INTRODUCTION By Troy Taylor Eighty years later, it was still the most famous murder and suicide in the small town where I grew up. I lived on an Illinois farm during my adolescent and teenage years, and the closest town to us was a place called Moweaqua (a Native American word that was said to mean “muddy water.”) It was a rural community, built up around farming and a coal mine that closed down after a disaster in 1932 that killed fifty-four miners. But the Portwood Murder was still whispered about after eight decades and was still distantly recalled as one of the dark spots in the town’s history. It happened on September 10, 1905. Henry Portwood was a wealthy retired farmer who had owned a large farm about two miles east of town until 1903. He was respected and generally well-liked in the community. He had served in the Union Army during the Civil War, enlisting in 1862 at age seventeen, and was a quiet and industrious man. After he retired from farming, he purchased a home from H.C. O’Dell, which was located on the northeast edge of Moweaqua. On Sunday morning, September 10, he cut the throat of his fourth wife—nearly severing her head, the newspaper said – before slashing his own throat with a straight razor. Mrs. Portwood died quickly but her husband lived for several hours, first claiming that “God” had killed his wife and then confessing when he was told that his son would be blamed for the crime. The boy, Everett, age nine, had discovered his father and step-mother lying in pools of blood on their bedroom floor and was the first to raise the alarm about the tragic event. Ironically, it was Everett who was the source of the problems between the husband and wife, which led to the murder-suicide. The newspapers stated, “Moweaqua is greatly excited because of the awful deed of the enraged husband.” Portwood had been a widower three times over. All of his previous wives had died, including Everett’s mother, who passed away in 1902. This never generated much sympathy from his fourth wife, Mollie. Just twelve years younger than her husband, Mary Helen Doyle, who went by the name of Mollie, was born in Bunker Hill, Illinois, and had moved to Moweaqua with her family when she was a child. As far as I can learn, she had never been married before becoming engaged to Portwood, who began courting her the same year that his third wife passed away. It was a troubled marriage, and Mollie never got along with Everett. She constantly complained about the boy, perhaps because he served as a reminder of Portwood’s previous marriage or because of the boy’s behavior, since those who knew the family stated that she was often angry because Portwood would never allow her to discipline the boy. The constant disagreements about Everett led to the couple separating for a brief time in July 1905. They stayed apart for about two weeks and then reconciled. According to friends and witnesses, they seemed to be getting along well, even as little as an hour before the murder took place. The Portwoods had been visiting with neighbors that Sunday morning and they seemed in good spirits, the neighbors later told police. But around 10:30 a.m., something occurred in the Portwood home that would never be revealed. Henry Portwood took the true reason for his wife’s murder to the grave. A half-hour later, young Everett walked into his parent’s bedroom and found them lying there, surrounded by blood. Screaming for help, the horrified child ran out of the back door and gave the alarm to the closest neighbors. Several men ran into the Portwood house and discovered the awful scene. The newspapers stated, “The room looked like a slaughterhouse.” Mollie was lying on the floor near the window. Her head had nearly been severed from her body by the brutal force of the cut. Blood was still flowing from the gaping wound and she twitched and gurgled, still showing signs of life. The damage that had been done to her throat prevented her from her speaking. With a wound to his neck almost as deep as his wife’s, Portwood was lying a short distance away, almost in the doorway to the parlor. He was still alive, his feet kicking and his legs twisting as he thrashed about in his own blood. He was obviously in terrible condition, but he was in better shape than his wife. Looking about, the men could see that a struggle had taken place in the room. Furniture was knocked over and the bed covers were twisted onto the floor. Everything in the room, from the bed to the walls, with spattered with blood. It was, the newspaper said, “a scene more terrible than can be described.” Mollie had evidently been sitting at the north window of the bedroom, dressing her hair, when she was attacked by her husband. Bloodstains showed that she rose from her chair after she was cut. After his wife had been dealt with, Portwood had then turned the razor on himself, cutting fast and deep across his own throat. Seeing that Portwood was still alive, one of the man pressed a cloth to his throat to try and stop the bleeding. The straight razor was on the floor, just inches from Portwood’s hand. It was obvious to everyone what had happened. Cyrus Mitchell, one of the first to arrive on the scene, asked him why he had killed Mollie. But Portwood’s replies were nonsensical, claiming that he had not killed his wife and that he had not been hurt. Mitchell told him that his throat had been cut, as had his wife’s, and that he must have done it. He replied, “Nobody cut my throat, did they? I did not do anything to my wife or myself.” Pressed to explain, Portwood insisted, “I did not do it, God must have done it.” But Mitchell didn’t let up. He insisted that Portwood confess to what he had done, even stating that the police might believe that it was Everett who committed the murders if Portwood died before admitting to what had happened. Apparently, this worked because the dying man made one more statement: “Yes, I did it. But it don’t make any difference why. It is all right.” And those were the last words that Portwood would speak about the murder. Dr. Pratt was summoned to try and save the man’s life. He sewed up the wound in his neck, but his jugular had been severed and there was little he could do for him. Henry Portwood died later that afternoon – a killer and a suicide. He never explained what had caused him to snap and murder Mollie. To this day, the motivations for the crime remain a mystery. The bodies of the Portwoods were later examined by the Shelby County coroner and then an inquest was held on Monday. The verdict was as expected: murder and suicide. Henry was buried in Hayes Cemetery, outside of Moweaqua, and Mollie was buried separately in West Cemetery. They were divided, even in death. As for Everett, he was taken in by his sister, Mrs. Frank Clark, Portwood’s daughter with his second wife, Almira, who had died in 1883. She promised to take care of him, assuring the newspapers that he would be “well raised.” From there, Everett seems to vanish from history. I could find no trace of what became of the boy whose life was shattered by a single bloody event. The idea for this book came to René and me while we were driving from her home in southwest Pennsylvania to Gettysburg one spring during one of our annual outings. When we travel anywhere together, it always turns into a “multi- hour gabfest,” as René calls it. She told me about the White Rocks Murder, which is included in this book. I told her that she needed to write that story up for inclusion in some future book, but I had no idea what book it would be. At that time, we had recently written our first book on American disasters and hauntings (And Hell Followed With it) and were in the midst of planning the sequel. The idea for Fear the Reaper was still coming, and when I put it together, I asked René to not only contribute the story of the White Rocks Murder, but to co-author the book with me. It was an easy fit. We have been friends for going on two decades now and had written two other books together, but that wasn’t all there was to it. Both of us had grown up on farms (although, as I often say, MANY years apart) in Illinois for myself and Kansas for René. We were both very familiar with the loneliness and the isolation of rural life and we are both well aware of the dark things that can happen in what seems like an idyllic setting. We had both grown up hearing many blood-curdling stories of murder and depravity that people mistakenly believe only happen in the “big city.” Trust me when I assure you that the farms, fields and woods of America’s rural countryside have been drenched with blood. But it wasn’t just isolation that led to murder. Many of the tragedies that occurred on farms in years past were carried out at the hands of the hired help. Farmhands were among the scariest-looking folks around in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries – and the most dangerous. Many of them developed sinister reputations in local communities and on neighboring farms; usually with good reason. Farmhands were essentially field laborers, uneducated and scarred by rough outdoor conditions. They often slept in barns, outhouses or packed into a farmhouse’s cramped spare bedroom. They drank heavily and had little in the way of worldly possessions. They would do just about anything for money, ranging from back-breaking labor to murder. One had only to glance at nineteenth-century execution records to realize the danger inherent in transient workers. The death penalty was in heavy use during those years. Men went to the gallows on a weekly basis. Farmhands were frequently hanged for murder in all parts of the country. In 1874, a farmworker named Marshall Martin, who worked in Martinez, California, in the San Francisco Bay area, murdered his work supervisor with an axe. He had been put up to it by the supervisor’s wife. Martin was convicted and sentenced to death, while his boss’ wife went to an insane asylum. His hanging, the last in Martinez, was particularly gruesome, during a time when such things were public spectacles. The noose was so tight that it popped his head off his neck like a grape being plucked from a vine. A newspaper article stated, “Although there was a drop of only six feet, the body dropped headless to the ground. His head rebounded a distance of six feet.” Another farmhand who was hanged was Joseph Waltz. He was a troubled young man who worked as a grounds-keeper for his parents near Catskill, New York. He was frequently in trouble for robbing school houses and setting fires. A local newspaper reported that he had built a stone tower on his parents’ property, from which he intended to make speeches to gatherings of interested onlookers. One night, a travelling scissor-grinder was given lodging at the Waltz house. Joseph Waltz entered the man’s bedroom, smashed his head several times with a hatchet, cleaned up the crime scene and buried the body on the farm. Waltz later confessed to the murder by saying, “an evil spirit came over me.” He led the police to where the body was buried and was later hanged. Before his sentence could be carried out, though, Waltz killed again. Confined to a jail cell, he managed to pull an eighteen-inch iron bar from the flooring and used it to beat one of his guards to death. “Joe won’t hurt me,” the guard had confidently (and erroneously) said when asked why he allowed the prisoner to be loose in his cell without leg irons. He should have known better. Across the country, bitter and angry farmhands were committing murder for seemingly pointless reasons. Some of them killed because they had been fired or because they were hired by someone else and had a grudge against their previous employer. Some killed out of greed or imagined slights. Some killed over jealousy and others because someone looked at them funny. But despite their misdeeds, farmworkers were essential in rural life. Unless a farmer had a large brood of children, he needed help to plant seeds, harvest the crops or tend the farm animals. Farmhands were physically strong. They were necessary and they knew the land because it was the nature of their work. In most farm communities, they were a common thread. They knew almost everyone because they worked for almost everyone, but when they disappeared, they left no trace behind. But not all of those who committed murders in the countryside were strangers and drifting farmhands – far from it. Many of the killers were members of the victim’s family and the most common weapon seemed to be an axe. It was a tool that was indispensable for rural life. It was used to clear the land, cut down trees and chop the wood that provided heat and warmth for homes. It was also handy for lopping the heads off chickens and other domestic fowl. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the vast majority of rural murders were committed with an axe. On November 20, 1894, a brutal mass murder occurred outside the small village of Wellsville, Missouri. It was carried out by Thomas Portercheck, who allegedly went insane and slaughtered his mother, two sisters and a brother before killing himself. The family, who lived in humble circumstances, occupied a small house about a half-mile east of downtown Wellsville. On the afternoon of November 19, Portercheck began acting strangely and gave, the newspaper stated, “indications that his mind was deranged.” He labored under the idea that his neck was broken and insisted that someone call a doctor. His family tried to convince him that he was mistaken and to persuade him to go to bed. But he refused to lie down, insisting on sitting up all night. Late that Sunday night, the family finally went to bed, exhausted, leaving Portercheck sitting in a chair, slowly rocking back and forth, staring at the wall. At around 3:00 a.m., one of the sisters, Mary, was awakened by an agonizing scream from her mother. When she emerged from her bedroom, she found her mother lying on the floor and Portercheck standing over her with an axe in his hands. The floor was covered with blood. In an adjoining room, she could hear her other brother moaning in what turned out to be his death throes. Mary ran through the house in a panic. After finding all of the doors locked, opened a window and jumped to the ground. Her murderous brother never noticed that she left. Through the glass, she watched in horror as he seized a can of coal oil, poured it all over the floor and then set it on fire. From the kitchen, he took a butcher knife and, standing in the midst of the flames, cut his own throat. He collapsed to the floor next to the body of his mother. The fire spread so quickly that in less than ten minutes, the entire house was engulfed in flames. Mary’s screams awakened the neighbors and they rushed to the scene, but the fire had already finished the work that the maniac had started. When the remains of the house were cool enough for the ruins to be searched, four bodies were found, blackened and charred among the timbers. They were those of Mrs. Portercheck, her youngest daughter, son James and the killer, Thomas. The investigation showed that the mother, daughter and son had been horribly mutilated by an axe and it was surmised that it had probably been Thomas’ intention to kill Mary too, but her life was saved by the screams of her mother. “No theory is advanced for the sudden fit of insanity which overcame the young man,” the newspaper said. It was simply another gruesome tragedy in rural America. In other cases, those who lived in the isolated conditions of the heartland fell prey to passing strangers, who chose their victims because the families lived far away from help from neighbors or the law. In far too many cases, such crimes went unsolved. Murderous strangers passed through, never seen by the distant neighbors, and vanished without a trace. But when they were caught, the vengeance extracted could be brutal. In 1870, one of the most horrific murders in Missouri’s history occurred on a farm near the small town of Potosi. On November 21, David and Louisa Lapine, along with their two children and Mrs. Lapine’s sister, Mary Christopher, and her child, were found shot and hacked to death with an axe. The family had been murdered by two brothers, Leon and Charles Jolly, and a third man, John Armstrong. The drunken trio had called at the Lapine cabin and at some point, a disagreement erupted between Armstrong, Charles Jolly and Mrs. Christopher. David Lapine got between them, attempting to stop the argument, and Jolly pulled out a revolver and shot him four times. He then struck Louisa, knocking her to the floor. Armstrong, in the meantime, had snatched up an axe, killed Mary with it, and then attacked the children. The heads were severed from all of their bodies. After the murders, the men set fire to the cabin to try and hide the evidence, but the bodies were found in the ruins the following morning and clear evidence pointed an accusatory finger at the Jollys and John Armstrong. The men were quickly arrested and jailed. Leon Jolly, who did not participate in the murders, agreed to testify against his brother and Armstrong in the upcoming trial. But some of the local residents didn’t want to wait for the legal system to act. Five days after the murders, a mob gathered outside the jail and demanded that the pair be given over to them to be hanged. When the sheriff refused, the angry townspeople attacked the building. When it was over, six residents had been wounded and one killed by the sheriff and his deputies as they defended the jail and their prisoners. The case went to trial and made headlines in the state and beyond, with reporters gleefully referring to the case as “The Missouri Horror.” On December 21, 1870, Charles Jolly and John Armstrong were found guilty and sentenced to death by hanging. The punishment was carried out on January 21, 1871. Surrounding newspapers proclaimed the event the “Day of the Double Hanging,” and families came from all over the region to see justice carried out. The men were led to the gallows and nooses were placed around their necks. The trapdoor was sprung and the two plunged to their deaths. Jolly died instantly as his head was nearly ripped completely from his body. Armstrong was not so lucky. The heavy man dangled with his toes scraping the ground. His neck had not broken and because the rope was stretched from his weight, he slowly strangled to death. The deaths of the Lapine family had finally been avenged. You’ll find many such stories – and many much worse – in the pages ahead. For those who believe that the most horrendous crimes in American history were confined to major cities like New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, you’ll be both frightened and shocked by events that occurred in the bucolic countryside, along peaceful back roads, in the dark woods and in the small farming communities of America. But you will not be surprised by the number of ghosts that are lingering behind. Keep the lights on while you’re reading this one! I can promise that René and I did while we were writing it! Troy Taylor Spring 2014
Description: