11/5/14 UMASS / TOWN OF AMHERST HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINAL PRESENTATION TOWN GOWN STEERING COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 3, 2014 AGENDA Work to Date Final Recommendations • Site & Program • Development Mechanisms • Innovation Economy • Organization Implementation Steps 2 1 11/5/14 WORK TO DATE 3 SUMMARY: ANALYSIS • Amherst’s economic and residential growth is driven by UMass • Local housing supply is not keeping pace with demand, including student demand • Both economic opportunity and lack of housing is contributing to the decline in the young workforce • Development constraints (available land, zoning, approval process) are contributing to the imbalance between UMass and Amherst 4 2 11/5/14 SUMMARY: OBSERVATIONS UMass and Amherst have physically disconnected and disengaged over time 5 SUMMARY: OBSERVATIONS Lack of forums encouraging collaboration between UMass and Amherst (although the Amherst Business Improvement District is one) 6 3 11/5/14 SUMMARY: OBSERVATIONS Many levels of positive interrelationships between UMass and Amherst 7 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS Mixed use development with housing for students and retail Foster local start-up and entrepreneurial community Shared approach towards future development 8 4 11/5/14 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Received feedback for Agust 4th TGSC meeting via emails and letters • Housing: o Concern for student impact on nearby neighborhoods o Tension between wanting to remove unruly student behavior and connect energy to Downtown o Importance of housing affordabilty • Economic development o Desire for tax revenue o Need for a year round population o Desire for more dining options o Need for entrepreneurial space 9 STUDENT FEEDBACK • Little incentive to utilize Downtown o Pre-paid, excellent dining options on campus o Doesn’t have the same appeal as a Northampton or larger Downtown o Proximity is an issue o Recommended special events as an excellent way to attract more student activity • Would welcome higher quality housing, but affordability is an issue o Belief that off-campus housing is more affordable than on-campus housing o Student group homes will always be desirable • Desire by Greek Life to use a housing cluster as a means of legitimizing their organizations o Can create a new social hub for the University, compliant with University regulations, away from neighborhoods o May address some of the off-campus party conflicts 10 5 11/5/14 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS SITE & PROGRAM 12 6 11/5/14 WHERE IS THE OVERLAP Walking Zones Intersection of Zones Campus Core 0.5 Mile Buffer 0.75 Mile Buffer 13 FOCUS AREA • Within close proximity of campus core and village center / downtown • On UMass owned land • Undeveloped / underdeveloped sites • Appropriate for a mix of housing 7 11/5/14 FOCUS AREA M A S S A V E MASS AVE MASS AVE. N O R T H P LE A S A N PHILLIPS STREET T STR E E T Ownership Owned by Individuals FEARING STREET Owned by Entities Parking Lots UMass Property Buildings 8 11/5/14 MASS AVE UMASS ALTERNATIVE 1 MAIN ENTRY • Mixed Use with graduate and upper-classman housing • sAtcatritv-eu pfi r/s tre fsloeoarr cwhi tshp bacleen adn odf MASS AVE. PEDESTRIAN WAY retail • Mass Ave. as “Main Street” with INCNENOTVEART ION N O dynamic small scale uses guide R students coming from campus TH P south along North Pleasant LEAS A Street NT S TR EET FEARING STREET MASS AVE UMASS ALTERNATIVE 2 MEANITNR Y • Mixed Use with graduate and upper-classman housing • Active first floor with blend of MASS AVE. start-up / research space and INTERNAL STREET retail • A“Mvea.i nw iStthr edeytn”a smoiuct hs mofa lMl sacsasl e INCNENOTVEART ION NO R uses guide students coming TH P from campus south along North LEA Pleasant Street SA N • Neighborhood grid complete and T STR made “public” to eliminate dead EET end streets FEARING STREET 9 11/5/14 FOCUS AREA UNIVERSITY DRIVE STUDENT VILLAGE UNIVERSITY DRIVE MASS AVE. U N IV E R S IT Y D R IV E OOwwnender bsyh iIpn dividuals FEARING STREET OPawrnkeindg b Lyo Etsn tities MUIDATS UMass Property EVIRD Buildings 10
Description: