992. Stacked generalization, Neural Networks, Acknowledgements 5:241–259. The author is grateful to the following programs supporting this work: NASA New Investigator Program, NSF Geography and Regional Sci- Author ence Program, and Syracuse Center of Excellence Collaborative Activi- Giorgos Mountrakis ties for Research and Technology Innovation (CARTI) Program. Assistant Professor of GIS/Remote Sensing Director of Intelligent Geocomputing Lab References Department of Environmental Resources and Forest Engineering Aires, F., C. Prigent, and W.B. Rossow, 2004. Neural network State Uni. of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry uncertainty assessment using Bayesian statistics: A remote Syracuse, NY sensing application. Neural Computation, 16:2415-2458. [email protected] - www.aboutgis.com Alimohammadi, A., H.R., Rabiei, and P.Z. Firouzabadi, 2004. A 1180 October 2008 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING OOccttoobbeerr LLaayyoouutt..iinndddd 11118800 99//1177//22000088 88::3300::4466 AAMM As a prelude to the ASPRS 75th Anniversary, we are running this column to see if you can identify your ASPRS colleagues from their experiences in the industry. The following material is an abstracted version of an interview conducted by Charles E. Olson, Jr., ASPRS Emeritus Member and Fellow, as part of the Eastern Great Lakes Region’s Oral History Project. Some questions were used to stimulate the person interviewed. From what is printed below, can you identify the person interviewed? The person will be identifi ed next month. Question: “How, where or when did you fi rst become involved in would be an overwhelming number of images, particularly from satel- remote sensing and GIS?” lites, that would be pouring down to Earth; that would be put in the hands of environmental scientists and Earth-resource managers, and Answer: I don’t have to think very long to give a clear answer to this it would be an incredible experience to be part of that profession and question because I remember it as if it happened yesterday. It goes to help it grow. During the second year of my master’s program, he back to the summer of 1961, when I was in college and enrolled encouraged me to join ASPRS. in the Forestry Program. Between the sophomore and junior year, Let me jump ahead. When I retired, I had gone from a wet-behind- forestry students were required to take ten weeks of summer fi eld the-ears graduate student working with black-and-white aerial photos instruction. About the middle of July, we were led out into a meadow to Chief of the USGS’s EROS Data Center, which holds the largest behind the study hall and the subject of study for the day was for- civilian archive of aerial photography and satellite imagery in the est photo interpretation in a fi eld setting. Even before the instructor World—more than 15 million frames of imagery. I was the director started to speak, it had a profound effect on me, as to what this tool, of that center and I would have never gotten there if my professor at the time called aerial reconnaissance, had to offer. In fact, Chuck hadn’t pointed me in that direction. I certainly thank him for his vision Olson clarifi ed for me when the term “Remote Sensing” was coined. and enthusiasm as a mentor. It didn’t come until a year later, in 1962. Question: “Who were some of the more infl uential people in keep- Question: “What prompted you to join ASP or ASPRS?” ing you in ASPRS?” Answer: At that time (1966) it was the American Society for Photo- Answer: I’ve been a member since 1966 and stayed a member of grammetry. I was working on a plan for the future. Students in those the ASPRS for all these years because of the Society’s programs and days thought it was long-term planning if you could get past the next activities, but mostly because of the people. My membership afforded Saturday night. But, my plan, since I played basketball, was to enter me opportunities to make professional contacts. I was able to meet the military, go to Offi cer’s Candidate School in the U.S. Navy, become people, who had similar professional interests, beyond the close an offi cer in the Navy, and then by prearrangement be stationed in circle that you have in your school or work environment -- scientists, Hawaii and play four years of basketball for a Navy all-star team. What engineers, practicing professionals across the nation. My direct in- would happen beyond four years, after the Navy, I had no clue. volvement in ASPRS was mainly on the technical side, as a scientist The professor who taught me to see stereo in the fi eld was a long- conducting research, writing papers, getting those papers published term member of the American Society for Photogrammetry. At our in the peer-reviewed journal, and working with Jim Case, who had commencement reception he approached me and made a suggestion: been the long-term technical editor of PE&RS. I worked with Bill Why don’t you consider graduate school? And, of course, I asked French, the long-term Executive Director who approached me when why? He had a vision as to where he thought aerial photography I was working at USGS, to put training fi lms together for ASPRS. Bill and remote sensing was headed; what the future would be. One also suggested that I be one of the Correspondents to ISPRS, it was vision was, moving from airplanes fl ying a few thousand feet above Commission VII at the time and was called Photo Interpretation of the surface, to high-fl ying airplanes, to satellites that orbit the Earth, Data. I did that for eight years and made many more contacts in the and not only have fi lm cameras but electronic sensors on board. He international community. Those that infl uenced me were too many to basically convinced me that afternoon – while I was still wearing my name. I’ve only mentioned a few here, but I think it was the colleague commencement black robe and black hat – that I should chuck the interaction that really kept me in ASPRS. Navy approach and go to grad school. He expected someday there continued on page 1188 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING October 2008 1187 OOccttoobbeerr LLaayyoouutt..iinndddd 11118877 99//1177//22000088 88::3300::4477 AAMM BE AN ASPRS MEMBER CHAMPION ASPRS is recruiting new members and YOU benefit from each new member YOU champion. Not only can you contribute to the growth of ASPRS, but you can earn discounts on dues and merchandise in the ASPRS Store. Member Champions by Region as of August 31, 2008 Central New York Puget Sound Steven Steinberg REMEMBER! To receive credit for Thomas E. Henderson Monika Moskal Wubishet Tadesse a new member, the CHAMPION’S Ricardo Lopez-Torri Carolyn S. Tate Rocky Mountain name and ASPRS membership James Mower Phyllis Ullery Jeff Walton Lloyd P. Queen Keith T. Weber number must be included on the new Saint-Louis member’s application. Central US Jackson Cothren David Kreighbaum Recruited CONTACT INFORMATION Columbia River Southwest US 5 through 10 For Membership materials, contact us Christopher Aldridge Stuart E. Marsh New Members at: 301-493-0290, ext. 109/104 or Daniel L. Civco Michelle Kinzel Western Great Lakes email: [email protected]. Brian Miyake Brian Miyake David Hart Brian Murphy Individuals who want to join ASPRS Robert S. Peckyno Thomas Lillesand Monika Moskal may sign up on-line at https://asprs. Mike Renslow Member Champions org/application. Eastern Great Lakes By number of new James S. Bethel members recruited Phyllis Ullery RECRUIT Recruited from 1 new member, earn a 10% DISCOUNT off your ASPRS DUES Florida 1 to 4 New Members and $5 in ASPRS BUCK$. Tarig A. Ali Christopher Aldridge Brian Murphy Tarig A. Ali 5 new members, earn a 50% DISCOUNT off your ASPRS DUES and $25 in Inter-Mountain LloJaymd eHs. SB.l aBcekthbeulrn ASPRS BUCK$. Lloyd H. Blackburn Jackson Cothren Keith T. Weber Barry Haack 10 or more new members in a calendar year and receive the Mid-South David Hart Ford Bartlett Award, one year of complimentary membership, Marguerite Madden Thomas E. Henderson and $50 in ASPRS BUCK$. Sorin C. Popescu Michelle Kinzel Wubishet Tadesse David Kreighbaum All newly recruited members count toward the Region’s tally for the Thomas Lillesand Region of the Month Award given by ASPRS. North Atlantic Kenneth W. Potter Ricardo Lopez-Torri Those elibible to be invited to join ASPRS under the Member Champion Marguerite Madden Program are: New England Stuart E. Marsh Daniel L. Civco James Mower (cid:122) Students and/or professionals who have never been ASPRS mem- Robert S. Peckyno bers. Northern California Sorin C. Popescu Steven Steinberg (cid:122) Former ASPRS members are eligible for reinstatement if their mem- Kenneth W. Potter Carolyn S. Tate Lloyd P. Queen bership has lapsed for at least three years Potomac Mike Renslow Elizabeth M. Smith Yogendra P. Singh ASPRS BUCK$ VOUCHERS are worth $5 each toward the pur- Barry Haack Elizabeth M. Smith chase of publications or merchandise available through the ASPRS Yogendra P. Singh web site, catalog or at ASPRS conferences. Mission Statement ASPRS CONFERENCE INFORMATION The mission of the ASPRS is to advance knowledge and Abstract deadlines improve understanding of Hotel information mapping sciences and to Secure on-line registration promote the responsible www.asprs.org applications of photogrammetry, remote sensing, geographic information Is your contact information current? Contact us at [email protected] or log on to systems (GIS), and https://eserv.asprs.org to update your information. supporting technologies. We value your membership. 1200 October 2008 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING OOccttoobbeerr LLaayyoouutt..iinndddd 11220000 99//1177//22000088 88::3300::4488 AAMM "From the depths of the ocean to the surface of Mars." - Dr. Allan Carswell, Founder and Chairman, Optech Incorporated The founding vision of Optech Incorporated literally spans worlds. Optech technology is now applied in every part of Planet Earth and beyond. Our lidar products can be found on every continent surveying from the air, land and sea. Now Optech is on Mars as an integral part of the NASA Phoenix Mars Mission. Our technology is at the core of the meteorological lidar delivered to the northern polar region of Mars on May 25, 2008 by the Phoenix Mars Lander. A mission enjoying spectacular success, this technology is now revealing secrets about the Red Planet in an effort to understand its atmospheric processes and habitability for life. For the first time in history, Optech technology is helping scientists study and monitor the atmosphere of Mars, and in doing so, helping us understand the forces driving climate change here on Earth. By studying other worlds we learn more about ours. By working at the leading edge of space, Optech is able to drive new innovation into its many products. Many Products - One Family CCoovveerr..iinndddd 33 99//1177//22000088 88::3344::1166 AAMM SOCET GXP®SOFTWARE. EXPERIENCE THE POWER OF EXTREME ANALYSIS.TM Experience the power of real-time image analysis,automated geospatial production, mapping,and 3-D visualization — all in a single application. SOCET GXP®enables interoperability and collaboration among users and decision-makers at all levels,and its intuitive,customizable interface provides direct access to shared databases and extended capabilities. Image and geospatial analysis—together for the first time in one powerful tool. This is just one of the ways BAE Systems delivers real advantage. www.baesystems.com/gxp CCoovveerr..iinndddd 44 99//1177//22000088 88::3344::1188 AAMM S p in e.in Vo dd 1 lum e 7 4 , N o . 1 0 , p p . 1 1 7 3 -1 2 8 0 P H O T O G R A M M E T R IC E N G IN E E R IN G & R E M O T E S E N S IN G O c to b e r 2 0 0 8 9 /1 7 /2 0 0 8 8 :4 1 :2 5 A M SSppeecciiaall IIssssuuee:: AArrttiiffiicciiaall IInntteelllliiggeennccee iinn RReemmoottee SSeennssiinngg PPEE&&RRSS October 2008 Volume 74, Number 10 y g o ol n h c e d t n a e c n e ci s n o ati m or nf al i ati p s o e g d n a g n gi a m or i al f n ur o al j ci offi e h T GG NN SISI NN EE S E E TT OO MM EE R & & G G NN RIRI EE EE NN GIGI NN E C C RIRI TT EE MM MM AA RR GG OO TT OO SUNY HH ESF P CCoovveerr..iinndddd 11 99//1100//22000088 22::5522::4477 PPMM Say hello to IMAGINE Objective. Ease the pain of manually creating, updating and replacing geospatial content. With IMAGINE Objective, you can automate workflows that analyze remotely sensed imagery, even with today’s increased imagery resolution and mapping scales. Convert to vector features with minimal post processing. Perform both single feature type extractions and multi-class “wall-to-wall” classification. Only IMAGINE Objective combines inferential learning with expert knowledge – enabling you to get the most value out of your imagery assets. Say hello to the Earth to Business Company at or Author Manage Connect Deliver Geospatial Business Systems CCoovveerr..iinndddd 22 99//1100//22000088 22::5522::5599 PPMM
Description: