eSSentialS oF ForenSiC SCienCe John hunter Barrie SimpSon Caroline Sturdy CollS Forensic ApproAches to Buried remAins Forensic Approaches to Buried Remains Forensic Approaches to Buried Remains John Hunter MFL (Manlove Forensics Limited), Wantage, Oxfordshire, UK University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Barrie Simpson MFL (Manlove Forensics Limited), Wantage, Oxfordshire, UK Caroline Sturdy Colls MFL (Manlove Forensics Limited), Wantage, Oxfordshire, UK Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK Thiseditionfirstpublished2013(cid:2)C 2013byJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd WileyBlackwellisanimprintofJohnWiley&Sons,formedbythemergerofWiley’sglobalScientific, TechnicalandMedicalbusinesswithBlackwellPublishing. Registeredoffice:JohnWiley&Sons,Ltd,TheAtrium,SouthernGate,Chichester,WestSussex,PO198SQ,UK Editorialoffices: 9600GarsingtonRoad,Oxford,OX42DQ,UK TheAtrium,SouthernGate,Chichester,WestSussex,PO198SQ,UK 111RiverStreet,Hoboken,NJ07030-5774,USA Fordetailsofourglobaleditorialoffices,forcustomerservicesandforinformationabouthowtoapplyfor permissiontoreusethecopyrightmaterialinthisbookpleaseseeourwebsiteat www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. TherightoftheauthortobeidentifiedastheauthorofthisworkhasbeenassertedinaccordancewiththeUK Copyright,DesignsandPatentsAct1988. Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,in anyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recordingorotherwise,exceptaspermittedby theUKCopyright,DesignsandPatentsAct1988,withoutthepriorpermissionofthepublisher. Designationsusedbycompaniestodistinguishtheirproductsareoftenclaimedastrademarks.Allbrandnames andproductnamesusedinthisbookaretradenames,servicemarks,trademarksorregisteredtrademarksoftheir respectiveowners.Thepublisherisnotassociatedwithanyproductorvendormentionedinthisbook. LimitofLiability/DisclaimerofWarranty:Whilethepublisherandauthor(s)haveusedtheirbesteffortsin preparingthisbook,theymakenorepresentationsorwarrantieswithrespecttotheaccuracyorcompletenessof thecontentsofthisbookandspecificallydisclaimanyimpliedwarrantiesofmerchantabilityorfitnessfora particularpurpose.Itissoldontheunderstandingthatthepublisherisnotengagedinrenderingprofessional servicesandneitherthepublishernortheauthorshallbeliablefordamagesarisingherefrom.Ifprofessional adviceorotherexpertassistanceisrequired,theservicesofacompetentprofessionalshouldbesought. LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData Hunter,John. Forensicapproachestoburiedremains/JohnHunter,BarrieSimpsonandCarolineSturdyColls. pagescm Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex. ISBN978-0-470-66630-2(cloth)–ISBN978-0-470-66629-6(pbk.) 1.Forensicsciences. 2.Forensicanthropology. 3.Criminalinvestigation. I.Title. HV8073.H89362014 363.25–dc23 2013015040 AcataloguerecordforthisbookisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary. Wileyalsopublishesitsbooksinavarietyofelectronicformats.Somecontentthatappearsinprintmaynotbe availableinelectronicbooks. Setin10/12ptTimesbyAptaraInc.,NewDelhi,India 1 2013 Contents Listoffigures vii Seriesforeword xi Prefaceandacknowledgements xiii Theauthors xv Aboutthecompanionwebsite xvii 1 Anintroductiontoburiedremains 1 1.1 Questionsoftime 1 1.2 Questionsofinterpretation 2 1.3 Forensicarchaeology 5 1.4 Legalissuesandprocedures 8 1.5 Decaydynamic 10 1.6 Searchmethodsandadaptations 12 1.7 Recoverymethodsandadaptation 14 1.8 Massgraves 19 2 Searchtheoryandthelandscape 23 2.1 Thetheory 23 2.2 Landscapemapping 30 2.3 Remotesensing 37 3 Searchapplication 49 3.1 Geophysicalsurvey 49 3.2 Cadaverdogs 60 3.3 Mechanicalexcavation 68 3.4 Bodiesinaqueousenvironments 73 4 Searchdesign 77 4.1 Searchdesign 77 4.1.1 Definitionofsearchboundaries 77 4.1.2 Recordingandarchiving 78 4.1.3 Thoroughness 79 4.2 Interrogatinglandscapes 79 4.3 Balancingprobabilities 93 5 Longer-term‘nobody’cases 101 5.1 Introduction 101 5.2 Historyofcoldcaseinvestigation 102 vi CONTENTS 5.3 Culturalchangestorurallandscapes 104 5.4 Naturalchangestorurallandscapes 108 5.5 Planningcontrolsandbuildingcontrols 116 5.6 Currentplanningarrangements 118 5.7 Planningrecords 120 5.8 Buildingrecords 121 5.9 Specialcircumstances 124 5.9.1 Archaeologicalinvestigation 124 5.9.2 Listedbuildings 124 5.9.3 Ecclesiasticalbuildings 125 5.9.4 Burialgrounds 126 5.10 Landfillsitesandwastedisposal 131 6 Recovery,stratigraphyanddestruction 137 6.1 Stratigraphy 138 6.1.1 Layersandcontamination 138 6.1.2 Firescenes 153 6.1.3 Formalexhumations 158 6.2 Thedestructiveprocess 160 6.2.1 Documentation 160 6.2.2 Planningandphotography 169 Appendix:Theforensicarchaeologist’sreport(takenfromSection7ofthe StandardsandGuidanceforForensicArchaeologists) 178 7 Recovery,samplinganddating 181 7.1 Sieving 181 7.2 Samplingandforensicecology 186 7.2.1 Entomology 187 7.2.2 Palynology 190 7.3 Essentialtaphonomics 193 7.3.1 Naturalmodifications 194 7.3.2 Anthropogenicmodification 196 7.4 Physicalanthropology,recoveryandsurfacescatters 199 7.5 Dating 204 7.5.1 Relativedating 206 7.5.2 Absolutedating 208 8 Theinvestigationofmultipleburials 213 8.1 Diversityandchallenges 213 8.2 Developments 218 8.3 Interrogatingtheevidence 221 8.4 Theaftermathofconflict 225 8.5 PoliticsandReligion 227 8.6 Archivesforhistory 228 Bibliography 233 Index 251 List of figures 1.1 Exampleofanarchaeologicalmatrixoflayersduringexcavation. 2 1.2 Agraverequiringbotharchaeologicalandanthropologicalattention. 7 1.3 Exampleofadipocereformation. 11 1.4 Theuseofheavymachineryinsearchingforburials. 13 1.5 Typicalscaleplanofhalf-sectionedgrave. 16 1.6 Asiteplanusinglocalfixedpoints. 17 1.7 Massgraveexcavation(top)anddetailofcommingling(bottom). 20 2.1 Excavationoftheconcretefloorofabarnmarkedoutonacommongrid resultingfromGPRresponses. 27 2.2 Theso-called‘MoorsMurders’. 29 2.3 Overlyingmapsshowingcurrentand‘historic’landscapefeaturesfor breakingdownintodomains. 31 2.4 Largescalemapsof(top)aruralareaand(bottom)anurbanareausedin therecoveryofmissingpersons. 33 2.5 Examplesofdifferentscaledmapsillustratingdifferencesindetail. 35 2.6 Examplesofcomputer-generateddigitalterrainmodels(DTMs)ofthe TrentValley. 36 2.7 Superimpositionofaerialphotographs. 39 2.8 Planshowingdiscrepancybetweensitesidentifiedunderdifferent conditions. 41 2.9 ExampleofaLiDARimagewhichcapturessubtletopographicchangeon thegroundsurface. 42 2.10 FourLiDARimagesofthesamelandscapeshowingtheeffectsofdifferent computer-generatedlightingangles. 43 2.11 LiDARimagesshowinganunfiltered(top)andfiltered(bottom)landscape. 44 2.12 SurveyingusingGPS. 47 3.1 Twogeophysicalsurveysystemsoperatingwithinagridsystem. 52 3.2 Typicalradargrams(verticalslices)acrossknowngravesitesshowingthe effectsofdifferentantennafrequencies. 55 3.3 Resistivityplotsshowingareasofhigher(lighter)andlower(darker) resistance. 58 3.4 Three-dimensionalviewofmassgravegeneratedusingelectricalresistance tomography. 60 3.5 Recommendedphasesofsearchforcadaverdogs. 63 3.6 Examplesillustratingthepotentialtravelofscentaccordingtolandscape andwatercoursing. 65 viii LISTOFFIGURES 3.7 Three-dimensionalmodelofmoorlandlandscapefromagroundpenetrating radarsurveyshowingwettestareasandundergroundwatercoursing. 68 3.8 Carefulmachinestrippingofsurfacelayersinordertoidentifydisturbances cutintoundisturbedsubstrates. 70 3.9 Removalofsurfacedepositsclearlyillustrates(top)thebadlyconcealed burialofcontaminatedwasteand(bottom)theremainsofanearlier excavation. 71 4.1 VentinganddrillingthroughconcreteinordertoventaGPRresponsefor cadaverdogattention. 81 4.2 Carefultrowellinginordertoidentifyapossibledisturbancecausedbya burialduringtheconstructionofapipeline. 83 4.3 Theuseofamachine(Stage4)inthesearchforthegardensub-soilofa demolishedbuilding. 86 4.4 Carefulexcavationattheedgeofwoodlandindifficultwetconditions resultingintherecoveryofaplasticbagcontainingneonatalremains. 87 4.5 Hypotheticalexampleofuseof‘RAG’analysisoflandscape. 88 4.6 Excavationofquarryshowingstratigraphicremovaloffillusingheavy machinery. 91 4.7 Investigationofadefinedareaoflandshowing(top)systematicventingfor dogs(Stage3)and(bottom)carefulexcavationandsamplingofareaof burning(Stage4). 92 4.8 Illustrationshowinggravemarkedbybricks(topleft),identificationof gravecut(topright)andfullyexcavatedgrave(bottom). 99 5.1 PoliceandapathologistrecoveringtheremainsofburiedvictimsinJersey. 105 5.2 Comparisonofphotographtakeninthe1960s(top)andin2012(bottom). 109 5.3 Changesintheerosionpatternsofmoorlandpeatexposure. 110 5.4 Humanremainsdiscoveredasaresultofcoastalerosion. 111 5.5 Humanremainsdiscoveredasaresultofcoastalerosionofsanddune. 112 5.6 Awoodlandsearchshowing(top)areaofinterestand(bottom)locationof buriedcontainer. 114 5.7 Aerialphotographoffieldcontainingmanureheap. 115 5.8 Flowchartforsearchinglocallybasedplanningandbuilding documentation. 123 5.9 Flowchartforsearchingpotentiallandfilldisposalsites. 134 6.1 Half-sectionofgravestratigraphy. 140 6.2 ACSIbeingtrainedtorecognisethegraveedges. 141 6.3 Half-sectionofgrave. 143 6.4 Graveinwoodland. 145 6.5 Theuseofsmallimplementstorecovertraceevidence. 147 6.6 Excavationusingapart-pedestalmethod,inthiscasenecessitatedbythe presenceofahighwatertable. 149 6.7 Spademarksidentifiedonarootfromthediggingofthegrave. 151 6.8 Excavationofgraveincellar. 152 6.9 ArchaeologistsexcavatinginthefiredebrisatWindsorCastle. 155 6.10 Thestratigraphiccollapseofacountryhousecontainingthreevictims. 156 6.11 Theseatofsuccessivebonfires. 157
Description: