Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals Kinetics and Dynamics of Reactions John W. Root, EDITOR University of California, Davis Based on a symposium sponsored by the Division of Physical Chemistry at the 169th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 7-11, 1975. 66 ACS S Y M P O S I U M SERIES AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY WASHINGTON, D. C. 1978 In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. Library of Congress CIP Data Main entry under title: Fluorine-containing free radicals. (ACS symposium series; 66 ISSN 0097-6156) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Radicals (Chemistry)—Congresses. 2. Fluorides —Congresses. I. Root, John W., 1935- . II. American Chemical Society. Division of Physical Chemistry. III. Series: American Chemical Society. ACS symposium series; 66. QD471.F67 546'.731 77-26667 ISBN 0-8412-0399-7 ACSMC 8 66 1-423 Copyright © 1978 American Chemical Society All Rights Reserved. The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of each article in this volume indicates the copyright owner's consent that reprographic copies of the article may be made for personal or internal use or for the personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay the stated per copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to copying or transmission by any means—graphic or electronic—for any other purpose, such as for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, for resale, or for information storage and retrieval systems. The citation of trade names and/or names of manufacturers in this publication is not to be construed as an endorsement or as approval by ACS of the commercial products or services referenced herein; nor should the mere reference herein to any drawing, specification, chemical process, or other data be regarded as a license or as a conveyance of any right or permission, to the holder, reader, or any other person or corporation, to manufacture, repro duce, use, or sell any patented invention or copyrighted work that may in any way be related thereto. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. ACS Symposium Series Robert F. Gould, Editor Advisory Board Kenneth B. Bischoff Nina I. McClelland Donald G. Crosby John B. Pfeiffer Jeremiah P. Freeman Joseph V. Rodricks E. Desmond Goddard F. Sherwood Rowland Jack Halpern Alan C. Sartorelli Robert A. Hofstader Raymond B. Seymour James P. Lodge Roy L. Whistler John L. Margrave Aaron Wold In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. FOREWORD The ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES was founded in 1974 to provide a medium for publishing symposia quickly in book form. The format of the SERIES parallels that of the continuing ADVANCES IN CHEMISTRY SERIES except that in order to save time the papers are not typeset but are reproduced as they are sub mitted by the authors in camera-ready form. As a further means of saving time, the papers are not edited or reviewed except by the symposium chairman, who becomes editor of the book. Papers published in the ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES are original contributions not published elsewhere in whole or major part and include reports of research as well as major part and include reports of research as well as reviews since symposia may embrace both types of presentation. In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. PREFACE This volume was conceived originally after a symposium that I organized for the Physical Chemistry Division. The symposium consisted of two half-day invited-lecture sessions presented in Philadelphia in April, 1975. Chemical kinetics and dynamics research with fluorine-rich radicals (including atomic fluorine) has become increasingly popular during the seventies. Since the Philadelphia symposium was not comprehensive, this subject received further discussion one year later during three half- day invited-lecture sessions that were given in New York City. This second symposium, whic Chemistry and Fluorine Chemistry and Technology, included topics on the kinetics, reactivities, and structures of fluorine-containing radicals. The present volume was intended initially to provide the first com prehensive treatment of the kinetic and dynamic characteristics of these interesting chemical species. Following acceptance of this proposal by the A.C.S. Symposium Series Editorial Advisory Board, invitations to participate were sent to many individuals throughout the English-speak ing scientific community. All of the contributors in kinetics and dynamics at both American Chemical Society symposia were included, but multiple coverage of individual topics was strongly discouraged. Participants were requested specifically to aim for comprehensive state of the art reviews and to prepare theoretical presentations addressed mainly to experimen tally oriented readers. Partially because of last minute cancellations, several important topics have not been included in the present work. Papers on fluorine atom chemical lasers, high-energy fluorine atom reactions, and classical trajectory simulations of hydrogen transfer reactions by atomic fluorine are conspicuously absent. Other more specialized topics not included were olefin addition reactions by fluorine-rich carbenes, H /F explosions, 2 2 unimolecular reaction dynamics of fluorine-containing aliphatic radicals, and high-power fluorine atom lasers in energy research. Hopefully these omissions will not detract too severely from the usefulness of this work. The above unpublished topics and the rapid pace of ongoing research in this exciting field clearly suggest the need for another project of this type in the near future. I wish to thank the participants for their excellent work, the many individuals with whom this project has been discussed during the past vii In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. two years, Mr. Robert Gould of the A.C.S. Books Department for guid ance and assistance, Ms. Cecelia Damian who performed the bulk of the minor editorial revisions, and Dr. James Muckerman of Brookhaven National Laboratory for the materials used in the design of the dust jacket. University of California, Davis JOHN W. ROOT Davis, California November 1, 1977 viii In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. 1 Elementary Reaction Kinetics of Fluorine Atoms, FO, and NF Free Radicals E. H. APPELMAN Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 M. A. A. CLYNE Department of Chemistry, Queen Mary College, London E1 4NS, England The study of reactions o free fluorine atoms i thei ground 2p5 2P states has progressed rapidly in the last several years. 3/2,M1/a2jor technique difficulties have been gradually overcome, and several methods of determining F atom concentrations are now available. Elementary reaction kinetics in low pressure flow systems have received particular attention, probably because of the relative ease of interfacing flow systems to F-atom detection devices such as mass spectrometers and vacuum-uv atomic resonance spectrometers. Photolytic production of F atoms is less easy - F, for instance, absorbs only very weakly in the near ultraviolet or2 visible regions. Similarly,detection of F 2P atoms in static systems presents problems that have not been fullJy solved at the present time. Therefore, the work described in this article has mostly been carried out in flow systems. Current interest in fluorine-based chemical lasers extends from HF and DF lasers based on F atom reactions into the area of elementary processes involving electronically excited radicals such as NF. Also, the chemistry of NF and OF radicals is of con siderable interest, and we summarize here selected aspects of the kinetic behaviour of these species. Production of F 2P atoms J Ground state 2P halogen atoms may be produced by direct J dissociation of the molecular halogens, F , Cl, Br and I. A 2 2 2 2 convenient and commonly-used technique is to pass a mixture of molecular halogen diluted with argon or helium through a microwave discharge at a total pressure near 100-200 Ν m""2. This is the simplest technique for forming F 2Pj atoms (1-4); the typical degree of dissociation of F using an uncoated silica discharge 2 tube is 70-80%(1). Mixtures of fluorine diluted with inert gas can be handled in a conventional glass flow vacuum system. A © 0-8412-0399-7/78/47-066-003$10.00/0 In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. 4 FLUORINE-CONTAINING FREE RADICALS problem with microwave-excited dissociation of F is that SiF^ 2 and molecular and atomic oxygen are produced as a result of attack on the Si0 material of the discharge and flow tubes (1, 2, 5) . 2 Rosner and Allendorf (3_) have replaced the silica discharge tube by one fabricated from pure fused alumina, which is inert to attack by fluorine atoms. However, this reduces the efficiency of dissociation somewhat. The pyrex or silica flow tube may be pro tected from attack by F atoms by application of a thin coating of teflon or Kel-F fluorocarbon polymer (2). A technique for coating with a thin fused layer of teflon has been described (6). The presence of undissociated F in the discharge products causes 2 complications in kinetic studies involving hydrogen atoms or alkyl radicals, which react rapidly with F . However, F appears 2 2 to be unreactive toward h othe atom Ο 3P Ν **S CI 2P and Br 2P (2,7) . T T d J — — Production of F 2Pj atoms can also be achieved by microwave dissociation of fluorides such as SF and CT% (8). These sources 6 are satisfactory for spectroscopic studies such as the epr spect roscopy of F 2Ρ3/2 an^ F 2pi/2 (§)r or for the formation of ex cited BrF and IF from the recombination of Br + F or I + F in the presence of singlet oxygen (9). However, they are in some degree suspect for systematic quantitative kinetic studies, in as much as the nature and reactivity of the discharge products other than F 2Pj are very incompletely known. In principle, a cleaner source of F 2Pj atoms than any of the preceding ones is the rapid reaction of Ν **S atoms with NF 2 radicals produced by thermolysis of N F^ (10,11). This reaction 2 occurs either directly to give F atoms Ν + NF -> 2F + N (10) or 2 2 via the formation of NF radicals; Ν + NF -> 2NF (11), followed by 2 NF + NF -> N + 2F or Ν + NF -»· N + F. In practice, the instabil 2 2 ity of N^LJ. and its expense have precluded extensive use of the Ν + NF method for forming F atoms. 2 The formation of F 2Pj atoms from the bimolecular reaction of NO with F is extensively used in HF, DF chemical lasers: 2 NO + F -> FNO + F. The kinetics of this reaction have been studied 2 (12,13). Measurement of Atom Concentrations : absolute concentrations. The range of methods that have been employed to measure atom concentrations is wide, and includes thermal and diffusion methods which are not considered here. Most of the physical methods avail able are suitable only for relative concentration measurements, and require calibration by chemical means in order to yield absolute concentrations. This need not always be a disadvantage; for instance, in kinetic studies of simple atom reactions under pseudo-first order conditions it is sometimes only necessary to monitor relative changes in atom concentrations. In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. 1. APPELMAN AND CLYNE Elementary Reaction Kinetics of F Atoms 5 Titration reactions based on simple stoichiometry, and pro ceeding extremely rapidly, have been developed for the measurement of absolute concentrations of ground state atoms in flow systems. Well-known examples for Ν, Ο and Η atoms include the reactions, Ν + NO -* N + Ο, Ο + N0 -> NO + Ο , H + ClNO -> HCl + NO and 2 2 Η + N0 -> OH + NO. These reactions permit the determination of 2 absolute atom concentrations by the addition of known quantities of a stable reagent. Several similar titration reactions have been characterized and used to determine F atom concentrations, namely F + ClNO -*· NO + GIF (1) , F + Cl -* C1F + CI (2) , 2 F + Br + BrF + Br (3), F + The reaction of ClNO with F has been used to determine F atom concentrations by mass spectrometric measurement of the C1F produced after the addition of excess ClNO. The C1F+ ion peak was calibrated by the addition of measured quantities of ClF from a cylinder (14). To eliminate the need to work with the reactive ClF gas, a variant of this method was developed in which the F atoms were titrated with ClNO to an endpoint identified as the amount of added ClNO beyond which the C1F+ peak no longer incr eased (1). The ClNO methods are less well established than some other, inasmuch as the rate constant of reaction (1) has not been determined. Also, at high concentrations, the reaction NO + F ->· FNO + F, which has a rate constant of 8 χ 10~15 cm3 2 molecule"1 s-1at 300 K, may occur to an appreciable extent, lead ing to an erroneous value for [F]. The reaction of F atoms with Cl appears to be an excellent 2 means of determining absolute F atom concentrations. Reaction (2) has a forward rate constant around 1 χ ΙΟ"10 cm3 molecule"1 s"1 at 300 Κ and an equilibrium constant greater than 5 (1_, 7,15) . Hence the reverse reaction is unlikely to be important under the correct conditions. Furthermore, the possible secondary reaction CI + F •> ClF + F 2 has a rate constant less than 5 χ 10~ll+ cm3 molecule""1 s"1 at 300 Κ (1_) and may be safely neglected. Reaction (2) has been used to determine F atom concentrations mass spectrometrically by addition of a measured excess concentration of Cl and subsequent deter 2 mination of either the amount of Cl consumed (7_) or the amount of 2 ClF produced (4) . In the latter case the C1F+ ion current was calibrated by measuring its intensity when an exces-s of F atoms was added to a known amount of Cl . Measurement of ClF production 2 is more sensitive than measurement of Cl consumption and is also 2 free from errors that might result from recombination of CI atoms or reaction of Cl with other species such as H or O. Reaction 2 (2) has also been utilized as a titration of F atoms, with the In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978. 6 FLUORINE-CONTAINING FREE RADICALS endpoint estimated to be the point of critical extinction of the F atom fluorescence (7) . In an alternative titration procedure, the chemiluminescenee accompanying the recombination of the CI atoms formed in reaction (2) is monitored, and Cl is added until the 2 intensity of this emission reaches a plateau. At low pressures, this method yields a sharp endpoint (16). Concentrations of F atoms have also been determined by titration with Br to the point of extinction of the F atom fluor 2 escence (7). Reaction(3) has a rate constant of about 2 χ 10"10 cm3 molecule"1 sec"1 at 298 K, and an equilibrium constant in ex cess of 109 (7). Hence its back reaction is of no concern and in this respect it should be superior to reaction (2) as a means of determining F atom concentrations. On the other hand, the rate of the reaction (5), Br + F does not appear to be known. In practice reactions (2) and (3) appear to be equally satisfactory for the determination of F atom concentrations. Reaction (4) has a rate constant of about 2 χ 10"11 cm3 molecule"1 s"1 at 300 Κ (10) and has been used to determine F atom concentration. However, the secondary reaction F + H + HF + F (6) 2 has a rate constant of about 3 χ 10"12 cm3 molecule"1 s"1 at 300 K. (17). Inasmuch as reaction (6) regenerates the F atoms consumed in reaction (4), when a substantial amount of F is present the 2 added H will first consume the F and only subsequently will it 2 2 consume the F. Advantage has been taken of this effect to titrate both F and F with hydrogen mass spectrometrically, using an inlet 2 system that incorporates an inhomogeneous magnetic field to permit monitoring of both the F and F (2). 2 Measurement of Atom Concentrations: Atomic Resonance The method of atomic resonance spectrometry in the vacuum ultraviolet, with detection of either absorption or fluorescence, has become one of the most useful direct methods for the measure ments of reaction rates of ground (18)(and metastable excited (19/20) ) state atoms. The sensitivity and scope of atomic res onance in this respect rivals, and possibly surpasses, that of other methods such as epr and mass spectrometry. Recently, it has been shown that atomic resonance may be used to measure fluorine atom concentrations in a flow system (7,21). The sensitivity for F is not yet as high as for atoms such as CI, whose resonance transitions lie in the Schumann region of the vacuum ultraviolet. The essence of the method is as follows. The source of atom ic resonance radiation, usually a microwave-excited discharge in a low-pressure flowing gas, is incident on the reaction vessel, either static or flowing, in which ground state atoms are present. In Fluorine-Containing Free Radicals; Root, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978.
Description: