ebook img

Field Notebook: 2000 PDF

56 Pages·2000·3.3 MB·English
by  HickeyLeo
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Field Notebook: 2000

Columbia River Basalt 87 SERIES QPCVP SUB¬ FORMATION MEMBER K-Ar AGE MAGNETIC GROUP (m.y) POLARITY lower monumental member 6 N L EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY cc ICE harbor member 8.5 uj Basalt ol Goose island N CL Basalt ol Martlndale R a Basalt ol Basin City N D EROSONAL UNCONFORMrTY CL BUFORD MEMBER R 3 ELEPHANT MOUNTAIN MEMBER 10.5 R. T O CC EROSONAL UNCONFORMrTY CL o D CO POMONA MEMBER R O 3 CC CO EROSONAL UNCONFORMrTY C3 ESOUATZEL MEMBER \ N EROSONAL UNCONFORMrTY WEISSENFELS RIDGE MEMBER MOUNTAINS Basalt ol Slippery Creek N Basalt ol Tenmlle Creek N Basalt ol Lewiston Orchards N Basalt ol Cloverland N DD An uCn AL 1 1T < ASOTIN MEMBER 13 N CO < Basalt ol Huntzlnger < CO ID UJ 03 < LOCAL EROSONAL UNCONFORMrTY Z J CO LU a WILBUH CREEK MEMBER o a Basalt ol Lapwal N o s Basalt ol Wahluke N UMATILLA MEMBER Basalt ot Slllusl N Basalt ol Umatilla N DC UJ LOCAL EROSONAL UNCONFORMrTY > E PRIEST RAPIDS MEMBER Basalt ol Lo»o ^— 14.5 R < Basalt ol Rosalia . _/ •&? R s ROZA MEMBER T, R E < WANAPUM FRENCHMAN SPRINGS MEMBER > Basalt ol Lyons Ferry N Basalt ol Sentinel Gap 15.3 N < Basalt ol Sand Hollow N BASALT Basalt ol Sliver Falls N, E CO Basalt ol Ginkgo 15.5 E S Basalt ot Palouse Falls E =3 _J ECKLER MOUNTAIN MEMBER O Basalt ol Shumaker Creek N o Basalt ol Dodge N Basalt ol Robinette Mountain N n2 GRANDE FDNDE / See Mangan and others, 1986; \ R 2o DC UJ 1 Reidel. 1983 lor Individual llowsy GCFCE 5 Ni o BASALT BASALT R i *“30U OTA IMNAHA tRi BASALT (See Hooper and others, 1984) 16.5-17.0 No R0 Figure 2. Stratigraphy of the Columbia River Basalt Group. Modified from Swanson and others (1979) by Reidel and Fecht (1987). Natural remanent magnetization indicated by: N=normal, R=reversed, T=transitional, and E=excursional. % /? e 4t / 5 p. fte.c}\ Tj /{. ft. i f fit - 7^ < /Jv/sT2- 1 jf/ou/ e v tdevc £ 6{ Uj e Co/i{>vJ?/^ Ihuer BzsWZ perr*ji€*£7Tc. pi,^Tsoaa. (j~ £q /. So C - c"/'- ^ ^ ^ ts T®-»---Tl- ( Columbia River Basalt 87 SERIES GROUP GSFUOBU-P FORMATION MEMBER K-(Amr .Ay)G E MPOALGANREITTIYC lower monumental member 6 N FROSONAL UNCONFORMITY i.X. ;......i.- e ICE HARBOR MEMBER 8.5 UJ Basalt ot Goose island N 0. Basalt ot Martlndale R a Basalt ol Basin City N D EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY R CL BUFORD MEMBER 3 o Elfe»HANT MOUNTAIN MEMBER 10.5 R. T CL O EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY C2L f3fi POMONA MEMBER 1 2 R o CL CO EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY O ESOUATZEL MEMBER -J N SADDLE EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY WEtSSENFELS RIDGE MEMBER MOUNTAINS Basalt ol Slippery Creek N Basalt ot Tenmlle Creek N Basalt ol Lewiston Orchards N H Basalt ol Cloverland N J< F-1- DngnL 1 ASOTIN MEMBER 13 N < Basalt ol Huntzlnger CO < CO UzJ Li U CD <ffi LOCAL EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY UJ o WILBUH CREEK MEMBER o Q Basalt ol Lapwal N o Basalt ol Wahluka N s i UMATILLA MEMBER Basalt ol Slliusl N Basalt ol Umatilla N CL UJ LOCAL EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY > PREST RAPIDS MEMBER E Basalt ol Lolo — 14.5 (C < 'iasalt ol Rosalia -sSlO 1 tC 2 ROZA MEMBER T, R *< WANAPUM FRENCBHaMsaAlNt SoPl RILNyGonSs MFEeMrrByE R N > Basalt ol Sentinel Gap 15.3 N < BASALT BBaassaalltt ooll SSainlvde r HFolallolws NN. E CD Basalt ol Ginkgo 15.5 E s Basalt ol Palouse Falls E 3 -i eckler mountain member O Basalt ol Shumaker Creek N o Basalt ol Dodge N Basalt ol Robinette Mountain N n2 GRANDE FCND6 R2 CL PICTURE ) 15.6-16.5 UJ 1 Reidel, 1983 lor Individual Hows GCFCE N1 5 y h -J BASALT A** <m BASALT R 1 ^*“3UU OTA IMNAHA f’ (See Hooper and others. 1984) 16.5-17.0 N0 BASALT Ro Figure 2. Stratigraphy of the Columbia River Basalt Group. Modified from Swanson and others (1979) by Reidel and Fecht (1987). Natural remanent magnetization indicated by: N=normal, R=reversed, T=transitional, and E=excursional. cf ft aft/ 5 p. titvA pad) Tf J{ ft. ) ffc . J7) <_ /^cv- yT/0u/ - <? v Ut/vS e Ch C ('c/nrnJ?/^ JIclSk.(Z ***>(, r? p^Trag eyerie ^ phts^T/OAA. (j- eo I S'* c. Cw s J W/. 7 % & £ Zf ~ & » | Columbia River Basalt 87 SUB¬ K-Ar AGE MAGNETIC SERIES GROUP GROUP FORMATION MEMBER (m.y) POLARITY LOWER MONUMENTAL MEMBER 6 N EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY R ICE HARBOR MEMBER 8 5 E Basail oi Goose island N P Basal) ol Martlndale R P Basail of Basin City N JmJ EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY BUFORD MEMBER R CL =o> EliPHANT MOUNTAIN MEMBER 10.5 R. T cc o EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY CL m 5 3 POMONA MEMBER i£ R o cc Cfl EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY o ESOUATZEL MEMBER N SADDLE EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY WEtSSENFELS RIDGE MEMBER MOUNTAINS Basalt ol Slippery Creek N Basail ot Tenmlle Creek N Basalt ol Lewiston Orchards N t- Basalt ot Cloverland N l< H-1 DAOnL1 ASOTIN MEMBER 13 N cn < Basalt ol Huntzlnger < (0 UzIooIJI UlQ9 J CD <CD WLOILC8AULBBH E aaRCssaaORllSttE OEooNKll A MWLLE aaMUphwNBiuaCEklRO e NFORMITY NN 2 s UMATILLA MEMBER Basalt ol Slllusl N Basalt ol Umatilla N C UJ LOCAL EROSONAL UNCONFORMITY > E PRIESTB aRsaAltP IDolS MLoEloM BER — 14.5 ac <5 ROZA BaMsaEltM BolE RR osalia 1 Tre , R CJ.**K ¥ < WANAPUM FRENCHMAN SPRINGS MEMBER > Basail ol Lyons Ferry N Basalt ol Sentinel Gap 15.3 N < Basalt ol Sand Hollow N BASALT Basalt of Sliver Falls N, E S Basalt ol Ginkgo 15.5 E s Basalt ol Palouse Falls E 3 -1 ECKLER MOUNTAIN MEMBER o Basalt ol Shumaker Creek N o Basalt ol Dodge N Basalt ol Robinette Mountain N n2 GRANDE FCND6 R2 <r PICTURE J 15.6-16.5 UJ 1 Reidel, 1983 lor Individual Hows $ OCRS N1 Q y <^- -J BASALT A\*t<zj n R 1 BASALT *SJU> <7T A IMNAHA tRi (See Hooper and others, 1984) 16.5-17.0 N0 BASALT R0 Figure 2. Stratigraphy of the Columbia River Basalt Group. Modified from Swanson and others (1979) by Reidel and Fecht (1987). Natural remanent magnetization indicated by: N=normal, R=reversed, T=transitional, and E=excursional. cf ft euf't / 5 p. u'W pncftTf /< ft- ) ' P) < //v/sTt* ipc/~ L ■ e yUt/^c e 6{ £vrj-*te t Co/ i7t r facs^tx ^ $ p^Tr &p. <?a' £77c ) pi i Crsi.TfOAAs. (- e0 So c. /hn - ^^ & ' 6 £ 4 ~ 6 ?? J.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.