ebook img

Food Habits of the Red Panda, Ailurus Fulgens in the Singhalila National Park, Darjeeling, India PDF

7 Pages·2001·4 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Food Habits of the Red Panda, Ailurus Fulgens in the Singhalila National Park, Darjeeling, India

) J FOOD HABITS OF THE RED PANDA, AILURUSFULGENSIN THE SINGHALILANATIONAL PARK, DARJEELING, INDIA' SunitaPradhan, GautomK. Saha2andJamalA. Khan3 (With one text-figure Key words: Red panda, Ailurusfulgens diet, eastern Himalaya, temperate , zone, subalpine zone Food habits ofthe red panda in the Singhalila National Park (SNP) were investigated at three sites from 1994 to 1996, by examining 1,250 droppings or faeces. Red panda was found to consume two species of bamboo, Arundinaria mating and A. aristata, which dominated the understorey ofSNP, along with seasonal supplements ofsome fruits and shoots of the above mentioned bamboo species. However, the composition of the diet differed between the sites. The difference in their dietary composition in relation to the overall ecology ofthe red panda in the SNP needs further investigation. Introduction gestation period, low fecundity and slow postnatalgrowth, whichplace constraints onthe The red panda belongs to the Order rapid propagation of its population (McNab Carnivora, but interestingly subsists on a 1989). Moreover, the bamboo mass flowers herbivorousdiet, specificallyonbambooleaves. periodically,anddiesaftertheseedsareproduced Althoughthemodificationsofdentitionandskull (Janzen 1976). The panda faces scarcity offood structures have typicalherbivorous features, the during the flowering stage ofthe bamboo. This digestive system is ill-adapted for proper paper presents preliminary findings on the food utilization of its low nutrient diet of bamboo and feeding habits ofredpanda studied during a (Roberts and Gittleman 1984, Bleijenberg and research project (1993-1996) in the Singhalila Nijboer 1989). The gut is short and simple, National Park (SNP), Darjeeling, eastern typicalofthecarnivores, anddevoidofcellulose Himalaya, India. digestingmicrobes(RobertsandGittleman 1984, Schaller et at. 1985). As a result, the red panda Study area consumes alarge amountofbambooto fulfill its The SNP (87° 59'-88° 53' E; 26° 31'-27° energy requirement (Oftedal et at. 1989). The 31' N) ranges from2,400 to 3,600 m above msl, redpandahasevolvedaphysiologicaladaptation encompassing the temperate zone and subalpine oflowering the metabolic rate to cope with low zones.ThemoisttemperateclimateofSNPvaries nutrient diet, reducing energy expenditure for withaltitude.Theobservedsummertemperature maintenance and reproduction (McNab 1989). ranged from 7 to 17 °C, and winter temperature This evolutionary strategy results in a long dropped as low as 1 °C in the temperate zone. Average summer and winter temperature in the 'AcceptedJuly,2000 2P.G.DepartmentofZoology, subalpineregionwere7°Cand 1 °Crespectively. DaijeelingGovernmentCollege, Mean annual rainfall was 350 cm and average Darjeeling734101,WestBengal,India, humidity ranged from 83% to 96%. departmentofWildlifeSciences, Theintensivestudyareacomprisedofthree AligarhMuslimUniversity, Aligarh202002,UttarPradesh,India. sites (Fig. 1). Sites 1 and 2 represented the 224 JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG. 200 FOODHABITSOFTHEREDPANDA,AILURUSFULGENS BataseA KaiyakattaA^ Gairibons = 1 -MR ROAO A *METALLED ROAD PhatakA Tumling -unmetalled ROAD -“BRIDLE PATHS “INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY -STATE BOUNDARY -•••-BOUNDARY BETWEEN CORE AND BUFFER ZONE A SETTLEMENTS ’ s Fig. 1: SinghalilaNational Park, Darjeeling, India. JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG.2001 225 FOODHABITSOFTHEREDPANDA,AILURUSFULGENS temperate zone, and Site 3 the subalpine zone. investigated for the three—study sites within two Trees such as Quercus spp. dominated the broad vegetation zones the temperate and temperate zone, Arundinaria maling being subalpine zones separately. The difference in dominant in the understorey. In the higher intake oftwo bamboo species was tested using reachesofthetemperatezone, Quercusspp.were Mann-Whitney U test following Fowler and scarce, and the vegetation was dominated by Cohen (1986). Sorbus Acer and Vitex. The understorey was Nutritional analysis: Leaves of both , composed of both Arundinaria maling and species ofbamboo, ofall age classes (1 year, 2 A. aristata. The subalpine zone hadaprominent year, and>2 years), were collectedevery month association oftrees such as Abies densa Betula for a year. Fruits ofActinidia strigosa, Sorbus , utilis and Rhododendron spp., with an microphylla and Rosa spp., and shoots ofboth understorey ofA. aristata. bamboo species were collected during their seasonofemergence. Alltheplantsampleswere Methods dried to a constant weight at 55 °C and ground inWilley’smillpriortoanalysis. Hemicellulose, Red panda food habits and nutritional cellulose and lignin were determined following status of food plants were investigated by the Goering and Van Soest (1970), using Fibertech following methods: System. Crudeproteinwasdeterminedfollowing Phenology ofthe food plants: Inorderto Allen (1989). investigate the availability of cover and food resources inthe study area, phenologicalstudies Results were undertaken (Pradhan 1999). The fruiting seasonality ofthe food plants is presented here. A total of 1,250 pellets were examined. It Phenology and recruitment rates of the two was found that the red panda in the SNP bamboo species were studied in sixty 1 sq. m consumed both the species of bamboo. The plots, thirty each for the two species. Initially, differencebetweentheintakeoftheleavesofthe m all the bamboo culms in the 1 sq. plots were two species was, however, not statistically countedandmonitoredmonthly.Whentheshoots significant (Mann-Whitney; z = 0.24, df = 12, appeared, they were counted and labelled. After p=0.813).Alongwiththebamboo leaves, some that, all the labelled shoots were monitored to seasonal fruitsandshootsofthebamboo species assess their survival and death. were also consumedby the red panda. Faecal analysis: Red panda pellets were Availabilityanddistributionoffood:The collected monthly, broken and macroscopically bamboo species A. maling locally known as examined. While the leaves ofthe two bamboo maling had an average heig,ht of 4.9 ±0.80 m species couldbe identified macroscopically, the and a diameter of 1.5 ±0.73 cm. The average shoots ofboth the species were not identifiable. number ofnodes was 22 with an average sheath The fruits andberries consumedwere identified length of22 cm. A. aristata locally known as , from the seed remains, undigested skin of the ratonigalo was shorter, with an average height fruitsandevensheaths,whichsurviveddigestion. of3.9 ±0.053 m. The average number ofnodes Each food item was expressed by its frequency was 22; average sheath length 12.81 cm. ofoccurrence andbypercentvolume, computed A. aristata had a higher density of culms than foreachseasonfromtheentire studyarea. Thus, A. maling. the diet spectrum of red panda was also A. maling was the dominant bamboo 226 JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG. 2001 ) FOODHABITSOFTHEREDPANDA,AILURUSFULGENS m m between 2,600 to 3,100 in the study area. Seasonalvariationindiet: Thedietofthe A. aristatawas foundfrom2,850m,butactually redpandainSNPvariedseasonally(Table 1). In m dominated the understorey from 3,150 to pre-monsoon, itsdietwas acombinationof52% 3,600 m. Shoots ofA. molingappearedannually A. aristataand48%A. malingleavesbyvolume. between early June and October, whereas the In the monsoon, it fed on A. aristata and shoots ofA. aristata emerged from late June to A. maling leaves, bamboo shoots and traces of October. The recruitment rate of bamboo an unidentified fruit. In post-monsoon, food (A. maling and A. aristata was low, with an variety increased with the availability of fruit average of 1.92 /sq. m, out ofwhich only 0.98 / resources in the forest. Red panda was found to sq. m remained intact. Of the bamboo shoots consume A. aristata leaves (45%), A. maling monitored, 48% were eatenby insects and other leaves (35%), fruits ofActinidia strigosa (13%) animals,and9.8%werebrokenaccidentally.The bamboo shoots (6%), Sorbus microphylla and bambooshootscollectedbythelocalswas 10.96 Rosa sericera in trace amounts. The winter diet kg/family. consisted of A. aristata leaves (53%) and In the temperate zone, the fleshy fruit of A. maling (47%). Actinidiastrigosa a creeper was found to be an The overall intake of A. aristata varied , important component of the red panda’s from 34.86% to 53% (x = 45.97%), while post-monsoon diet. A. strigosa was found A. maling varied from 36.18% to 48.16% (x = between 2,800 m and 3,100 minthe study area. 41.97 %), andtherest(x= 11.82%) consistedof A. strigosa started fruiting from September, fruits and bamboo shoots. No evidence oflarge matured around October, and the fruits lasted scale camivory was found in the faecal pellets, till November. The fruits ofA. strigosa had a except fora fewbird feathers. thin skin and were sweet when ripe, they were Feeding ecology in the three study sites: muchsoughtafterbythe localsto addflavourto Thedietshowedseasonaldifferencesinproportions their liquor. An estimated amount of ofdifferentfooditemsconsumedatthethreestudy approximately 3.75 kg/family was collected by sites(Table2).AtSite 1, itcomprisedofA. maling the locals during its fruiting season. Sorbus leaves (100%) in the premonsoon and winter microphylla started fruiting from June to July seasons.Inthemonsoon,itfedonA. malingleaves m and was found from 3,200 to 3,600 m. Rosa (61%),bambooshoots(38%)andunidentifiedfruit sericera ashrub indisturbedareas, fruitedfrom (1.1%). Thepost-monsoon dietwas composed of , JunetoNovember. A. maling leaves (70%), A. strigosa fmits (20%) Table1 INCIDENCEOFFOODITEMSIDENTIFIEDIN ,250REDPANDADROPPINGSBYNUMBEROFDROPPINGS AND%VOLUME(INBRAC1KETS)INSINGHAL1LANATIONALPARK Pre-monsoon Monsoon Post-monsoon Winter Fooditems (Mar-May) (June-Aug) (Sept-Nov) (Dec-Feb) Arundinariamaling 295 (48.16) 98 (36.18) 120 (34.57) 85 (47.0) Arundinariaaristata 385 (51.84) 80 (34.86) 105 (44.70) 112 (53.0) Bambooshoots 0 (0) 53 (28.58) 22 (6.23) 0 (0) Actinidiastrigosa 0 (0) 0 (0) 27 (13.33) 0 (0) Sorbusmicrophylla 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.6 (0) 0 (0) Rosasericera 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0 (trace) 0 (0) Unidentifiedfruit 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (trace) 0" (0) Totalnumberofdroppings 632 188 235 195 Trace=lessthan 1.00% JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG.2001 227 FOODHABITSOFTHEREDPANDA AILURUSFULGENS , Table2 SEASONALINCIDENCEOFFOODITEMSINREDPANDADROPPINGSBYNUMBEROFDROPPINGSAND %VOLUME(INBRACKETS)FROMTHREESTUDYSITESINSINGHALILANATIONALPARK Site1 Site2 Site3 Fooditems PR MN PM W PR MN PM W PR MN PM W Arundinariamaling 122 68 90 52 156 42 35 33 0 0 0 0 (100) (60.6) (70) (100) (45.5) (38.8) (33.8) (41) (0) (0) (0) (0) Arundinariaaristata 0 0 0 0 111 38 24 35 270 42 85 77 (0) (0) (0) (0) (54.4) (46) (44) (59) (100) (74.6) (91) (100) Bambooshoots 0 30 8 0 0 24 9 0 0 10 7 0 (0) (38.3) 00) (0) (0) (15.3) (2.2) (0) (0) (25.3) (6.7) (0) Actinidiastrigosa 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 (0) (0) (20) (0) (0) (0) (20) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Sorbusmicrophylla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) G-73) (0) Rosasericera 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (trace) (0) Unidentifiedfruit 1 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (trace) (1.1) (trace) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Totaldroppings 122 68 97 52 240 79 53 65 270 42 85 77 TPrRa=cePr=el-emsosntshoaonn1,.M0N0=%Monsoon,PM=Post-monsoon,W=Winter % andbamboo shoots (10%). was 15.1 and A. aristata leaves was 14.2%. AtSite2, redpandawasfoundconsuming Fruits of A. strigosa seem to be nutritionally A. aristata (54%) andA. maling(46%) leaves in richer, with high and crude protein, and low premonsoon, and about the same proportion of cellulose and lignin content, as compared to thesameleavesinwinter. Tnemonsoondietwas S. microphylla and R. sericera (Table 3). composedofA. aristataleaves(46%),A. maling leaves (39%) and bamboo shoots (15%), while Discussion the postmonsoon diet was A. aristata (44%), A. maling (34%) leaves, A. strigosa (20%) and Macroscopic examination of faeces, as bamboo shoots (2%). doneinthisstudy,hasalsobeenusedsuccessfully At Site 3, the diet consisted entirely of by Reid et al. (1991), and Yonzon and Hunter A. aristata leaves (100%) during premonsoon (1991) in describing the red panda’s diet. Red and winter. In the monsoon, the pellets were panda consumed both the species of bamboo found to have A. aristata leaves (75%) and presentintheSNP,whichformedthechieffood, bamboo shoots (25%). Postmonsoon samples of Table3 Site 3 consisted of A. aristata leaves (91%), PROTEIN,HEMICELLULOSE,CELLULOSEAND bamboo shoots (6.7%), S. microphylla (1.73%) TLHIRGENEINFRCUOINTTSEENATTE(%NDBRYYTMHAETRTEEDRP)AONFDA and R. sericera in trace amounts of0.57%. INSINGHALILANATIONALPARK Nutritive value of the food plants: Fruit Crude Hemicellulose Cellulose+lignin A. maling leaves were found to have higher Protein cellulose and lignin content (40.12% ofthe dry Actinidiastrigosa 10.63 8.00 20.59 matter) than A. aristata (31.83%). The crude Sorbusmicrophylla 4.38 2.54 41.00 Rosasericera 8.88 1.95 28.01 protein and lignin content ofA. maling leaves 228 JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG. 2001 1 FOODHABITSOFTHEREDPANDA,AILURUSFULGENS especially during the premonsoon and winter However, the pandas in Jiuzhaigou (China) and periods. Seasonal fruits such as A. strigosa and elsewhere subsisted entirely on the Fargesia sp. S. microphylla,andbambooshootssupplemented which was regarded an adequate food (Schaller the diet ofbamboo leaves during the monsoon etal 1985). and the postmonsoon period. The monsoon and Thetopographyofthestudyareawassuch postmonsoon coincided with the period ofbirth thatthetwo species ofbamboowerenotequally and rearing ofthe young ofred panda. Earlier abundant in any of the three sites. A. maling studiesspecifyleavesandshootsofSinamndinaria dominated Site 1. At Site 2, both A. maling and fangiana, andshoots ofFargesiaspathececi tobe A. aristata were found. A. aristata dominated taken in the Wolong Nature Reserve (China), Site 3. From the results of Site 1 and Site 3, it (Schalleretcil. 1985, Johnson etal. 1988, Reid et could be tentatively said that the red panda was al. 1991) and a species ofbamboo locallyknown consuming the species of bamboo most easily asjhapra in the Langtang National Park, Nepal available. Investigation of the food quality of (Yonzon and Hunter 1991). Fruits and berries of plants ascertained that A. aristata leaves had Sorbus spp., Maddenia hypoleuca Cotoneaster higher levels of protein, less of cellulose and , moupinensis Clematoclethera tiliaceae Rubus lignin as compared to A. maling. However, not , , mesogaeus R.pdeatus Ribesmoupinense Pninus muchcouldbeinferredaboutthefoodpreference , , , vaniotti and P. brachyoda and even mushrooms on the basis of nutrient content, as A. maling are reported to be taken by the red panda in the andA. aristataleavesweretakeninalmostequal wild(Johnsonetal. 1988,Reidetal. 1991,Yonzon quantity at Site 2. Moreover, A. maling and and Hunter 1991). A. aristataleavesseemedanadequatedietatSite Feeding ecology in the three study sites 1 and Site 3 respectively. ofSNP: The amount ofA. aristata leaves taken Fruits ofA. strigosa formed an important by the redpanda in the SNP was slightly higher supplementtotheredpandadiet.However,more than A. maling, although the difference is not can be said of the selection of fruits only by statisticallysignificant. Itwasnotpossibletosay comparingthepreferenceandavoidanceofother how particular they were about selecting the fruits found within a site rather than between bamboo species. Red panda was found to be sites. Forexample,withinSite 1 andSite2, other consuming mainly A. maling leaves in Site 1, fruits, whichtheredpandamayhaveconsumed, the dominant species in the area, as A. aristata were Holbellia latifolia and Sorbus cuspidata. was found only in patches above 2,850 m. At Butfaecalexaminations showedthatthese fruits Site2,bothA. malingandA. aristataleaveswere were not taken, despite their abundance. The consumedbecause ofthe increasing availability nutritional analysis of other fruits was beyond ofA. aristata as compared to that in Site 1. At the scope ofthe present study. Site3,thedietwassolelycomposedofA. aristata Bothspeciesofbamboohavebeenaffected leaves,thedominantbamboospeciesofthearea. by intensive cattle grazing, and they were also The giant panda selected Sinarundinaria foundtohavelowrecruitmentrate. Thebamboo sp. over Fargesia sp. in the Choushuigou study shoots ofboth A. maling and A. aristata were area in China, where both species were easily not only eaten by other wild animals, but also accessible, perhaps due to the higher protein, harvested by the locals. All these factors could other nutrients and less cellulose, lignin and haveaneffectontheirgrowthdynamicsandneed better balance of essential amino acids in further studies. A. strigosa is also harvested by Sinarundinaria sp. (Schaller et al. 1985). the locals in significant quantity. JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG.200 229 , FOODHABITSOFTHEREDPANDA AILURUSFULGENS Thisstudyfinallyrevealsthatthedietofthe West Bengal and implemented by the red panda in the temperate zone consisted ofA. P.G. Department of Zoology, Darjeeling malingandA. aristataleavesandshoots,andfruits Government College. We thank Dr. E. Sharma ofA. strigosa, whereas in the subalpine zone, A. forfacilities to carry outthe nutritional analysis aristata leaves, shoots and fruits of of the food plants at G.B. Pant Institute for S. microphylla and R. sericera were consumed. HimalayanResearchandDevelopment, Sikkim The difference in the dietary composition in Unit. Dr. Angela R. Glatston, Dr. Prahlad relationto the overallecology oftheredpandain B. Yonzon, Mr. Miles Roberts, Dr. A.R. the SinghalilaNational Park needs further study. Rahmani, Dr. M. Coulter, Dr. S. Javed, Dr. S. Kumar, Sarala,Nakul,Iyatta,TehminaandRana Acknowledgements for their help and support during the entire tenure ofthis study. Comments ofthe referees ThefieldstudywasfundedbytheWildlife have helped immensely to improve the Circle, Department ofForests, Government of manuscript. ReferENCES Allen,S.(1989):Chemicalanalysisofecologicalmaterials. Publishing,TheHague,Netherlands,pp.73-78. BlackwellScientificPublications,London.Pp.368. Oftedal,O.,K.J.Fulton& S.D.Crissey(1989):Bamboo Bliejienberg, M.C.K & J. Nijboer (1989): Feeding asasourceofdigestibleenergyforredpandas.Int. herbivorous carnivores. In: Red panda Biology Theriol. Congr. (Abstract)Rome,August 1989. (Glatston, A.R. ed.)SPB Publishing,The Hague, Pradhan,S.(1999):Studiesonsomeaspectsoftheecology Netherlands,pp.41-50. oftheredpanda(Ailurusfulgens,Cuvier 1825)in Fowler,J.& L.Cohen(1986):StatisticsforOrnithologists. the Singhalila National Park, Darjeeling, India. BTOGuideNo.22. Ph.D.thesis.NorthBengal University,India. Goering,H&P.VanSoest(1970):Foragefiberanalysis Reid,D.G.,H.Jinchu&Y.Haung(1991):Ecologyofthe (apparatus, reagents, procedure and some redpandaAilurusfulgensintheWolongReserve, applications). In: Agricultural Handbook, 379: China.J. Zool. Lond225: 347-364. 1-20.U.S.Dept.Agriculture. Roberts,M.S.&J.L.Gittleman(1984):Ailurusfulgens. Janzen, D.(1976):Whybambooswaitsolongtoflower. Mammalian species. The American Society of Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 347-91. Mammalogists222: 1-8. Johnson, K.G., G.B. Schaller & H. Jinchu (1988): Schaller, G.B., H. Jinchu, P. Wenshi &Z. Jing(1985): Comparativebehaviourofredpandaandthegiant The giant pandas ofWolong. The University of pandasintheWolongReserve,China.J.Mammal ChicagoPress,Chicago.Pp.298. 69(3):552-564. Yonzon, P.B. & M. Hunter(1991): Conservationofthe McNab,B.K.(1989):EnergyexpenditureintheRedpanda. Red panda, Ailurus fulgens. Biological In: Red panda Biology (Glatston, A.R. ed.) SPB Conservation59: 1-15. 230 JOURNAL, BOMBAYNATURAL HISTORYSOCIETY, 98(2), AUG. 2001

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.