For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida

196 Pages·2019·3.062 MB·English

by  Elizabeth Rottenberg

D
For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida o
w
n
Elizabeth Rottenberg lo
a
d
e
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.001.0001 d
Published: 2019 Online ISBN: 9780823286065 Print ISBN: 9780823284115 from
h
ttp
s
://a
c
a
d
e
m
FRONT MATTER ic
.o
Copyright Page  up
.c
o
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.002.0003 Page iv m
/fo
Published: June 2019 rd
h
a
m
-s
c
h
Subject: Philosophy of Mind o
la
rs
h
ip
-o
n
lin
e
p. iv Fordham University Press gratefully acknowledges �nancial assistance and support provided for /b
o
o
the publication of this book by DePaul University. k/3
7
3
9
Copyright © 2019 Fordham University Press 5/c
h
a
p
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or te
r/3
transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any 3
1
4
other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the 25
8
5
publisher. 4
b
y
S
Fordham University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external o
u
th
or third-party Internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any a
m
content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. pto
n
O
Fordham University Press also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content ce
a
n
that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. o
g
ra
p
Visit us online at www.fordhampress.com. hy
C
e
n
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available online at https://catalog.loc.gov. tre
N
a
Printed in the United States of America tio
n
a
l O
21 20 19 5 4 3 2 1 c
e
a
n
o
First edition gra
p
h
ic
L
ib
ra
ry
u
s
e
r o
n
1
9
S
e
p
te
m
b
e
r 2
0
2
2
D
For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida o
w
n
Elizabeth Rottenberg lo
a
d
e
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.001.0001 d
Published: 2019 Online ISBN: 9780823286065 Print ISBN: 9780823284115 from
h
ttp
s
://a
c
a
d
e
m
FRONT MATTER ic
.o
Dedication  up
.c
o
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.002.0004 Pages v–vi m
/fo
Published: June 2019 rd
h
a
m
-s
c
h
Subject: Philosophy of Mind o
la
rs
h
ip
-o
n
lin
e
pp.. vvi for Avivi /b
o
o
k
/3
7
3
9
5
/c
h
a
p
te
r/3
3
1
4
2
5
8
5
8
b
y
S
o
u
th
a
m
p
to
n
O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
y
C
e
n
tre
N
a
tio
n
a
l O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
L
ib
ra
ry
u
s
e
r o
n
1
9
S
e
p
te
m
b
e
r 2
0
2
2
D
For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida o
w
n
Elizabeth Rottenberg lo
a
d
e
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.001.0001 d
Published: 2019 Online ISBN: 9780823286065 Print ISBN: 9780823284115 from
h
ttp
s
://a
c
a
d
e
m
FRONT MATTER ic
.o
Abbreviations of Works Cited  up
.c
o
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.002.0006 Pages ix–xii m
/fo
Published: June 2019 rd
h
a
m
-s
c
h
Subject: Philosophy of Mind o
la
rs
h
ip
-o
n
lin
e
Works by Sigmund Freud /b
o
o
k
/3
7
3
9
GW 5
/c
h
Gesammelte Werke. 18 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1940–1968. a
p
te
N r/33
1
4
Gesammelte Werke, Nachtragsband, Texte aus den Jahren 1885 bis 1938. Ed. Angela Richards in collaboration 2
5
8
with Ilse Grubrich-Simitis. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1987. 6
3
b
y
SE S
o
u
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. Trans. James Strachey th
a
m
in collaboration with Anna Freud, assisted by Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson. London: Hogarth, 1953–1974. p
to
n
O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
y
C
e
n
tre
N
a
tio
n
a
l O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
L
ib
ra
ry
u
s
e
r o
n
1
9
S
e
p
te
m
b
e
r 2
0
2
2
D
Works by Jacques Derrida o
w
n
lo
a
d
e
“AI” d fro
“Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides—a Conversation with Jacques Derrida.” Trans. Pascale- m
h
Anne Brault and Michael Naas. In Philosophy in a Time of Terror, ed. Giovanna Borradori, 85–136. Chicago: ttp
s
University of Chicago Press, 2003. “Auto-immunités, suicides réels et symboliques.” In Le “concept” du 11 ://a
c
septembre, 133–196. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2003. ad
e
m
ic
“BPP” .o
u
p
“Beyond the Power Principle.” Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. The Undecidable Unconscious 2, no. 1 (2015): .c
o
m
7–17. “Au-delà du principe de pouvoir.” Rue Descartes 82, no. 3 (2014): 4–13. /fo
rd
h
BS1 a
m
The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume I: Seminar of 2001–2002. Trans. Geo�rey Bennington. Chicago: -sc
h
o
University of Chicago Press, 2009. Séminaire La bête et le souverain, Volume I (2001–2002). Ed. Michel la
rs
Lisse, Marie-Louise Mallet, and Ginette Michaud. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2008. h
ip
-o
n
BS2 lin
e
The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume II: Seminar of 2002–2003. Trans. Geo�rey Bennington. Chicago: /bo
o
k
p. x University of Chicago Press, 2011. Séminaire La bête et le souverain, Volume II (2002–2003). Ed. Michel /3
7
Lisse, Marie-Louise Mallet, and Ginette Michaud. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2010. 39
5
/c
h
“CHM” ap
te
“Cogito and the History of Madness.” In Writing and Di�erence, 31–63. “Cogito et histoire de la folie.” In r/3
3
L’écriture et la di�érence, 51–97. 14
2
5
8
6
“DoA” 3
b
“Deconstruction of Actuality.” In Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews, 1971–2001, ed., trans., and y S
o
intro. Elizabeth Rottenberg, 85–116. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002. u
th
a
m
DP1 pto
n
The Death Penalty, Volume I: Seminar of 1999–2000. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago O
c
e
Press, 2014. Séminaire La peine de mort, Volume I (1999–2000). Ed. Geo�rey Bennington, Marc Crépon, and a
n
o
Thomas Dutoit. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2012. g
ra
p
h
y
DP2 C
e
The Death Penalty, Volume II: Seminar of 2000–2001. Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. Chicago: University of ntre
Chicago Press, 2017. Séminaire La peine de mort, Volume II (2000–2001). Ed. Geo�rey Bennington and Marc N
a
Crépon. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2015. tio
n
a
l O
“Env” ce
a
“Envois.” In The Post Card, 3–256. “Envois.” In La carte postale, 7–273. no
g
ra
p
EO hic
L
The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation. Ed. Christie V. McDonald. Trans. Peggy Kamuf ib
ra
and Avital Ronell. New York: Schocken, 1985. L’oreille de l’autre: otobiographies, transferts, traductions. Ed. ry
u
Claude Lévesque and Christie V. McDonald. Montréal: VLB Éditeur, 1982. se
r o
n
“FSW” 1
9
S
“Freud and the Scene of Writing.” In Writing and Di�erence, 196–231. “Freud et la scène de l’écriture.” In e
p
L’écriture et la di�érence, 293–340. tem
b
e
“FV” r 20
2
2
D
“Le facteur de la vérité.” In The Post Card, 411–96. “Le facteur de la vérité.” In La carte postale, 441–524. o
w
n
lo
a
FWT d
e
d
For What Tomorrow … A Dialogue. With Élisabeth Roudinesco. Trans. Je� Fort. Stanford, CA: Stanford fro
m
University Press, 2004. De quoi demain … Dialogue. With Élisabeth Roudinesco. Paris: Libraire Arthème
h
Fayard et Éditions Galilée, 2001. ttp
s
://a
c
“Geo” a
d
e
“Geopsychoanalysis ‘and the rest of the world.’” Trans. Peggy Kamuf. In Psyche 1, 318–43. m
ic
“Géopsychanalyse ‘and the rest of the world.’” In Psyché, tome 1, 327–52. .ou
p
.c
o
“Imp” m
/fo
“Implications: Interview with Henri Ronse.” In Positions, 1–14. “Implications: Entretien avec Henri rd
h
a
Ronse.” In Positions, 9–24. m
-s
c
h
p. xi “K” o
la
“Khora.” Trans. Ian McLeod. In On the Name, 87–127. Khora. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 1993. rsh
ip
-o
n
“LL” lin
e
“For the Love of Lacan.” In Resistances, 39–69. “Pour l’amour de Lacan.” In Résistances, 55–88. /b
o
o
k
/3
LLF 7
3
9
Learning to Live Finally: The Last Interview. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Hoboken, NJ: 5
/c
h
Melville House, 2007. Apprendre à vivre en�n: Entretien avec Jean Birnbaum. Paris: Éditions Galilée/Le a
p
te
Monde, 2005. r/3
3
1
4
“LNF” 2
5
8
“Let Us Not Forget—Psychoanalysis.” Trans. Geo�rey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Oxford Literary 6
3
b
Review 12, nos. 1–2 (1990): 3–7. y
S
o
u
LVLM tha
m
Séminaire La vie la mort (1975–1976). Ed. Pascale-Anne Brault and Peggy Kamuf. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, p
to
n
2019. Life Death, Seminar of 1975–1976. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago: University O
c
of Chicago Press, 2020. ea
n
o
g
“MC” ra
p
h
“My Chances/Mes chances: A Rendezvous with Some Epicurean Stereophonies.” Trans. Irene Harvey and y C
e
Avital Ronell. In Psyche 1, 344–76. “Mes chances: Au rendez-vous de quelques stéréophonies n
tre
épicuriennes.” In Psyché, tome 1, 353–84. N
a
tio
n
MO a
l O
Monolingualism of the Other; or, The Prosthesis of Origin. Trans. Patrick Mensah. Stanford, CA: Stanford c
e
a
University Press, 1998. Le monolinguisme de l’autre: ou la prothèse d’origine. Éditions Galilée, 1996. n
o
g
ra
p
“MP” h
ic
“Me—Psychoanalysis.” Trans. Richard Klein. In Psyche 1, 129–42. “Moi—la psychanalyse.” In Psyché, Lib
tome 1, 145–58. rary
u
s
e
ON r o
n
On the Name. Ed. Thomas Dutoit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993. 1
9
S
e
PC pte
m
The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, b
e
1987. La carte postale: de Socrate à Freud et au-delà. Paris: Flammarion, 1980. r 2
0
2
2
D
o
“PMS” w
n
lo
“Peine de mort et souveraineté (pour une déconstruction de l’onto-théologie).” Divinatio 15 (2002): 13– a
d
e
38. d
fro
m
PoF h
ttp
Politics of Friendship. Trans. George Collins. New York: Verso, 1997. Politiques de l’amitié. Paris: Éditions s
://a
Galilée, 1994. c
a
d
e
m
Pos ic
.o
Positions. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981. Positions. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, u
p
.c
1972. o
m
/fo
“Pos” rdh
a
m
“Positions: Interview with Jean-Louis Houdebine and Guy Scarpetta.” In Positions, 37–96. “Positions:
-s
c
Entretien avec Jean-Louis Houdebine and Guy Scarpetta.” In Positions, 51–133. h
o
la
rs
“PSS” hip
-o
“Psychoanalysis Searches the States of Its Soul: The Impossible Beyond of a Sovereign Cruelty.” Trans. n
lin
p. xii Peggy Kamuf. In Without Alibi, 238–80. États d’âme de la psychanalyse: L’impossible au-delà d’une e
/b
o
souveraine cruauté. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2000. o
k
/3
7
3
Psy1 9
5
/c
Psyche 1. Inventions of the Other. Ed. Peggy Kamuf and Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford, CA: Stanford h
a
p
University Press, 2007. Psyché: Inventions de l’autre. Tome 1. Éditions Galilée, 1987–1998. te
r/3
3
1
Psy2 4
2
5
Psyche 2. Inventions of the Other. Ed. Peggy Kamuf and Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford, CA: Stanford 8
6
3
University Press, 2008. Psyché: Inventions de l’autre. Tome 2. Éditions Galilée, 1987–2003. b
y
S
o
R uth
a
Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Stanford, CA: Stanford m
p
to
University Press, 2005. Voyous. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2003. n
O
c
e
Res a
n
o
Resistances of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Peggy Kamuf, Pascale-Anne Brault, and Michael Naas. Stanford, CA: gra
p
Stanford University Press, 1996. Résistances: de la psychanalyse. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 1996. h
y
C
e
n
“Res” tre
“Resistances.” In Resistances, 1–38. “Résistances.” In Résistances, 13–53. N
a
tio
n
a
“SoF” l O
“To Speculate—on ‘Freud.’” In The Post Card, 257–409. “Spéculer—sur ‘Freud.’” In La carte postale, ce
a
n
277–437. o
g
ra
p
h
“Tel” ic
L
“Telepathy.” Trans. Nicholas Royle. In Psyche 1, 227–61. “Télépathie.” In Psyché, tome 1, 237–69. ib
ra
ry
“UWC” us
e
“The University without Condition.” Trans. Peggy Kamuf. In Without Alibi, 202–37. L’université sans r o
n
condition. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 2001. 19
S
e
p
WA te
m
Without Alibi. Ed., trans., and intro. Peggy Kamuf. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002. be
r 2
0
2
2
D
WD o
w
n
Writing and Di�erence. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978. L’écriture et la lo
a
d
di�érence. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1967. e
d
fro
m
h
ttp
s
://a
c
a
d
e
m
ic
.o
u
p
.c
o
m
/fo
rd
h
a
m
-s
c
h
o
la
rs
h
ip
-o
n
lin
e
/b
o
o
k
/3
7
3
9
5
/c
h
a
p
te
r/3
3
1
4
2
5
8
6
3
b
y
S
o
u
th
a
m
p
to
n
O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
y
C
e
n
tre
N
a
tio
n
a
l O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
L
ib
ra
ry
u
s
e
r o
n
1
9
S
e
p
te
m
b
e
r 2
0
2
2
D
For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida o
w
n
Elizabeth Rottenberg lo
a
d
e
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.001.0001 d
Published: 2019 Online ISBN: 9780823286065 Print ISBN: 9780823284115 from
h
ttp
s
://a
c
a
d
e
m
FRONT MATTER ic
.o
Epigraph  up
.c
o
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.002.0007 Pages xiii–xiv m
/fo
Published: June 2019 rd
h
a
m
-s
c
h
Subject: Philosophy of Mind o
la
rs
h
ip
-o
n
lin
e
p. xiii Psychoanalysis brings out the worst in everyone … /b
o
o
k
/3
p. xiv —SIGMUND FREUD, “On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement” 7
3
9
5
/c
h
a
p
te
r/3
3
1
4
2
5
8
7
2
b
y
S
o
u
th
a
m
p
to
n
O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
y
C
e
n
tre
N
a
tio
n
a
l O
c
e
a
n
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
L
ib
ra
ry
u
s
e
r o
n
1
9
S
e
p
te
m
b
e
r 2
0
2
2
D
For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida o
w
n
Elizabeth Rottenberg lo
a
d
e
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.001.0001 d
Published: 2019 Online ISBN: 9780823286065 Print ISBN: 9780823284115 from
h
ttp
s
://a
c
a
d
e
m
CHAPTER ic
.o
Introduction: Freuderrida  up
.c
o
Elizabeth Rottenberg m
/fo
rd
h
https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823284115.003.0001 Pages 1–6 a
m
Published: June 2019 -s
c
h
o
la
rs
h
ip
-o
Abstract nlin
e
/b
For the Love of Psychoanalysis: The Play of Chance in Freud and Derrida is about the historic coupling of o
o
k
Freud and Derrida. With di�erent emphases, both parts of this book are called “Freuderrida.” Freud /3
7
3
and Derrida are thus bonded, this introduction claims, in life and letter(s). Freud is, for Derrida, along 95
/c
with Heidegger, one of the “two great ghosts of the ‘great epoch.’” But the reverse is also true: h
a
p
Derrida’s work has utterly transformed the way we read Freud today. te
r/3
3
1
4
2
5
Keywords: Cixous, coupling, Derrida, Freud, Freuderrida 8
7
7
b
Subject: Philosophy of Mind y
S
o
u
th
a
m
p
to
n
Psychanalyse et déconstruction: double modalité de l’inoriginaire. O
c
e
a
—JEAN-LUC NANCY, “Double plongée aux abîmes” no
g
ra
p
I would like to begin this book with an anecdote of a slightly confessional nature. If I mention this anecdote, hy
C
it is because it came to me by chance as an association to what French analyst and philosopher Monique e
n
David-Ménard calls “positive contingency” or the “positive aspect of chance,”1 what in colloquial English tre
N
we would call a “happy accident.” atio
n
a
So here is the association. For reasons I cannot fully explain, the therapist I was seeing in graduate school l O
c
e
encouraged me to take the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory test (the MMPI, as it’s called), a a
n
o
widely used psychometric test of adult personality and psychopathology. The test involved hundreds of gra
2 p
simple, ino�ensive questions, questions like “do you read all the editorials in the newspaper every day?” h
ic
and it took me hours to complete. A week or so after taking the test, I met with my therapist, and we went Lib
ra
over the results together. According to the test (which, interestingly, takes into account even the ry
u
performative aspects of test-taking), I had answered all the questions in such a way as to appear neither s
e
excessively good nor excessively bad; that is, I had answered all the questions honestly and consistently. As r on
1
p. 2 far as psychopathology was concerned, my answers showed few signs of hypochondriasis, hysteria, 9
S
e
psychopathy, schizophrenia, or hypomania. On the other hand, when it came to depression, paranoia, p
te
psychasthenia, and social introversion, my scores were a little higher, and a shockingly high percentage of m
b
e
my answers re�ected “stereotypical masculine interests/behaviors.” None of this seemed to worry my r 2
0
2
2
D
therapist in the least. The only thing she pointed to were my “odd answers” (the MMPI also has a special o
w
n
category for odd answers—which, presumably, correspond to the answers of academics). She wondered lo
a
d
about my answer to this question in particular: “Do you see people or animals or things that other people e
d
don’t see?” “You answered ‘yes’ to that question,” she said. “I don’t understand. Why would you answer fro
m
‘yes’? You’re not psychotic.” I explained that I had read the “or”—do you see people OR animals OR things h
ttp
that other people don’t see—as a disjunctive rather than a conjunctive OR. “So, yes, when I read texts, s://a
sometimes I see things that other people don’t see.” At the time, of course, I wasn’t thinking of Gilles c
a
d
Deleuze’s “contingent reason” or of his account of the inventive power of disjunctive synthesis. And I em
ic
certainly wasn’t thinking that my �gurative reading of seeing, my misreading of seeing, my seeing in seeing .o
u
p
something that my therapist did not, was indicative of the essential and indeterminable contingencies of .c
o
reading (of grammar and semantics). No, I was only giving what I took to be a perfectly accurate description m
/fo
of the déformation professionnelle that belongs to academics or to anyone who is a stickler for grammar, a rd
h
a
positive déformation, I might add. m
-s
c
h
This association immediately led me to another (contingent?) association, this time to Freud and to Freud’s ola
rs
astonishment before the transformative power of Jean-Martin Charcot’s dazzling, clinical insight. Although h
ip
Freud was at times critical of Charcot, he never questioned his X-ray vision of things: -o
n
lin
e
/b
[Charcot] … had the nature of an artist—he was, as he himself said, a “visuel,” a seer [ein Seher]. o
o
k
Here is what he himself told us about his method of working. He used to look again and again at the /3
7
3
things he did not understand, to deepen his impression of them day by day, till suddenly [plötzlich] 9
5
an understanding of them dawned on him. … He might be heard to say that the greatest /ch
a
p
satisfaction a person could have was to see something new—that is, to recognize it as new; and he te
remarked again and again on the di�culty and value of this kind of “seeing.” He would ask why it r/33
1
4
was that in medicine people only see what they have already learned to see. 2
5
8
7
3 7
(SE 3:12/GW 1:22–23, modified) b
y
S
o
p. 3 Or a few pages later: uth
a
m
p
Charcot … never tired of defending the rights of purely clinical work, which consists in seeing … to
n
O
against the encroachments of theoretical medicine. On one occasion there was a small group of us, c
e
a
all students from abroad, who, brought up on German academic physiology, were trying his n
o
g
patience with our doubts about his clinical innovations. “But that can’t be true,” one of us ra
p
h
objected, “it contradicts the Young-Helmholz theory.” He did not reply “So much the worse for y
C
the theory, clinical facts come �rst” … but he did say something which made a great impression on e
n
us: “La théorie, c’est bon, mais ça n’empêche pas d’exister [Theory is good, but it doesn’t prevent tre N
a
things from existing].” tio
n
a
(SE 3:13/GW 1:23–24) l O
c
e
a
n
o
Freud sees in Charcot a form of vision—of sight and insight—that is bound up with another kind of g
ra
contingency. He sees an innovative vision that disturbs, disrupts, and resists the saturation of the natural ph
ic
world by theoretical medicine. Charcot’s insight appears suddenly, out of the blue, by chance, plötzlich. It is L
ib
something one doesn’t see coming. What strikes Charcot and what leaves an impression on his students also ra
ry
calls for a movement of appropriation (description, determination, knowledge). But this appropriation does us
e
not reduce the insight. Rather it leads to the enrichment or advancement of theoretical medicine: “No r o
n
physician needs to be told what a wealth of forms were acquired by neuropathology through him [Charcot], 19
S
and what increased precision and sureness of diagnosis were made possible by his observations” (SE e
p
te
3:13/GW 1:23). m
b
e
r 2
0
2
2